Author :
Abstract
The quality of education has important effects on the progression of a country. This vital service provided by teachers who are the key person on quality of education. The teachers’ attitudes towards teaching profession and students are important as teaching knowledge as. It is estimated that teachers have positive attitudes towards teaching profession may show humanistic attitudes and behaviors to students. With this purpose, it is supposed that examination of the relationship between attitudes towards teaching profession and pupil control ideology of teacher candidates is going to contribute the literature. Therefore, this study examines correlation between attitudes towards teaching profession and pupil control ideology of teacher candidates. Answers for the following questions are sought in this study: (1) Is there a meaningful relationship between attitudes towards teaching profession and pupil control ideology of teacher candidates? (2) Are the attitudes towards teaching profession a meaningful predictor for pupil control ideology on teacher candidates? (3) Is there meaningful difference teacher candidates’ attitudes towards teaching profession and pupil control ideology according to gender? In this study, two instruments were used for data gathering. “Teaching Profession Attitude Scale” was used to evaluate the attitudes towards teaching profession of the teacher candidates. “Pupil Control Ideology Inventory” was used for determining the level of pupil control ideology of teacher candidates on a humanistic-custodial dimension. The study was conducted among teacher candidates from the Faculty of Education at Ondokuz Mayıs University in Turkey.
Keywords
Abstract
The quality of education has important effects on the progression of a country. This vital service provided by teachers who are the key person on quality of education. The teachers’ attitudes towards teaching profession and students are important as teaching knowledge as. It is estimated that teachers have positive attitudes towards teaching profession may show humanistic attitudes and behaviors to students. With this purpose, it is supposed that examination of the relationship between attitudes towards teaching profession and pupil control ideology of teacher candidates is going to contribute the literature. Therefore, this study examines correlation between attitudes towards teaching profession and pupil control ideology of teacher candidates. Answers for the following questions are sought in this study: (1) Is there a meaningful relationship between attitudes towards teaching profession and pupil control ideology of teacher candidates? (2) Are the attitudes towards teaching profession a meaningful predictor for pupil control ideology on teacher candidates? (3) Is there meaningful difference teacher candidates’ attitudes towards teaching profession and pupil control ideology according to gender? In this study, two instruments were used for data gathering. “Teaching Profession Attitude Scale” was used to evaluate the attitudes towards teaching profession of the teacher candidates. “Pupil Control Ideology Inventory” was used for determining the level of pupil control ideology of teacher candidates on a humanistic-custodial dimension. The study was conducted among teacher candidates from the Faculty of Education at Ondokuz Mayıs University in Turkey.
Keywords
- Abacı, R. (1996). Öğrenci kontrol eğilimi ölçeğinin uyarlama çalışması, III. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi, Adana, 15-16 Nisan 1996.
- Appleberry, J. B. & Hoy, W. K. (1970). Teacher-principal relationships in humanistic and custodial schools. The Journal of Experimental Education, 39, 27-31.
- Appleton, A. B. & Stanwyck, D. (1996). Teacher personality, pupil control ideology, and leadership style. Individual Psychology, 52, 2, 119-129.
- Başbay, M., Ünver, G. & Bümen, N. T. (2009). Ortaöğretim alan öğretmenliği tezsiz yüksek lisans öğrencilerinin öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumları: boylamsal bir çalışma, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 59, 345-366.
- Bloom, B. S. (1998). İnsan Nitelikleri ve Okulda Öğrenme. (Çev: D. A. Özçelik). Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
- Bulut, İ. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi (Dicle ve Fırat üniversitesi örneği). Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 3-24.
- Cicmanec, K. M. (2001). High school mathematics teachers: grading practice and pupil control ideology. American Educational Research Association. Seattle, W. A, April, 10-14,
- Çapa, Y. & Çil, N. (2000). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 69-73.
- Çakır, Ö. (2005). Anadolu üniversitesi açık öğretim fakültesi ingilizce öğretmenliği lisans programı (iölp) ve eğitim fakülteleri ingilizce öğretmenliği lisans programı öğrencilerinin mesleğe yönelik tutumları ve mesleki yeterlik algıları. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, (6), 27-42.
- Çapri, B., & Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2008). Investigation of pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards teaching and professional self-efficacy beliefs according to their gender, programs, and faculties. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(15), 33-53.
- Çeliköz, N. & Çetin, F. (2004). Anadolu öğretmen lisesi öğrencilerinin öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumlarını etkileyen etmenler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 162, 136-145.
- Çetin, Ş. (2006). Öğretmenlik mesleği tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi (geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması). Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 28-37.
- Deibert, J. P. & Hoy, W. K. (1977). Custodial high school and self-actualization of students. Educational Research Quarterly, 2, 24-31.
- Dodeen, H. A., Ibrahim, A. A., & Emad, M. (2003). Attitude of pre-service teachers towards persons with disability: prediction for the success of inclusion. College Student Journal, 37, 4, 515-522.
- Doğan, T., & Çoban, A. E. (2009). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumları ile kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34 (153), 157-168.
- Erdem, A. R., Gezer, K. & Çokadar, H. (2005). Ortaöğretim fen-matematik ve sosyal alanlar öğretmenliği tezsiz yüksek lisans öğrencilerinin öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları. XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi. 28-30 Eylül 2005.
- Evans, D. B. (1989). Teacher pupil control ideology, teacher morale and their relationship to teacher involvement, principal interpersonal style and school achievement in urban schools. Atlanta University, Unpublished doctoral thesis, Atlanta.
- Griepenstrop, G. & Miskel, C.. (1976). Changing the custodial socialization of teachers pupil control ideology. (ERIC NO: ED 127268).
- Gürbüztürk, O. & Genç, S. Z. (2004) Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (7), 47-62.
- Harty, H., & Hassan, H. A. (1983). Student control ideology and the science classroom environment in urban secondary schools of Sudan. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 9, 851-859.
- Hayon, L. K. (1989). The International Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. London: Paragon Press.
- Hoy, W. K. (1969). Pupil control ideology and organizational socialization: a further examination. The School Review Quarterly, 77, 57-265.
- Hoy, W. K. & Henderson, J. E. (1983). Principal authencity, school climate and pupil control orientation. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29, 123-130.
- Hoy, W. K. (2001). Pupil control studies: a historical, theoretical, and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 39 (5), 424-441.
- Hussain, S., Ali, R., Khan, M. S., Ramzan, M., & Qadeer, M. Z. (2011). Attitude of secondary school teachers towards teaching profession. International Journal of Academic Research, 3, 1, 985-990.
- Kalkan, M. (1996). Lise öğretmenlerinin öğrenci kontrol eğiliminin tükenmişlik ve çeşitli değişkenlerle ilişkisi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Samsun.
- Kottkamp, R. B. & Mulhern, J. A. (1987). Teacher expectancy motivation, open and closed climate and pupil control ideology in high school. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20, 9-18.
- Lasek, J., & Wiesenbergova, S. (2007). Prospective teachers’attitudes to their profession. The New Educational Review, 13 (3-4), 129-136.
- Lunnenberg, F. C. (1983). Pupil control ideology and self-concept as a learner. Educational Research Quarterly, 8, 33-39.
- Lunnenberg, F. C. & Stouten J. W. (1983). Teacher pupil control ideology and pupils’ projected feelings towards teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 528-533.
- Lunnenberg, F. C. (2000). School bureaucratization, pupil control ideology, and pupil control behavior. American Educational Research Association. New Orleans: LA.
- Memişoğlu, S. P. (2006). Nasıl bir öğretmen. Orta Öğretime Yeniden Yapılanma Sempozyumu 20-22 Aralık 2004. Bildiriler Kitabı içinde (s. 334-338), Ankara: MEB Talim Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
- Multhauf, A. P., Willower, D. J. & Licata, J. W. (1978). Teacher pupil control ideology and behavior and classroom environmental robustness. The Elementary School Journal, 79 (1), 40-46.
- Oral, B. (2004). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 15, 88-98.
- Richardson, A. G., & Payne, M. A. (1988). The pupil control ideology of elementary and secondary school teachers: some caribbean findings. Education, 108 (3), 409-412.
- Saad, I. A., & Hendrix, V. L. (1993). Pupil control ideology in a multicultural society: arab and jewish teachers in ısraeli elementary schools. Comparative Education Review, 37
- Lunnenberg, F. C., & Schmidt, L. J. (1989). Pupil control ideology, pupil control behavior and the quality of school life. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22, 36
- Sewell, K. C. (1991). A study of the effects of personality type, socialization pressure and contextual factors on the pupil control factors on the pupil control ideology of students teachers. The State University, Unpublished doctoral thesis, Rutgers.
- Sparks, R., & Lipka, R. P. (1992). Characteristics of master teachers: personality factors self- concept, locus of control and pupil control ideology. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5 (3), 303-311.
- Terzi, A. R. & Tezci E. (2007). Necatibey eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 52, 593-614.
- Uskiewicz, V. D. & Willower, D. J. (1973). Perceived pupil control ideology consensus and teacher job satisfaction. Urban Education, 8 (3), 231-238.
- Üstüner, M. (2006). Öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutum ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 12 (45), 109–127.
- Willover, D. J., Eidell, T. L. & Hoy, W. K. (1973). The School and Pupil Control Ideology. (Penn State Studies Monograph, No:24), University Park: Pennslivania State University Press.
- Willover, D. J. ,Heckert, J. & Hoy, W. K. (1977). Teacher pupil control ideology-behavior congruenge and job satisfaction. Yavuzer, N. (1990). Etkin öğretmen eğitimi uygulamasının öğretmenlerin tutumlarına etkisi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul.
- Yılmaz, K. (2007). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin okul yöneticilerinin liderlik davranışlarıve öğrenci kontrol ideolojilerine ilişkin görüşleri. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi,