Students’ Intentions to Persist in, Versus Dropout of High School: What Self-determined Motivation Tells Us about It? (Pages: 282-290)
Author :
Abstract
High school dropout represents an important problem that affects thousands of students each year, and has obvious psychological, economical, and social ramifications. One factor in a student's decision to dropout of school may be motivation. Teachers play important role in helping students develop motivational resources through the provision of autonomy-supportive classrooms. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of behavioral regulation and competence to students’ intention to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. The authors argue more self-determined forms motivations could positively predict the intention of students to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. The subjects were 318 Iranian 9th grade students. All subjects completed academic self–regulation questionnaire, perceived competence scale and intention to persist in high school questionnaire. The results of regression analysis showed that more self-determined forms of behavioral regulation predict the intention of students to persist in high school. The results indicated students’ intentions to persist in high school increase with more self-determined forms of behavioral regulation and more perceived competence in classroom. The results also yielded an interesting finding that identified regulation didn’t predict students’ dropout intention. With respect to intention to persist in high school, these results highlight the importance of taking into account the fostering of perceived competence and more self-determined forms of behavioral regulation.
Keywords
Abstract
High school dropout represents an important problem that affects thousands of students each year, and has obvious psychological, economical, and social ramifications. One factor in a student's decision to dropout of school may be motivation. Teachers play important role in helping students develop motivational resources through the provision of autonomy-supportive classrooms. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of behavioral regulation and competence to students’ intention to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. The authors argue more self-determined forms motivations could positively predict the intention of students to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. The subjects were 318 Iranian 9th grade students. All subjects completed academic self–regulation questionnaire, perceived competence scale and intention to persist in high school questionnaire. The results of regression analysis showed that more self-determined forms of behavioral regulation predict the intention of students to persist in high school. The results indicated students’ intentions to persist in high school increase with more self-determined forms of behavioral regulation and more perceived competence in classroom. The results also yielded an interesting finding that identified regulation didn’t predict students’ dropout intention. With respect to intention to persist in high school, these results highlight the importance of taking into account the fostering of perceived competence and more self-determined forms of behavioral regulation.
Keywords
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
- Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740 – 756.
- Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hagger, M. S., Biddle, S. J. H., Smith, B., & Wang, J. C. K. (2003). A meta-analysis of perceived locus of causality in exercise, sport, and physical education contexts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25, 284–306.
- Daley, A.J., & Duda, J.L. (2006). Self-determination, stage of readiness for exercise, and frequency of physical activity in young people. European Journal of Sport Science, 6, 231–243.
- Deci, E. L. (1995). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. New York: Penguin Books.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘‘what’’ and ‘‘why’’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
- Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642–650.
- Flink, C., Boggiano, A. K., & Barrett, M. (1990). Controlling teaching strategies: Undermining children’s self- determination and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 916 –924.
- Fortier, M.S., Sweet, S.N., O’Sullivan, T.L., & Williams, G.C. (2007). A self-determination process model of physical activity adoption in the context of a randomized controlled trial. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 741–757.
- Gagne, M. (2003). The role of support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.
- Goudas, M., Biddle, S. J. H., & Fox, K. R. (1994). Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 453–463.
- Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual differences investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890 – 898.
- Hagger, M.S., & Chatzisarantis, N.L.D. (2009). Integrating the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory in health behavior: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 275–302.
- Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N., Culverhouse, T., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2003). The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: a trans contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 784–795.
- Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students’ intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 347–356.
- Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–180.
- Khalkhali, Vali (2012). Behavioral Regulations: What is Physical Education Role in Students’ Physically Active Lifestyle? International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 265-272.
- Khalkhali, Vali, Golestaneh, Seiyed Moosa (2011). The impact of teacher’ motivationalstyle and competition result on students’ subjective vitality and happiness in physical education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2989–2995.
- Lim, B. S. & Wang, C. K. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioral regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 52–60.
- Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60 –70.
- Mensch, B. S., & Kandel, D. B. (1988). Dropping out of high school and drug involvement. Sociology of Education, 61, 95-113.
- Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225–242.
- Reeve, J. (2002). Self–determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self–determination research (pp. 193–204). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
- Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.
- Reeve, J. (1996). Motivating others: Nurturing inner motivational resources. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Reeve, J., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (1999). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 537–548.
- Ryan, R.M., & Connell, J.P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 54–56.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
- Rumberger, R.W. (1987). High school dropouts: A review of issues and evidence. Review of Educational Research, 57, 101 - 121.
- Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 97–110.
- Steinberg, L., Elmen, J. D., & Mounts, N. S. (1989). Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents. Child Development, 60, 1424 –1436.
- Tidwell, R. (1988). Dropouts speak out: Qualitative data on early school departures. Adolescence, 23, 939-954.
- Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599 – 620.
- Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72,1161–1176.
- Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style up on early adolescents’ academic achievement. Child Development, 76, 483-501.
- Wang, C. K. J., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). Young people’s motivational profiles in physical activity: a cluster analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23, 1–22.
- Wang, C. K. J., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Spray, C. M., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2002). Achievement goal profiles in school physical education: differences in self-determination, sport ability beliefs, and physical activity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 433–445.
- Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68 – 81.