Examining the Studies Related with Embedded Instruction Provided by the Implementers to the Children with Developmental Disabilities who Received Staff Training

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-Volume 10, Issue 4
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 63-87
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Erken çocukluk döneminde gelişimsel yetersizliği olan çocuklara sunulan eğitimin niteliği çocukların çıktılarıyla yakından ilişkilidir. Araştırma bulguları, kaynaştırma uygulamalarında çocuklara bulundukları ortamın özelliklerine uygun öğretim düzenlemelerinin sunulmasının yararlı olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu düzenlemelerden biri de gömülü öğretimdir. Alanyazında personel eğitimi alan uygulamacıların, gömülü öğretimi başarılı şekilde uygulayarak sınıflarındaki çocukların çıktılarını olumlu yönde etkilediklerini gösteren çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. Bu makalede personel eğitimi alan uygulamacıların sınıflarındaki gelişimsel yetersizliği olan çocuklara sundukları gömülü öğretimin etkilerini belirleyen çalışmaların “tek-denekli araştırmalar niteliksel ölçüleri” açısından değerlendirilmesi ve kapsamlı bir betimsel analizinin yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Bulgular, 16 çalışmanın “kabul edilebilirlik” ölçütünü karşıladığını göstermektedir. Bulgular alanyazın çerçevesinde tartışılmış, uygulamacılara ve araştırmacılara yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

Abstract

The quality of the education provided to the children with developmental disabilities closely related with the children’s outcomes in the early childhood years. The findings of the research studies reveal that providing teaching procedures appropriate to the settings where children live have benefits. One of these procedures is embedded instruction. In the literature, it can be seen that there are studies showing that implementers who received staff training could implement embedded instruction successfully and affect the outcomes of their students’ positively. In this manuscript, it was aimed to evaluate the studies which examined the effects of embedded instruction provided to children with developmental disabilities by the implementers who received staff training according to “the qualitative criteria of single-subject research studies” and also to make a comprehensive descriptive analysis. Results showed that 16 studies met the criteria of “acceptance”. The results were discussed within the literature framework and some suggestions were presented for the future implementers and researchers.

Keywords


  • Aldemir, Ö. (2017). Okulöncesi öğretmenlerince sunulan gömülü öğretimin kaynaştırma öğrencilerinin hedef davranışlarını edinmelerindeki etkileri (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.

  • Aldemir Fırat, Ö., & Ergenekon, Y. (2018). Uygulamacılar için özel eğitimde farklı bir bakış açısı: Gömülü öğretim. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 19(2), 379-401. doi: 10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.328444

  • Aydın, O. (2017). Otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan bireylere matematik becerilerinin öğretimi: Tek-denekli araştırmalarda betimsel ve meta analiz (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim

  • Ayres, K., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Dependent measures and measurement systems. In D. L. Gast, & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 124-153). New York: Routledge.

  • Barton, E. E., Chen, C., Pribble, L., Pomes, M., & Kim, Y. (2013). Coaching preservice teachers to teach play skills to children with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(4), 330-349. doi: 10.1177/0888406413505113

  • Batu, E. S. (2012). Yasal dayanaklar ve kaynaştırma. İçinde Özel gereksinimli çocukların kaynaştırılması (s. 9-22). Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.

  • Berkeban, C. H. (2013). Gelişimsel yetersizliği olan çocuklara toplumsal uyarı işaretlerinin öğretiminde gömülü öğretimle sunulan eşzamanlı ipucuyla öğretimin etkililiği (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Merrill Prentice Hall.

  • Fowler, S. A., Yates, T., & Ostrosky, M. M. (2011). Professional development for early childhod intervention: Current status and future directions. In C. Groark (Series Ed.), & S. Eidelman (Vol. Ed.), Early childhood intervention: Shaping the future forchildren with special needs and their families, Vol. 1, Contemporary policy andpractices landscape (pp. 95-122). Santa Barbara, California: Praeger/ABCCLIO, LLC.

  • Grisham-Brown, J., Hemmeter, M. L., & Pretti-Frontczak, K. (2005). Blended practicesfor teaching young children in inclusive settings. London: Paul Brooks Pub.

  • Grisham-Brown, J., Schuster, J. W., Hemmeter, M. L., & Collins, B. C. (2000). Using an embedding strategy to teach preschoolers with significant disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10(2), 139-162.

  • Grisham-Brown, J., Ridgley, R., Pretti-Frontczak, K., Litt, C., & Nielson, A. (2006). Promoting positive learning outcomes for young children in inclusive classrooms: A preliminary study of children’s progress toward pre-writing standards. Journal of Early and Intensive Behaviour Intervention, 3(1), 171-190.

  • Grisham-Brown J., Pretti-Frontczak K., Hawkins S. R., & Winchell, B. N. (2009). Addressing early learning standards for all children with in blended pre-school classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(3), 131-42. doi: 10.1177/0271121409333796

  • Horn, E., Lieber, J., Li, S., Sandall, S., & Schwartz, I. (2000). Supporting young children's IEP goals in inclusive settings through embedded learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(4), 208223.

  • Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Council for Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179.

  • Koegel, R. L., Vernon, T. W., & Koegel, L. K. (2009). Improving social initiations in young children with autism using reinforcers with embedded social interactions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(9), 1240-1251. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0732-5

  • Kohler, F. W., Strain, P. S., Hoyson, M., & Jamieson, B. (1997). Merging naturalistic teaching and peer-based strategies to address the IEP objectives of preschoolers with autism: An examination of structural and child behaviour. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 12(4), 196-207.

  • Lerner, J. W., Lowenthal, B., & Egan, R. W. (2003). Preschool children with special needs: Children at risk and children with disabilities. Boston: Pearson Education.

  • McDonnell, J., Johnson, J. W., & McQuivey, C. (2008). Embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities in general education classrooms. A Publication of the Division on Developmental Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children.

  • Macy, M. G., & Bricker, D. D. (2007). Embedding individualized social goals into routine activities in inclusive early childhood classrooms. Early Child Development and Care, 177(2), 107-120. doi:10.1080/03004430500337265

  • Malmskog, S., & McDonnell, A. P. (1999). Teacher-mediated facilitation of engagement by children with developmental delays in inclusive preschools. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19(4), 203-216.

  • McBride, B. J., & Schwartz, I. S. (2003). Effects of teaching early interventionists to use discrete trials during ongoing classroom activities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(1), 5-17.

  • Moore, S. M., Perez-Mendez, C., & Kaczmarek, L. A. (2011). Partnerships with families from diverse cultures. In C. Groark (Series Ed.), & L. A. Kaczmarek (Vol. Ed.), Early childhood intervention: Shaping the future for children with specialneeds and their families, Vol. 3, Emerging trends in research and practice (pp. 1-32). Santa Barbara, California: Praeger/ABC-CLIO, LLC.

  • National Autism Center (NAC). (2015). National Autism Center’s National Standards Report. Randolph, Massachusetts.

  • National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) (2014). Naturalistic Intervention. Evidence-Based Practices.

  • [http://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/content/naturalistic-intervention] (Erişim tarihi: 04.03.2018)

  • Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği (2018).

  • [http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_07/09101900_ozel_egitim_hizmetleri_yonetmeligi_07072018. pdf] (Erişim tarihi: 23.07.2018)

  • Özen, A., Ergenekon, Y., Ülke-Kürkçüoğlu, B., & Genç, D. (2013). Opinions of special education teachers about activity-based intervention. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 262-274.

  • Pretti-Frontczak, K., & Bricker, D. (2004). An activity-based approach to early intervention. London: Paul Brooks Pub.

  • Rakap, S. (2017a). Impact of coaching on preservice teachers’ use of embedded instruction in inclusive preschool classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 125-139. doi:10.1177/0022487116685753

  • Rakap, S. (2017b). Okulöncesi kaynaştırma eğitimi uygulamalarının desteklenmesinde doğal öğretim yaklaşımları [Naturalistic instructional approaches to support inclusion of preschool children with disabilities]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 18, 1-22. doi: 10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.319665

  • Rakap, S., & Balikci, S. (2016). Using embedded instruction to teach functional skills to a preschool child with autism. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63(1), 17-26.

  • Rakap, S., & Parlak-Rakap, A. (2011). Effectiveness of embedded instruction in early childhood special education: A literature review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(1), 79-96. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2011.548946

  • Sakız, H., & Woods, C. (2015). Achieving inclusion of students with disabilities in Turkey: Current challenges and future prospects. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(1), 21-35. doi:1080/13603116.2014.902122

  • Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., Ownbey, J., & Parsons, M. B. (2001). Training support staff to embed teaching within natural routines of young children with disabilities in an inclusive preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(3), 313-327. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-313

  • Snyder, P. A., Denney, M. K., Pasia, C., Rakap, S., & Crowe, C. (2011a). Professional development in early childhood intervention: Emerging issues and promising approaches. In C. Groark (Series Ed.), & L. A. Kaczmarek (Vol. Ed.), Early childhood intervention: Shaping the future for children with special needs and their families, Vol. 3, Emerging trends in research and practice (pp. 169-198). Santa Barbara, California: Praeger/ABC-CLIO, LLC.

  • Snyder, P. A., Hemmeter, M. L., & McLaughlin, T. (2011b). Professional development in early childhood intervention: Where we stand on the silver anniversary of PL 99-457. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 357-369. doi:10.1177/1053815111428336

  • Snyder, P. A., Rakap, S., Hemmeter, M. L., McLaughlin, T. W., Sandall, S., & McLean, M. E. (2015). Naturalistic instructional approaches in early learning: A systematic review. Journal of Early Intervention, 37(1), 6997. doi:10.1177/1053815115595461

  • Tate, T. L., Thompson, R. H., & McKerchar, P. M. (2005). Training teachers in an infant classroom to use. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(3), 206-221.

  • Toelken, S., & Miltenberger, R. G. (2012). Increasing independence among children diagnosed with autism using a brief embedded teaching strategy. Behavioral Interventions, 27(2), 93-104.

  • Venn, M. L., & Wolery, M. (1992). Increasing day care staff members' interactionsduring caregiving routines. Journal of Early Intervention, 16(4), 304-319. doi:10.1002/bin.337

  • Winton, P. J. (2016). Taking stock and moving forward: Implementing quality early childhood inclusive practices. In B. Reichow, B. A. Boyd, E. E. Barton, & S. L. Odom (Eds), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 57-74). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

  • Wolery, M., Anthony, L., & Heckathorn, J. (1998). Transition-based teaching: Effects on transitions, teachers’ behaviour, and children’s learning. Journal of Early Intervention, 21(2), 117-131.

  • Wolery, M., Anthony, L., Caldwell, N. K., Snyder, E. D., & Morgante, J. D. (2002). Embedding and distributing constant time delay in circle time and transitions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22(1), 14-25.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics