Investigation Of Mathematics Teachers’ Level Of Following Understanding, And Applying Educational Research

Author :  

Year-Number: 2017-Volume 9, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Determining teachers’ level of following, understanding and applying research in their disciplines and in the education of other disciplines in in-class activities is of great importance for further studies. This study aims to reveal the views of mathematics teachers about following, understanding and applying studies on mathematics education or different disciplines. As a result of the study, it has been determined that the research topics mathematics teachers attach importance are misconceptions, learning difficulty and attitudes towards mathematics. It is seen that teachers follow sources about mathematics education on the internet. Mathematics teachers do not participate in scientific meetings, and do not find in-service training seminars useful. The teachers do not follow scientific studies and do not find the language of scientific findings understandable. It was also revealed that teachers do not follow studies in other fields and that they think using them in their application would take time.

Keywords

Abstract

Determining teachers’ level of following, understanding and applying research in their disciplines and in the education of other disciplines in in-class activities is of great importance for further studies. This study aims to reveal the views of mathematics teachers about following, understanding and applying studies on mathematics education or different disciplines. As a result of the study, it has been determined that the research topics mathematics teachers attach importance are misconceptions, learning difficulty and attitudes towards mathematics. It is seen that teachers follow sources about mathematics education on the internet. Mathematics teachers do not participate in scientific meetings, and do not find in-service training seminars useful. The teachers do not follow scientific studies and do not find the language of scientific findings understandable. It was also revealed that teachers do not follow studies in other fields and that they think using them in their application would take time.

Keywords


  • Ahuja, S. (2012). Research results for quality schooling: Bridging the gap between research and practice. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices, 2(2), 206-214.

  • Anderson, L. W. (1997). The stories teachers tell and what they tell us. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(1), 131-136. doi: 10.1016/S0742051X(96)00035-2

  • Arends, R. (1990). Connecting the university to the school. In B. Joyce, (Ed.). Changing school culture through staff development (117-143). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Bauer, K., & Fisher, F. (2007). The education research–practice interface revisited: A scripting perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 221–236. doi: 10.1080/13803610701626150

  • Beycioglu, K., Ozer, N., & Ugurlu, C. T. (2010). Teachers’ views on educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1088-1093. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.004

  • Biddle, B. J., & Anderson, D. S. (1991). Social research and educational change. In D.S. Anderson & B.J. Biddle, (Eds.). Knowledge for policy: Improving education through research ( 1-20). London: Falmer Press.

  • Biesta, G. (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 295-301. doi: 10.1080/13803610701640227

  • Boardman, A. G., Argüelles, M. E., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Klingner, J. (2005). Special education teachers' views of research-based practices. The Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 168-180. doi: 10.1177/00224669050390030401

  • Boon, L., Gottschal, P., Otten, R., & De Vries, G. H. (1989). Disciplines, kundes en de kwaliteit van wetenschap. Onderwijskunde, gezondheidsvoorlichting en–opvoeding in internationaal perspectief [Disciplines, expertises and the quality of science. Educational science, health advice and health education in an international perspective]. Maastricht/Groningen, The Netherlands: RUL/RUG.

  • Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In R.C. Calfee & D. Berliner, (Eds.). Handbook on educational psychology ( 673-708). New York: Macmillan.

  • Broekkamp, H., & Van Hout Wolters, B. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review, symposium, and questionnaire. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 203-220. doi: 10.1080/13803610701626127

  • Bryan, L. A. & Abell, S. K. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121-139. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)10982736(199902)36:2<121::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-U

  • Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032009003

  • Chafouleas, S. M., & Riley-Tillman, T. C. (2005). Accepting the gap: An introduction to the special issue on bridging research and practice. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 455–458. doi: 10.1002/pits.20084

  • Çiltaş, (2012). Content analysis of the graduate thesis and dissertations in mathematics education in Turkey between 2005-2010. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(7), 211-228.

  • Çiltaş, A., Güler, G., & Sözbilir, M. (2012). Mathematics education research in Turkey: A content analysis study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 565-580.

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories- stories of teachers- school stories- stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24- 30.

  • Clarke, P. A. J., & Fournillier, J. B. (2012). Action research, pedagogy, and activity theory: Tools facilitating two instructors' interpretations of the professional development of four pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.013

  • Costa, N., Marques, L., & Kempa, R. (2000). Science teachers’ awareness of findings from educational research. Research in Science & Technological Education, 18(1), 37-44. doi: 10.1080/713694955

  • Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

  • Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Science, 47(2), 108-121. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00106

  • De Jong, O. (2004). Mind your step: Bridging the research-practice gap. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 64, 5-9.

  • De Vries, B., & Pieters, J. (2007). Knowledge sharing at conferences. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 237-247. doi: 10.1080/13803610701626168

  • De Vries, G. H. (1990). De ontwikkeling van wetenschap [The development of science]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.

  • Eilks, I., & Markic, S. (2011). Effects of a long-term participatory action research project on science teachers’ professional development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(3), 149-160.

  • Ekiz, D. (2006). Primary school teachers’ attitudes towards educational research. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 373-402.

  • Everett, S. A., Luera, G. R., & Otto, C. A. (2007). Pre-service elementary teachers bridge the gap between research and practice. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10763-006-9063-6

  • Everton, T., Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2000). Teachers’ perspectives on educational research: Knowledge and context. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(2), 167-182. doi: 10.1080/02607470050127081

  • Everton, T., Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2002). Educational research and the teacher. Research Papers in Education, 17, 373-401. doi: 10.1080/0267152022000031388

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (1998). Teachers as teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 21(1), 63-74. doi: 10.1080/0261976980210107

  • Gitlin, A., Barlow, L., Burbank, M. D., Kauchak, D., & Stevens, T. (1999). Pre-service teachers’ thinking on research: Implications for inquiry oriented teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 753769. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00015-3

  • Gore, J. M., & Gitlin, A. D. (2004). [Re] Visioning the academic-teacher divide: Power and knowledge in the educational community. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Teaching, 10(1), 35–58. doi: 10.1080/13540600320000170918

  • Greenwood, C. R., & Maheadly, L. (2001). Are future teachers aware of the gap between research and practice and what should they know? Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(4), 333-347. doi:

  • Groth, R. E., & Bergner, J. A. (2007). Teachers’ perspectives on mathematics education research reports. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 809-825. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.12.002

  • Güler, G. (2015). Mathematics education studies in Turkey between 2009 and 2014: A descriptive study. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research MAJER, 15, 46-65.

  • Hallinan, M.T. (1996). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Sociology of Education, 131-134. doi:

  • Harbers, H. (1986). Sociale wetenschappen en hun speelruimte [Social sciences and their room to play]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1997). Teaching as a research based profession: Possibilities and prospects. London: Teacher Training Agency.

  • Harrington, J. (1991). Applying a relative ranking model to the self- assessment of extended performances. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2(1), 17-25.

  • Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 449-471. doi: 10.1080/0305498032000153025

  • Huberman, M. (1993). Linking the practitioner and researcher communities for school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/0924345930040101

  • Hurd, P. D. (1991). Issues in linking research to science teaching. Science Education, 75(6), 723-732. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750611

  • İlhan, N., Sözbilir, M., Şekerci, A. R., & Yıldırım, A. (2015). Turkish science teachers’ use of educational research and resources. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1231-1248

  • Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2005). Institutional strategies to link teaching and research. York: Higher Education Academy.

  • Jenkins, E.W. (2000). What can physics teachers learn from research in physics education? Physics Education, 35(4), 245-250. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/35/4/04

  • Kennedy, M. M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4-12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X026007004

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1991). Science and behavioral research. In D.S. Anderson & B.J. Biddle, (Eds.). Knowledge for policy: Improving education through research ( 87-102). London: Falmer Press.

  • Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research Chicago, IL, University Press.

  • Lamm, Z. (1993). The pedagogic significance of the problem of structure of knowledge. In Y. Danielov, (Ed.). Planning educational policy (1993-94). Tel Aviv: Machon

  • Lather, P. (2004). Scientific research use in education: A critical perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 30, 759–772. doi: 10.1080/0141192042000279486

  • Levin, B. (2004). Making research matter more. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(56). doi: 10.14507/epaa.v12n56.2004

  • Levin, J. R., & O’Donnell, A. M. (1999). What to do about educational research’s credibility gaps? Issues in Education, 5(2), 177 – 229. doi: 10.1016/S1080-9724(00)00025-2

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K.E. (1998). Designing Professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

  • McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 357– 382. doi: 10.1080/03057640500319065

  • Millar, R., Leach, J., Osborn, J., Ratcliffe, M., Hames, V., Hind, A., Bartholomew, H., Collins, S., Lewis, J., Schoot, P., & Duschl, R. (2002). Towards evidence-based practice in science education. School Science Review, 84(307), 19-20.

  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.

  • Mortimore, P. (2000). Does educational research matter? British Educational Research Journal, 26, 5–24. doi:

  • National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • National Science Teachers Association. (1996). The role of research in science teaching. Retrieved March 3, 2016 http://www.nsta.org/positionstatement&psid=30

  • Oancea, A. (2005) Criticisms of educational research: Key topics and level of analysis. British Educational Research Journal, 3, 157–183. doi: 10.1080/0141192052000340198

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307

  • Randi, J., & Corno, L. (1997). Teachers as innovators. In B. Biddle, T. Good, and I. Goodson, (Eds.). The international handbook of teacher and teaching (1163-1221). New York: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-0114942-6_29

  • Ratcliffe, M., Bartholomew, H., Hames, V., Hind, A., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). The nature of science education research. School Science Review, 84, 35-41.

  • Richardson-Koehler, E. (1987). What happens to research on the way to practice? Theory into Practice, 26(1), 38-43. doi: 10.1080/00405848709543247

  • Rossouw, D. (2009). Educators as action researchers: Some key considerations. South African Journal of Education, 29(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1590/S0256-01002009000100001

  • Shkedi, I.A. (2003). Words that are trying to touch: Qualitative research, theory and practice. Tel-Aviv: Ramot.

  • Shulman, L. S. (1990). Reconnecting foundations to substance of teacher education. In S. Tozer, T.H. Andeson, & B.B. Armbruster, (Eds.). Foundational studies in teacher education: A reexamination ( 2- 12). New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2007). Bridging the gap between basic and applied research by an integrative research approach. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 249–261. doi: 10.1080/13803610701632075

  • Sydoriak, D., & Fields, M. (1997). Response to bridging the research to practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 529.

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Vanderlinde, R., & Van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299 – 316. doi: 10.1080/01411920902919257

  • Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher–practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26, 13–22. doi: 10.3102/0013189X026007013

  • Weiss, C. H. (1995). The four “I’s” of school reform: How interests, ideology, information, and institution affect teachers and principals. Harvard Educational Review, 65(4), 571-592. doi: 10.17763/haer.65.4.05530845t676w50h

  • Whitty, G. (2006) Education(al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32, 159–176. doi: 10.1080/01411920600568919

  • William, D. (2002). Linking research and practice: Knowledge transfer or knowledge creation? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Athens, GA.

  • Wubbels, T. (1993). Do you know what you look like? CL: Interpersonal relationships in education. UK: Routledge.

  • Yıldırım, A., İlhan, N., Şekerci, A. R. & Sözbilir, M. (2014). Science teachers’ level of following, understanding and using of educational researches: The example of Erzurum and Erzincan. Kastamonu Education Journal, 22(1), 81-100.

  • Zeichner, K. M. (1993). Action research: Personal renewal and social reconstruction. Educational Action Research, 1(2), 199-219. doi: 10.1080/0965079930010202

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics