Author :
Abstract
Teacher preparedness is linked to student achievement, yet regularly teachers are entering the profession unprepared. In-service training, or professional development activities, are increasingly being used to remedy this situation. There is little agreement regarding exactly what key components should be included in an effective professional development activity. This study seeks to provide the meaning of effective professional development activities and to offer a list of key components inherent in any effective professional development offering. Sixteen elementary school teachers (8 male, 8 female), from a large city in Turkey, were interviewed about their experiences with professional development activities offered over a 12-month period. They were asked to generate a list of the key components to be included in an effective professional development activity. Additionally, document analysis of result reports from Ministry of National Education trainings was performed. The findings indicate that any effective professional development activity should consist of the following components: 1) a match to existing teacher needs, 2) a match to existing school needs, 3) teacher involvement in the design/planning of professional development activities, 4) active participation opportunities, 5) long-term engagement, and 6) high-quality instructors. The researcher hopes that the Ministry of National Education will consider these findings and begin providing more effective professional development activities for teachers. With this means of on-going professional development Turkish teachers’ growth will be enhanced and students will be better prepared to compete in a 21st century global environment.
Keywords
Abstract
Teacher preparedness is linked to student achievement, yet regularly teachers are entering the profession unprepared. In-service training, or professional development activities, are increasingly being used to remedy this situation. There is little agreement regarding exactly what key components should be included in an effective professional development activity. This study seeks to provide the meaning of effective professional development activities and to offer a list of key components inherent in any effective professional development offering. Sixteen elementary school teachers (8 male, 8 female), from a large city in Turkey, were interviewed about their experiences with professional development activities offered over a 12-month period. They were asked to generate a list of the key components to be included in an effective professional development activity. Additionally, document analysis of result reports from Ministry of National Education trainings was performed. The findings indicate that any effective professional development activity should consist of the following components: 1) a match to existing teacher needs, 2) a match to existing school needs, 3) teacher involvement in the design/planning of professional development activities, 4) active participation opportunities, 5) long-term engagement, and 6) high-quality instructors. The researcher hopes that the Ministry of National Education will consider these findings and begin providing more effective professional development activities for teachers. With this means of on-going professional development Turkish teachers’ growth will be enhanced and students will be better prepared to compete in a 21st century global environment.
Keywords
- Abadiano, H. L. & Turner, J. (2004). Professional staff development: What works? The NERA Journal, 40(2), 87-91.
- Abate-Vaughn, J. & Paugh, P. (2009). The paraprofessional to teacher pipeline: Supports throughout graduation. Journal of Developmental Education, 33(1), 14-27.
- Ascher, C. & Fruchter, N. (2001). Teacher quality and student performance in New York City’s low- performing schools. Journal of Education for Students Places at Risk, 6(3), 199-214. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327671ESPR0603_3
- Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28-33.
- Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3-15. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X033008003
- Borman, G. D. & Kimball, S. M. (2005). Teacher quality and educational equality: Do teachers with higher standards based evaluation ratings close student achievement gaps? The Elementary School Journal,106(1), 3-20.
- Boydak, O. M.,& Dikici, A. (2001). Hizmet ici egitim programlarinin etkililiğinin degerlendirilmesi.[The evaluation of the effectiveness of in-service training programs]. Firat Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 225-240.
- Boyle, B., While, D., & Boyle, T. (2004). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? The Curriculum Journal, 15(1), 45-68.
- Carver, C. L. & Katz, D. S. (2004). Teaching at the boundary of acceptable practice: What is a new teacher mentor to do? Journal of Teacher Education, 55(5), 449-462. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487104269524
- Cheng, Y. C. (1996). Relation between teachers’ professionalism and job attitudes, educational outcomes, and organizational factors. The Journal of Educational Research, 89 (3), 163-171.
- Collinson, V. & Cook, T. F. (2000). “I don’t have enough time” Teachers’ interpretations of time as a key to learning and school change. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(3), 266- 281. DOI: 10.1108/09578230110392884
- Collinson, V. (2000). Staff development by any other name: Changing words or changing practices. The
- Educational Forum, 64(2), 124-132. DOI: 10.1080/00131720008984740
- Corcoran, T. B. (1995). Helping teachers teach well: Transforming professional development. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 1-11.
- Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon. K. S.,& Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3594138
- Easton, L. B. (2008). From professional development to professional learning. Phi delta Kappan, 89(10), 755- 761.
- Eisner, E. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
- Guskey, T. R. (1994). Professional development in education: In search of the optimal mix (Report No: ED 369181). American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
- Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 8(3). DOI: 10.1080/13540600210000051 2
- Hirsh, S. (2001). We’re growing and changing. Journal of Staff Development, 22(3), 255-258.
- Hodge, C. L. & Krumm, B. L. (2009). NCLB: A Study of its effects on rural schools- School administrators rate service options for students with disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(1), 20-27.
- Jonson, K. F. (2002). Being an effective mentor: How to help beginning teachers succeed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Kelleher, J. (2003). Professional development that works: A model for assessment-driven Professional development. Phi Delta Kappan. 84(10), 751-756.
- Kwakman, K. (2001). Work stress and work-based learning in secondary education: Testing the Karasek
- McCaughtry, N., Martin, J., Kulinna, P. H., & Cothra,D. (2006). What makes teacher professional development work? The influence of instructional resources on change in physical education. Journal of In-service Education, 32(2), 221-235. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13674580600650997
- McLaughlin. M. W.& Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teacher College Press.
- Mahon, J. P. (2003). Professional development for K-12 reform. Principal Leadership (Middle School Edition), 3(6), 51-53.
- Meister, D. M. (2010). Experienced secondary teachers’ perceptions of engagement and effectiveness: A guide for professional development. The Qualitative Report, 15(4), 880- 898.
- Mertens, D. M. (2009). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Moir, E. & Gless, J. (2001). Quality induction: An investment in teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(1), 109-114. Retrieved February 17, 2010, from ERIC database.
- National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching and America's Future. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Okoye, S. N.,Momoh, S. O., Aigbomain, D. O. & Okecha, R.E. (2008). Teachers’ quality, instructional strategies and students’ performance in seconsay school science. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 34
- Opfer, V. D. & Pedder, D. (2011). The lost promise of teacher professional development in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 3-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.534131
- Ozer, B. (2008).Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi. [Professional development of teachers] A. Hakan (Ed.), Öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi alanındaki gelişmeler [The developments in the field of teaching] (pp. 195-216). Eskişehir: Anadolu ÜniversitesiAçıköğretim Fakültesi.
- Palardy, G. J. & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in first grade: The importance of background qualifications, attitudes, instructional practices for student learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 111-140. DOI: 10.3102/0162373708317680
- Pedder, D., James, M., & MacBeath, J. (2005). How teachers value and practice professional learning. Research
- Peske, H. G. & Haycock, K. (2006). Teaching inequality: How poor and minority students are shortchanged on teacher quality, A report and recommendations by The Education Trust. The Education Trust, 1-18.
- Penuel, W. R., Fishman, J. B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007).What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958 http://aerj.aera.net
- Porter, A. C.& Brophy, J. E. (1988). Synthesis of research on good teaching: Insights from the work of the institute for research on teaching. Educational Leadership, 45(8), 74-85.
- Rockoff, J.E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement evidence from Panel Data. The American Economic Review. 94(2), 247-252. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592891
- Rogers, M. P., Abell, S., Lannin, J., Wang, C-Y.,Musikul, K., Barker, D., &Dingman, S. (2007). Effective professional development in science and mathematics education: Teachers’ and facilitators’ views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 507-532. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-006-9053-8
- Sparks D. & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 40-57.
- Sparks, D. (2002). Designing powerful professional development for teachers and principals. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
- Sparks, D. (2004). The looming danger of a two-tiered professional development system. PhiDelta Kappan, 86(4), 304-306. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20441766
- Starkey, L., Yates, A., Meyer, L. H., Hall, C., Taylor, M., Stevens, S.,&Toia R. (2009). Professional development design: Embedding educational reform in New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 181-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.007
- Taylor, S. J.& Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research (3rd Ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Guidance for the Reading First program. Washington,DC: Author Retrieved February 16, 2013, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/readingfirst/guidance.doc
- Visser, T. C., Coenders, F. G, M.,Terlouw, C.,&Pieters, J. M.(2010). Essential characteristics for a professional development program for promoting the implementation of a multidisciplinary Science Module. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 623-642. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-010-9212-1
- Vogt, F. & Rogalla, M. (2009). Developing adaptive teaching competency through coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1051-1060. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.002