Transformational Leadership Behaviors Of School Principals: A Qualitative Research Based On Teachers’ Perceptions

Author :  

Year-Number: 2012-Volume 4, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Transformational leadership helps school principals’ to frame their attitudes to move their schools forward. It has four major characteristics. Of these, idealized influence is defined as leader’s behavior and the follower’s attributions about the leader. Inspirational motivation refers to the ways by which transformational leaders motivate and inspire those around them. Individualized consideration represents the leader’s continuing effort to treat each individual as a special person and act as a mentor who attempts to develop their potential. Finally, intellectual stimulation represents the leader’s effort to stimulate followers to be innovative and creative to define problems and approach them in new ways. It is considered that principals who demonstrate these major characteristics of transformational leadership have effects on satisfaction among teachers and better performance at school. Therefore, this study purposes to discover the level of transformational leadership behaviors that school principals demonstrate at schools during their administrative practices on daily basis. Results reveal that school principals demonstrate high level characteristics of transformational leadership such as idealized influence, inspirational motivation, individualized consideration and intellectual stimulation.

Keywords

Abstract

Transformational leadership helps school principals’ to frame their attitudes to move their schools forward. It has four major characteristics. Of these, idealized influence is defined as leader’s behavior and the follower’s attributions about the leader. Inspirational motivation refers to the ways by which transformational leaders motivate and inspire those around them. Individualized consideration represents the leader’s continuing effort to treat each individual as a special person and act as a mentor who attempts to develop their potential. Finally, intellectual stimulation represents the leader’s effort to stimulate followers to be innovative and creative to define problems and approach them in new ways. It is considered that principals who demonstrate these major characteristics of transformational leadership have effects on satisfaction among teachers and better performance at school. Therefore, this study purposes to discover the level of transformational leadership behaviors that school principals demonstrate at schools during their administrative practices on daily basis. Results reveal that school principals demonstrate high level characteristics of transformational leadership such as idealized influence, inspirational motivation, individualized consideration and intellectual stimulation.

Keywords


  • Anderson, K. D. (2008). Transformational teacher leadership in rural schools. The Rural Educator, 8-17.

  • Bailey, K. D. (1994). Methods of social research. (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

  • Bass, B. (1998). Transformational leadership: industry, military, and educational impact, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.

  • Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130-139.

  • Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Full range leadership development: manual for the multifactor leadership Questionnaire. CA, Mind Garden.

  • Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1997). Leaders: the strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper and Row.

  • Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

  • Bommer, W. H., Rubin, R. S. & Baldwin, T. T. (2004). Setting the stage for effective leadership: antecedents of transformational leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(2004), 195–210.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.

  • Castanheira, P. & Costa, J. A. (2011). In search of transformational leadership: A (Meta) analysis focused on the Portuguese reality. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15 (2011), 2012–2015.

  • Chew, J. & Chan, C. C. A. (2008). Human resource practices, organizational commitment and intention to stay. International Journal of Manpower, 29(6), 503-522.

  • Cho, J. & Dansereau, F. (2010). Are transformational leaders fair? A multi-level study of transformational leadership, justice perceptions, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2010), 409–421.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle Creek, NJ: Pearson Education.

  • Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolly, H. & Beresford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

  • Den Hartog, D. N., House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A. & Dorfman, P. W. (1999). Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadership Quarterly 10(2), 219-257.

  • Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oak.

  • Evers, C. W. & Lakomski, G. (1996). Exploring educational administration: coherentist applications and critical debates. NY: Elsevier Science.

  • Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J. C., Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2003).Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school re-form. Journal of Educational Administration, 41, 229256.

  • Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J. C., Stoel, R. D. & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological, school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406-427.

  • Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J. C., Van den Berg, R. & Kelchtermans, G. (2001). Conditions fostering the implementation of large-scale innovation programs in schools: teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(1), 130-166.

  • Glaser, B. G. (1992) Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Ca: Sociology Press.

  • Gronn, P. (1995). Greatness re-visited: the current obsession with transformational leadership. Leading and Managing 1(1), 14-27.

  • Hall, J., Johnson, S., Wysocki, A. & Kepner, K. (2008).Transformational Leadership: The transformation of managers and associates. UF University of Florida, IFAS Extension, 1-3.

  • Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33 (3), 329-351. Heck, R. H. & Hallinger, P. (1999). Next generation methods for the study of leadership and schoolimprovement. In J. Murphy & L. Seashore (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Educational Administration. 2

  • Judge, T. A. & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751–65.

  • Jung, D. & Avolio, B. (2000). Opening the black box: an experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 949-964.

  • Kerkhof , van de M. (2006). The repertory grid technique, (RGT), integrated assessment, http://www.ivm.vu.nl/en/Images/PT4_tcm53-161509.pdf, 1-7. retrieved on 5 November, 2011; 12:00.

  • Kreitner, R. & Kinicki, A. (1998). Organizational behavior. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

  • Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-129.

  • Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational leadership research, 1996-2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177-200.

  • Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large scale reform: effects on students, teachers and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201228.

  • Leithwood, K., Harris, A. & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about leadership and the performance of international innovation seeking alliances. The Leadership Quarterly, 20 (2009), 191–206.

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B. & Fullan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership for large- scale reform: the case of England’s national literacy and numeracy strategies. Journal of School Leadership and Management, 24(1), 57-80.

  • Leithwood, K., Steinbach, R. & Jantzi, D. (2002). School leadership and teachers’ motivation to implement accountability policies. Education Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 94-119.

  • Lewis, P. S., Goodman, S. H. & Fandt, P. M. (1998). Management: challenges in the 21st century. Cincinnati: Thomson.

  • Marshall, C. & Rosman, B. G. (2006). Designing qualitative research, 4th Edition, Sage, Thousand Oak.

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis, forum: Online Journal Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 1-10.

  • McFarlin, D. B. & Sweeney, P. D. (1998). International management: trends, challenges and opportunities, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing.

  • Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J. & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Occupying the principal position: examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623– 670.

  • Muenjohn, N. & Armstrong, A. (2007). Transformational leadership: the influence of culture on the leadership behaviors of expatriate managers. School of Management, Australia, 2(2), 265-283.

  • Nemanich, L. A. & Keller, R. T. (2007). Transformational leadership in an acquisition: a field study of employees. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2007), 49–68.

  • Nguni, S., Sleegers, P. J. C. & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: the Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 145-177.

  • Northouse, P. G. (2001). Leadership theory and practice. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Osborn, N. & Marion, R. (2009). Contextual leadership, transformational leadership and the performance of international innovation seeking alliances. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2009), 191–206.

  • Popper, M., Mayseless, O. & Castelnovo, O. (2000). Transformational leadership and attachment. Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 267-289.

  • Rafferty, A. E. & Griffin, M. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15 (2004), 329–354.

  • Reichard, R. J., Riggio, R. E., Guerin, D. W., Oliver, P. H., Gottfried, A. W. & Gottfried, A. E. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of relationships between adolescent personality and intelligence with adult leader emergence and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22 (2011), 471–481.

  • Ross, J. A. & Gray, P. (2006). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: the mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 179

  • Shao, L. & Webber, S. (2006). A cross-cultural test of the ‘five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 59 (2006), 936–944.

  • Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R. & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613-642.

  • Stewart, J. (2006). Transformational leadership: an evolving concept examined through the works of Burns, Bass, Avolio, and Leithwood. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 54, 1-24.

  • Vinger, G. & Cilliers, F. (2006). Effective transformational leadership behaviors for managing change. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 4 (2), 1-9.

  • Walumbwa, F. O. & Lawler, J. J. (2003). Building effective organizations: transformational leadership, collectivist orientation, work-related attitudes, and withdrawal behaviors in three emerging economies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 1083-1101.

  • Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W. D. & Bass, B. M. (1993). Transformational leadership and performance: a longitudinal investigation. Leadership Quarterly, 4(1), 81-102.

  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2000). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara.

  • Yu, H., Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2002). The comparative effects of transformational leadership on teachers commitment to change in Hong Kong and Canada. Journal of Educational Administration, 1(4), 368-384. Yukl, G. A. (2005). Leadership in organizations, Ninth Edition, Prentince – Hall.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics