Using The Brief Experimental Analysis To Determine The Effective Reading Comprehension Strategy İn Story Comprehension Of Students With Mental Retardation

Author :  

Year-Number: 2010-Volume 2, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

In recent years, brief experimental analysis studies are being done to determine the effective teaching strategies for academic skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effective reading comprehension strategy in story comprehension of students with mental retardation by using brief experimental analysis. Brief experimental analysis is used to determine the most effective strategy among four reading comprehension strategies. These strategies are; talking about the used heading before the reading, making the student tell and predict the story while reading, discussing text after reading and a multi element strategy combined of making the student tell and predict the story while reading and discussing the used text after reading. Two boys and one girl were participated in the study. The design of the study was an alternating treatment design. The results of the study showed that the multi-element strategy was the most effective technique on story comprehension skill in all three participants. Implications of the study were discussed and recommendations for further research were provided.

Keywords

Abstract

In recent years, brief experimental analysis studies are being done to determine the effective teaching strategies for academic skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effective reading comprehension strategy in story comprehension of students with mental retardation by using brief experimental analysis. Brief experimental analysis is used to determine the most effective strategy among four reading comprehension strategies. These strategies are; talking about the used heading before the reading, making the student tell and predict the story while reading, discussing text after reading and a multi element strategy combined of making the student tell and predict the story while reading and discussing the used text after reading. Two boys and one girl were participated in the study. The design of the study was an alternating treatment design. The results of the study showed that the multi-element strategy was the most effective technique on story comprehension skill in all three participants. Implications of the study were discussed and recommendations for further research were provided.

Keywords


  • Akçamete, G., Gürgür, H. ve Kış, A. (2003). Kaynaştırma programlarına yerleştirilmiş özel gereksinimli öğrencilerin okuma yazma becerilerine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 4(2), 39-53.

  • Billingsley, B. S., & Wildman, T. M. (1988). The effects of prereading activities on the comprehension monitoring of learning disabled adolesscents. Learning Disabilities Research, 4(1), 36-44.

  • Chafouleas, S. M., Martens, B. K., Dobson R. L., Weinstein, K. S., & Gardner, K. B. (2004). Fluent reading as the improvement of stimulus control: Additive effects of performance-based interventions to repeated reading on students’ reading and error rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13, 67-81.

  • Çevik, G. (2006). Zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin sesli okuma hızlarının arttırılmasında okuma öncesi ve okuma sonrası sağaltım tekniklerinin farklılaşan etkililiği. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.

  • Daly, E. J., Bonfiglio, C. M., Mattson, T., Persampieri, M., & Foreman-Yates K. (2006). Refining the experimental analysis of academic skills deficits: Part II. Use of brief experimental analysis to evaluate reading fluency treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(3), 323-331.

  • Daly, E.J., & Martens, B. K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 459-469.

  • Daly, E.J., Martens, B. K., Dool, E. J., & Hintze, J. M. (1998). Using brief fuctional analysis to select interventions for oral reading. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 203-218.

  • Daly, E.J., Martens, B. K., Hamler, K.R., Dool, E. J., & Eckert, T. L., (1999). A brief experimental analysis for identifying insructional components needed to improve oral reading fluency. Journal of Appilied Behavior Analysis, 32, 83-94.

  • Doğanay-Bilgi, A. (2009). Zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin bilgi veren metinleri anlamalarında uyarlanmış çok ögeli bilişsel strateji öğretimini etkililiği. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.

  • Dole, J. A., Valencia S. W., Greer E. A., & Wardrop J. L. (1991). Effects of two types of prereading instruction on the comprehension of narrative and expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(2), 142-159.

  • Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daisey, M. D., & Scarola, M. D. (2000). Empirically evaluating the effectiveness of reading interventions: the use of brief experimental analysis and single case designs. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 463-473.

  • Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., & Martens, B. K. (2002). Improving oral reading fluency: A brief experimental analysis of combing an antecedent intervention with consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271-281.

  • Ellis, E. S., & Graves, A. W. (1990). Teaching students with learning disabilities: A paraphrasing strategy to increase comprehension of main ideas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 10(2), 2–10.

  • Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Send for the reading POSSE. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 123-138.

  • Eripek, S. (1987). Alt özel sınıf öğrencilerinin ilkokul sınıfları düzeyinde sesli okuma başarılarının değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 125-140.

  • Fournier, D. N. E., & Graves, M. F. (2002). Scaffolding adolescents’ comprehension of short stories. Journal of Adolescent & Adults Literacy, 46(1), 30-39.

  • Güldenoğlu, İ. B. (2008). Karşılıklı öğretim tekniğinin hafif derecede zihin engelli öğrencilere okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin öğretiminde etkililiğinin ve sürekliliğinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.

  • Güzel, R. (1998). Alt özel sınıflardaki öğrencilerin sesli okudukları öyküyü anlama becerisini kazanmalarında doğrudan öğretim yöntemiyle sunulan bireyselleştirilmiş okuduğunu anlama materyalinin etkililiği. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.

  • Güzel, R. (1999). Doğrudan öğretim yönteminin öykü anlama becerisinin öğretiminde uygulanması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 23, 31-41.

  • Güzel-Özmen, R. (1999). Öykü yapısı ve öykü yapısının okuduğunu anlama öğretiminde kullanılması. Bilig Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11, 105-119.

  • Güzel-Özmen, R. (2006). The effectiveness of modified cognitive strategy ınstruction in writing on mildly mentally retarded turkish students. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 281-297.

  • Güzel-Özmen, R., Karakoç, T., Çakmak, S., & Özdemir, S. (2009, May). Determining effective interventions within a brief experimantal analysis to improve oral reading fluency of students with low vision: combined and single effects of skill-based and performance-based interventions. Paper presented at the meeting of the First International Congress of Educational Research, Çanakkale.

  • Heilman, A. W., Blair, T. R., & Rupley, W. H. (1994). Principles and practices of teaching reading. New York: MacMillan College Publishing Company.

  • Holcombe, A., Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (1994). Comparative single-subject research: Description of designs and discussion of problems. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 119-145.

  • House, A. E., House, B. G., & Campbell, M. B. (1981). Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formula and distribution effect. Journal of Behavioral Assessment. 3, 37-57.

  • Idol-Maestas, L. (1985). Getting ready to read: Guided probing for poor comprehenders. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 243-254.

  • Kalkan, S. (2009). Özel eğitim sınıfları ile birlikte eğitim ortamlarına devam eden zihinsel yetersizlikten etkilenmiş öğrencilerin okuduğunu anlama, okuma hızları ve okuma hatası performanslarının karşılaştırılması (Çorum İli Örneği). Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.

  • Klinger, J., Vaughn, S., Arguelles, M., Hughes, M., & Leftwich, A. (2004). Collaborative strategic reading: Real world lessons from classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 291-302.

  • Klingner, K. J., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, S. J. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classroom. Elementary School Journal, 98(1), 3-13.

  • Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin J. R. (1978). What time-series designs may have to offer educational researchers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 273-329.

  • Linden, M., & Wittrock, M. C. (1981). The teaching of reading comprehension according to the model of generative learning. Reading Research Quarterly, XVII, 1, 45-57.

  • Martens, B. K., Eckert, T. L., Bradley, T. A., & Ardoin, S. P. (1999). Identifying effective treatments from a brief experimental analysis: Using single-case desing elements to aid decision-making. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 163-181.

  • Mothus, T. G., & Lapadat, J. C. (2006). A strategy intervention to increase the reading comprehension of junior high school students with reading disabilities. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from ERIC database.

  • Özbay, Y., Özmen, E. R., Tuncer, A. T., & Altunay, B. (2007). Temel eğitim projesi II. fazı: Özel eğitimin etkisi ve etkililiği temel araştırması. Yayınlanmamış Proje Raporu, Ankara: MEB.

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). The reciprocal teaching of comprehension- manitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.

  • Singer, H. (1991). Comprehension instruction international. In Arich Lewy (Ed.). Encylopedia of curriculum, Oxford: Pergoman Press.

  • Singer, H., & Donlan, D. (1982). Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, XVII, 2, 166-185.

  • Snider, V. E. (1989). Reading comprehension performance of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 87-96.

  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New direction in discourse processing (pp. 53119). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Inc.

  • Tawney, W. J., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education, Colombus: Merrill Publishing Company.

  • Tekin, E., & Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2001). Özel eğitimde yanlışsız öğretim yöntemleri. Ankara, Nobel Yayınevi.

  • Therrien, W. J., Wickstrom, K., & Jones, K. (2006). Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21, 89-97.

  • Vaughn, S., & Klingner, J. (2004). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning disabilities. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.). Handbook of language and literacy development and disorders (541-55). New York: Guilford Pres.

  • Wilber, A., & Cushman, T. P. (2006). Selecting effective academic interventions: An example using brief experimental analysis for oral reading. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 79–84.

  • Wittrock, M. C. (1987). Process oriented measures of comprehension. The Reading Teacher, April, 734-736.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics