Pre-service Science Teachers’ Perceptions About Relationship Between Religion And Science İn The Context Of Their Worldviews

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-Volume 8, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The academic and public interest in perceptions with regard to the relationship between science and religion had been steadily grown in recent years. That interest caused the possible rise of related issues for teachers in their science classes such as compatibility/incompatibility of religious and scientific worldviews and the impact of religious worldviews on perceptions of science. For Islam, those issues are seen to be responded positively and the relationship between science and Islam is thought within the perspectives of harmony or dialog. However, the issue of the relationship between Islam and science is not adequately held in Turkish literature, especially the perceptions of science teachers and candidates, and the need for empirical data is seen obvious. In this study, in order to overcome that lack of empirical data, the perspectives of 32 Turkish pre-service science teachers with regard to the relationship between Islam and science in the context of their worldviews were questioned. The data source of the study was a questionnaire that comprised of nine open ended questions which were analyzed qualitatively. In the analysis process, the perceptions of the participants about the relationship between Islam and science were categorized with the help of Barbour’s model. The results of study revealed that the participants mainly have religious worldviews, define science as inquiry, researching answers and Islam as providing meaning for life, guiding society. Their perspectives with regard to the relationship between Islam and science were seen as either being in harmony or integration.

Keywords

Abstract

The academic and public interest in perceptions with regard to the relationship between science and religion had been steadily grown in recent years. That interest caused the possible rise of related issues for teachers in their science classes such as compatibility/incompatibility of religious and scientific worldviews and the impact of religious worldviews on perceptions of science. For Islam, those issues are seen to be responded positively and the relationship between science and Islam is thought within the perspectives of harmony or dialog. However, the issue of the relationship between Islam and science is not adequately held in Turkish literature, especially the perceptions of science teachers and candidates, and the need for empirical data is seen obvious. In this study, in order to overcome that lack of empirical data, the perspectives of 32 Turkish pre-service science teachers with regard to the relationship between Islam and science in the context of their worldviews were questioned. The data source of the study was a questionnaire that comprised of nine open ended questions which were analyzed qualitatively. In the analysis process, the perceptions of the participants about the relationship between Islam and science were categorized with the help of Barbour’s model. The results of study revealed that the participants mainly have religious worldviews, define science as inquiry, researching answers and Islam as providing meaning for life, guiding society. Their perspectives with regard to the relationship between Islam and science were seen as either being in harmony or integration.

Keywords


  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Worldviews, students, science teachers, school science: Where to next? Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 135-141. doi: 10.1080/03057260108560170.

  • Allen, N. J., & Crawley, F. E. (1998). Voices from the bridge: Worldview conflicts of Kickapoo students of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 111–132. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802).

  • Aslan, O., & Taşar, M. F. (2013). Fen öğretmenlerinin bilimin doğası görüşleri ve öğretimleri nasıldır? Bir sınıf içi araştırması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(167), 65-80.

  • Ayvacı, H. Ş., & Çoruhlu T. Ş. (2012). Fen ve Teknoloji öğretmen adaylarının bilim ve fen kavramları ile ilgili sahip oldukları görüşlerim araştırılması. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 29-37.

  • Barbour, I. (1997). Religion and science: Historical and contemporary ıssues. New York: Harper Collins.

  • Bogden, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Campbell, R. A. (2005). Students' views on the relationship between religion and science: Analyses of results from a comparative survey. Canadian Review of Sociology, 42(3), 249-265. doi: 10.1111/j.1755618X.2005.tb00839.x.

  • Cobern, W. W. (1991). Worldview theory and science education research. NARST Monograph No. 3. Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.

  • Cobern, W. W. (1994, March). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA, USA.

  • Cobern, W. W. (2000). The nature of science and the role of knowledge and belief. Science & Education, 9(3), 219-246. doi: 10.1023/A:1008747309880.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

  • Dzama, E. N. N., & Osborne, J. F. (1999). Poor performance in science among African students: An alternative explanation to the African worldview thesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 387–405. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903).

  • Edis, T. (2009). Modern science and conservative Islam: An uneasy relationship. Science & Education, 18(6), 885- 903. doi: 10.1007/s11191-008-9165-3.

  • Ellison, C., & Musick, M. (1995). Conservative Protestantism and public opinion toward science. Review of Religious Research, 36(3), 245-262.

  • Gauld, C. F. (2005). Habits of mind, scholarship and decision making in science and religion. Science & Education, 14(3), 291-308. doi: 10.1007/s11191-004-1997-x.

  • Gay, L.R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, R. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

  • Glennan, S. (2009). Whose science and whose religion? Reflections on the relations between scientific and religious worldviews. Science & Education, 18(6), 797-812. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9097-3.

  • Gould, S. J. (1999). Rock of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballantine.

  • Hansson, L., & Redfors, A. (2007). Physics and the possibility of a religious view of the universe: Swedish upper secondary students’ views. Science & Education, 16(3), 461-478. doi: 10.1007/s11191-006-9036-8.

  • Kearney, M. (1984). World view. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp Publishers, Inc.

  • Keranto, T. (2001). The perceived credibility of scientific claims, paranormal phenomena, and miracles among primary teacher students: A comparative study. Science & Education, 10(5), 493-511. doi: 10.1023/A:1011261132355.

  • Liu, S-Y., & Lederman, N. G. (2007). Exploring prospective teachers’ worldviews and conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1281-1307. doi: 10.1080/09500690601140019.

  • Mansour, N. (2011). Science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. the Islamic perspective: Conflicting or compatible? Science Education, 95(2), 281-309. doi: 10.1002/sce.20418.

  • Matthews, M. R. (2009). Science, worldviews and education: An introduction. Science & Education, 18(6), 641- 666. doi: 10.1007/s11191-008-9170-6.

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Noddings, N. (1993). Educating for intelligent belief or unbelief. New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Nidhal, G. (2010). Science, religion and the quest for knowledge and truth: An Islamic perspective. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 55-69. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9208-3.

  • Pennock, R. T. (2002). Should creationism be taught in the public schools? Science & Education, 11(2), 111-133. doi: 10.1023/A:1014473504488.

  • Reiss, M. J. (2009). Imagining the world: The significance of religious worldviews for science education. Science & Education, 18(6), 783-796. doi: 10.1007/s11191-007-9091-9.

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Sutherland, D., & Dennick, R. (2002). Exploring culture, language and perception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1080/09500690110067011.

  • Taşdere, A., Özsevgeç, T., & Türkmen L. (2014). Bilimin doğasına yönelik tamamlayıcı bir ölçme aracı: Kelime ilişkilendirme testi. Fen Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Derneği Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 2(2), 129-144.

  • Tsai, C. C. (2001). Ideas about earthquakes after experiencing a natural disaster in Taiwan: An analysis of students’ worldviews. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1007–1016. doi: 10.1080/09500690010016085.

  • Turgut, H., Akçay, H., İrez, S. (2010). Bilim sözde-bilim ayrımı tartışmasının öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğası inanışlarına etkisi, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10(4), 2621-2663.

  • Turgut, H., Turgut-Şengül, G. (2014, Eylül). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının bilime ve din-bilim ilişkisine dair algıları. XI. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Adana.

  • Valk, J. (2010). Knowing self and others: Worldview study at Renaissance College. Journal of Adult Theological Education, 6(1), 69-80.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics