A Qualitative Study Concerning the 6th Grade Students’ Conceptual Structures about the Cell Concept

Author :  

Year-Number: 2014-Volume 6, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

This study aims to investigate 6th grade students’ conceptual structures about the cell concept in science education. For this purpose, drawing method, open-ended questions and word association test were applied to 65 middle school students. Descriptive analysis and content analysis were used to analyze the data. It was found that there were a wide range of alternative conceptions in students’ drawings and definitions of the cell. They mostly designated the nucleus, cell membrane and the mitochondria as the most important parts or organelles. The participants association of the cell concept with daily life was mostly categorized as ‘awareness generated by knowledge’, ‘health’ and ‘finding it necessary for the future’. Also, the data collected through the word association test was categorized under 5 categories and ‘defining the cell’, ‘parts and the organelles of the cell’ and ‘giving examples to the cell’ were the mostly persisting ones. We conclude that the 6th grade students who met for the first time with the cell concept at school had insufficient conceptions about that concept.

Keywords

Abstract

This study aims to investigate 6th grade students’ conceptual structures about the cell concept in science education. For this purpose, drawing method, open-ended questions and word association test were applied to 65 middle school students. Descriptive analysis and content analysis were used to analyze the data. It was found that there were a wide range of alternative conceptions in students’ drawings and definitions of the cell. They mostly designated the nucleus, cell membrane and the mitochondria as the most important parts or organelles. The participants association of the cell concept with daily life was mostly categorized as ‘awareness generated by knowledge’, ‘health’ and ‘finding it necessary for the future’. Also, the data collected through the word association test was categorized under 5 categories and ‘defining the cell’, ‘parts and the organelles of the cell’ and ‘giving examples to the cell’ were the mostly persisting ones. We conclude that the 6th grade students who met for the first time with the cell concept at school had insufficient conceptions about that concept.

Keywords


  • Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M. ve Westbrook, S.L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 147-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310206

  • Alparslan, C., Tekkaya, C. ve Geban, Ö.( 2003). Using the conceptual change instruction to improve learning. Journal of Biological Education 37, 3, 133–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655868

  • Artun, H. ve Coştu, B. (2011). Sınıf öğretmen adaylarının difüzyon ve osmoz kavramları ile ilgili yanılgılarının belirlenmesi. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 8(4), 117-127.

  • Aşcı, Z. S., Özkan, ve Tekkaya, C. (2001). Students’ misconceptions about respiration: A cross-age study. Education and Science, 26(120), 29–36.

  • Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen Öğrenimi ve Öğretimi. Ankara: Asil Yayınevi.

  • Ayas, A. & Çalık, M. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of eight-grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 638667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20076

  • Bahar, M. ve Kılıç, F. (2001). Kelime iletisim testi yöntemi ile Atatürk ilkeleri arasındaki kavramsal bağların Araştırılması. IX. Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi’nde sunulmuş bildiri, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.

  • Bahar, M. ve Özatlı, N.S. (2003). Kelime iliskilendirme yöntemi ile lise 1. sınıf ögrencilerinin canlıların temel bileşenleri konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının araştırılması. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1),75-85.

  • Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H. & Sutcliffe, R.G. (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 134-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655653

  • Bahar, M., Özel, M., Prokop, P. & Uşak, M. (2008). Science student teachers’ ideas of the heart. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(2), 1648 -3898.

  • Braund, M. (1998). Trends in children’s conceptions of vertebrate and invertebrates. Journal of Biological Education, 32(2),112–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1998.9655606

  • Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (5. baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.

  • Cardellini, L. & Bahar, M. (2000). Monitoring the learning of chemistry through word association tests. Australian Chemistry Resource Book, 19, 59.

  • Carmichael, P., Driver, R., Holding, B., Phillips, I., Twigger, D., & Watts, M. (1990). Research on students' conceptions in science: A bibliography. Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.

  • Cavas, B. & Kesercioglu, T. (2010). A qualitative study on student’ understanding and misconceptions regarding the livıig cell. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 5(1), 321-331.

  • Cinici, A. (2013) From caterpillar to butterfly: a window for looking into students’ ideas about life cycle and life forms of insects. Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 84-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.773361

  • Cle´ment, P. (2007). Introducing the cell concept with both animal and plant cells: A historical and didactic approach. Science & Education, 16, 423–440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9029-7

  • Çapa, Y. (2000). An analysis of 9th grade students’ misconceptions concerning photosynthesis and respiration in plants. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

  • Çardak, O. (2009). Science students’ misconceptions of the life cycle according to their drawings. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(5), 865–873.

  • Daskolia, M., Flogaitis, E. & Papageorgiou, E. (2006). Kindergarten Teachers' Conceptual Framework on the Ozone Layer Depletion. Exploring the Associative Meanings of a Global Environmental Issue. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 15(2), 168-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9004-8

  • Dreyfus, A. & Jungwirth, E. (1988) The cell concept of 10th. graders: Curricular expectations and reality. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 221-229. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/0950069880100210

  • Dreyfus, A. & Jungwrith, E. (1989) The pupil and the living cell: a taxonomy of dysfunctional ideas about an abstract idea. Journal of Biological Education, 23, 49–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1989.9655024

  • Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2004) Educational Psychology: Windows, Classrooms. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

  • Fisher, K. M. (1983). In H. Helm & J. D. Novak (Chairs). Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

  • Flores, F., Tovar, M.E. & Gallegos, L. (2003). Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: An integrated view. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 269-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126793

  • Francek, M. (2013). A compilation and review of over 500 geoscience misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 35(1), 31-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.736644

  • Glynn, M. S. & Tomone, T. (1998). Learning from analogy-enhanced science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1129-1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199812)35:10<1129::AIDTEA5>3.0.CO;2-2

  • Gussarsky, E. & Gorodetsky, M. (1990). On the Concept Chemical Equilibrium: The Associative Framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (3), 197-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270303

  • Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731–743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200804

  • Kempa, R.F. & Nicholls, C.E. (1983). Problem solving ability and cognitive structure an explanatory investigation. European Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 171-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0140528830050205

  • Kindfield, A. C. (1991). Confusing chromosome number and structure: A common student error. Journal of Biological Education, 25, 193–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1991.9655206

  • Kostova, Z. & Radoynovska, B. (2008). Word Association Test for Studying Conceptual Structures of Teachers and Students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 2 (2), 209-231.

  • Kostova, Z. & Radoynovska, B. (2010). Motivating Students’ Learning Using Word Association Test and Concept Maps. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 4 (1), 62-98.

  • Köse, S.(2008). Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283-293.

  • Köseoglu, F., Budak, E. ve Kavak, N. (2002). “Fen eğitiminde kavramsal anlama için bir degerlendirme yöntemi: Kelime çağrışımları ve gravimetrede uygulanışı. V. Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi, ODTÜ, Ankara.

  • Kurt, H., ve Ekici, G. (2013). Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının ‘bakteri’ konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının ve alternatif kavramlarının belirlenmesi. Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic. 8(8), 885-910.

  • Lazarowitz, R. ve Penso, S. (1992). High school students’ difficulties in learning biology concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26, 215–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1992.9655276

  • Longden, B. (1982). Genetics-are there inherent learning difficulties? Journal of Biological Education, 16, 135– 140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1982.9654439

  • Longfield, J. (2009). Discrepant teaching events: Using an inquiry stance to address students’ misconceptions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 266-271.

  • MEB (2012). İlköğretim 6. Sınıf Fen ve Teknoloji Ders Kitabı (2. Baskı). Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü Basımevi.

  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

  • Nakiboğlu, C. (2003). Instructional misconceptions of Turkish prospective chemistry teachers about atomic orbitals and hybridization. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4, 171-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B2RP90043B

  • Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11(3), 183–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279

  • Okeke, E. A. C. & Wood–Robinson, C. (1980) A study of Nigerian pupils’ understanding of selected biological concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 14, 329–338.

  • Ozden, M. (2009). Primary student teachers’ ıdeas of atoms and molecules: Using drawings. Education. 129(4), 635–642.

  • Patrick, P. G., & S. D. Tunnicliffe. (2010). Science teachers’ drawings of what is inside the human body. Journal of Biological Education, 44 (2), 81–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656198

  • Pashley, M. (1994). A-level students: Their problems with gene and allele. Journal of Biological Education, 28(2), 120–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1994.9655377

  • Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1991). Bibliography. Students’ alternative frameworks and science education (3rd Ed.). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel.

  • Preece, P.F.W. (1978). Exploration of semantic space: review of research on the organisation of scientific concepts in semantic memory. Science Education, 62, 547-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730620415

  • Prokop, P., & J. Fancˇovicˇova. (2006). “Students’ ıdeas about human body: do they really draw what they know? Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2(10), 86–95.

  • Reiss, M. J. & S. D. Tunnicliffe. (2001). Students’ understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 383–399.

  • Reiss, M.J., S.D. Tunnicliffe, A.M. Andersen, A. Bartoszeck, G.S. Carvalho, S.Y. Chen, R. Jarman, S. Jónsson, V. Manokore, N. Marchenko, J. Mulemwa, T. Novikova, J. Otuka, S. Teppa & W.V. Rooy. (2002). An international study of young peoples’ drawings of what is inside themselves. Journal of Biological Education, 36(2), 58-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2002.9655802

  • Rennie, L. J. & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children’s choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25, 239–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013116228261

  • Sato, M. & James, P. (1999). "Nature" and "Environment" as perceived by university students and their supervisors. International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, 18 (2), 165-172.

  • Sesli, E. & Kara, Y. (2012). Development and application of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of cell division and reproduction, Journal of Biological Education, 46(4), 214-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2012.688849

  • Shavelson, R. J. (1974). Methods for examining representations of a subject-matter structure in a student’s memory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(3), 231-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660110307

  • Smith, M. (1991) Teaching cell division: Students’ difficulties and teaching recommendations. Journal College Science Teaching, September/October, 28–33.

  • Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C. & Geban, Ö. (2001). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to students’ understanding of the human circulatory system. School Science and Mathematics, 101(2), 91–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18010.x

  • Tekkaya, C. ve Balcı, S. (2003). Öğrencilerin fotosentez ve bitkilerde solunum konularındaki kavram yanılgılarının saptanması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 101–107.

  • Thompson, F. & Logue, S. (2006). An exploration of common student misconceptions in science. International Education Journal, 7(4), 553-559.

  • Topsakal, U. U. & Oversby, J. (2012) Turkish student teachers’ ideas about diagrams of a flower and a plant cell. Journal of Biological Education, 46(2), 81-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.572988

  • Tunnicliffe, S. D. & Reiss, M. J. (1999). Building a model of the environment: How do children see animals? Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 142 - 148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655654

  • Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (eds) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (Macmillan), 177- 210.

  • White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (2000). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.

  • Yalçınkaya, E., Taştan-Kırık, Ö., Yıldıran, D. & Boz, Y. (2012). Is case-based learning an effective teaching strategy to challenge students’ alternative conceptions regarding chemical kinetics? Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(2), 151-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.698605

  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

  • Yip, D.Y. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 461–477.

  • Yörek, N. (2007). Öğrenci çizimleri yoluyla 9. ve 11. sınıf öğrencilerinin hücre konusunda kavramsal anlama düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. [Determination of student conceptual understanding of cellcell using student drawings at grades 9 and 11]. 9 Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 107-114.

  • Zamora, S. & Guerra, M. (1993). “Misconceptions about cells.” Technical Report, Universum, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico.

  • Zoldosova, K. & P. Prokop. (2007). Primary pupils’ preconceptions about child prenatal development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 239–246.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics