Author :
Abstract
In this study, it was revealed how the developed "Practice Teacher Training Program" was perceived by the participants. The "Practice Teacher Training program (PTTP)" consisting of nine learning moduleshas been developed by the researcher as a result of the needs analysis conducted throughout Turkey. The research was conducted with mixed methods research design. The experimental phase was completed in 30 hours with 15 Classroom Teachers. As a result of the descriptive analysis of the qualitative data obtained from the participants during and at the end of the experimental process, it is understood that the PTTP brought in the terminal behavior. It has been understood that the training program developed awareness about the ideal internship environment and mentoring, as well as improving the communication skills and reflective behaviors of the mentors. It was also determined that it is useful for the system in terms of its contribution to the training of qualified preservice teacher and providing professional and personal development. In addition, the training program was found to be successful in terms of improving the pre-service teacher's development, evaluation and communication skills.
Keywords
Abstract
In this study, it was revealed how the developed "Practice Teacher Training Program" was perceived by the participants. The "Practice Teacher Training program (PTTP)" consisting of nine learning moduleshas been developed by the researcher as a result of the needs analysis conducted throughout Turkey. The research was conducted with mixed methods research design. The experimental phase was completed in 30 hours with 15 Classroom Teachers. As a result of the descriptive analysis of the qualitative data obtained from the participants during and at the end of the experimental process, it is understood that the PTTP brought in the terminal behavior. It has been understood that the training program developed awareness about the ideal internship environment and mentoring, as well as improving the communication skills and reflective behaviors of the mentors. It was also determined that it is useful for the system in terms of its contribution to the training of qualified preservice teacher and providing professional and personal development. In addition, the training program was found to be successful in terms of improving the pre-service teacher's development, evaluation and communication skills.
Keywords
- AERA (2005). The impact of new teacher induction on teacher practices and student learning. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal April 13, Unpublished Work.
- AIR. (2015). Promoting teacher effectivenss teacher ınduction and mentoring brief. july, California.
- Başar, H. (2002). Sınıf yönetimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
- Broom, H. (1996). Building professional partnerships: A mentor program for special education teachers. 74.Orlando: FL; April, 1-5.
- Clark, S. K. (2012). Through the eyes of the novice teacher: Perceptions of mentoring support. Part of the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons, retrieved on October 3,2016 from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/teal_facpub
- Deutsch, N.L. and Spencer, R. (2009). Capturing the magic: Assesing the quality of youth mentoring relationships. New Directions for Youth Development, 121,47-70.
- Duckworth, V.; Maxwell, B. (2015) Extending the mentor role in initial teacher education: embracing social justice. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(1), 4-20.
- Gershenfeld, S. (2014). A review of undergraduate mentoring programs. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 365-391.
- Hirst, A., Short, C. and Rinne, S. (2014). The role of mentoring in supporting Apprenticeships. Research paper 20, April- 2014.
- Parra, G.R., DuBois,D,L., Neville, H.A., Pugh-Lilly, A.O; Povinelli, N (2002). Mentoring relationships for youth: ınvestigation of a process-oriented model. Journal of Community Psychology, 367-388.
- Garvey, D.J (2000). Mentoring beginning teachers program handbook. The alberta teacher’s association, executive secretary:Thomas Gordon .
- Keller, T.E (2005b). The stages and development of mentoring relationships. Handbook of youth mentoring. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage
- Kiraz, E. (2001). Aday öğretmen- rehber öğretmen etkileşimi: mesleki gelişimde diğer boyut. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5, 85- 92.
- Kochan, F. (2013). Analyzing the relationships between culture and mentoring. Mentoring &Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(4), 412-430.
- Miller L., Pollard E, Neathey F, Hill D. Ritchie H. (2005). Gender segregation in apprenticeships. Institute for Employment Studies, EOC Working Paper Series No.25.
- Moir, E., and Gless, J. (2004). Quality induction: an investment in teachers. New teacher center. Retrived on April, 15, 2008 from http://www.newteachercenter.org/article-CCETQInd.html
- NCATE (2010). Commissioned by the national council for accreditation of teacher education. Report of the blue ribbon panel on clinical preparation and partnerships for improved student learning.
- Odell, S. J., Huling,L., Sweeny, B. (1999). Conceptualizing quality mentoring: Background information. Indianapolis, IN: Kappa Delta Pi.
- Rowley, J.B (1999). The good mentor. Supporting New Teachers, 56(8), 20-22.
- Wong, H. (2004). Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving. NASSP, Bulletin, 87(638).
- Yalın Uçar, M. (2017). The effect of mentor training program on competence and attitude regarding mentorship. Journal of Family Counseling and Aducation, 2(1), 50-71. E n t r y D a