Prediction of ELT Students’ Academic (Language) Achievement: Language Learning Orientation and Autonomous Learning

Author :  

Year-Number: 2015-Volume 7, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Learner autonomy is frequently debated among English language teachers and scholars around the world. Particular concerns include the ways in which conceptions of autonomy are changing within our field, and the ways in which new conceptions of autonomy fit in with broader developments in language teaching and learning theory, educational practice and social thought (Benson, 2007). From the perspective of Self-determination theory, autonomy supported learning environment has close relation with intrinsic motivation, higher perceived competence and academic achievement. The present study aims to define the prediction level of ELT students’ academic achievement using their language learning orientation and autonomous learning. Results show that there is a positive correlation between intrinsic motivation and academic achievement, and also between autonomous learning and academic achievement. The regression analysis shows that autonomous learning and intrinsic motivation predict academic achievement strongly.

Keywords

Abstract

Learner autonomy is frequently debated among English language teachers and scholars around the world. Particular concerns include the ways in which conceptions of autonomy are changing within our field, and the ways in which new conceptions of autonomy fit in with broader developments in language teaching and learning theory, educational practice and social thought (Benson, 2007). From the perspective of Self-determination theory, autonomy supported learning environment has close relation with intrinsic motivation, higher perceived competence and academic achievement. The present study aims to define the prediction level of ELT students’ academic achievement using their language learning orientation and autonomous learning. Results show that there is a positive correlation between intrinsic motivation and academic achievement, and also between autonomous learning and academic achievement. The regression analysis shows that autonomous learning and intrinsic motivation predict academic achievement strongly.

Keywords


  • Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045-2068.

  • Balcikanli, C. (2008). İngilizce’nin yabancı dil olarak öğrenildiği ortamlarda öğrenen özerkliği. GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28 (3), 1-16.

  • Benson, P. (2009). Making sense of autonomy in language learning. In S. Toogood, R. Pemberton & A. Barfield (Eds.), Maintaining control: Autonomy and language learning (pp. 13-26). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  • Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40 (01), 21­40.

  • Benson, P. (2010a). Measuring autonomy: Should we put our ability to the test? In A. Paran, & L. Sercu (Eds.), Testing the untestable in language education (pp. 77-97) Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

  • Bernard HR (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative methods. (3rd edition). California: Alta Mira Press ,Walnut Creek.

  • Black, A. E., &Deci, E. L. (2000) The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: a self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.

  • Boyd, F. B. (2002). Motivation to continue: Enhancing literacy learning for struggling readers and writers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 18, 257–277.

  • Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

  • Carreira, J.M., Ozaki, K., & Maeda, T. (2013). Motivational model of English learning among elementary school students in Japan. System, 41, 706-719.

  • Chirkov, V. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2001) Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and U.S adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 618-635.

  • Cokley, K. O., Bernard, N., Cunningham, D., & Motoike, J. (2001). A psychometric investigation of the academic motivation scale using a United States sample. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 109–119.

  • Collentine, K. (2011). Learner autonomy in task-based 3D world and production. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 50–67.

  • Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23 (2), 195-205.

  • Dang, T. T. (2010). Learner Autonomy in EFL Studies in Vietnam: A Discussion from Sociocultural Perspective. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 3-9.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘‘what’’ and ‘‘why’’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self- determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 227–268.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, USA: The University of Rochester Press.

  • Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation. A literature review. System, 23 (2), 165-174.

  • Dincer, A., Yesilyurt, S., &Takkac, S. (2012). The effects of autonomy-supportive climates on EFL learners’ engagement, achievement and competence in English speaking classrooms. Paper presented in WCES 2012. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 3890–3894.

  • Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Longman.

  • Dornyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research and applications. Language Learning, 53 (1), 3-32.

  • Gao, X. (2006). Understanding changes in Chinese students’ uses of learning strategies in China and Britain: a socio-cultural re-interpretation. System 34 (1), 55-67.

  • Gardner, R.C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of motivation and use. London: Edward Arnold.

  • Gardner, R.C. (2000). Correlation, causation, motivation, and second language acquisition. Canadian Psychology, 41, 10-24.

  • Goldberg, M. D., & Cornell, D. G. (1998). The influence of intrinsic motivation and self-concept on academic achievement in second- and third-grade students. Journal of Education of the Gifted, 21, 179–205.

  • Gonzales, R. DLC. (2010). Motivational orientation in foreign language learners. TESOL Journal, 3, 3–28.

  • Gottfried, A.E., 1985. Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 631–645.

  • Gremmo, M.-J., Riley, P., 1995. Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea. System, 23 (2), 151–164.

  • Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C. F., Marsh, H. W., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 711–735.

  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: OUP.

  • Hussein, G., (2010).The attitudes of undergraduate students towards motivation and technology in a foreign language classroom. International, Journal of Learning and Teaching. 2, (2), 14-24.

  • Kankaanranta, M. & Neittaanmaki, P. (2011). Participation of the young ones in virtual worlds: A look at experiences and motivations. World Journal on Educational Technology, 3 (1), 16-27.

  • Johnson, M. K., Beebe, T., Mortimer, J. T., & Snyder, M. (1998). Volunteerism in adolescence: A process perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 309–332.

  • Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2014). Predicting students' cognitive learning activity and intrinsic learning motivation: How powerful are teacher statements, student profiles, and gender? Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 132–139.

  • Lamb, T. (2009). Controlling learning: Learners’ voices and relationships between motivation and learner autonomy. In S. Toogood, R. Pemberton & A. Barfield (Eds.), Maintaining control: Autonomy and language learning (pp. 67-86). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  • Lewis, J.L. &Sheppard SRJ (2006). Culture and communication: Can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities? Landsc. Urban Plan. 77: 291-313.

  • Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy. Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Ireland.

  • Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: the dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181.

  • Little, D. (2001).Learner autonomy and the challenge of tandem language learning via the Internet. In Chambers & Davies (eds.), 29–38. University of Southampton

  • Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 14-29.

  • Little, D. (2009). Learner autonomy, the European language portfolio and teacher development. In S. Toogood, R. Pemberton & A. Barfield (Eds.), Maintaining control: Autonomy and language learning (pp. 147-173). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  • Little, D., Ridley, J., & Ushioda, E. (2003). Towards greater learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom. Dublin: Authentik.

  • Littlewood, W. (1996). Autonomy: an anatomy and a framework. System 24, 427-435.

  • Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20 (1), 71-94.

  • Macaskill, A. & Taylor, E. (2010). The development of a brief measure of learner autonomy in university students. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 351–359.

  • Mahdinejad, G., Hasanzadeh, R., Mirzaian, B., & Ebrahimi, S. (2012). Motivational orientations and students' English language learning: The case of Iranian EFL learners. European Journal of Social Sciences, 32(2), 239-250.

  • Manolopoulou-Sergi, E. (2004). Motivation within the information processing model of foreign language learning. System 32, 427–441.

  • Masouleh, N. S. & Jooneghani, R. B. (2012). Autonomous learning: A teacher-less learning!. Paper presented in International Conference on New Horizons in Education (INTE2012). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 835–842.

  • Mitchell, J. V. (1992). Interrelationships and predictive efficacy for indices of intrinsic, extrinsic, and self- assessed motivation for learning. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25, 149–155.

  • Mohammadi, M., Moenikia, M., &Zahed-Babelan, A. (2010). The relationship between motivational systems and second language learning Paper presented in WCES-2010. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3258–3262.

  • Nakata, Y. (2010). Towards a framework for self-regulated language-learning. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 1-10.

  • Nasiri, S. (2000).The investigation of increasing secondary students' motivation about school & giving some scientific solutions from the viewpoint of teachers & students. Unpublished MA Thesis, Educational Management. Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch.

  • Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57- 85.

  • Noels, K., Pelletier, L., & Clement, R. (2003) ‘Why Are You Learning a Second Language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning 53(1), 33–64.

  • Noels, K. A. (2001a). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners' orientations and perceptions of their teachers' communication style. Language Learning, 51, 107−144.

  • Oxford, R. (2003). Towards a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. In: Palfreyman, D., Smith, R.C. (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 75-92). Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke,

  • Oxford, R. (2008). Hero with a thousand faces: Learner autonomy, learning strategies and learning tactics in independent language learning. In: Hurd, S., Lewis, T. (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 41-63). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

  • Pae, T. & Shin, S.K. (2011). Examining the effects of differential instructional methods on the model of foreign language achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 215–222.

  • Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety & the motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38, 467-479.

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in earning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.

  • Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209-218.

  • Ryan, R.M., 1991. The nature of the self in autonomy and relatedness. In: Strauss, J., Goethals, G.R. (Eds.), The self-interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 208–238). New York: Springer.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54−67.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 171–195). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Ryan, R. M. (2005). The developmental line of a autonomy in the etiology, dynamics, and treatment of borderline personality disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 987-1006.

  • Sanprasert, N. (2010). The application of a course management system to enhance autonomy in learning English as a foreign language. System, 38, 109–123.

  • Sao, H., & Wu, Z. (2007). Nurturing language learner autonomy through caring pedagogic practice. In A.Barfield, & S. Brown (Eds.), Restructuring autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation. Basinstoke: Palgrave.

  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., &Meece, J. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

  • Skinner, B. & Madden, M.C. (2009). Help seeking in English language learning. ELT Journal, 64 (1), 21–31

  • Smith, R. and Ushioda, E. (2009) Autonomy: under whose control? In Maintaining control, autonomy and language learning, 241- 253, Editors: Pemberton, R., Toogood, S. and Barfield, A. (9789622099234) Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

  • Urdan, T. & Schoenfelder, E. (2006) Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology 44, 331–349.

  • Ushioda, E. (1996). Learner autonomy 5: The role of motivation. Dublin: Authentik.

  • Ushioda, E. (2010). Researching growth in autonomy through I-statement analysis. In B. O’Rourke, & L. Carson (Eds.), Language learner autonomy: Policy, curriculum, classroom (A festschrift in honor of David Little) (pp. 45-62). Oxford: Peter Lang.

  • Vallerand, R. J., &Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and a motivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599–620.

  • Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction and validation of the Motivation toward Education Scale/Construction et validation de l’Échellede Motivation en Éducation (ÉMÉ). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21, 323–349.

  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M, Senécal, C., Vallières, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017.

  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Sénécal, C., &Vallières, E. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and a motivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the Academic Motivation Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 159–172.

  • Wenden, A. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics 23(1), 32–55.

  • Williams, G. C., McGregor, H. A., Sharp, D., Kouides, R. W., Levesque, C. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). A self-determination multiple risk intervention trial to improve smokers’ health. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 1288-1294.

  • Wu, X. (2003). Intrinsic motivation and young language learners: The impact of the classroom environment. System, 31, 501–517.

  • Xhaferi, B. &Xhaferi, G. (2011). Teachers for the knowledge society developing learner autonomy in higher education in Macedonia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 150–154.

  • Yang, N. (1999).The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System 27, 515-535.

  • Zhang, J.L. (2003). Research into Chinese EFL learner strategies: methods, findings and instructional issues. RELC Journal 34, 284-322.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics