Primary Education Science and Technology Teachers’ Knowledge, Awareness and Degree of Use of Science Process Skills

Author :  

Year-Number: 2014-Volume 6, Issue 2
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

This study was done in order to determine the active science teachers’ knowledge, awareness and degree of use of Science Process Skills (SPS) in their courses within the Primary Education in Central province of Tokat in Turkey. The method of this study is a general descriptive design. The target population of this study is those teachers who are actively teaching in these second level of Primary Education and the population size is 87 and the sample size is 62 Science Technology teachers who are chosen from the target population by a conveniance sampling method. Within this study, ‘Science Process Skills Knowledge & Awareness Scale’ (SPS-KAS) and ‘Degree of Use of Science Process Skills’ (DUSPS) scales, both were developed by us have been used as data collecting tools. After pilot application of the scales to 24 4th grade teacher canditate students (from the GaziosmanpaşaUniversity in Tokat) and 21 active science and thecnology teachers (who are out of central province in Tokat) validty calculations were made. In order for validity assesment item discrimination calculations were made and those items which have 0.3 or above ‘rjx’ values were used. For the face and content validity expert opinion were relied. In order to calculate internal consistency realibility scale KR-20 formula were used and was found as 0,80. Questions of the DUSPS scale were presented using a five-point Likert item, of the The results for the construct validityimplies a single factor. DUSPS’ Cronbach Alfa internal consistencyco efficient was found as .97. The result of this study Show that only 1.5% active Science and Technology teachers in Tokat have enough knowledge about SPS, but none of them can relate a SPS-related question to a specific SPS . In addition to these, 11% of science and technologyteachers have admitted to try to use these SPS in their courses during teaching. In addition, teachers' knowledge and awareness differ according to their inauguration year (before or after the new program).

Keywords

Abstract

This study was done in order to determine the active science teachers’ knowledge, awareness and degree of use of Science Process Skills (SPS) in their courses within the Primary Education in Central province of Tokat in Turkey. The method of this study is a general descriptive design. The target population of this study is those teachers who are actively teaching in these second level of Primary Education and the population size is 87 and the sample size is 62 Science Technology teachers who are chosen from the target population by a conveniance sampling method. Within this study, ‘Science Process Skills Knowledge & Awareness Scale’ (SPS-KAS) and ‘Degree of Use of Science Process Skills’ (DUSPS) scales, both were developed by us have been used as data collecting tools. After pilot application of the scales to 24 4th grade teacher canditate students (from the GaziosmanpaşaUniversity in Tokat) and 21 active science and thecnology teachers (who are out of central province in Tokat) validty calculations were made. In order for validity assesment item discrimination calculations were made and those items which have 0.3 or above ‘rjx’ values were used. For the face and content validity expert opinion were relied. In order to calculate internal consistency realibility scale KR-20 formula were used and was found as 0,80. Questions of the DUSPS scale were presented using a five-point Likert item, of the The results for the construct validityimplies a single factor. DUSPS’ Cronbach Alfa internal consistencyco efficient was found as .97. The result of this study Show that only 1.5% active Science and Technology teachers in Tokat have enough knowledge about SPS, but none of them can relate a SPS-related question to a specific SPS . In addition to these, 11% of science and technologyteachers have admitted to try to use these SPS in their courses during teaching. In addition, teachers' knowledge and awareness differ according to their inauguration year (before or after the new program).

Keywords


  • Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D. ve Turgut, M. F. (1996). Fizik öğretimi. Ankara: Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi Deneme Basımı.

  • Çoşgun E. B. ve E. Usta. (2012). İlköğretim II. Kademe Fen ve Teknoloji öğretmenlerinin Bilimsel Süreç Becerileri İle İlgili bilgi, farkındalık ve kullanma düzeylerinin Araştırılması (Tokat Örneği). Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.

  • Downing, J. ve Gifford, V. (1996). An investigation of preservice teachers’ science process skills and questioning strategies used during a demonstration science discovery lesson. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 8 (1), 64-75. DOI: 10.1007/BF03173741

  • Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers. ISBN: 0673464164, 9780673464163

  • Germann, P. J., & Aram, R. J. (1996). Stu+dent performances on the science processes of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 773-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<773::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-K

  • Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 129-140. DOI: 10.1080/09695949993044

  • Harlen, W. (2000). Teaching, learning and assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 129- 144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695949993044

  • Işık, A. ve Canan, N. (2012). Sınıf öğretmenleri ile fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretmenlerinin bilimsel süreç becerileri ile ilgili durumlarının belirlenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 145-160.

  • Kaptan, S. (1998). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Tekışık Web Ofset.

  • Kaptan, F. (1999). Fen bilgisi öğretimi. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.

  • Kefi, S., Nadir, Ç. ve Yavuz, E. (2013) Okulöncesi eğitim öğretmenlerinin temel bilimsel süreç becerilerini kullanım düzeyleri. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 300-319.

  • Korucuoğlu, P. (2008). Fizik öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel süreç becerilerini kullanım düzeylerinin fizik tutumu, cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi ve mezun oldukları lise türü ile ilişkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü

  • Lee, A. T., Hairston, R. V., Thames, R., Lawrence, T., & Herron, D. S. (2002). Using a computer simulation to teach science process skills to college biology and elementary majors. Computer Simulations Bioscene, 28(4), 35-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/SAC-120002714

  • McGinn, M. K. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: ımplications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher 28(3), 14-24. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1177252. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X028003014

  • MEB, (2006). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı, Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.

  • NRS, (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.

  • O’Brien, G. ve Peters, J. (1994). Effects of four ınstructional strategies on ıntegrated science process skill achievement of preservice elementary teachers having different cognitive development levels. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 6 (1), 30-46. DOI: 10.1007/BF03170648

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). Science process skills and achievement in research methodology courses. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South. Educational Research Association.

  • Serin U., Oğuz, S. ve Teoman, K. (2005). Eğitim fakülteleri ilköğretim bölümü öğrencilerinin fen bilimlerine yönelik tutumlarının bazı değişkenler açısından karşılaştırılması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 30 (138), 38-44.

  • Silay, İ. ve P. Çelik. (December, 2013) Evaluation of scientific process skills of teacher candidates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral, 106, 1122–1130. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.126

  • Sittirug, H. (1997). The predictive value of science process skills, cognitive development, attitude towards science on academic achievement in a Thai teacher institution. The Faculty of Graduate School University Of MissouriColumbia (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).

  • Şimşek, C. L. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının fen ve teknoloji ders kitaplarındaki deneyleri bilimsel süreç becerileri açısından analiz edebilme yeterlilikleri. İlköğretim Online, 9 (2), 433-445.

  • Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M., & Broekkamp, H. (2000). Teaching science problem solving: Anoverview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 442-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.1013

  • Temiz, B. K., (2001). Lise 1. sınıf fizik dersi programının öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerilerini geliştirmeye uygunluğunun incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.

  • Türkmen, H. ve Esin, M. K. (2011). Öğretmenlerin bilimsel süreç becerileri öğrenme alanı algıları üzerine bir durum çalışması. Journal of European Education, 1(1), 15-24. Usta, E., (2007). Fen bilgisi öğretimi ve bilimsel araştırma süreci. İlköğretmen Dergisi, 7, 30-38.

  • Yılmaz, F., (2005). İlköğretimde bilimsel tutum ve davranış kazandırmada fen bilgisi dersinin etkililiğine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.

  • Yiğit, N. ve Akdeniz, A. R., (2001). İlköğretim fen öğretimi dersinin öğretmen adaylarına bilimsel süreç ve mesleki becerileri kazandırması açısından değerlendirilmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 13 (1), 237-242.

  • YÖK/Dünya Bankası Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi, (1997). Fen öğretimi öğretmen eğitim dizisi. Ankara: YÖK Yayınları.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics