Author :
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analiyse the experiences of high school students regarding the application of fundamental high school, who prepare for the university exam, and attend to fundamental high schools and public high schools, via their own opinions. For this purpose, the study was conducted with a phenomenological research approach. The main analysis of unit was students who attended both fundamental high schools and public high schools, and preparing for university entrance exams, also known as YGS and LYS. Research data was collected with in-depth interwievs with 20 last year high school students. The interwievs were conducted in accordance with semi-structured interwiev form which was prepared by the researchers. Data obtained through interwievs was analysed with content analysis and two main themes emerged. One of those theme was named as “Equity”, and the other was named as “Fundamental High School Phenomenon”. These themes were presented by quotations of participants and results were discussed.
Keywords
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analiyse the experiences of high school students regarding the application of fundamental high school, who prepare for the university exam, and attend to fundamental high schools and public high schools, via their own opinions. For this purpose, the study was conducted with a phenomenological research approach. The main analysis of unit was students who attended both fundamental high schools and public high schools, and preparing for university entrance exams, also known as YGS and LYS. Research data was collected with in-depth interwievs with 20 last year high school students. The interwievs were conducted in accordance with semi-structured interwiev form which was prepared by the researchers. Data obtained through interwievs was analysed with content analysis and two main themes emerged. One of those theme was named as “Equity”, and the other was named as “Fundamental High School Phenomenon”. These themes were presented by quotations of participants and results were discussed.
Keywords
- Akkan, H. (2000). Öğretmen ve yönetici görüşlerine göre ilköğretim birinci kademe okullarının eğitimde fırsat ve imkan eşitliği açısından incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu.
- Alcott, B., & Rose, P. (2016). Does private schooling narrow wealth inequalities in learning outcomes? Evidence from East Africa. Oxford Review of Education. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2016.1215611
- Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, S. L. (2007). Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 167-180
- Alpman, P. S. (2009). Toplumsal sınıflar ve eğitim. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
- Althusser, L. (1991). İdeoloji ve devletin ideolojik aygıtları. (Y. Alp & M.Özışık, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim. (Orijinal basım tarihi, 1974).
- Apple, M. W. (2004a). Eğitim ve iktidar, (E. Bulut, Çev.). İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları (Orijinal basım tarihi, 1982).
- Apple, M. W. (2004b). Neoliberalizm ve eğitim politikaları üzerine eleştirel yazılar (F. Gök vd.,Çev.). Ankara: Eğitim Sen.
- Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative meta-analysis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267. doi: 10.3102/0013189X07306523
- Au, W. (2008). Between education and the economy: High‐stakes testing and the contradictory location of the new middle class. Journal of Education Policy, 23(5), 501-5013. doi: 10.1080/02680930802148941
- Au, W. (2009). Unequal by design. New York: Routledge.
- Au, W. (2010). The idiocy of policy: The anti-democratic curriculum of high-stakes testing. Critical Education, 1(1), 1-16.
- Berliner, D. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational reform. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 949-995. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00682.x
- Bourdieu, P. (2006). Pratik nedenler (H. Uğur Tanrıöver, Çev.). İstanbul: Hil Yayınları. (Orijinal basım tarihi,
- Bowles, S. (1972). Schooling and inequality from generation to generation. Journal of Political Economy, 80(3), 219-251.
- Bowles, S. (1999). Eşitsiz eğitim ve toplumsal işbölümünün yeniden üretimi. (K. İnal, Çev.). Eğitim ve Yaşam, Bahar (13), 15. (Orijinal makalenin yayım tarihi, 1977)
- Collins, J. (2009). Social reproduction in classrooms and schools. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 33-48. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085242
- Condron, D. J. (2011). Egalitarianism and educational excellence compatible goals for affluent societies? Educational Researcher, 40(2), 47-55. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11401021
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of ‘No Child Left Behind’. Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245-260.
- DeMarrais, K. (2004). Qualitative interview studies: Learning through experience. In K. DeMarrais, & S. D. Lapan, (Eds.). Foundations for research (pp. 51-68). Mahwah: Lawrrence Erlbaum.
- Dündar, S. (2010). Eğitimde fırsatların eşitliği ve post-moderndeki dönüşümü: Türkiye örneği. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Elacqua, G. (2012). The impact of school choice and public policy on segregation: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Development, 32, 444-453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.08.003
- Fenwick, L. (2011). Curriculum reform and reproducing inequality in upper-secondary education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(6), 697-716. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2011.576773
- Foucault, M. (1992). Hapishanenin Doğuşu (M. A. Kılıçbay, Çev.). Ankara: İmge Yayınevi. (Orijinal basım tarihi,
- Haney, W. (2000). The myth of Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41).
- Hoadley, U. (2007). The reproduction of social class inequalities through mathematics pedagogies in South African primary schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(6), 679-706. doi: 10.1080/00220270701261169
- Horn, C. (2003). High-stakes testing and students: Stopping or perpetuating a cycle of failure? Theory Into Practice, 1, 30-41
- Kapferer, J. L. (1986). Curricula and the reproduction of structured social inequalities. Curriculum Inquiry, 16(1), 5-31. doi: 10.2307/1179550
- Kurul, N., Küçüker, E., Yolcu, H., Özdemir, T., Çokluk, Ö., Baykal, N. S., & Öztürk, H. T. (2013). Kapitalist sistemde öğrenme ve pazar ilişkisi: Metalaştırma, ölçme ve standartlaştırma. N. Kurul, T. Öztürk, & İ. Metinnam, (Ed.), Kamusal eğitim: Eleştirel yazılar içinde (s. 57-92). Ankara: Siyasal.
- Kümbetoğlu, B. (2005). Sosyolojide ve antropolojide niteliksel yöntem ve araştırma. İstanbul: Bağlam.
- Languille, S. (2016). ‘Affordable’ private schools in South Africa. Affordable for whom? Oxford Review of Education, 42(5), 528-542. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2016.1220086
- Levin, H. M., Cornelizs, I. & Hanisch-Cerda, B. (2013). Does educational privatisation promote social justice?. Oxford Review of Education, 39 (4), 514-532. doi: 10.1080/03054985/2013.825983
- Maitra, P., Pal, S. & Sharma, An. (2016). Absence of altruism? Female disadvantage in private school enrollment in India. World Development, 85, 105-125. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.04.005
- Marvasti, A. B. (2004). Qualitative research in sociology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Mavelli, L. (2014). Widening participation, the instrumentalization of knowledge and the reproduction of inequality. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(8), 860-869. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.934352
- Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
- Millî Eğitim Temel Kanunu İle Bazı Kanun ve Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamelerde Değişiklik Yapilmasına Dair Kanun (2014). T.C. Resmi Gazete, 6528, 01 Mart 2014. 18.02.2017 tarihinde http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/03/20140314-1.htm adresinden ulaşılılmıştır.
- Motala, S. (2009). Privatising public schooling in post-apartheid South Africa – equity considerations. Compare: A Journal of Comperative and International Education, 39 (2), 185-202. doi: 10.1080/03057920902750459
- Ngok, L. K. & David, K. K. (2004). Towards centralization and decentralization in educational development in China: The case of Shanghai. In M. Ka-Ho, (Ed.). Centralization and decentralization: Educational reforms and changing governance in Chinese societies (pp. 81-97). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Öztürk, E. (2015). Education and income inequality in Turkey: New evidence from panel data. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Punch, K. F. (2005). Sosyal araştırmalara giriş (Nitel ve Nicel Yaklaşımlar). (D. Bayrak, H. B. Arslan ve Z. Akyüz, Çev.). Ankara: Siyasal. (Orijinal basım tarihi, 1998).
- Rutz, H. J., & Balkan, E. M. (2016). Sınıfın yeniden üretimi: Eğitim, neoliberalizm ve İstanbul'da yeni orta sınıfın yükselişi. (N. Balkan, Çev.). İstanbul: h2o. (Orijinal basım tarihi, 2009).
- Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Srivastava, P. & Noronha, C. (2016). The myth of free and barrier-free access: India’s Right to Education Act— private schooling costs and household experiences. Oxford Education Review, 42(5), 561-578. doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1220087
- Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 116-135. doi:10.2307/2112778
- Thompson, G. L., & Allen, T. G. (2012). Four effects of the high-stakes testing movement on african american K-12 students. Journal of Negro Education, 81(3), 218-227. doi: 10.7709/jnegroeducation.81.3.0218
- Tooley, J. & Dixon, P. (2006). ‘De facto’ privatisation of education and the poor: İmplications of a study from sub-Saharan Africa and India. Compare: A Journal of Comperative and International Education, 36 (4), 443462. doi: 10.1080/03057920601024891
- Willis, P. (2016). İşçiliği öğrenmek. (D. Elhüseyni, Çev.). Ankara: Heretik. (Orjinal basım tarihi, 1975).
- Van Zanten, A. (2005). New modes of reproducing social inequality in education: The changing role of parents, teachers, schools and educational policies. European Educational Research Journal, 4(3), 155-169. doi:10.2304/eerj.2005.4.3.1
- Velaskar, P. (1990). Unequal schooling as a factor in the reproduction of social inequality in India. Sociological Bulletin, 39(1/2), 131-145.
- Yanık, B. (2004). Türkiye'de eğitim eşitsizliği. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
- Yıldız, S. (2015). Türkiye'de eğitim ve toplumsal katmanlaşma ilişkisi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Zeitlyn, B., Lewin, K. M., Chimombo, J. & Meke, E. (2015). Inside private secondary schools in Malawi: Access or exclusion?. International Journal of Educational Development, 43, 109-117. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.05.008