Integrating Technologically-Enhanced Self-Regulated Strategies into Writing English as a Foreign Language Classes

Author :  

Year-Number: 2015-Volume 7, Issue 2
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the influence of technologically-enhanced (i.e., NetSupport School) self-regulated strategies (i.e., wrapper activity, think aloud and reciprocal teaching) on learners' achievement in the writing section of the TOEFL iBT (TOEFL Internet-based Test) and to explore the change in learners' self-regulated learning skill levels as a result of the technologically-enhanced self-regulated strategies training. Thirty-nine TOEFL iBT candidates who were studying TOEFL iBT writing preparation course were chosen as the participants of the study. The research design of this study is based on intervention in which pretests and posttests were administered before and after the technologically-enhanced self-regulated strategies training. Also, the Online Self-regulated Learning Questionnaire (OSLQ) was used to assess the effect of the intervention on students' self-regulated learning skill levels. Based on the data obtained, it was found that students' scores in the TOEFL iBT Writing Task and their self-regulated learning skills considerably improved as a result of the technologically-enhanced self-regulated strategies training.

Keywords

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the influence of technologically-enhanced (i.e., NetSupport School) self-regulated strategies (i.e., wrapper activity, think aloud and reciprocal teaching) on learners' achievement in the writing section of the TOEFL iBT (TOEFL Internet-based Test) and to explore the change in learners' self-regulated learning skill levels as a result of the technologically-enhanced self-regulated strategies training. Thirty-nine TOEFL iBT candidates who were studying TOEFL iBT writing preparation course were chosen as the participants of the study. The research design of this study is based on intervention in which pretests and posttests were administered before and after the technologically-enhanced self-regulated strategies training. Also, the Online Self-regulated Learning Questionnaire (OSLQ) was used to assess the effect of the intervention on students' self-regulated learning skill levels. Based on the data obtained, it was found that students' scores in the TOEFL iBT Writing Task and their self-regulated learning skills considerably improved as a result of the technologically-enhanced self-regulated strategies training.

Keywords


  • Arslan, R. Ş., & Şahin-Kızıl, A. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23 (3), 183-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.486575

  • Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1

  • Aydın, S. (2013). Second Life as a foreign language learning envireonment: A review of research. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 53-63

  • Banks, P. (2000). Improving conversation skills within a competency-based curriculum. In A. Burn & D. S. Joyce (Eds.), Teachers' voices 4: Staying learner-centred in a competency-based curriculum (pp. 122-131). Sydney: Macquarie University.

  • Barnard, L., Lan, W.Y., To, Y.M., Paton, V.O., & Lai, S.L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005

  • Bartolomé, A. & Steffens, K. (2011). Technologies for self-regulated learning. In R. Carneiro, P. Lefrere, K. Steffens, K.& J. Underwood (Eds.). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: A European perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Beishuizen, J.J. (2008). Does a community of learners foster self-regulated learning? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(3), 183 - 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759390802383769

  • Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology, 4 (1), 120-136.

  • Bland, L. S. (2005). The effects of a self-reflective learning process on student art performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University School of Visual Arts and Dance.

  • Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.2.89

  • Bronson, M. (2000). Self-regulation in Early Childhood: Nature and Nurture. NY: The Guildford Press.

  • Camahalan, F.M. (2006). Effects of self-regulated learning on mathematics achievement of selected Southeast Asian children. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(3), 194-205.

  • Chamot, A, U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22(1), 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb03138.x

  • Chang, M. M. (2007). Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 23, 187−196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00203.x

  • Ching, L. C. (2002). Strategy and self-regulation instruction as contributors to improving students’ cognitive model in an ESL program. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 261-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00008-4

  • Chung, M. (2000). The development of self-regulated learning. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1(1), 55- 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03026146

  • Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 537-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.10177

  • Council of Europe, (2001). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg: Modern Language Division

  • Cotterall, S. M. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54(2), 109-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.109

  • Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 131–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.131

  • De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 687–698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.687

  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00156001

  • Ferris, D. (2003). Responding to writing. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 119-140). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.

  • Fulk, B.M., & Brigham, F.J. (1998). Motivation and self-regulation: A comparison of students with learning and behavior problems. Remedial and Special Education, 19(5), 300-309. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/074193259801900506

  • Gonzalez, J., & Wagenaar, R. (2003). Tuning educational structures in Europe. Bilbao: Deusto University.

  • Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. An applied linguistic perspective. London: Longman.

  • Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. (1997). The writing course. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, B. Hartford (Eds.), Beyond Methods: Components of Second Language Education (pp. 172-197), McGraw Hill, New York.

  • Hauck, M. (2005). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive strategies and CALL. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 65-86). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Helsel, L., & Greenberg, D. (2007). Helping struggling writers succeed: A self regulated strategy instruction program. The Reading Teacher, 60(8), 752-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.60.8.5

  • Huisman, J., Maassen, P., Neave, G. (2001). Higher education and the nation state. Amsterdam: Pergamon.

  • Inan, B. (2014). The relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in a Turkish EFL setting. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(17), 1544-1550. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1561

  • Jacobs, H. H. (2010). Curriculum 21, essential education for a changing world. Alexandria, VA: Assn for Supervision & Curriculum Development.

  • Jacobs, G. M., & Farrell, T. S. (2001). Paradigm Shift: Understanding and Implementing Change in Second Language Education. TESL-EJ, 5(1), 1-16.

  • Joseph, N. (2010). Metacognition needed: Teaching middle and high school students to develop strategic learning skills. Preventing School Failure, 54(2), 99-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10459880903217770

  • Kurman, J. (2006). Self-enhancement, self-regulation and self-improvement following failures. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 339-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466605X42912

  • Lan, W.Y. (1996). The effects of self-monitoring on students' course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-judgment ability, and knowledge representation. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 101-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1996.9943798

  • Laskey, M.L., & Hetzel, C. S. (2010). Self regualted learning, metacognition and soft skills: The 21st century learner. Strategies (p.17). Online Submission. Retrieved on May 11, 2014 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED511589.pdf

  • Lauridsen, K., & Whyte, C.B. (1985). An integrated counseling and learning assistance center-chapter for new directions sourcebook. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

  • Ley, K. & Young, D. B. (1998). Self-regulation behaviors in underprepared (developmental) and regular admission college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 42-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0956

  • Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2), 1−16.

  • Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 15-34). New York: Cambridge UP.

  • McManus, T. F. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a Web-based hypermedia learning environment: Nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 219−251.

  • Miltiadou, M. & Savenye, W.C. (2003). Applying social cognitive constructs of motivation to enhance student success in online distance education. Educational Technology Review, 11(1), 78-95.

  • Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

  • Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching & Learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

  • O'Brien, T. (2004). Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 37, 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002113

  • O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R., & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 285

  • Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(89)90036-5

  • Paris, S.G., & Winograd, P. (2001). The role of self-regulated learning in contextual teaching: Principles and practices for teacher preparation. Retrieved on May 12, 2014 from http://www.ciera.org/library/archive/2001-04/0104parwin.htm

  • Perels, F., Gürtler, T., & Schmitz, B. (2005). Training of self-regulatory and problem-solving competence. Learning and Instruction, 15, 123-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.010

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Ed.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.

  • Rozendaal, J.S., Minnaert, A., & Boekaerts, M. (2003). Motivation and self-regulated learning in secondary vocational education: Information-processing type and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 273–289.

  • Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00096

  • Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3

  • Schunk, D.H. & Zimmerman, B.J. (Eds.) (1998). Self-regulated learning. From teaching to selfregulated practice. NewYork: Guilford Press.

  • Seow, A. (2002). The Writing Process and Process Writing. In J. C. Richards and W. A.Renendya. (Ed.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  • Steffens, K. (2007). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments–a European review. In R. Carneiro, P. Lefrere, K. Steffens (Eds), Kaleidoscope Seed Project. Retrieved on May 18, 2014 from http://www.lmi.ub.es/taconet/documents/srlinteles3.pdf

  • Sumie, M. (2001). A learner-centered classroom in a general English class. Retrieved on April 21, 2014 from http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/01/feb/sh_matsuno.html

  • Tudor, I. (1996). Learner-centredness as language education. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

  • Warschauer, M. (2001). Millennialism and media: Language, literacy, and technology in the 21st century. AILA Review, 14, 49-59.

  • Winters, F.I., Greene, J.G. & Costich, C.M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 429-444. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9

  • Wirth, J. & Leutner, D. (2008). Self-regulated learning as a competence. Implications of theoretical models for assessment methods. Journal of Psychology, 216(2), 102-110.

  • Wu, J. & Zhang, Y. (2010). Examining potentialities of handheld technology in students’ academic attainments. Educational Media International, 47 (1), 57-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523981003654977

  • Yang, S. C., & Chen, Y. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 860-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.015

  • Yigzaw, A., & Fentie, A. (2013). The impact of students’ self-regulated language learning on their reading achievement in Ethiopian high schools: Grade 9 in focus. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 5(5), 44-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/JMCS2013.0345

  • Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M. & Pintrich, P. (2000). Self-regulation. Directions and challenges for future research. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.). Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 749768). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Zimmerman, B., & Schunk (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research and applications (pp 1-30). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics