Examining Pre-Service Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge on Fractions in Terms of Students’ Errors (Pages: 719-735)
Author :
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine pre-service classroom teachers’ knowledge of students in order to understand students’ errors and their instructional written explanations to eliminate these errors. In this context, the participants of the study were composed of 69 pre-service classroom teachers who were studying in the Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education at Atatürk University and were selected via the purposive sampling method from among the non-random sampling methods. Accordingly, the case study method, which is based on the qualitative research approach, was used in the study. The answers given by secondary school students to the open-ended questions on fractions in the study of Soylu and Soylu (2005) were used as the data collection tool in the study. Incorrect answers of the students were given to the pre-service teachers in written form and the pre-service classroom teachers were requested to find the errors in these questions and correct these incorrect answers. The data obtained from the answers of the pre-service classroom teachers were analysed using the content analysis technique. The results of the study showed that the pre-service classroom teachers generally did not experience much difficulty in identifying the students’ errors related to the operations in fractions and, to a certain extent; they correctly detected the students’ errors. Conversely, it was observed from the obtained data that the instructional explanations of the pre-service teachers for the question on how to correct students’ errors were not at an adequate level.
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine pre-service classroom teachers’ knowledge of students in order to understand students’ errors and their instructional written explanations to eliminate these errors. In this context, the participants of the study were composed of 69 pre-service classroom teachers who were studying in the Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education at Atatürk University and were selected via the purposive sampling method from among the non-random sampling methods. Accordingly, the case study method, which is based on the qualitative research approach, was used in the study. The answers given by secondary school students to the open-ended questions on fractions in the study of Soylu and Soylu (2005) were used as the data collection tool in the study. Incorrect answers of the students were given to the pre-service teachers in written form and the pre-service classroom teachers were requested to find the errors in these questions and correct these incorrect answers. The data obtained from the answers of the pre-service classroom teachers were analysed using the content analysis technique. The results of the study showed that the pre-service classroom teachers generally did not experience much difficulty in identifying the students’ errors related to the operations in fractions and, to a certain extent; they correctly detected the students’ errors. Conversely, it was observed from the obtained data that the instructional explanations of the pre-service teachers for the question on how to correct students’ errors were not at an adequate level.
Keywords
- Aksu, M. (1997). Student performance in dealing with fractions. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 375-
- Alacaci, C. (2009). Öğrencilerin kesirler konusundaki kavram yanılgıları. E. Bingölbali ve M. F. Özmantar (Ed.), İlköğretimde karşılaşılan matematiksel zorluklar ve çözüm önerileri(1. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
- Aydın, M. (2010). Matematik öğretmenlerinin matematik eğitimine yönelik inanışlarındaki değişimin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
- Baki, M. (2013). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bölme işlemi ile ilgili matematiksel bilgileri ve öğretimsel açıklamaları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(167), 300-311.
- Ball, D. L. (1990a). Thematematicalunderstandingsthatprospectiveteachersbringtoteachereducation. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.
- Ball, D. L. (1990b). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132-144.
- Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on Teaching Mathematics: Making Subject-Matter Knowledge Part of the Equation in J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Greenwich(pp. 1–48). CT: JAI
- Baştürk, S. (2009). Mutlak değer kavramı örneğinde öğretmen adaylarının öğrenci hatalarına yaklaşımları. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 174–194.
- Behr, M.J., Wachsmuth, I., & Post, R.T. (1985). Construct a sum: a measure of children’s understanding of fraction size. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132-144.
- Booker, G. (1998, July). Children’s construction of initial fraction concepts. In Proceedings of the 22ndConference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp 128-135). Stellenbosch: South Africa.
- Chick, H. L. & Baker, M. K. (2005, July). Investigating teacher’s responses to student misconceptions. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.). Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp.249-256). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: PME.
- Çepni, S. (2009). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş (4. baskı). Trabzon.
- Davis, E. G. (2003). Teaching and classroom experiments dealing with fractions and proportional reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 107–111.
- Denscombe, M. (1998). The good research guide. Philadelphia (USA): Open University Press.
- Dikici, R. & İşleyen, T. (2004). Bağıntı ve fonksiyon konusundaki öğrenme güçlüklerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 11(2), 105–116.
- Doğan-Temur, Ö. (2011). Dördüncü ve beşinci sınıf öğretmenlerinin kesir öğretimine ilişkin görüşleri: fenomenografik araştırma. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 29,203–212.
- Dorgan, K. (1994). What textbooks offer for instruction in fraction concepts. Teaching Mathematics,1(3), 150-
- Ersoy, Y. & Ardahan, H. (2003). İlköğretim okullarında kesirlerin öğretimi-II: tanıya yönelik etkinlikler düzenleme. www.matder.org.tr [19.03.2013].
- Even, R. (1992). The inverse function: prospective teachers’ use of undoing. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 23(4), 557–562.
- Gökkurt, B., Şahin, Ö., & Soylu, Y. (2012). Matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel alan bilgileri ile pedagojik alan bilgileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(8),997-1012.
- Hart, K. M. (1987). Practical work and formalisation , too great a gap. In J. C. Bergeron, N. Herscovicsi, & C. Kieran (Eds.). Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference Psychology of Mathematics Education. (pp. 408-415), Montreal: The University of Montreal.
- Hasemann, K. (1981). On difficulties with fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(1), 71–87.
- Işıksal, M. (2006). A study on pre-service elementary mathematics’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge regarding the multiplication and division of fractions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Department of Secondary Science and Mathematics Education.
- Işık, C. & Kar, T. (2012). 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin kesirlerde toplama işlemine kurdukları problemlerin analizi. İlköğretim Online, 11(4), 1021-1035.
- Kahan, J., Cooper, D., & Bethea, K. (2003). The role of mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in their teaching: a framework for research applied to a study of student teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 223-252.
- Kapyla, M., Heikkinen, J.P., & Asunta, T. (2009). Influence of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching photosynthesis and plant growth. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1395–1415.
- Kocaoğlu, T. & Yenilmez, K. (2010). Beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin kesir problemlerinde yaptıkları hatalar ve kavram yanılgıları. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 71–85.
- Konyalıoğlu, A. C., Özkaya, M., & Gedik, S. D. (2012). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının konu alan bilgilerinin hataya yaklaşımları açısından incelenmesi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2, 27-32.
- Lubinski, C.A., Fox, T, & Thomason, R. (1998). Learning to make sense of division of fractions: one K-8 pre- service teacher’s perspective. School Science and Mathematics, 98(5),247–253.
- Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Nagle, L. M.,& Mccoy, L.P.(1999). Division of fractions: procedural versus conceptual knowledge. In McCoy, L.P. (Ed.), Studies in teaching:1999 research digest. Research projects presented at annual Research Forum (Winston-Salem, NC), PP.81-85. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No:.ED 443 814.
- Olkun, S. & Toluk-Uçar, Z. (2012). İlköğretimde etkinlik temelli matematik öğretimi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
- Sezer, E. (2012). Matematik öğretimi dersi kapsamında kullanılan yazma etkinliklerinin sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının kesirler konusuna ilişkin pedagojik alan bilgilerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
- Soylu, Y. & Soylu, C. (2005). İlköğretim beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin kesirler konusundaki öğrenme güçlükleri: kesirlerde sıralama, toplama, çıkarma, çarpma ve kesirlerle ilgili problemler. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 101-117.
- Soylu, Y. (2008). Öğrencilerin kesirler konusundaki hata ve yanlış anlamaları ve sınıf öğretmen adaylarının tahmin edebilme becerileri. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 33(356), 31–39.
- Şiap, İ. & Duru, A. (2004). Kesirlerde geometriksel modelleri kullanabilme becerisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 12 (1), 89-96.
- Tall, D. O. & Razali, M. R. (1993). Diagnosing students’ difficulties in learning mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Teaching, 24(2), 209-222.
- Thompson, A. G. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity and additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(3), 165-208.
- Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: the case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 5–25.
- Toluk-Uçar, Z. (2009). Developing pre-service teachers understanding of fractions through problem posing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 166–175.
- Toluk-Uçar, Z. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının pedagojik içerik bilgisi: öğretimsel açıklamalar. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 87-102.
- Türnüklü, E.B. (2005). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının pedagojik alan bilgileri ile matematiksel alan bilgileri arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21, 234–247.
- Ünlü, M. & Ertekin, E. (2012). Why do pre-service teachers pose multiplication problems instead of division problems in fractions? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 490-494.
- Ward, J. & Thomas, G. (2007). What do teachers know about fractions? In Findings from the New Zealand Numeracy Development Project 2006. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
- Watkins, C. & Mortimore, P. (1999). Pedagogy: What Do We Know?’, in P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding Pedagogy and its Impact on Learning (pp.1–20). London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
- Yeşildere, S. (2008, Ağustos). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının sayı örüntüleri ile ilgili pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi. VIII Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi.
- Yetkin, E. (2003). Student difficulties in learning elementary mathematics. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearing house for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education.
- Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri(8.baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.