Content Analysis of Postgraduate Theses Related to Misconceptions in Chemistry Education Between 2000-2020

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-Volume 14, Issue 2
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-03-28 13:04:20.0
Language : English
Konu : Mathematics and Science Education
Number of pages: 341-358
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

This research carried out a content analysis of access-authorized graduate theses, made in Turkey between 2000-2020 and registered on the official website of the Council of Higher Education [CoHE]-National Thesis Center, by document review method on the misconceptions encountered in chemistry education. For this purpose, a total of thirty accessible postgraduate theses with full access permits were examined, eight of which were doctoral and twenty-two were master degrees. In addition, six master theses, which were made between 2000 and 2003 and only the abstract part of which can be accessed, contributed to the research. Therefore, the research sample consists of thirty-six graduate theses related to "Misconceptions in Chemistry" carried out in the last two decades, 30 of which have full access permissions and six summary access permissions. Theses examined within the scope of the research; type, year of publication, the purpose of research, research subject, research method, working group, data collection tool, data analysis method, conclusions reached, and presented suggestions are classified and subjected to content analysis. All of the doctorate and master theses on the National Thesis Center website, mentioned in their names together with the "chemistry" and "misconceptions" keywords, have been reached. The difference between the other studies in this field is the richness of the problem situation, and the broader period the theses are done.

Keywords


  • Adiguzel, T., Simsir, F., Cubukluoz, O., & Gokkurt Ozdemi̇r, B. (2018). Master's theses and doctoral dissertations on misconceptions in mathematics and science education in turkey: A thematic analysis. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 13(25), 57-92.

  • Bag, H., & Calik, M. (2018). A thematic review of science education studies on 4th grade, Elementary Education Online, 17(3), 1353-1377.

  • Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), 55-64.

  • Baysen, E., Guneyli, A., & Baysen, F. (2012). Maddenin halleri ve ısı konusunda kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesinde kavramsal değişim metinlerinin etkisi, International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports &Science Education, 1(2), 108-117.

  • Batdi, V. (2019). Meta-tematik analiz. V. Batdi (Ed.), Meta-tematik analiz örnek uygulamalar içinde (1-76). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

  • Bayram, H., Sokmen, N., & Savci, H. (1997). Determining the level of understanding of basic science concepts. Marmara University Ataturk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 9, 89-100.

  • Bektasli, B. (2013). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının astronomi hakkındaki kavram yanılgılarının tespiti için astronomi kavram testinin geliştirilmesi, Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(168).

  • Bilgin, I., Uzuntiryaki, E., & Geban, O. (2003). Student's misconceptions on the concept of chemical equilibrium. Education and Science, 28(127), 10-17.

  • Buyukozturk, S. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Canpolat, N. (2002). Investigation of effectiveness of conceptual change approach on understanding of chemical equilibrium concepts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Atatürk University Institute of Educational Sciences, Erzurum.

  • Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1241-1257.

  • Council of Higher Education [CoHE]. (2021). National Theses Center. Council of Higher Education. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

  • Calik, M. (2003). A Cross-age study of the level of student's understanding related to concepts in solution (Unpublished master’s thesis). Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.

  • Calik, M., & Sozbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of Content Analysis. Education and Science, 39(174), 33-38.

  • Cepni, S. (2009). Effects of computer-supported instructional material (CSIM) in removing students' misconceptions about concepts: Light, light source and seeing. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 1(2), 51-83.

  • Cepni, S. (2018). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Ankara: Seçkin.

  • Cepni, S., & Ayas, A. P. (2005). Kuramdan uygulamaya fen ve teknoloji öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Cetingul, I., & Geban, O. (2011). Using conceptual change texts with analogies for misconceptions in acids and bases. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41, 112-123.

  • Ciltas, A., Guler G., & Sozbilir, M. (2012). Türkiye’de matematik eğitimi araştırmaları: Bir içerik analizi çalışması, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(1), 565-580.

  • Coruhlu, T. S., & Pehlevan, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Science Experimental Guidebook on the Conceptual Understanding of Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Science Learning, 4(3), 230243.

  • Coşkun, A., & Soylu, Y. (2021). Türkiye’de matematik eğitimi alanında problem çözmeye yönelik yapılan çalışmaların bir içerik analizi. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8(3), 230-251.

  • Dincer, S. (2018). Content analysis in scientific research: Meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, and descriptive content analysis. Bartin University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(1), 176-190.

  • Dabell, J. (2008). Using concept cartoons. Mathematics Teaching Incorporating Micromath, 209, 34-36.

  • Duran, M. (2013). Opinions of primary 7th-grade students about visual mathematics literacy Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 38-51.

  • Dutoit M. H. (2021). Chemistry for the masses: The value of small-scale chemistry to address misconceptions and re-establish practical work in diverse communities. In L. Mammino & J. Apotheker (Eds.), Research in Chemistry Education. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

  • Ecevit, T., & Simsek, P. O. (2017). The Evaluation of Teachers' Science Concept Teaching and Their Action to Diagnose and Eliminate Misconceptions. Elementary Education Online, 16(161), 129–150.

  • Feyzioglu, B. (2006). A comparative application of different learning process' for teaching and removing of misconceptions in general chemistry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir.

  • Gabel, D. L., & Bunce, D. M. (1994). Research on problem-solving: Chemistry. Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, 11, 301-326.

  • Gul, E., & Ozay-Kose, E., (2018). A Content Analysis of Misconception Articles towards Biology Subjects in Turkey. Igdir University, Journal of Social Science, 5, 499-521.

  • Gul, E., & Sozbilir, S., (2015). Fen ve matematik eğitimi alanında gerçekleştirilen ölçek geliştirme araştırmalarına yönelik tematik içerik analizi, Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(178), 85-102.

  • Kizilcik, H. S. (2021). An analogy on the difference between boiling and evaporation: A strange prison. The Physics Teacher, 59, 648. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0006919

  • Kibirige, I. (2021). Exploring the prevalence of misconceptions regarding heat and temperature among grade nine natural science learners. Unnes Science Education Journal, 10(3), 115-123

  • Lacin-Simsek, C. (2019). Fen öğretiminde kavram yanılgıları tespiti ve giderilmesi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Ed.), California: Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Morgil, İ., & Yılmaz, A. (2001). Kimya eğitiminde farklı madde türlerinin psikometrik özellikler ve öğrenci başarısı bakımından karşılaştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 111-116.

  • Nakhleh, M. B. (1994). Student's models of matter in the context of acid-base chemistry. Journal of chemical education, 71(6), 495.

  • Nakiboglu, C., & Ozkilic Arik, R. (2005). Determination of 4th-grade students' misconceptions about gases using V-diagram. Yeditepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 1-17.

  • Okur, M., & Seyhan, H.G. (2021). Determination of pre-service science teachers' conceptual understandings about the “solutions: dissolving-melting” with predict-observe-explain technique. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(3), 381-396.

  • Omilani, N., & Idika, M. (2020). An investigation into the reasoning of pre-service integrated science teachers when classifying matter into elements and compounds. Creative Education, 11, 2512-2522.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri (Trans. Ed. M. Bütün & S. B. Demir). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Polat, M. (2013). Fen bilimleri eğitimi alanında tamamlanmış yüksek lisans tezleri üzerine bir araştırma: Celal Bayar üniversitesi örneği. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 46-58.

  • Prescott, A., & Mitchelmore, M. (2005, July). Teaching projectile motion to eliminate misconceptions. In H.L. Chick, and J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 97-104, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Riche, R. D. (2000). Strategies for assisting students overcome their misconceptions in high school physics. Memorial University of Newfoundland Education, 6390.

  • Sari-Ay, O., & Aydogdu, C. (2015). Maddenin halleri ve ısı konusunda kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesinde kavramsal değişim metinlerinin etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 99-111.

  • Sinan, O. (2010). Differences in prospective science teachers' descriptions of the same concepts used in chemistry and biology classes-II. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 4(1), 85-107.

  • Sönmez, G., Geban, O., & Ertepınar, H. (2001, September). Altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin elektrik konusundaki kavramları anlamalarında kavramsal değişim yaklaşımının etkisi. Yeni Binyılın Basında Türkiye’de Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu, İstanbul.

  • Sozbilir M., Pinarbasi T., & Canpolat N. (2010). Prospective chemistry teachers' conceptions of chemical thermodynamics and kinetics. Eur. J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., 6(2), 111–120.

  • Tayan, E, Gedi̇k, S., Morkoyunlu, Z., Sozbi̇li̇r, M., & Konyalioglu, A. (2019). Articles regarding parent- children relationship: A thematic content analysis. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 1183-1208.

  • Temel, S., Şen, Ş., & Yılmaz, A. (2015), Fen eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenme ile ilgili yapılan çalışmalara ilişkin bir içerik analizi: Türkiye örneği, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23(2), 565-580.

  • Türkdoğan, A., Mandacı-Şahin, S., & Baki, A. (2011). Using misconceptions gathered via alternative evaluation methods in developing a test. Electronic Journal of Social Science, 10(37), 78-92.

  • Turkdogan, A., Guler, M., Bulbul, B., & Dani̇sman, S. (2015). Studies about misconceptions in mathematics education in Turkey: A thematic review. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 215-236.

  • Uyanik, G., & Dindar, H. (2016). İlkokul 4. sınıf fen bilimleri dersinde kavramsal değişim metinlerinin kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesine etkisi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(2), 349- 374.

  • Vogelezang, M. J. (1987). Development of the concept 'chemical substance’‐some thoughts and arguments. International Journal of Science Education, 9(5), 519-528.

  • Yagbasan, R., & Gulcicek, C. (2003). Describing the characteristics of misconceptions in science teaching. Pamukkale University Journal of Education Faculty, 13(13), 102–120.

  • Yanarates, E., & Yilmaz, A. (2020). Metaphorical perceptions of prospective teachers towards the concept of environmental sensitivity. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 40(3), 1019-1050. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.699406

  • Yavuz, S. (2017). A content analysis related to theses about misconceptions in chemistry education: The case of Turkey (2005-2015). Kastamonu Educational Journal, 25(3), 957-974

  • Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.

  • Yılmaz, A., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının elektrokimya konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(24), 881-906.

  • Yilmaz, A., & Yanarates, E. (2020). Determination of metaphorical perceptions of prospective teachers on the concept of "water pollution" through triangulation. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1500-1528. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.722554.

  • Yürük, N., Çakır, O. S., & Geban, O. (2000, September). Kavramsal değişim yaklaşımının hücresel solunum konusunda lise öğrencilerinin biyoloji dersine karşı tutumlarına etkisi. 4. Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics