A Content Analysis of the Academicians’ Views and Experiences on the Central Foreign Language Examinations in Turkey
Author :
Abstract
Keywords
Abstract
This research aims to examine academicians' views regarding the compatibility of central foreign examinations with academic studies. Having a qualitative research design, this research used a phenomenological design. The research was carried out with education faculty academicians working at a higher institution in Turkey. Convenience sampling method was used to determine the participants in the current research as the sample was selected among the academicians who are the colleagues of the researchers. The research utilized a semi-structured interview form developed by the researchers. Content analysis was used during data analysis. Research findings revealed that the majority of the academicians experienced the exams twice and their scores ranged across 45 and 85. In addition, all of the academicians have reported that there is an inconsistency between the central foreign language exams and the ability to speak foreign languages fluently. Most of the academicians have emphasized that central foreign language exams do not measure foreign language knowledge in detail with no contribution to scientific studies; moreover, they are useful only in literature review in terms of vocabulary, and other academic studies have been negatively affected because of time constraint. Besides, academicians have particularly stated that they attended courses during the exam preparation and that they received a full examination-oriented training. As a result, academicians were determined to have negative views on the compatibility of the central foreign language examinations with academic studies.
Keywords
- Akın, G. (2016). Evaluation of national foreign language test in Turkey. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 11-21.
- Akpinar, K. D., & Cakildere, B. (2013). Washback effects of high-stakes language tests of Turkey (KPDS and ÜDS) on productive and receptive skills of academic personnel. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 9(2), 81-94.
- Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
- Cinkara, E., & Tosun, Ö. Ö. (2017). Face validity study of a small-scale test in a tertiary level intensive EFL program. B.U. Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(2), 395-410.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London and New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
- Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, Inc. California.
- Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Çetin, K., & Kılıçkaya, F. (2019). An inquiry into Turkish academicians’ willingness to communicate in English. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 7(13), 289-308.
- Dewaele, J.-M. (2012) Personality: Personality traits as independent and dependent variables. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan and M. Williams (Eds.) Psychology for Language Learning: Insights from Research, Theory and Practice (pp. 42-57). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Douglas, D. (2002). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge.
- Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Eurydice (2008). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA P9 Eurydice).
- Gür, O. (2012). Testing, Assessment and KPDS (foreign language proficiency examination for state employees)– What does this exam assess? Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(1), 23-32.
- Hatipoğlu, Ç. (2016). The impact of the university entrance exam on EFL education in Turkey: Pre-service English language teachers’ perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 136-144.
- Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. London: Sage.
- Karakütük, K., Tunç, B., Özdem, G., & Bülbül, T. (2008). Academic personnel profile of educational faculties. Ankara: Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Publications.
- Kılıçkaya, F. (2010). ÜDS (Üniversitelerarası kurul yabancı dil sınavı): Nasıl olmalı? In Cumhuriyetimizin 100. Yılına Doğru Üniversite Vizyonumuz (Tebliğler Kitabı) (pp. 257-264), Ankara. Retrieved from https://www.turkegitimsen.org.tr/lib_basili/176.pdf.
- Kohonen, V. (1997). Authentic assessment as an integration of language learning, teaching, evaluation and the teacher’s Professional growth. In A. Huhta, V. Kohonen, L. Kurki Suonio and S. Louma (Eds.), Current developments and alternatives in language assessment: Proceedings of LTRC 96 (pp. 7-22). Jyvaskyla, Finland: University of Jyvaskyla.
- Külekçi, E. (2016). A concise analysis of the Foreign Language Examination (YDS) in Turkey and its possible washback effects. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 3(4), 303-315.
- Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design. Upper Sadle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
- Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Luo, S., & Zhang, X. (2011). Multiple-choice item and its backwash effect on language teaching in China. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(4), 423-425.
- MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44(2), 283–305.
- Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Neubauer, B.E., Witkop, C.T. & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8, 90–97.
- Özmen, K. S. (2011b). Washback effects of the inter-university foreign language examination on foreign language competences of candidate academics. Novitas ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 5(2), 215-228.
- Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. London: Sage Pub.
- Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research evaluation methods. California: Sage.
- Poonpon, K. (2010). Expanding a second language speaking rating scale for instructional and assessment purposes. English Language Institute, 8, 69-94.
- Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The importance of four skills reading, speaking, writing, listening in a lesson hour. European Journal of Language and Literature, 1(1), 29-31.
- Sayın, B. A., & Aslan, M. M. (2016). The negative effects of undergraduate placement examination of English (LYS-5) on ELT students in Turkey. Participatory Educational Research, 3(1), 30-39.
- Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Shohamy, E. (1992a). Beyond proficiency testing: A diagnostic feedback testing model for assessing foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 76(4), 513-521.
- Toksöz, I., & Kılıçkaya, F. (2018). Review of journal articles on washback in language testing in Turkey (2010- 2017). Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 41(2), 184.
- Uysal, H. H. (2009). A critical review of the IELTS writing test. ELT Journal, 64(3), 314-320.
- Wall, D., & Alderson, J. C. (1993). Examining washback: the Sri Lankan impact study. Language Testing, 10(1), 41-69.
- Weiping, G., & Juan, L. (2005). Test analysis of college students’ communicative competence in English. Asian EFL Journal, 7(2).
- Ya-Chen, Su (2007). Students’ changing views and the integrated-skills approach in Taiwan’s EFL college classes. Education Research Institute. Tainan, Taiwan
- Yavuzer, H. & Gover, İ. H. (2012). Akademik personelin yabancı dil durumu ve yabancı dil sınavlarına bakışı: Nevsehir örnegi. Nevsehir University Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 136-158.
- Yesilyurt, S. (2016). An attempt for the exploration of academicians' experiences of the standard foreign language tests held in Turkey through metaphors. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 263-274.
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Scientific research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
- Yıldırım, Ö. (2010). Washback effects of a high-stakes university entrance exam: Effects of the English section of the university entrance exam on future English language teachers in Turkey. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2),
