Development of the Self-Regulation Skills Scale*

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-Volume 8, Issue 4
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Preschool children develop cognitive, behavioral, emotional and motivational regulation and controlskills to achieve their own goals. The evaluation of these skills, named as self-regulation skills, in anearly period of life time is important to direct educational and interventional programs. For thisreason, it is necessary to have valid and reliable measurement tools to assses these skills. Thepurpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable scale in order to evaluate 48-72 monthschildren’s self-regulation skills. The research was carried out on a total of 447 preschoolers. Theexploratory factor analysis of the data indicated that the scale consist of 33 items and two subscales(regulation and control skills). The total variance revealed was 55.71% and the factor loadings of thescale were observed to be between .58 and .82. The Cronbach’s Alpha value of the total scale wasfound as .96 and test-retest value was calculated as .99. The findings indicated that the scale, namedas the “Self-Regulation Skills Scale”, is a valid and reliable test that can evaluate 48-72 monthschildren’s self-regulation skills. 

Keywords

Abstract

Preschool children develop cognitive, behavioral, emotional and motivational regulation and controlskills to achieve their own goals. The evaluation of these skills, named as self-regulation skills, in anearly period of life time is important to direct educational and interventional programs. For thisreason, it is necessary to have valid and reliable measurement tools to assses these skills. Thepurpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable scale in order to evaluate 48-72 monthschildren’s self-regulation skills. The research was carried out on a total of 447 preschoolers. Theexploratory factor analysis of the data indicated that the scale consist of 33 items and two subscales(regulation and control skills). The total variance revealed was 55.71% and the factor loadings of thescale were observed to be between .58 and .82. The Cronbach’s Alpha value of the total scale wasfound as .96 and test-retest value was calculated as .99. The findings indicated that the scale, namedas the “Self-Regulation Skills Scale”, is a valid and reliable test that can evaluate 48-72 monthschildren’s self-regulation skills. 

Keywords


  • Blair, C. (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children’s functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57, 111–127. doi: 10.1037//0003066X.57.2.111

  • Blair, C. & Razza, R.P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive functions, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy abilities in kindergarden, Child Development, 78, 647-663. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x.

  • Böke, K. (2009). Örnekleme. Kaan Böke (Ed.), Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. (s.105-147). İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.

  • Bryce, D., Whitebread, D. & Szüer, D. (2015). The relationship among executive functions, metacognitive skills and educational achievement in 5 and 7 year old children, Metacognition Learning, 10(2), 181-198. doi: 10.1007/s11409-014-9120-4.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayınları.

  • Carlson, S. M. (2005). Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 585–615. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2802_3.

  • Carlson, S. M., Mandell, D. J., & Williams, L. (2004). Executive functions and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from age 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1105–1122, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1105.

  • Cole, P. M., Martin, S. E., & Dennis, T. A. (2004). Emotion regulation as a scientific construct: Methodological challenges and directions for child development research. Child Development, 75, 317–333. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00673.x.

  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

  • Dede, Y. & Yaman, S. (2008). Fen öğrenmeye yönelik motivasyon ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 2(1), 19-37.

  • DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D.J. et al. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x.

  • DeVellis, R. F., (2014). Ölçek geliştirme: Kuram ve uygulamalar. T. Totan (Çev. Ed). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

  • Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318, 1387–1388. doi: 10.1126/science.1151148.

  • Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., & Eggum, N.D. (2010). Self regulation and school readiness, Early Education and Development, 21:5, 681-698. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2010.497451.

  • Erkuş, A. (2012). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme (2. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

  • Erkuş, A. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma sarmalı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.

  • Flavel, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

  • Fındık Tanrıbuyurdu, E. & Güler Yıldız, T. (2014). Okul öncesi öz düzenleme ölçeği (OÖDÖ): Türkiye uyarlama çalışması, Eğitim ve Bilim, 39 (176), 317-328. doi: 10.15390/EB.2014.3647.

  • Franzen, M. D. (2002). Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment. 2nd ed. Springer Science & Business Media. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, ISBN 978-1-4757-3224-5 (eBook).

  • Gençtanırım, D. (2014). Riskli davranışlar ölçeği üniversite formu: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik çalışmaları. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(1),24-34.

  • Hughes, C., Dunn, J., & White, A. (1998). Trick or treat? Uneven understanding of mind and emotion and executive dysfunction in ‘‘hard-to-manage’’ preschoolers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 981–994.

  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.

  • Kochanska, G. & Knaack, A. (2003). Effortful control as a personality characteristic of young children: antecedents,correlates, and consequences. Journal of Personality,71(6), 1087-1112. doi:10.1111/1467

  • Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36, 220–232. doi: KM037//0O12-1649.36.2.220.

  • Kopp, C. B. (1982). Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 199–214.

  • Ladd, G.W., Birch, S.H., & Buhs, E.S. (1999). Children’s social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: Related spheres of influence? Child Development, 70, 1373-1400.

  • McClelland, M.M.& Cameron, C.E. (2012). Self regulation in early childhood: Improving conceptual clarity and developing ecologically valid measures, Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 136–142, doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00191.x.

  • McClelland, M. M., Morrison, F. J., & Holmes, D. L. (2000). Children at-risk for early academic problems: The role of learning-related social skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 307-329.

  • Özdamar, K. (2003). Modern bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Eskişehir: Kaan Kitabevi.

  • Özdamar, K. (2013). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Eskişehir: Nisan Kitapevi.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics.(6. Baskı), Pearson.

  • Tezbaşaran, A. A. (1996). Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.

  • Ponitz, C. E. C., McClelland, M. M., Jewkes, A. M., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Touch your toes! Developing a direct measure of behavioral regulation in early childhood. Early childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 141–158, doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.01.004.

  • Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

  • Smith-Donald, R., Raver, C.C., Hayes, T. & Richardson, B. (2007). Preliminary construct and concurrent validity of preschool self-regulation assessment (PSRA) for field-based research. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22,173-187, doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.01.002.

  • Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pino Pasternak, D., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., et al. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 63–85, doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1.

  • Yazıcıoğlu, Y. & Erdoğan, S. (2004). Spss uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.

  • Yurdugül, H. (2005). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında kapsam geçerliği için kapsam geçerlik indekslerinin kullanılması. XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 28–30 Eylül 2005, Denizli.

  • Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D.H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1-30). Boca Raton, FL: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis Group.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics