Investigation Of Pre-service Teachers’ Learning Styles And Beliefs About Mathematical Problem Solving

Author :  

Year-Number: 2017-Volume 9, Issue 4
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate pre-service teachers’ learning styles and mathematical problem solving beliefs according to gender, department, take course for mathematical problem solving, importance level of problem solving and perception of knowing problem solving steps. In addition, the purpose of this study is to determine the effects of pre-service teachers’ learning styles on mathematical problem solving beliefs. In this research, survey model has been used which is descriptive research methods. The study group of this research consists of 219 mathematics pre-service teachers. Pre-service teachers are studied in primary and secondary mathematics education department at the one of the education faculty in the center of big city. Kolb learning style scale, belief scale towards mathematical problem solving and personal information form have been used as data collection tools. In the analysis of the obtained data, chi-square, t-test, Kruskall Wallis, one way ANOVA and regression analysis were performed. The results of the data analysis demonstrated that pre-service teachers’ dominant learning styles are converger and assimilator. There isn’t any significant differences between learning styles and mathematical problem solving beliefs according to gender, department and importance level of problem solving. The same analysis also revealed that there were significant differences between learning styles and mathematical problem solving beliefs according to take course for mathematical problem solving. Pre-service teachers' beliefs about mathematical problem solving candidates were found to be similar and did not differ according to their learning styles. In the study, a low-level significant correlation was found between concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization and active experimentation variables which are components of Kolb learning styles model and mathematical problem solving beliefs. Reflective observation which is component of learning style is determined to be significant predictors of pre-service teachers’ beliefs for solving mathematical problems.

Keywords

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate pre-service teachers’ learning styles and mathematical problem solving beliefs according to gender, department, take course for mathematical problem solving, importance level of problem solving and perception of knowing problem solving steps. In addition, the purpose of this study is to determine the effects of pre-service teachers’ learning styles on mathematical problem solving beliefs. In this research, survey model has been used which is descriptive research methods. The study group of this research consists of 219 mathematics pre-service teachers. Pre-service teachers are studied in primary and secondary mathematics education department at the one of the education faculty in the center of big city. Kolb learning style scale, belief scale towards mathematical problem solving and personal information form have been used as data collection tools. In the analysis of the obtained data, chi-square, t-test, Kruskall Wallis, one way ANOVA and regression analysis were performed. The results of the data analysis demonstrated that pre-service teachers’ dominant learning styles are converger and assimilator. There isn’t any significant differences between learning styles and mathematical problem solving beliefs according to gender, department and importance level of problem solving. The same analysis also revealed that there were significant differences between learning styles and mathematical problem solving beliefs according to take course for mathematical problem solving. Pre-service teachers' beliefs about mathematical problem solving candidates were found to be similar and did not differ according to their learning styles. In the study, a low-level significant correlation was found between concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization and active experimentation variables which are components of Kolb learning styles model and mathematical problem solving beliefs. Reflective observation which is component of learning style is determined to be significant predictors of pre-service teachers’ beliefs for solving mathematical problems.

Keywords


  • Açık, S. (2013). Lise öğrencilerinin öğrenme stilleri ve problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.

  • Aljaberi, N.M. (2015). University students’ learning styles and their ability to solve mathematical problems. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(4), 152-165.

  • Ali, R.M., & Kor, L.K. (2007). Association between brain hemisphericity, learning styles and confidence in using graphics calculators for mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 127-131.

  • Anderson, J. (1996). Some teachers’ beliefs and perceptions of problem solving. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology of mathematics education (pp. 30-37). Melbourne: MERGA

  • Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.

  • Bahar, H. H., Özen, Y. & Gülaçtı, F (2009). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin cinsiyet ve branşa göre akademik başarı durumları ile öğrenme stillerinin incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(1), 69-86.

  • Bulut, S. ve Tat, E.T. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel problem çözme performanslarının incelenmesi. 18. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı’nda sunulan bildiri, Ege Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, İzmir.

  • Cooney, T. J. (1985) A beginning teacher's view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324-336.

  • Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş. Trabzon: Celepler Matbaacılık.

  • De Corte, E., & Op 't Eynde, P. (2002). Unraveling students' belief systems relating to mathematics learning and problem solving. In A. Rogerson (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference "The Humanistic renaissance in mathematics education (pp. 96 -101). Palermo, Sicily: The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project.

  • Elçi, A.N. (2008). Öğrenme stillerine uygun olarak seçilen öğrenme yöntemlerinin öğrenci başarısına, matematiğe yönelik tutumuna ve kaygısına etkileri. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.

  • Fadlelmula, F.K., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2011). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions about mathematics problems and the nature of problem solving. Education Research Journal, 1(3), 30-36.

  • Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of style. ASEE Prism, 6(4), 18-23.

  • Fer, S. (2003). Matematik, fizik ve kimya öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin öğrenme biçemlerine göre kolay öğrendikleri öğrenme etkinlikleri. Çağdaş Eğitim, 28(304), 33-43.

  • Frykholm, J. (2003). Teachers’ tolerance for discomfort: Implications for curricular reform in mathematics. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 19(2), 125-149.

  • Gencel, İ.E. (2007). Kolb’ün deneyimsel öğrenme kuramına dayalı öğrenme stilleri envanteri – III’ü Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), 120-139.

  • Gülten, D.Ç., Soytürk, İ., & Derelioğlu, Y. (2012). The relationship between preservice teachers’ computer use and their beliefs about math literacy and mathematical problem solving. International Conference on HigherEducation, 29 May- 03 June 2012.

  • Güneş, S. (2012). Ortaöğretim Matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel problem çözmeye ilişkin inançlarını yordamada eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerinin incelenmesi. X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi. Niğde Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi. 27-30 Haziran 2012. Niğde.

  • Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2011). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematiksel problem çözmeye ilişkin inançlarını yordamada epistemolojik inançlarının incelenmesi. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 206-220

  • Hart, L. C. (2002). Pre-service teachers’’ beliefs and practice after participating in an integrated content/methods course. School Science and Mathematics, 102(1), 4–15.

  • Kailani, I.B., & Mkomange, W.C. (2012). Prospective secondary teachers’ beliefs about mathematical problem solving. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 1-13.

  • Kandemir, M.A. ve Gür, H. (2009). The use of creative problem solving scenarioa in mathematics education: Views of some prospective teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1628-1635.

  • Kayan, F. (2007). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel problem çözmeye yönelik inanışları. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Kayan, F. ve Çakıroğlu E. (2008). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel problem çözmeye yönelik inançları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 218-226.

  • Kitchens, A. N., Barber, W.D., & Barber, D.B. (1991). Left brain / right brain theory: Implications for developmental math instruction. Review of Research in Development Education, 8(3), (ERIC ED, 354 963).

  • Leng, Y.L., Hoo, C.T., Chong, J., & Tin, L.G. (1998). Differential brain functioning profiles among adolescent mathematics achievers. The Mathematics Educator, 3(1), 113-128.

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  • Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning style inventory – version3.1. Hay Group. Retrieved on 016.07.2010, from http://www.haygroup.com

  • Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory-Version3.1: 2005 technical specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Resources Direct.

  • Küçükkaragöz, H., et.al. (2009). İlköğretim matematik, fen bilgisi ve Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme stilleri ve problem çözme becerilerinin incelenmesi. 1. Uluslararası Türkiye Eğitim Araştırmaları Kongresi, Çanakkale Üniversitesi, Çanakkale.

  • Lloyd, G., & Wilson, S. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher’s conceptions of functions on his implementations of a reform curriculum. Journal forResearch in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 248-274.

  • Louange, J. E. G. (2007). An Examination of the relationships between teaching and learning styles, and the number sense and problem solving ability of year 7 students. Online Submission. ERIC Number: ED500706, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED520910.pdf.

  • Lovat, T. J., & Smith, D. (1995). Curriculum: Action on reflection revisited. Australia: Social Science Press.

  • Memnun, S.D., Akkaya, R., & Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2012).The effect of prospective teachers’ problem solving beliefs on self- efficacy beliefs about mathematical literacy. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(4), 289-298.

  • Memnun, S.D., Hart, L.C., & Akkaya, R. (2012). Teachers trainees’ beliefs about mathematical problem solving. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society For Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 4469-4476). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB] (2013a). Ortaöğretim matematik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara: MEB.

  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB] (2013b). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara.

  • Narlı, S., Özgen, K., & Alkan, H. (2011). In the context of multiple intelligences theory, intelligent data analysis of learning styles was based on rough set theory. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 613-618.

  • Nisbet, S., & Warren, E. (2000). Primary schools teachers' beliefs relating to mathematics, teaching and assessing mathematics and factors that influence those beliefs. Mathematics Teacher Educationand Development, 2, 34-47.

  • Orhun, N. (2007). An investigation into the mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics with respect to learning style according togender. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(3), 321-333.

  • Özer, D. (2010). İlköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin öğrenme stilleri ile problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Burdur.

  • Özgen, K. (2012). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımı kapsamında, öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerine uygun öğrenme etkinlikleri geliştirilmesi: Fonksiyon ve türev kavramı örneklemesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.

  • Özgen, K. ve Alkan, H. (2014). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme yaklaşımı kapsamında, öğrencilerin öğrenme stillerine uygun öğrenme etkinliklerinin akademik başarı ve tutuma etkileri: fonksiyon ve türev kavramı örneklemesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1-38.

  • Özgen, K., Tataroğlu, B., & Alkan, H. (2011a). An examination of multiple intelligence domains and learning styles of pre-service mathematics teachers: Their reflections on mathematics education. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(2), 168-181.

  • Özgen, K., Tataroğlu, B., & Alkan, H. (2011b). An examination of brain dominance and learning styles of pre-service mathematics teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 743-750.

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

  • Peker, M. (2009). Pre-service teachers’ teaching anxiety about mathematics and their learning styles. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(4), 335-345.

  • Peker, M., Mirasyedioğlu, Ş., & Aydın, B. (2004). Matematik öğretmenlerinin dikkate alabilecekleri öğrenme stilleri: McCarthy modeli. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 163. Retrieved on 03.05.2010, from http://yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/163/peker.htm.

  • Perry, C., & Ball, I. (2004). Teacher subject specialisms and their relationships to learning styles, multiple intelligences and Psychological types: Implications for course development. Teacher Development, 8(1), 9-28.

  • Prescott, A., & Cavanagh, M. (2006). An investigation of pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs as they begin their teacher training. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces (Vol. 2, pp. 424–431). Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Adelaide, SA: MERGA.

  • Raymond, A. M. (1997). In consistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 552–575.

  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education, (pp.102-119). New York: Macmillan.

  • Schoenfeld, A.H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Beliefs system, social cognition, and metacognition as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7, 329–363.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1-94.

  • Seng, S. H., & Yeo, A. (2000). Spatial visualization ability and learning style preference of low achieving students. (ED446055). Retrieved on November 24, 2010, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content _storage_01/0000000b/80/23/29/a3.pdf

  • Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ belief and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.,), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.127–146), New York: Macmillian.

  • Wilkins, J., & Brand, B. (2004). Change in pre-service teachers’ beliefs: An evaluation of a mathematics methods course. School Science & Mathematics, 104(5), 226-232.

  • Wilson, M., & Cooney, T. J. (2000). Mathematics teacher change and development. The role of beliefs. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen& G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematical education? (pp. 127-148). Dordrecht: Kluwer Acadmic Publishers.

  • Yılmaz, K. ve Delice, A. (2007). Öğretmen adaylarının epistemolojik ve problem çözme inançlarının problem çözme sürecine etkisi. XVI. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi (s.575–581), Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Tokat.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics