The Digital User of Social Networks: A Comparative, Transcultural and Intergenerational Study (Pages: 598-610)

Author :  

Year-Number: 2013-Volume 5, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

This article presents the results of a research study carried out in 2010 and 2011 on the evolution of the digital divide in two different cultural contexts: Europe and the United States of America. Using an Internet-based questionnaire parents and teenagers were surveyed regarding some variables related to their digital skills and their participation in social networks. Their answers were analyzed taking into account a range of factors such as age, gender and place of residence. The results highlight that there are significant differences between the United States of America and Europe regarding the presence of parents and teens on social networks, even though the generational digital divide decreases between minors and parents in both cultural contexts

Keywords

Abstract

This article presents the results of a research study carried out in 2010 and 2011 on the evolution of the digital divide in two different cultural contexts: Europe and the United States of America. Using an Internet-based questionnaire parents and teenagers were surveyed regarding some variables related to their digital skills and their participation in social networks. Their answers were analyzed taking into account a range of factors such as age, gender and place of residence. The results highlight that there are significant differences between the United States of America and Europe regarding the presence of parents and teens on social networks, even though the generational digital divide decreases between minors and parents in both cultural contexts

Keywords


  • Albero, M. (2002).Adolescentes e internet. Mitos y realidades de la sociedad de la información(Teenagers and internet. Myths and realities of the information society).ZerRevista De Estudios De Comunicación,13, Retrieved on June, 07, 2011, from http://www.ehu.es/zer/zer13/adolescentes13.

  • Agarwal, R., Animesh, A., & Prasad, K. (2009). Social interactions and the “digital divide”: Explaining variations in Internet use. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 277-294. doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0194

  • Aranda, D., Sánchez-Navarro, J &Tabernero, C. (2009). Jóvenes y ocio digital. Informe sobre el uso de herramientas digitales por parte de adolescentes en España(Youth and digital entertainment. The use of digital tools by adolescents in Spain report). Barcelona: UOC.

  • Balaguer, R. (2006).Videojuegos, Internet, Infancia y Adolescencia del nuevo milenio(Video Games, Internet, Children and Adolescents of the new millennium). Kairos. Revista de temas sociales, 10, en Retrieved on June, 07, 2011, fromhttp://www2.fices.unsl.edu.ar/~kairos/k10-06.htm

  • Beniger, J.R. (1986). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Bennett, S., Maton, K. & Kevin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 775-786.

  • Corrin, L., Bennett, S. & Lockyer, L. (2010). Digital natives: Everyday life versus academic study. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning 2010 (pp. 643-650). Lancaster: Lancaster University.

  • Duerager, A. & Livingstone, S. (2012).How can parents support children’s internet safety?London, UK: EU Kids Online.

  • Feixa, C., González, I., Martínez, R, Porzio, L. (2002). “Identitatsculturalsiestils de vida” (Cultural identities and lifestyles), C. Gómez-Granell; M. Garcia-Mila; A. Ripoll-Millet; C. Panchón (eds.), La infànciai les famíliesalsinicis del segle XXI (Children and families at the beginning of the century), Barcelona: Institutd’InfànciaiMónUrbà-Observatori de la Infància, vol III: 325-474.

  • Foresight, I. (2010).Norton online family report.NY: Symantec Corporation.

  • Garmendia, M., Garitaonandia, C., Martínez, G., Casado, M. A. (2011). Riesgos y seguridad en internet: Los menores españoles en el contexto europeo (Risks and safety on the internet: Spanish teenagers in the European context).Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Bilbao: EU Kids Online.

  • Gurpegui, C. (2010). Nuevas tecnologías en familia (New technologies in family). Zaragoza: Gobierno de Aragón.

  • Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S. &Haddon, L. (2008).Comparing children’s online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU Kids Online.Retrieved on July 10, 2012, from www.eukidsonline.net

  • Holloway,D., Green, L. &Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight. Young children and their internet use. LSE, London: EU Kids Online.

  • Lenhart, A. (2005). “Protecting teens online,” Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved on March 14, 2012, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Filters_Report.pdf,

  • Lenhart, A. and Madden, M. (2008). Social networking websites and teens:An overview. Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., Ólafsson, K. (2010).Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Initial Findings.LSE, London: EU Kids Online.

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, On the Horizon, 9, 1-6, Retrieved on June 10, 2012, from, http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants% 20-%20Part1.pdf,

  • Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital:The rise of the net generation, New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • UNESCO (2010).Le guide de mesure pour l’integration des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) en education (Measuring Guide for the integration of information and communication technology (ICT) in education). Montreal: Institut de statistique de l’UNESCO.

  • Vicente, M.R. &López A.J. (2011) Assessing the regional digital divide across the European Union-27. Telecommunications Policy35 (3), 220–237.

  • West, A., Lewis, J. & Currie,P. (2009). Students' facebook 'friends': public and private spheres. Journal of Youth Studies, 12 (6), 615-627.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics