The Role of University Education in Changing the Gender Role Perceptions of Turkish ELT Student Teachers
Author :
Abstract
Despite recent improvements in demographics and educational outcomes, it is still the case that traditional expectations and attitudes toward gender roles in the Turkish society have been preserved to a great extent. Given this current position of Turkey in terms of gender issues, the transformative power of education, especially of teachers, could be emphasized more strongly at all levels of education. Therefore, it is important that teachers are trained to identify and counter gender bias to help fight the problem of sexism prevalent in the country. The purpose of this study was to compare the gender role perceptions and gender role classifications of first-year and fourth year English language teaching student teachers and to identify any difference between the two groups. The sample (N=204) for the present study was obtained from a large state university in western Turkey. Gender role orientation was assessed with the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI, Bem 1974). Findings have indicated that male student teachers still have a traditional perspective on gender roles and that university education does not seem to have a role in changing their existing value judgments in relation to gender. On the other hand, Turkish female students have adopted a more masculine gender role within the four years of their university education. Implications are included for teacher education institutions in Turkey.
Keywords
Abstract
Despite recent improvements in demographics and educational outcomes, it is still the case that traditional expectations and attitudes toward gender roles in the Turkish society have been preserved to a great extent. Given this current position of Turkey in terms of gender issues, the transformative power of education, especially of teachers, could be emphasized more strongly at all levels of education. Therefore, it is important that teachers are trained to identify and counter gender bias to help fight the problem of sexism prevalent in the country. The purpose of this study was to compare the gender role perceptions and gender role classifications of first-year and fourth year English language teaching student teachers and to identify any difference between the two groups. The sample (N=204) for the present study was obtained from a large state university in western Turkey. Gender role orientation was assessed with the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI, Bem 1974). Findings have indicated that male student teachers still have a traditional perspective on gender roles and that university education does not seem to have a role in changing their existing value judgments in relation to gender. On the other hand, Turkish female students have adopted a more masculine gender role within the four years of their university education. Implications are included for teacher education institutions in Turkey.
Keywords
- Arat, Y. (2009). Religion, politics and gender equality in Turkey: Implications of a democratic paradox (United Nations Re search Institute for Social development Final Research Report). Switzerland.
- Arıkan, A. (2005). Age, gender and social class in ELT course books: A critical study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 29-38.
- Atay, D., & Ece, A. (2009). Multiple identities as reflected in English-language education: The Turkish perspective. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 8, 21-34.
- Baba, H. B.(2007). Teacher Candidates as Agents of Change for a More Equal Society. (Unpublished master thesis). Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
- Bem, S, L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 42 (2), 153-162.
- Bem, S, L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31 (4), 634-643.
- Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45(2), 196-205.
- Bilgin, E. (2004). An Analysis of Turkish Modernity Through Discourses of Masculinities. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
- Blumberg, R. L. (2008). The invisible obstacle to educational equality: Gender bias in textbooks. Prospects, 38, 345-361.
- Civil, B., & Yıldız, H. (2010). Erkek öğrencilerin cinsel deneyimleri ve toplumdaki cinsel tabulara yönelik görüşleri. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Elektronik Dergisi, 3 (2), 58-64.
- Copur, Z., Erkal, S., Dogan, N., & Safak, S. (2010). Sharing and spending time on domestic tasks: A Turkish sample. Journal of Comparative Studies, Winter 2010, 87-109.
- Coşkun, Y. & Yıldırım, A. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin değer düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, VI(1), 311-328.
- Doğramacı, E. (2000). Women in Turkey and the New Millennium. Ankara: Semih Ofset.
- Dökmen Z. (1999). Bem Cinsiyet rolü envanteri kadınsılık ve erkeksilik ölçekleri Türkçe formunun psikometrik özellikleri. Kriz Dergisi, 7(1), 27-40.
- Dökmen, Z. (2004). Toplumsal Cinsiyet: Sosyal Psikolojik Açıklamalar. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
- Eagly A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes and H. M. Trautner (Eds.). The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, 123-174, NJ: Erbaum.
- Erol Öngen, D. (2007). The relationship between sensation seeking and gender role orientations among Turkish university students. Sex Roles, 57, 111-118.
- Ger, N. (2011, January 24). Interview. Cumhuriyet, p. 11.
- Golombok, S., & Fivush, R. (1994). Gender Development. USA: Cambridge University Press.
- Göğüş Tan, M. (2007). Gender mainstreaming and education. In U. Dufner and S. Sevim (Eds.), The Debate on Gender Mainstreaming in Turkey (pp.39-45). İstanbul: Sena Ofset.
- Holt, C. L., & Ellis, J. B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the bem sex-role inventory. Sex Roles, 39, (11/12), 929-941.
- Horowitz, J. M., & Wike, R. (2010). Pew research center presents: Seeing the second sex. Harvard International Review, Fall 2010, 64–67.
- Johnston, B. (2003). Values in English Language Teaching. NJ: Lawrence Erbaum.
- Jönsson, P., & Carlsson, I. (2000). Androgyny and creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 269-274.
- Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1982). Sex roles, value of children and fertility. In Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Ed.), Sex Roles, Family, & Community in Turkey (pp. 151-180). USA: Indiana University Turkish Studies.
- Kandiyoti, D. (1982). Urban change and women’s roles in Turkey: An overview and evaluation. In Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Ed.), Sex Roles, Family, & Community In Turkey (pp. 101-120). USA: Indiana University Turkish Studies.
- Karakitapoğlu Aygün., Z. & İmamoğlu, E. O. (2002). Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(3), 333-351.
- Kavuncu, N. (1987). Bem Cinsiyet Rolü Envanterinin Türk Toplumuna Uyarlama Çalışması (Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University, Turkey.
- Keller, C. J., Lavish, L. A., & Brown, C. (2007). Creative styles and gender roles in undergraduate students. Creativity Research Journal, 19, (2-3), 273-280.
- Kızılaslan, I. (2010). Student teachers’ perceptions of gendered texts in English language textbooks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2010), 3528-3531.
- Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Malaysia: Pearson.
- Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2005). Masculinity, femininity, and the Bem sex role inventory in Turkey. Sex Roles, 52 (1/2), 103-110.
- Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269-281.
- Sev’er, A. (1999). Culture of honor, culture of change: A feminist analysis of honor killings in Turkey. Violence Against Women: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 964-999.
- Sunderland, J. (1994). Exploring gender: Questions and Implications for English Language Education. UK: Prentice Hall.
- United Nations Development Programme (2006). Turkey ranks 92nd among 177 countries. Retrieved from http://undp.org.tr.
- Vefikuluçay, D., Zeyneloğlu, S., Eroğlu, K., & Taşkın, L. (2007). Kafkas üniversitesi son sınıf öğrencilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin bakış açıları. Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 26-38.
- Vefikuluçay Yılmaz, D., Zeyneloğlu, S., Kocaöz, S., Kısa, S., Taşkın, L., & Eroğlu, K. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin görüşleri. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6 (1), 777-792.