Doctoral Theses İn The Field Of Educational Administration İn The 14-year Process Following The Establishment Of Yök
Author :
Abstract
This work has attempted to identify researches prepared in Turkish Universities as doctoral theses in the area of Education Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics of Education (EASPEE) in terms of distribution according to university, the knowledge levels of the upper level administrators concerning the subject area of these works, the degree of applicability of the developed suggestions; and opinions about the application of these suggestion. It has been established that one hundred and fifty-three doctoral theses were carried out in fourteen out of eighteen EASPEE departments in Turkey's fifty-six universities between the years of 1983-1996. The upper level administrators which doctoral theses were done about their organization have become the population of this study. These organizations include; The Ministry of National Education, Banks, organizations bound to the ministry, private organizations and Higher Education Association. A survey was carried out to collect data from one hundred and fifty-five administrators in these seventy-three organizations. According to the results , it was found that the knowledge level of the administrators on the awareness level for the Ph.D studies done for their organizations was 'little' some statistically significant differences were found in terms on "type of organizations" and "being attended to an in-service training course or not". In the studies, the administrators determined the applicability levels of the suggestions as 'medium'. A statistically significant difference was found according to the "type of organization", "education level" and "field of graduation" of the respondents. The respondents stated that suggestions concerning their organizations were implemented at "medium" level. It was also found that there were statistically significant differences among the opinions of the administrators of the application level of the suggestions according to "type of organizations" and 'job title" on the respondents. Alongside the difference between those of a high education level and those of a low education level, a statistically significant difference was found between those who had received in-service training and those who had not, in that the former group carried out the suggestions to a greater degree. A positive relation was found of the administrators' suggestions between the "level of knowledge concerning the research" and the applicability (p= 0.042) and level of application(p=0.018). Similarly, there found a positive correlation between the opiruons of the administrators on "the applicability level" and "the level of application" of the suggestions at .001 probability level In conclusion, the largest obstacle in the implementation of the suggestions was shown to be " the personnel working for the organizations lacking the ability to carry out the suggestions".
Keywords
Abstract
This work has attempted to identify researches prepared in Turkish Universities as doctoral theses in the area of Education Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics of Education (EASPEE) in terms of distribution according to university, the knowledge levels of the upper level administrators concerning the subject area of these works, the degree of applicability of the developed suggestions; and opinions about the application of these suggestion. It has been established that one hundred and fifty-three doctoral theses were carried out in fourteen out of eighteen EASPEE departments in Turkey's fifty-six universities between the years of 1983-1996. The upper level administrators which doctoral theses were done about their organization have become the population of this study. These organizations include; The Ministry of National Education, Banks, organizations bound to the ministry, private organizations and Higher Education Association. A survey was carried out to collect data from one hundred and fifty-five administrators in these seventy-three organizations. According to the results , it was found that the knowledge level of the administrators on the awareness level for the Ph.D studies done for their organizations was 'little' some statistically significant differences were found in terms on "type of organizations" and "being attended to an in-service training course or not". In the studies, the administrators determined the applicability levels of the suggestions as 'medium'. A statistically significant difference was found according to the "type of organization", "education level" and "field of graduation" of the respondents. The respondents stated that suggestions concerning their organizations were implemented at "medium" level. It was also found that there were statistically significant differences among the opinions of the administrators of the application level of the suggestions according to "type of organizations" and 'job title" on the respondents. Alongside the difference between those of a high education level and those of a low education level, a statistically significant difference was found between those who had received in-service training and those who had not, in that the former group carried out the suggestions to a greater degree. A positive relation was found of the administrators' suggestions between the "level of knowledge concerning the research" and the applicability (p= 0.042) and level of application(p=0.018). Similarly, there found a positive correlation between the opiruons of the administrators on "the applicability level" and "the level of application" of the suggestions at .001 probability level In conclusion, the largest obstacle in the implementation of the suggestions was shown to be " the personnel working for the organizations lacking the ability to carry out the suggestions".
Keywords
- Açıkalın, A. (1994). Çağdaş örgütlerde insan kaynağının (personel) yönetimi. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları No: 7
- Akarsu, F. (1990). Eğitim araştırmalın 1960-1988 niceliksel bir analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim. (Özel Sayı) 4, 3-17.
- Akyol, B. , Yavuzkurt, T.(2016). Türkiye’de lisansüstü tezlerde eğitim denetimi Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi 5(2), 908-926.
- Alkan, C. (1977). Eğitim teknolojisi: Kavramlar- yöntemler. Ankara: Yargıçoğlu Matbaası.
- Alkan, C. (1989). Eğitim biliminde araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 23- 27.
- Badavan, Y. (1985). Üniversitelerde eğitim yönetimi ve denetimi alanında yapılmış tez çalışmaları Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
- Balcı, A. (1988). Eğitim yönetiminde araştırmaların durumu. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1-2), 421434
- Balcı, A. (1991). Eğitim yönetiminde araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1): 81- 94.
- Balcı, A. (1993). Örgütsel davranışta araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 47-
- Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1994). Türk eğitim sisteminde araştırma eğitimi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1).
- Cafoğlu, Z. (1996) Eğitimde toplam kalite yöntemi. İstanbul: Avni Akyol Umut Kültür ve Eğitim Vakfı Yayınları. Yayın No: 3.
- Doğan, İ. (1994). Bilgi toplumu, uzun ince bir yol. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1),
- Duman, H. (1990) Uluslararası bilgi ve belge sağlayan merkezler, Ankara: Enformasyon ve Dokümantasyon Hizmetleri Vakfı
- Ergün, M., Recepoğlu, E., Küçük, Z. A. ve Oğuz, K. (2014). Türkiye’deki üniversitelerde eğitim denetimi alanında yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelemesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 22(1), 25-40
- Gürüz, K. (1994). Yükseköğretimde Bilim ve Eğitim. Bilim ve Eğitim. 97-115, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi. Ankara: TUBA Bilimsel Toplantı Serileri:2
- Güvenç, B. (1994). Türkiye‟ de sosyal bilimler gelişmeler ve süreklilikler. Dünya'da ve Türkiye'de bilim, etik ve üniversite. (s. 23-35). Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi (TÜBA), Bilimsel Toplantı Serileri, 1.
- Herriot, R. William, F. (1982). Two images of schools as organizations: A refinement and elaboration Educational Administration Quarterly. 20(4), 41-57
- Kaptan, S. (1982). Bilimsel araştırma teknikleri ve istatistik yöntemleri, Ankara: Rehber Yayınevi.
- Karasar, N. (1984). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Hacettepe Taş Kitapçılık.
- Karasar, N. (1993) Araştırma kültürü, Türk Araştırma bilim teknoloji ve eğitim politikalarının kanayan yarası. Eğitim yönetimi ve planlaması ve halk eğitimi, Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi Yayınları
- Kaya, Ç., Yazıcı, A. Ş., Deliveli, K. ve Hoşgörür, V. (2016) Türkiye’de eğitim denetimi alanında yapılan lisansüstü çalışmaların değerlendirilmesi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 38-51.
- Kerlinner, N. F. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research, New York: Holt, Rinehart And Winston
- Korkut, H. (1981) Üniversitelerimizde yapılan araştırmaların toplum sorunlarına donukluğu açısından değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmış doktora tezi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
- Korkut, H. (1984) Türk üniversiteleri ve üniversite araştırmaları. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları No: 134.
- Kök Sosyal ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Vakfı. (1992) Yükseköğretimde uygulamalar ve yönelimler. KÖK Sosyal ve stratejik araştırmalar vakfı eğitim araştırmaları komisyonu. Ankara: KÖK Eğitim araştırmaları Serisi No:
- Özoğlu, S. Ç. (1994). Bilim ve eğitim ilişkileri. Bilim ve Eğitim. 75-83, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi. Ankara: TUBA Bilimsel Toplantı Serileri:2
- Popper, K. (1995), Tarihselciliğin sefaleti, İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları.
- Varış, F.(1972). Türkiye’de lisansüstü eğitim, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,10(1-2), 51-74.
- Varış, F.(1973). Türkiye’de lisansüstü eğitim: Sosyal bilimlerde. Ankara: Kalite Matbaası.
- Varış, F. (1981). (1981). Eğitim bilimine giriş. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları.
- Varış, F. (1981). Türkiye'de lisansüstü eğitim, pozitif bilimlerin temel ve uygulamalı alanlarında, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
- Yılmaz, T. , Altun, B. , Uygun, H. , Hoşgörür, V.(2016). Eğitim denetimine ilişkin Türkiye’de yayımlanmış makalelerin değerlendirilmesi. MSKU Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi MSKU 3(1), 47-63.
- Ward, A. Bruce, H. Charles, S. (1975) Evatuation of published educational research, a national survey. American Educational Research Journal, 12(2), 109-128.