Author :
Abstract
What students learn about science and science practice can be inferred by examining student work about science other than their class work. There are two components to this study. The first is a broad examination of projects participating in a national science fair over several years to ascertain what types of inscriptions (from which orders of variables can be inferred) are used in their projects. This data is compared to patterns of inscriptional use at professional science conferences. The second component is a detailed examination of six specific randomly-selected projects to gain insights about use of inscriptions by students in their presentations. Results suggest that there are broad-based (considering the data source) issue with how data representation/graphing is taught in schools, and that teacher education programs need to specifically focus on this issue so that student teachers are better prepared to deal with these issues.
Keywords
Abstract
What students learn about science and science practice can be inferred by examining student work about science other than their class work. There are two components to this study. The first is a broad examination of projects participating in a national science fair over several years to ascertain what types of inscriptions (from which orders of variables can be inferred) are used in their projects. This data is compared to patterns of inscriptional use at professional science conferences. The second component is a detailed examination of six specific randomly-selected projects to gain insights about use of inscriptions by students in their presentations. Results suggest that there are broad-based (considering the data source) issue with how data representation/graphing is taught in schools, and that teacher education programs need to specifically focus on this issue so that student teachers are better prepared to deal with these issues.
Keywords
- American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2003). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bencze, J. L., & Bowen, G. M. (2005). Science fairs: Mechanisms of socio-economic stratification. A paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
- Bencze, J. L., Bowen, G. M. & Alsop, S. (2006). Teachers’ tendencies to promote student-led science projects: Associations with their views about science. Science Education, 90, 400- 419.
- Bowen, C. M., & Bartley, A. (2007). Understanding issues of pre-service teachers reviewing high school science laboratory reports submitted to an on-line publishing environment. The International Journal of Learning, 14(9), 45-57.
- Bowen, G. M., & Bencze, J. L. (2008). Engaging preserving secondary science teacher with inquiry activities: Insights into difficulties promoting inquiry in high school classrooms. In W. M. Roth & K. Tobin (Vol. Eds.), The World of Science Education: Handbook of Research in North America (pp. 587-609). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. (2002). Why students may not learn to interpret scientific inscriptions. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 303-327.
- Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Data and graph interpretation practices among pre- service teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1063-1088.
- Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
- Collins, H. M. (2010). Tacit knowledge, trust and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 71-85.
- Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670.
- Jordan, B., & Henderson, K (2005). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal Of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39-103.
- Knorr-Centina, K. (2009). Epistemic culture: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B. (2007). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2001). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lynch, M. (2005). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a laboratory. London: Routledge.
- National Research Council (NRC). (2006). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
- National Science Board (NSB). (2009). Preparing our children: Math and science education in the national interest. (Vol. NSB99-31). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
- National Science Foundation (NSF). (2006). Shaping the-future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology Washington: DC.
- Roth, W.M. (2005). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry laboratories. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Roth, W.M. (2003). Toward an anthropology graphing. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Roth, W.M., & Bowel G. M. (2004). Mathematization of experience in a grade 8 open- inquiry environment: An introduction to the representational practices of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(3), 293-318.
- Roth, W. M., Bowen, G. M., & McClain, M. IC. (2009). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbook and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 977-1019.
- Roth, W.M., McGinn, M. K., & Bowen; G. M. (2008). How prepare are preservice teachers to teach scientific inquiry? Levels of performance in scientific representation practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-48.
- Strauss, K, & Corbin, J. (2000). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. CA: Sage Publications.
- Wenger, E. (2008). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.