Preservice Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science and Their Metaphoric Perceptions of Science and Scientists

Author :  

Year-Number: 2019-Volume 11, Issue 4
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 141-159
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

In this study, a mixed-method approach is used to examine preservice teachers’ views of the nature of science (NOS) and their perceptions of science and scientists. Study sample consisted of 72 preservice primary school teachers of the Faculty of Education of a university in the Aegean Region. 10 items were selected from the 25 VOSTS-TR items (Turkish version of Views on Science-Technology-Society) to determine participants' views of NOS and their perceptions of science and scientists were analyzed using metaphor analysis. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted based on participants’ responses. Categories were developed based on participants' created metaphors and were compared with their responses to the related VOSTS-TR items. The majority of participants responded to some items from a contemporary point of view while about half of them responded from an insufficient point of view. Participants’ metaphoric perceptions of science and scientists varied according to their views of NOS. It is believed that this study will pave the way for further research.

Keywords


  • Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, & Lederman. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatrual natural. Science Education, 82(4), 1–20.

  • Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 673–699.

  • Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20226

  • Aflalo, E. (2018). Changes in the perceptions of the nature of science and religious belief. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 237–253.

  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: “Views on Science- Technology- Society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760503

  • Aikenhead, G. S., Ryan, A. G., & Fleming, R. W. (1989). Views on science-technology society (form CDN.mc.5). Saskatoon, Canada.

  • Aktamış, H., & Dönmez, G. (2016). Metaphoric perceptions of students’ towards science course, science, science teacher and scientist. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Faculty of Education, 35(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.35.1.2

  • Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432

  • Aslan, O., & Taşar, M. F. (2013). How do science teachers view and teach the nature of science? A classroom investigation. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(167), 65–80.

  • Aslan, O., Yalçın, N., & Taşar, M. F. (2009). The views of the teachers of the science and technology on the nature of science. Ahi Evran Ünv. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 1–8.

  • Buldu, M. (2006). Young children’s perceptionsof scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research, 48(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880500498602

  • Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90(5), 803–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20147

  • Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2002). Investigation of preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10052

  • Craven, J. A., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2002). Assessing explicit and tacit conceptions of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 785–802.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2015). Mixed method researches. (Y. Dede & S. Beşir Demir, Eds.) (2nd ed.). Ankara: Anı Publishing.

  • Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. Science & Education, 25(1–2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9800-8

  • Demir, C. E. (2007). Metaphors as a reflection of middle school students’ perceptions of school: A cross-cultural analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701204099

  • Doğan Bora, N. (2005). An investigation of the views of physics, chemistry, biology teachers and 10th class math-science students on nature of science (NOS) in Turkey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Doğan, N. (2010). Comparison of students in different high school regarding their views on nature of science. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 30(2), 533–560.

  • Doğan, N., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/tea.20243

  • Farland-Smith, D. (2009). How does culture shape students’ perceptions of scientists? Cross-national comparative study of American and Chinese elementary students. Journal of Elementary Science Education (Vol. 21). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182355

  • Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the draw‐a‐ scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.19498594.1995.tb15762.x

  • Fleming, R. W. (1987). High‐school graduates’ beliefs about science‐technology‐society. II. the interaction among science, technology and society. Science Education, 71(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/ sce.3730710204

  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Güler, T., & Akman, B. (2006). 6 year old children’s views on science and scientists. Journal of Hacettepe University Education Faculty, 31, 55–66.

  • Gültekin, M. (2013). The metaphors that primary education teacher candidates use regarding curriculum. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 126–141.

  • Hanley, P., Bennett, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2014). The Inter-relationship of Science and Religion: A typology of engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1210–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09500693.2013.853897

  • İrez, S. (2009). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education, 93(3), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20305

  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A Family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science and Education, 20(7), 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4

  • Jensen, D. (2006). Metaphors as a bridge to understanding educational and social contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500104

  • Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2005). Examining students’ views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders. Science Education, 89(2), 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20053

  • Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualized " Family Resemblance Approach " : A Holistic Perspective on Nature of Science in Science Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(2), 77–90.

  • Kıral, B. (2017). Faculty of education students’ perspectıves to “scientist.” The Journal of International Social Research, 10(52), 773–782.

  • Koballa, T. R., & Crawley, F. E. (2018). The influence of attitude on science teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 85(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1985.tb09615.x

  • Kösem, Ş. (2017). Metaforic perspectives of teacher candidates in science and technology. International Congress of Eurasian Social Sciences (ICOESS), 8(28), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.206.

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2010). Metaphors, life, meaning, and language. Istanbul: Ithaki Publishing.

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science.

  • Lederman, N. G., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740207

  • Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teaching behavior? Science Education, 71(5), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710509

  • Lee, T. R. (2010). Young children’s conceptions of science and scientists. University of Washington. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001043

  • Liu, S., & Lederman, N. G. (2007). Exploring prospective teachers’ worldviews and conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1281–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/

  • Lloyd, S. H. (2016). Preschool teachers’ attitudes and beliefs toward science. Walden University.

  • Lucas, K. B., & Roth, W.-M. (1996). The nature of scientific knowledge and student learning: Two longitudinal case studies. Research in Science Education, 26(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356966

  • Mansour, N. (2011). Science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. the Islamic perpsective: Conflicting or compatible? Science Education, 95(2), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20418.Science

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousands Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • MoNE. (2017). Science course curriculum. Retrieved September 13, 2017, from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=143

  • Murcia, K., & Schibeci, R. (1999). Primary student teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1123–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290101

  • NRC. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A Guide for teaching and learning. (S. Olson & S. Loucks-Horsley, Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9596

  • Palmquist, B. C., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice teachers’ views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199708)34:6<595::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-I

  • Park, H., Nielsen, W., & Woodruff, E. (2013). Students’ conceptions of the nature of science: Perspectives from Canadian and Korean middle school students. Science & Education (Vol. 23). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191013-9613-6

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

  • Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261–278.

  • Rosenthal, D. B. (1993). Images of scientists: A comparison of biology and liberal studies majors. School Science and Mathematics, 93(4), 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1993.tb12227.x

  • Rubba, P. A., & Harkness, W. J. (1996). A new scoring procedure for the Views on Science‐Technology‐Society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500699

  • Saban, A. (2008). Primary school teachers ’ and their students ’ mental images about the concept of knowledge, 7(2), 421–455.

  • Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0950069032000119456

  • Saraç, E., & Cappellaro, E. (2015). The opinions of the primary school teachers and the pre-service primary school teachers about the nature of science. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 5(2), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.13114/MJH.2015214576

  • Şenel, T., & Aslan, O. (2014). The metaphoric perceptions of preservice early childhood teachers conceptions on science and scientist. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(2), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.36641

  • Sinnes, A. (2006). Three approaches to gender equity in science education. NorDiNa, 2(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.451

  • Solomon, J., Scott, L., & Duveen, J. (1996). Large‐scale exploration of pupils’ understanding of the nature of science. Science Education, 80(5), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<493::AIDSCE1>3.0.CO;2-6

  • Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration?

  • Tatar, E., Karakuyu, Y., & Tüysüz, C. (2011). Pre-servıce primary school teachers’ misunderstandings about nature of science. Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 29, 153–161.

  • Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (1999). Using metaphor to probe students’ conceptions of chemistry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290507

  • Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. J. (1996). Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science teaching. Science Education, 80(6), 711–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199611)80:6<711:: AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-M

  • Turgut, H. (2007). Scientific literacy for all. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 40(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000176

  • Türkaslan, M. (2014). Classroom teachers’ views toward the study of the nature of science. Unpublished master’s thesis. Zirve University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

  • Türkmen, H. (2008). Turkish primary students’ perceptions about scientist and what factors affecting the image of the scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 55–61.

  • Vesterinen, V.-M., Aksela, M., & Lavonen, J. (2013). Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in Nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Science & Education, 22(7), 1839–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9400-1

  • Wan, D., Zhang, H., & Wei, B. (2018). Impact of Chinese culture on pre-service science teachers’ views of the nature of science. Science and Education, 27(3–4), 321–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9968-9

  • Waters‐Adams, S. (2006). The relationship between understanding of the nature of science and practice: The influence of teachers’ beliefs about education, teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 919–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498351

  • Yakmacı, B. (1998). Science (biology, chemistry and physics) teachers views on the nature of science as a dimension of scientific literacy. Unpublished master’s thesis. Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.

  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (8th ed). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics