The Relation between Learning-Centered Leadership and Structural Empowerment of Teachers

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-Volume 13, Issue 4
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2021-09-06 12:02:06.0
Language : English
Konu : Educational Sciences
Number of pages: 965-983
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

In this study which was conducted to determine whether there was a statistical significance between the learning-centered leadership attitudes of school principals and the structural empowerment of teachers based on the views of the teachers working in secondary schools, the correlational survey model was employed. The study group of the research consisted of 261 secondary school teachers who were working in the central district of Bolu, Turkey in the 2020-2021 academic year and participated in the study voluntarily. Along with the scale of structural empowerment of teachers developed by Ilıman, Püsküllüoğlu and Altinkut (2017) and adapted to Turkish culture by Gümüş-Kılınç, Bellibaş and Gümüş (2017), a demographic survey form was used as data collection instruments in this study. Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) was used for the analysis of the data. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test which was employed for the normality test suggested that the data distributed non-normally. Thus, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted. Spearman correlation analysis was also performed to determine the correlation between learning-centered leadership and teachers' views on structural empowerment. As a result of the analyses, it emerged that the views of learning-centered leadership and structural empowerment of teachers were at a high level. It was also found that variables such as gender, professional seniority and the duration of working with the principal did not show statistically significant difference with the teachers' views on learning-centered leadership and structural empowerment of teachers. Besides, it was also seen that there was a statistical difference between the variable of years of experience at the school and the views on the learning-centered leadership in managing the curriculum and being a model while there is no statistically significant difference in the views on structural empowerment of teachers. In addition, a significant, positive and a high-level correlation was found between learning-centered leadership and structural empowerment of teachers.

Keywords


  • Altınkurt, Y., Türkkaş Anasız, B., & Ekinci, E. (2016). The relationships between structural and psychological empowerment of teachers and their organizational citizenship behaviors. Education and Science. 41(187),79-96.

  • Bakan, I., Dogan, I. F., Kocdemir, M., & Oguz, M. (2018). Effect of learned resourcefulness on learning- centered leadership: a field research. PressAcademia Procedia (PAP), 7, 109-115.

  • Bogler, R., & Nir, A. E. (2012). The importance of teachers' perceived organizational support to job satisfaction: What's empowerment got to do with it? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 287-306.

  • Cerit, Y. (2004). The competence of the administrators of prımary schools in the process of globalization. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 4(8), 1-11.

  • Cravens, X. C. (2008). The cross-cultural fit of the learning-centered leadership framework and assessment for Chinese principals. Unpublished doctoral dissertion, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

  • Çavuş, M. F. (2006). An application in manufacturing industry on the effects of organizational creativity and innovativeness of employee empowerment. Unpublished doctoral dissertion, Selçuk University Social Sciences Institute, Konya.

  • Çöl, G., & Gül, H. (2004). A research on the effects and consequences of social-structural antecedents on empowerment in creating an organizational structure that empowers personnel. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 18(3-4), 60-80.

  • Duman, Ş. (2018). Structural empowerment, trust to the manager, and leader-member exchange as the predictors of the psychological empowerment of secondary school teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertion, Gazi UniversityEducation Sciences Institute, Ankara.

  • Ertürk, R. (2019). Teachers' views on the effectiveness of leaders and principals. 28th international congress of educational sciences abstract book in (s. 398-400). Hacettepe University, Ankara.

  • Ertürk, R. (2020). Teacher autonomy: A conceptual analysis. International Pegem education congress (Ipcedu- 2020) full text book in (s. 452-464). Ankara: Pegem Publishing.

  • Ertürk, R. (2021). The relationship between teachers' behavioral empowerment and organizational commitment. Doctoral dissertion, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Graduate Institute of Education, Bolu.

  • Gedik, S. (2017) The effect of empowering leader behaviours on employees’ psychological and structural empowerment: public bank example. Unpublished doctoral dissertion, İstanbul Bilgi University Social Science Institute, Ankara.

  • Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliott, S., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership. Connections to research, professional standards and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1-36.

  • İliman Püsküllüoğlu, E., & Altınkurt, Y.(2017) Development of teachers’ structural empowerment scale (TSES): A validity and reliability study. Universitepark Bulletin, 6(1), 118-132.

  • İhtiyaroğlu, N. (2017). The effect of structural and psychological empowerment on teachers’ motivation. Journal of Social Science Kırıkkale University, 7(2), 361-378.

  • Kalman, M., & Gedikoğlu, T. (2014). An investigation of the relationship between school administrators’ accountability and organizational justice. Hacettepe University Jornal of the Faculty of Education, 29(2), 115-128.

  • Karasar, N. (2014). Scientific research method concepts principles techniques. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.

  • Kılınç, Ç., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2017). Adaptation of learning-centered leadership scale: A validity and reliability study. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(3), 132-144.

  • Kirby, P. C., Wimpelberg, R., & Keaster, R. (1992). Teacher empowerment depends on needs, expectation of principals, schools, districts. NASSP Bulletin, 76(540), 89-95.

  • Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., Honig, M. I., Plecki, M. L., & Portin, B. S. (2010). Learning-focused leadership and leadership support: Meaning and practice in urban systems. The Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

  • Koçel, T. (2010). Business management. İstanbul: Beta Publishing.

  • Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference?. Teaching and Teacher Education. 59, 79-91.

  • Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2013). Education Management (Trans. Ed. G. Arastaman). Ankara: Nobel Publisher.

  • Male, T., & Palaiologou, I. (2012). Learning-centred leadership or pedagogical leadership? An alternative approach to leadership in education contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education 15(1), 107118.

  • Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S.(1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 19(3), 245-275.

  • McCarthy, V. (2004). Facilitative leadership in public organizations: A study of federal agency supervisors. Unpublished doctoral dissertion, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, ABD.

  • McDonald, A. M. (2014). Simulation education of communication skills and the effects on nurse empowerment, Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Colombia University, New York.

  • Mete, A.(2004). Empowering teachers in primary schools. XIII National Educational Sciences Congress, 6-9 July 2004, İnönü University Faculty of Education.

  • Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A.C. (2006). Learning-centered leadership: A Conceptual foundation. Learning Sciences Institute, Vanderbilt University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505798.pdf from 23.01.2021 accessed on.

  • Odabaş, İ. (2014). The role of structural and psychological empowerment on realization of commitment to the organization: study on teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, İstanbul Kültür University Social Science Institute, İstanbul.

  • Özaslan, G. (2018). An investigation of the relationship between social-structural empowerment and organizational cynicism. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(1), 169-185.

  • Pérez-García, P., López, M. C. & Bolívar, A. B. (2018). Efficacy of the educational leadership in the Spanish context: The perspective of its agents. NASSP Bulletin, 102(2), 141-160.

  • Polat, L. (2020). Learning-centered leadership as a predictor of teacher professionalism. Unpublished Master thesis. Karabük University Graduate Institute of Education, Karabük.

  • Polatçı, S., & Özçalık, F.(2013). The effects of structural and psychological empowerment on workplace incivility and burnout. Journal of Business Science, 1(1), 17-34.

  • Saphier, J., King, M., & D’Auria, J. (2006). Three strands form strong school leadership. Journal of Staff Development, 27(2), 51-57.

  • Seferoğlu, S. S. (2004). Teacher candıdates’ evaluation of their teaching competencies. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 26, 131-140.

  • Southworth, G. (2002) Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management, 22, 73-91.

  • Short, P. M., & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of level of empowerment within the school environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(6), 951-960.

  • Sürgevil, O., Tolay, E., & Topoyan, M. (2013). Validity and reliability analyzes of structural empowerment and psychological empowerment scales. Journal of Yasar University, 8(31), 5371- 5391.

  • Taş, M. (2017). Managers with teachers 'behavioral empowerment investigation of the relationship between detected leadership styles, Unpublished master thesis, Maltepe University Social Sicience Institute, Istanbul.

  • Telli, E., Ünsar, A. S., & Oğuzhan, A. (2012). The impact of leadership attitude styles on employee organizational burnout and the tendency to leave from job: A topic related application. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, 2(2), 135-150.

  • Umar, S., & Özen, H. (2019). Structural strengthening of teachers phenomenological approach.Journal of Contemporary Management Sciences, 6(2), 203-224.

  • Uygur, K., & Bakır Arabacı, İ. (2019). The relationship between high school teachers' perceptions of employee empowerment and organizational trust: The sample of elazığ province. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 16(1), 744-770.

  • Yıldız, K., & Ertürk, R. (2019). Teachers' views on the administrator and leadership concept: A metaphor study. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(4), 1190-1216.

  • Yorulmaz, Y. İ., Çolak, İ., & Çiçek-Sağlam, A. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ structural and psychological empowerment and their autonomy. Journal of Educational Sciences Research-Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 8(2), 81-96.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics