Relationship of Phubbing, a Behavioral Problem, with Assertiveness and Passiveness: A Study On Adolescents
Author :
Abstract
Bu araştırmada ergenlerin güvengenlik ve çekingenlik özelliklerinin sosyotelizm davranışını yordayıp yordamadığını incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Bu araştırma, 2018-2019 eğitim öğretim yılı I. döneminde Orta Anadolu’da bir ildeki 3 farklı lisede öğrenim gören 9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıf öğrencileri ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmaya 430 kız ve 204 erkek olmak üzere toplamda 634 öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri Sosyotelizm Ölçeği, Kendini Belirleme Ölçeği ve araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen kişisel bilgi formu kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde ikili değişkenler için t-testi, çoklu değişkenler için tek yönlü varyans analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada öğrencilerin güvengenliklerinin sosyotelizmi yordayıp yordamadığı hiyerarşik regresyon analizi ile belirlenmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre cinsiyetin ve okul türünün sosyotelizm üzerinde etkili olmadığı; fakat kullanılan telefonun akıllı telefon olup olmamasının sosyotelizm üzerinde etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Sosyotelizm güvengenlik ile negatif yönlü, çekingenlik ile pozitif yönlü anlamlı bir ilişkiye sahiptir. Araştırmada hem güvengenliğin hem de çekingenliğin sosyotelizmin anlamlı yodayıcısı olduğu saptanmıştır. Sosyotelizm davranışını açıklamada güvengenlik, çekingenlik ve kullanılan telefon etkilidir.
Keywords
Abstract
In this study, it was aimed to examine whether or not adolescents’ assertiveness and avoidance predicted phubbing behavior. This study was conducted with 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grade students in 3 different high schools in a province in Central Anatolia in the first period of 2018-2019 academic year. A total of 634 students, 430 girls and 204 boys participated in the study. The data were collected using by Phubbing Scale, The Assertiveness Scale and personal information form developed by the researcher. For data analysis, t-test was employed for binary variables, and one-way anova for multiple variables. Whether or not students' assertiveness and avoidance predicted phubbing behavior was determining by hierarchical regression analysis. The study findings revealed that gender and type of school did not have an effect on their phubbing behaviors. However, the fact that the telephone used was a smart phone was effective on phubbing behaviors. There was a negative significant relationship between assertiveness and phubbing. There was a positive significant relationship between avoidance and phubbing. In this study, it was determined that both assertiveness and avoidance were significant predictor of phubbing. The assertiveness, avoidance and the telephone used are effective in explaining the phubbing behavior.
Keywords
- Akeren, İ. (2017). Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Algılanan Sosyal Destek ve Güvengenlik İle Psikolojik Yardım İhtiyacının İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsi, Erzurum.
- Aydoğdu-Karaaslan, İ. & Budak, L. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin cep telefonu özelliklerini kullanımlarının ve gündelik iletişimlerine etkisinin araştırılması. Journal of Yasar University, 26(7), 4548-4525.
- Blachnio, A. & Przepiorka, A. (2018). Be aware! If you start using facebook problematically you will feel lonely: Phubbing, loneliness, self-esteem, and facebook intrusion. A cross-sectional study. Social Science Computer Review. First Published Online February 1, 2018
- Branas-Garza, P., Capraro, V. & Ramirez, E.R. (2018). Gender differences in altruism on Mechanical Turk: Expectations and actual behaviour. Econ. Lett., 170, 19–23.
- Buckle, C. (2016). Mobiles seen as most important device (14 September 2016). (Retrieved from: https: //blog.globalwebindex.com/chart-of-the-day/mobiles-seen-as-most-important-device/.28.02.2019).
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö. & Köklü, N. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik (6. baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayınevi.
- Chotpitayasunondh, V. & Douglas, K.M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18.
- Chotpitayasunondh, V. & Douglas, K.M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304-316.
- Çizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, though satisfied: Phubbing behavior and relationship satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 7(2), 364-375.
- Dalbudak, E., Evren, C., Aldemir, S., Taymur, I., Evren, B. & Topcu, M. (2015). The impact of sensation seeking on the relationship between attention deficit/hyperactivity symptoms and severity of Internet addiction risk. Psychiatry Research, 228(1), 156-161.
- Davey S., Davey A. & Singh J.V. (2016) Emergence of problematic internet use among Indian adolescents: A multi method study. Journal of Indian Assoc Child Adolesc Ment Health. 12(1), 60–78.
- Davey, S. Davey, A., Raghav, S.K., Singh, J.V., Singh, N., Blachnio, A. & Przepiorkaa, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of “Phubbing” among adolescents and youth in India: An impact evaluation study. Journal Of Family & Community Medicine, 25(1), 35-42.
- Demirci K., Orhan H., Demirdas A., Akpinar, A. & Sert H. (2014).Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the smartphone addiction scale in a younger population. Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 24(3), 226-34.
- Gökdağ, R. (2018). Which one has priority in ınterpersonal communication? Individual or mobile phone. (Ed. Oze, N.). Public Relations & Communicatıon Studies,(9-20). London: IJOPEC Publication.
- Guazzini, A., Duradoni, M., Capelli, A. & Meringolo, P. (2019). An explorative model to assess ındividuals’ phubbing risk. Future Internet, 11(1), 21.
- Güdek, K. (2014). Terapötik iletişim ve sosyal çalışma. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitapevi.
- Hamoud, S., Abd El Dayem, S. & Ossman, L. (2011). The effect of an assertiveness training program on assertiveness skills and self-esteem of faculty nursing students. Journal of American Science, 7(12), 454
- https://www.macmillandictionary.com/buzzword/entr ies /phubbing.html. (28.02.2019).
- Huck, S.W. (2008). Reading statistics and research, 5th Edition. New York: Pearson Educational Inc.
- Jacobsen, W. & Forste, R. (2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among universitystudent. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14(5), 275-280.
- Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş.B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Mızrak-Şahin, B., Çulha, İ. & Babadağ, B. (2016). Sanal dünyanın kronolojik bağımlılığı: Sosyotelizm (phubbing) Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addiction, 3(2), 223-269.
- Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş.B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B.M., Çulha, İ. & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of behavioral addictions, 4(2), 60-74.
- Karahan, T.F. (2005). Bir iletişim ve çatışma çözme beceri eğitimi programı'nın üniversite öğrencilerinin güvengenlik düzeylerine etkisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 217-230.
- Kuss, D.J. & Griffiths, M.D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction—A review of the psychological literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 8(9), 3528–3552.
- Martinez, V., Justicia, F.Y. & Haro, F.E. (2016). Teacher assertiveness in the development of students' social competence. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14(2), 310-332.
- McWhirter, J. & Voltan-Acar, N. (2005). Çocukla iletişim. İstanbul: MEB Yayınları.
- Mieczakowski, A., Goldhaber, T. & Clarkson, P. (2011). Culture, communication and change: summary of an ınvestigation of the use and ımpact of modern media and technology in our lives, Technical Report. Cambridge: Cambridge Engineering Design Centre.
- Mok, J.Y., Choi, S. W., Kim, D.J., Choi, J.S., Lee, J., Ahn, H. & Song, W.Y. (2014). Latent class analysis on internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Neuropsychiatric Disease And Treatment, 10, 817-828
- Pamuk, U.E. (2013). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin atılganlık düzeyi ile akran baskısı arasındaki ilişki (İstanbul İli Tuzla İlçesi Örneği). Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Yeditepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Rand, D.G., Brescoll, V.L., Everett, J.A., Capraro, V. & Barcelo, H. (2016) Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4), 389-396.
- Roberts, J., Yaya, L. & Manolis, C. (2014) The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(4), 254–265.
- Roberts, J.A. & David, M.E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computer in Human Behaviour, 54, 134–
- Shanmugam, V. & Kathyayini, B.V. (2017). Assertiveness and self-esteem in Indian adolescents. Galore Interantional Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 2(4), 8-13.
- Shen, C. & Williams D. (2010). Unpacking time online: Connecting internet and massively multiplayer online game use with psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 38(1), 123-149.
- Skeen, M., McKay, M., Fanning, P. & Skeen, K. (2016). Communication skills for teens: How to listen, express, and connect for success. California: New Harbinger Publications.
- Tagay, Ö., Önen, Ü.Ö. & Canpolat, İ. (2018). Ergenlerin sosyal kaygı düzeyleri ile güvengenlik ve özsaygıları arasındaki ilişki. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 261-629
- T'ng, S.T., Ho, K.H. & Low, S.K. (2018). Are you phubbing me? The determinants of phubbing behavior and assessment of measurement ınvariance across sex differences. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 159-190.
- Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
- Ugur, N.G. & Koc, T. (2015). Time for digital detox: Misuse of mobile technology and phubbing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1022-1031.
- Vagos, P. & Pereira, A. (2010). A proposal for evaluating cognition in assertiveness. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 657-665.
- Voltan-Acar, N. & Öğretmen, T. (2007). Kendini belirleme (güvengenlik) ölçeği geliştirme çalışmaları. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(27), 67-78.
- Voltan-Acar, N., Arıcıoğlu, A., Gültekin, F. & Gençtanırım, D. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin güvengenlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 342-350
- Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length, Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12-17
