Gender Discrimination in Educational Processes: An Analysis on the Experiences of Studentship (Pages: 757-782)

Author :  

Year-Number: 2013-Volume 5, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Schools don’t only socialize the individuals in a general way, but also they have a strong and restrictive effect on the development of the gender roles. The contents of all the activities which are taking place at school and in the classroom atmosphere convey both hidden and clear messages about gender stereotypes. Schools have an important role in reproducing and strengthening of the gender differentiation through these messages. In this research, it’s aimed to analyze how gender differentiation is experienced at school and in the classroom. The participants are asked open ended questions and their responses are evaluated with descriptive content analysis in the frame of qualitative research approach. According to the results of the research, it’s designated that the gender differentiation is experienced by men at the secondary level of the primary school and by women at the process of secondary education. The actors of sexist attitudes and behaviours in the educational progress are mostly the teachers. Men exposed the physical punishments generally, and women mostly faced sexism related to the educational progress and practice.

Keywords

Abstract

Schools don’t only socialize the individuals in a general way, but also they have a strong and restrictive effect on the development of the gender roles. The contents of all the activities which are taking place at school and in the classroom atmosphere convey both hidden and clear messages about gender stereotypes. Schools have an important role in reproducing and strengthening of the gender differentiation through these messages. In this research, it’s aimed to analyze how gender differentiation is experienced at school and in the classroom. The participants are asked open ended questions and their responses are evaluated with descriptive content analysis in the frame of qualitative research approach. According to the results of the research, it’s designated that the gender differentiation is experienced by men at the secondary level of the primary school and by women at the process of secondary education. The actors of sexist attitudes and behaviours in the educational progress are mostly the teachers. Men exposed the physical punishments generally, and women mostly faced sexism related to the educational progress and practice.

Keywords


  • Acker, J. (1989). Making gender visible. In R.A. Wallace (Ed.). Feminism and sociological theory (65-81). California: Sage.

  • Aksornkool, N. (2003). Gender-sensitive education for bridging the gender gap. In J.P. Keeves & R. Watanabe (eds). International handbook of educational research in the Asia-Pacific region (Part One). Great Britain: Kluwer.

  • Arnot, M. (2002). Reproducing gender. London: Routledge.

  • Baç, G. (1997). A study on gender bias in teachers’ behaviors, attitudes, perceptions and expectations toward their students. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, ODTÜ Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Bailley, S.M. (1993). The current status of gender equity research in American schools. Educational Psychologist, 28 (4), 321-339.

  • Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Brinkman, G. B.; Jedinak, A.; Rosen, L. A. & Zimmerman, T. S. (2011). Teaching children fairness: Decreasing gender prejudice among children. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11(1), 61—81.

  • Butler, J.(1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. NewYork&London: Rouledge.

  • Çetinkol, Ş. G. (2008). Türkiye’de eğitime farklı bir bakış açısı: Feminist pedagoji. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

  • Delamont, S.(1990). Sex roles and the school. London: Routledge.

  • Duffy, J.; Warren, K. & Walsh, M. (2001). Classroom interaction: Gender of teacher, gender of student and classroom subject. SexRoles, 45 (9-10), 579-593.

  • Eccles, J.S. & Blumenfeld, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter? In L.C. Wilkinson ve C.B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction. (pp.79114). Orlando: Academic Press.

  • Einarsson, C. & Granström, K. (2002). Gender-biased interaction in the classroom: The influence of gender and age in the relationship between teacher and pupil. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46:2, 117-127, DOI: 10.1080/00313830220142155

  • Francis, B. (2010). Re/theorising gender: Female masculinity and male femininity in the classroom? Gender and Education, 22(5), 477-490. 10 Ekim 2013 tarihinde http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142569970180403 adresinden alınmıştır.

  • Gabriel, S. L. & Smithson, I. (1990). Gender in the classroom: Power and pedagogy. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois.

  • Gray, C. & Leith, H. (2004). Perpetuating gender stereotypes in the classroom: A teacher perspective. Educational Studies, 30 (1), 3-17.

  • Hall, R. M. & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Project on the Status and Education of Women. Association of American Colleges. 23 Aralık 2010 tarihinde http://www.aacu.org/psew/publications/Classroom_Climate_ChilyOne.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.

  • Li, Q.( 1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Educational Research, 41 (1), 63-76.

  • Lumadi, M. W. & Shongwe, S. S. (2010). The need for training gender-sensitive teachers: Addressing challenges of gender sensitive education for gender sensitive national development. Contemporary Issues In Education Research, 3 (3), 41-50.

  • Mahiroğlu A. ve Buluç, B. (2003). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında fiziksel ceza uygulamaları. Gazi Üniversitesi Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1). 15 Ekim 2013 tarihinde http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/c1s1.html

  • McLaren, P. (1989). Life in Schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy of education. New York & London: Longman, 1989.

  • Myhill, D. & Jones, S. (2006). She doesn’t shout at no girls’: Pupils’ perceptions of gender equity in the classroom. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 99-113.

  • Parker, M. B. & Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2011). Sport education: A panacea for hegemonic masculinity in physical education or more of the same? Sport, Education and Society, 17(4), 479-496. DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2011.608945

  • Pearson, J. C.; Turner, L. H. & Mancillas, W. T. (1991). Gender and communication. NewYork: Brown Publishers.

  • Renold, E. (2006). Gendered classroom experiences. In C. Skelton, B. Francis ve L. Smulyan (Eds.), The sage handbook of gender and education. (pp.439-450). London: SagePub.

  • Robinson, K.H. (1992). Class-room discipline: Power, resistance and gender. A look at teacher perspectives'. Gender and Education, 4(3), 273-288.

  • Sadker, M. P. & Sadker, D. M. (1985). Sexism in the Schoolroom of the 80’s. Psychology Today,19(3), 54–57.

  • Sadker, D. (2000) Gender equity: Still knocking at the classroom door. Equity and Excellence in Education, 33:1, 80-83. DOI: 10.1080/1066568000330112

  • Sadker, D.M.; Sadker, M.P. & Zittleman, K.R. (2009). Still failing at fairness: How gender bias cheats girls and boys in school and what we can do about it. NewYork: Simon & Schuster.

  • Sayan, S. (2007). Kız öğrencilerin okul yaşantılarına ilişkin nitel bir araştırma. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Sayılan, F. ve Özkazanç, A. (2012). İktidar ve direniş bağlamında toplumsal cinsiyet: Bir okul etnografisi. F. Sayılan (Ed.). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve eğitim: Olanaklar ve Sınırlar (ss. 103-142). Ankara: Dipnot.

  • Smith, F.; Hardman, F. & Higgins, S. (2007). Gender inequality in the primary classroom: Will interactive whiteboards help? Gender and Education, 19 (4), 455-469.

  • Stanworth, M. (1990). Gender and schooling: A study of sexual divisions in the classroom. Cambridge: The University Pres.

  • Streitmatter, J. (1994). Toward gender equity in the classroom: Every day teachers’ beliefs and practices. NewYork: State University.

  • Şahin, B. (2007). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve başarı: Ankara ili Çankaya ve Mamak ilçeleri ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencileri örneği. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Tan, M. (2000). Eğitimde kadın-erkek eşitliği ve Türkiye gerçeği. M. Tan, Y. Ecevit ve S. S. Üşür (Ed.), Kadın- erkek eşitliğine doğru yürüyüş: Eğitim, çalışma yaşamı ve siyaset (ss.21-116). İstanbul: TÜSİAD.

  • Tan, M. (2007). Eğitimde cinsiyetçilik: Farkında mıyız? Kadın, 8 Mart, Eğitim-Sen Bülten Eki (s.15-18). Ankara: Desen.

  • Tan, M. (2008). Eğitim. M. Tan, Y. Ecevit, S. S. Üşür ve S. Acuner (Ed.), Türkiye’de toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği: Sorunlar, öncelikler ve çözüm önerileri (ss.23-105). İstanbul: TÜSİAD-KAGİDER.

  • Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), 49-62.

  • Torun, Y. (2002). Gender bias in student-teacher interactions and its effect on reproduction of gender roles in the classroom. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, ODTÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Tsouroufli, M. (2002). Gender and teachers' classroom practice in a secondary school in Greece. Gender and Education, 14(2), 135-147.

  • UNESCO (2004). Gender sensitivity: A training manual for sensitizing education managers, curriculum and material developers and media professionals to gender concerns. Paris: UNESCO. 6 Temmuz 2011 tarihinde http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001376/137604eo.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.

  • UNESCO (2005). Exploring and understanding gender in education: A qualitative research manual for education practitioners and gender focal points. Bangkok: UNESCO. 6 Temmuz 2011 tarihinde http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001393/139366e.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.

  • Unger, R. & Crawford, M. (1992). Women and gender. NewYork: McGrow-Hill.

  • UNICEF (2003). Eğitimin toplumsal cinsiyet açısından incelenmesi: Türkiye raporu. Ankara: UNICEF. 10 Temmuz 2009 tarihinde http://www.unicef.org/turkey/pdf/_ge21.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.

  • UNICEF, (2007). Çocuklara karşı şiddetin ortadan kaldırılması. Parlamentolar Arası Birlik. 30 Eylül 2013 tarihinde http://panel.unicef.org.tr/vera/app/var/files/e/v/evac-for-parliamentarians-tr.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.

  • UNICEF, (2011). Türkiye’de çocukların durumu raporu. 15 Nisan 2013 tarihinde http://www.unicef.org.tr/tr/knowledge/detail/822/turkiye-de-cocuklarin-durumu-raporu adresinden

  • Younger, M. & Warrington, M. (2008). The gender agenda in primary teacher education in England: Fifteen lost years? Journal of Education Policy, 23(4), 429–445.

  • Zittleman, K. & Sadker, D. (2002). Gender bias in teacher education texts: New (and old) lessons. Journal of Teacher Education, 53 (2),168-179.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics