Self-handicapping: A Conceptual Analysis

Author :  

Year-Number: 2011-Volume 3, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Self-handicapping strategies are impediments to performance that an individual constructs to protect or enhance his/her perceived competence. These impediments allow this individual to discount responsibility for failure and augment credit for success. This paper presents an overview about the consequences, psychodynamics, and underlying factors of the self-handicapping. Also self-handicapping strategies will be described.

Keywords

Abstract

Self-handicapping strategies are impediments to performance that an individual constructs to protect or enhance his/her perceived competence. These impediments allow this individual to discount responsibility for failure and augment credit for success. This paper presents an overview about the consequences, psychodynamics, and underlying factors of the self-handicapping. Also self-handicapping strategies will be described.

Keywords


  • Abacı, R., & Akın, A. (2011). Kendini sabotaj: İnsanoğlunun sınırlı doğasının bir sonucu. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.

  • Baumgardner, A. H., Lake, E. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1985). Claiming mood as a self-handicap: The influence of spoiled and unspoiled public identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 349-357.

  • Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to non-contingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 405-417.

  • Cavendish, S. (2004). Self-efficacy and use of self-regulated learning strategies and academic self- handicapping among students with learning disabilities. Wayne State University, Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi.

  • Coudevylle, G. R., Martin Ginis, K. A., & Famose, J.-P. (2008). Determinants of self- handicapping strategies in sport and their effects on athletic performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 36, 391-398.

  • Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation, and school reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

  • Feick, D., & Rhodewalt, F. (1997). The double-edged sword of self-handicapping: Disco- unting, augmentation, and the protection and enhancement of self-esteem. Motivation and Emotion, 21(2), 147-163.

  • Hirt, E. R., Deppe, R. K., & Gordon, L. J. (1991). Self-reported versus behavioral self- handicapping: Empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 981-991.

  • Hirt, E. R., McCrea, S. M., & Kimble, C. E. (2000). Public self-focus and sex differences in behavioral self-handicapping: Does increasing self-threat still make it “just a man’s game?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1131-1141.

  • Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self- handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200-206.

  • Leary, M. R., & Shepperd, J. A. (1986). Behavioral self-handicaps versus self-reported self- handicaps: A conceptual note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 12651268.

  • Midgley, C., Arunkumar, R., & Urdan, T. (1996). If I don’t do well tomorrow, there’s a reason: Predictors of adolescents’ use of self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 423-434.

  • Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61-75.

  • Rhodewalt, F., Morf, C., Hazlett, S., & Fairfield, M. (1991). Self-handicapping: The role of discounting and augmentation in the preservation of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 122-131.

  • Rhodewalt, F., & Tragakis, M. (2002). Self-handicapping and the social self: The cost and rewards of interpersonal self-construction. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives (s. 121-140). New York: Psychology Press.

  • Ryska, T. A. (2002). Effects of situational self-handicapping and state self-confidence on the physical performance of young participants. Psychological Record, 52, 461-478.

  • Self, E. (1990). Situational influences on self-handicapping. In R. L. Higgins, C. R. Snyder & S. Berglas (Eds.), Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn’t (s. 37-68). New York: Plenum Press.

  • Snyder, C. R., & Higgins, R. L. (1988). Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 23-35.

  • Snyder, C. R., & Smith, T. W. (1982). Symptoms as self-handicapping strategies: The vir- tues of old wine in a new bottle. In G. Weary & H. L. Mirels (Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social psychology (s. 104-127). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Snyder, C. R., Smith, T. W., Augelli, R. W., & Ingram, R. E. (1985). On the self-serving function of social anxiety: Shyness as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 970-980.

  • Strube, M. J. (1986). An analysis of the Self-handicapping Scale. Basic Applied Social Psychology, 7(3), 211-224.

  • Tice, D. M. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 711-725.

  • Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn? Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138.

  • Zuckerman, M., & Tsai, F. (2005). Costs of self-handicapping. Journal of Personality, 73, 411- 442.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics