Examining the Relationship between Supportive Behaviors of School Principals and Teacher Leadership

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-Volume 10, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationships between supportive behaviors of school principals and teacher leadership in state high schools. A total of 485 teachers employed in high schools in Kastamonu, participated in this study. The research was designed using a correlational model. Data was collected via “Teacher Leadership Scale,” developed by Beycioğlu and Aslan (2010), and the “Principal Support Scale,” developed by Litrell (1992) and adapted into Turkish by Günbayı, Dağlı and Kalkan (2013). Arithmetic mean, standard deviation, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficients, and Simple Linear Regression were conducted to analyze the data. Results revealed that teachers’ perceptions of teacher leadership behaviors is at a high level; teachers exhibit such behaviors usually in terms of a professional improvement subscale; teachers’ perceptions of support from their principal is high; as school principals’ supporting behaviors increase, teachers’ levels of exhibiting teachers’ leadership behaviors also increase; school principal’s support was a significant predictor on all subscales of teacher leadership. The findings of the study are discussed in relation to literature and some suggestions are offered.

Keywords

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationships between supportive behaviors of school principals and teacher leadership in state high schools. A total of 485 teachers employed in high schools in Kastamonu, participated in this study. The research was designed using a correlational model. Data was collected via “Teacher Leadership Scale,” developed by Beycioğlu and Aslan (2010), and the “Principal Support Scale,” developed by Litrell (1992) and adapted into Turkish by Günbayı, Dağlı and Kalkan (2013). Arithmetic mean, standard deviation, t-test, ANOVA, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficients, and Simple Linear Regression were conducted to analyze the data. Results revealed that teachers’ perceptions of teacher leadership behaviors is at a high level; teachers exhibit such behaviors usually in terms of a professional improvement subscale; teachers’ perceptions of support from their principal is high; as school principals’ supporting behaviors increase, teachers’ levels of exhibiting teachers’ leadership behaviors also increase; school principal’s support was a significant predictor on all subscales of teacher leadership. The findings of the study are discussed in relation to literature and some suggestions are offered.

Keywords


  • Akert, N. & Martin, B. N. (2012). The role of teacher leaders in school improvement through the perceptions of principals and teachers. International Journal of Education, 4(4), 284-299.

  • Anderson, K. D. (2004). The nature of teacher leadership in schools as reciprocal influences between teacher leaders and principals. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(1), 97-113.

  • Barth, R. (1999) The teacher leader. Providence RI: The Rhode Island Foundation.

  • Barth, R. (2001). Teacher Leader. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(6), 443-449.

  • Beachum, F. & Dentith, A. M. (2004). Teacher leader creating cultures of school renewal and transformation. The Educational Forum, 68(3), 276-286.

  • Beycioğlu, K. (2009). İlköğretim okullarında öğretmenlerin sergiledikleri liderlik rollerine ilişkin bir değerlendirme: Hatay ili örneği. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Malatya.

  • Beycioğlu, K. ve Aslan, B. (2010). Öğretmen liderliği ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İlkoğretim Online, 9(2), 764-775.

  • Beycioğlu, K. ve Aslan, B. (2012). Öğretmen ve yöneticilerin öğretmen liderliğine ilişkin görüşleri: Bir karma yöntem çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 18(2), 191-223.

  • Buckner, K. G. ve McDowelle, J. O. (2000). Developing teacher leaders: Providing encouragement, opportunities, and support. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 35-41.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Can, N. (2006). Öğretmen liderliğinin geliştirilmesinde müdürün rol ve stratejileri. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 349-363.

  • Can, N. (2013). Öğretmen liderliği. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Cemaloğlu, N. (2002). Öğretmen performansının arttırılmasında okul yöneticisinin rolü. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 153(154), 153-154.

  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, B. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL. Ankara: Pegem

  • Childs-Bowen, D. Moller, G. & Scrivner, J. (2000). Principals: Leaders of leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 84, 27-34.

  • Danielson, C. (2006). Teacher leadership that strengthens professional practice. Alexandria VA: ASCD.

  • Deal, T. ve Peterson, K. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.

  • Frost. D. & Durrant. J. (2003). Teacher leadership: Rationale, strategy and impact. School Leadership ve Management, 23(2), 173-186.

  • Frost. D. & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: Towards a research agenda. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 479-498.

  • Fullan, M. (2011). Change leaders. Learning to do what matters most. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

  • Günbayı, İ., Dağlı, E. ve Kalkan, F. (2013). İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin destekleyici davranışları ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 4(4), 575-602.

  • Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. UK: Teachers College.

  • Harris, A. (2002). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Education Journal, 59, 22-23.

  • Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership and Management, 23(3), 313-324.

  • Harris, A. (2005). Teacher leadership: More than just a feel-good factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 201-219.

  • Harris, A. ve Lambert, L. (2003). Building leadership capacity for school improvement. Philadelphia: Open University.

  • Harris, A. & Muijs, D. (2003). Teacher leadership: Principles and practice. London, UK: National College for School Leadership.

  • Harris, A. & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Philadelphia: Open

  • Harrison, C. & Killion, R. (2007). Ten roles for teacher leaders. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 74-77.

  • Hughes, A. L. Matt, J. J. V & O’Reilly, F. L. (2014). Principal support is imperative to the retention of teachers in hard-to-staff schools. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(1), 129-134. doi:10.11114/jets.v3i1.622.

  • Ingersoll, R. M. & Smith, T. M. (2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter? NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 28-40.

  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2008). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil.

  • Karasar, N. (1999). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi - kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Ankara: Nobel.

  • Katzenmeyer, M. & Moller, G. (1996). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. California: Corwin.

  • Kılınç, A. Ç., Cemaloğlu, N. ve Savaş, G. (2015). The relationship between teacher leadership, teacher professionalism, and perceived stress. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 58, 1-26. doi: 10.14689/ejer.2015.58.5.

  • Kılınç, A. Ç. ve Recepoğlu E. (2013). Ortaöğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin öğretmen liderliğine ilişkin algı ve beklentileri. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 175-215.

  • Kölükçü, D. (2011). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin öğretmen liderliğini gösteren davranışlarının gereklilik ve sergilenme derecesine ilişkin görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Başkent Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Lai, E., & Cheung, D. (2015). Enacting teacher leadership: The role of teachers in bringing about change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5), 673-692.

  • Lambert, L. (1998). Building leadership capacity in schools. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Virginia: ASCD

  • Leithwood, K. (2003). Teacher leadership: Its nature, development, and impact on schools and students. In M. Brundrett, N. Burton ve R. Smith (Eds), Leadership in education (pp. 103-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Little, J. W. (1995). Contested ground: The basis of teacher leadership in two restructuring high schools. The Elementary School Journal 96(1), 47-63.

  • Little, J. W. (2003). Constructions of teacher leadership in three periods of policy and reform activism. School Leadership ve Management, 23(4), 401-419.

  • Mangin, M. M. (2007). Facilitating elementary principals' support for instructional teacher leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 319-357.

  • Muijs, D. & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership - improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 31(4), 437-448.

  • Muijs, D. & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 961-972.

  • Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. California: Corwin.

  • Özdemir, A. (2010). İlköğretim okullarında algılanan yönetici desteğinin ve bireycilik-ortaklaşa davranışçılığın örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile ilişkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 16(1),

  • Özdemir, S. ve Kılınç, A. Ç. (2015). Teacher leadership: A conceptual analysis. In K. Beycioğlu ve P. Pashiardis (Eds), Multidimensional perspectives on principal leadership effectiveness. (pp. 257-282) . USA: IGI Global.

  • Öztürk, N. (2015). Eğitim örgütlerinde örgüt kültürü ve öğretmen liderliği: Lider- üye etkileşiminin aracılık rolü. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Gaziantep.

  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). Leadership: What is in it for schools? New York: Routledge ve Falmer.

  • Singh, K. & Billingsley, B. S. (2001). Professional support and its effects on teachers’ commitment. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 229-239.

  • Şama, E. ve Kolamaz, C. (2011). Destekleyici ve geliştirici liderlik özellikleri ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 313-342.

  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş. Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks.

  • Wallace, M. (2002). Modeling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), 163-186.

  • York-Barr, J. & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255-31.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics