Teacher Opinions About Students’ Reading Attitude, Habits and Metacognitive Awareness

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-Volume 14, Issue 2
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-02-24 22:30:07.0
Language : English
Konu : Language education
Number of pages: 387-407
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Reading is a physical and mental skill. The development of positive attitudes towards reading and reading habits in individuals improve their mental skills. For this reason, it is thought that there is a relationship between reading attitude and habit and metacognitive awareness. The purpose of the study is to determine first language teachers’ opinions on the relationship between students’ reading attitudes and habits and their metacognitive awareness. In accordance with this purpose, the study was carried out in a qualitative type of phenomenological design. The study group consists of 10 teachers who were chosen from among the teachers working in Malatya city center by typical case sampling method one of the purposeful sampling methods. The data were obtained through semi-structured face-to-face interviews with the participants. During the interviews, the interview guide prepared by the researchers and probing questions were used when necessary. Descriptive and content analysis methods were preferred in analyzing the data. The findings obtained were interpreted with reference to the literature. As a result, it can be said that there is a relationship between the reading attitude habits of the students and their metacognitive awareness level in terms of the participants.

Keywords


  • Applegate, A. J., Applegate, M. D., Mercantini, M. A., McGeehan, C. M., Cobb, J. B., DeBoy, J. R., … Lewinski, K. E. (2014) The peter effect revisited: reading habits and attitudes of college students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53(3), 188-204, DOI: 10.1080/19388071.2014.898719.

  • Akınoğlu, O. (2009). Teaching principles and methods. Pegem Akademi Publishing.

  • Akpunar, B. (2011). Analysis of cognition and metacognition concepts in terms of philosophy of mind. Turkish Studies, 6(4), 353-365.

  • Alkan, M. (2015). Educational sciences with keywords. Yargı Publishing House.

  • Asgari, M. & Rafiee, M. (2018). Meta-cognitive learning strategies: The effect of training strategies on memorizing, comprehension and the speed of reading. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 21(3), 21-34, DOI: 10.5782/2223-2621.2018.21.3.21.

  • Azmuddin, R. A., Nor, N. F. M. & Hamat, A. (2017). Metacognitive online reading and navigational strategies by science and technology university students. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 17(3), http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1703-02.

  • Baradaran, H. R., Shajari, J. & Alirezaee Tehrani, S. (2014). An assessment of the relationship between the meta- cognitive awareness of reading strategies and students’ achievement in Iran University of Medical Sciences in 2012-2013. Journal of Medical Education and Development, 9(2), 2-13.

  • Baş, T. & Akturan, U. (2017). Computer aided qualitative research methods in social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.

  • Batur, Z., Gülveren, H. & Bek, H. (2010). A research on pre-service teachers’ reading habits. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 32-49.

  • Bayat, N. & Çetinkaya, G. (2018). Reading habits and preferences of secondary school students. Elementary Education Online, 17(2), 984-1001.

  • Bećirović, S., Čeljo, A. B. & Sinanović, J. (2017). The use of metacognitive reading strategies among students at ınternational Burch university: a case study. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(4), 645-655, DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2017.4.645 www.ejournal1.com

  • Belet, D. Ş. & Yaşar, Ş. (2007). The effect of learning strategies on reading comprehension and writing skills and attitudes towards turkish lesson. Theory and Practice in Education, 3(1), 69-86.

  • Berkowitz, E. & Cicchelli, T. (2004). Metacognitive strategy use in reading of gifted high achieving and gifted underachieving middle school students in new york city. Education and Urban Society, 37(1), 37-57, DOI: 10.1177/0013124504268072.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. et al. (2014). Scientific research methods, Pegem Akademi Publishing.

  • Cabinda, M. (2016). Purported use and self-awareness of cognitive and metacognitive foreign language reading strategies in tertiary education in Mozambique. Africa Focus, 29(1), 25-47.

  • Candler, C. & Grajo, L. C. (2020). Reading participation profiles of school-aged children: use of the ınventory of reading occupations-pediatric. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 13(1), 6988, DOI: 10.1080/19411243.2019.1636747.

  • Caňizo, M. Á., García, C. M., Cuetos, F. & Coalla, P. S. (2020). Development of reading prosody in school-age Spanish children: a longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 1–18, DOI:10.1111/14679817.12286.

  • Cemiloğlu, M. & Ogur, E. (2016). Cognition and metacognition strategies in teaching reading. International Journal of Humanities Art and Researches - International Refereed Journal of Human and Art Researches, 118- 137.

  • Chai, W. N., Ruangrajitpakorn, T. & Supnithi, T. (2018). A supporting tool for learning to ımprove thinking skill through reading activities. 2018 IEEE.

  • Chan, J. S., Woolley, L. W., Heggie, L. & Kirby, J. R. (2019). Understanding prosody and morphology in school‑age children’s reading. Reading and Writing, 33, 1295–1324, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-01910005-4.

  • Chang, M., Graf, S., Corbett, P. Seaton, J. X., McQuiod, S. & Ross, T. (2019). OMEGA: a multiplayer online game for ımproving user’s meta-cognitive skills. 2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), DOI 10.1109/T4E.2019.00-26.

  • Christensen, L. B, Johnson, R. B. & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods: design and analysis. (A. Aypay, Trans. Edt.). Anı Publishing.

  • Cirocki, A., Parba, J., Caparoso, J. & Caday, K. A. (2019). Metacognitive reading strategies in the Filipino ESL classroom: use and ınstruction. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 28, 29-60.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2017). 30 essential skills for qualitative researchers. (H. Özcan, Trans.). Anı Publishing.

  • Çeliköz, N. (2018). Levels of use of meta-cognitive reading strategies by primary school teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 223-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2018.02.015.

  • Çetinkaya Ezider, Z. (2015). The relationship between Turkish pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards reading habits and level of use of metacognitive reading strategies. K. Ü. Kastamonu Education Journal, 23(2), 645658.

  • Çetinkaya Ezider, Z. & Özbilgin, E. (2019). Metacognitive reading awareness of eighth grade students. International Journal of Society Researches, 10(17), 156-175.

  • Davies, J. & Brember, I. (1997). The effects of pre‑school experience on reading attainment: a four year cross‑ sectional study. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 255-266, DOI: 10.1080/0144341970170302.

  • Demir, Ö. & Doğanay, A. (2009). Cognitive coaching approach in the development of cognitive awareness skills. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 15(60), 601-623.

  • Deniz, A. (2017). Turkish teachers’ views on the development of secondary school students’ reading habits. Unpublished master’s thesis.

  • Dore, R. A., Amendum, S. J., Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2018). Theory of mind: a hidden factor in reading comprehension? Educ Psychol Rev., 30, 1067–1089.

  • Glesne, C. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research. (A. Ersoy P. Yalçınoğlu, Trans. Edt.). Anı Publishing.

  • Gorzycki, M., Desa, G., Howard, P. J. & Allen, D. D. (2019). “Reading is important,” but “i don’t read”: undergraduates’ experiences with academic reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(5), 499– 508. DOI: 10.1002/jaal.1020.

  • Guerra, E. & Mellado, G. (2017). A-book: a feedback-based adaptive system to enhance meta-cognitive skills during reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience: Front Hum Neurosci, 11, 98.

  • Güneş, F. (2016). Turkish teaching approaches and models. Pegem Akademi Publishing.

  • Hare, V. C. & Smith, D. C. (1982). Reading to remember: studies of metacognitive reading skills in elementary school-aged children. The Journal of Educational Research, 75(3), 157-164.

  • Harman, G. & Çelikler, D. (2012). A Review on the importance of availability in education, Journal of education and Training Research, 1(3), 147-156.

  • Hovland, I. (2019). Bringing reading into the classroom: using active learning to practice the ınvisible skill. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(3), 512-523.

  • Isakson, R. L., Isakson, M. B., Plummer, K. J. & Chapman, S. B. (2016). Development and validation of the ısakson survey of academic reading attitudes (ISARA). Journal of College Reading and Learning, 46(2), 113138, DOI: 10.1080/10790195.2016.1141667.

  • Johnson, T. E., Archibald, T. N. & Tenenbaum, G. (2010). Individual and team annotation effects on students’ reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1496–1507.

  • Kana, F. (2014). Secondary School students’ metacognition reading strategies awareness levels. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 16(1), 100-120.

  • Karatay, H. (2010). Cognitive awareness of primary school students related to reading comprehension. TÜBAR-XXVII, 457-475.

  • Kazi, A. S., Moghal, S. & Asad, Z. (2020). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies for academic materials: a study of undergraduate students in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, 1, 44-51. DOI:10.31703/gssr.2020(V-I).05.

  • Lan, Y. C., Lo, Y. L. & Hsu, Y. S. (2014). The effects of meta-cognitive ınstruction on students’ reading comprehension in computerized reading contexts: a quantitative meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 186–202.

  • Lien, H. Y. (2016). Effects of EFL individual learner variables on foreign language reading anxiety and metacognitive reading strategy use. Psychological Reports, 119(1), 124–135. sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0033294116659711.

  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (2016). An extended resource book: qualitative data analysis. (S. A. Altun, A. Ersoy Trans.). Pegem Akademi Publishing.

  • Mirasol, R. G. (2020). A survey of grade 5 and 6 pupils’ attitudes toward reading. a survey of grade 5 and 6 pupils’ attitudes toward reading. Reading Psychology, 41(3), 229-239, DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2020.1768982.

  • Molotja, T. W. & Themane, M. (2018). enhancing learners’ reading habits through reading bags at secondary schools. Reading & Writing: Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa, 9(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v9i1.185.

  • Msaddek, M. (2016). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on Moroccan EFL learners’ strategy use and reading achievement. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 7(3).

  • Oakley, G. (2011). The assessment of reading comprehension cognitive strategies: practices and perceptions of western Australian teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(3), 279-293.

  • Onat, O. (2016). Phenomenology and grounded theory: a comparison in terms of some features, phenomenology and grounded theory: a comparison in terms of some features. Trakya University Journal of Education, 6(1), 55-66.

  • Özden, M. (2018). Turkish education students’ awareness of metacognitive reading strategies. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 13(19), 1427-1439, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13784.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (M. Tüm & S. B. Demir, Trans. Edt.). Pegem Akademi Publishing.

  • Peverly, S. T., Brobst, K. E., & Morris, K. S. (2002). The contribution of reading comprehension ability and meta-cognitive control to the development of studying in adolescence. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2), 203–216.

  • Rock, A. (2018). Response to intervention: reading and reading disabilities. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 10(1), 25-29.

  • Seçkin Kapucu, M. & Öksüz, R. (2016). Investigation of middle school students’ metacognitive awareness. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 6(12), 5-28.

  • Sever, S. (2011). Turkish teaching and learning. Anı Publishing.

  • Schröter, H. & Bar-Kochva, I. (2019). Reading competencies in Germany and underlying cognitive skills. Z Erziehungswiss. 22, 17-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-018-00864-y.

  • Shehzad, W., Razzaq, S., Dahri, A. S. & Shah, S. K. B. (2019). The association between reading self-efficacy beliefs and meta cognitive reading strategies among Saudi PYP students. Dialogue, 14(2), 32-43.

  • Shen, W. & Park, H. (2018). The effects of meta-cognitive strategies, working memory capacity and syntactic awareness on L2 reading comprehension. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 87-112.

  • Silverman, D. (2018). Interpreting qualitative data. (E. Dinç, Trans. Edt.). Pegem Akademi Publishing.

  • Snoubar, T. K. A. (2017). English as a foreign language learners’ major and meta-cognitive reading strategy use at Al-Balqa Applied University. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 69-85. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v10n9p69.

  • Soto, C., Blume, A. P. G., Bernal, M. A. C. & Castro, M. A. C. (2020). The role of meta-cognitive cues on the comprehension of proficient and poor readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(3), 272–289. DOI:10.1111/1467-9817.12303.

  • Steensel, R. V., Oostdam, R., Gelderen, A. V. & Schooten, E. V. (2016). The role of word decoding, vocabulary knowledge and meta-cognitive knowledge in monolingual and bilingual low-achieving adolescents’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(3), 312–329, DOI:10.1111/1467-9817.12042.

  • Steensel, R. V., Oostdam, R., & Gelderen, A. V. (2019). Affirming and undermining motivations for reading and associations with reading comprehension, age and gender. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(3), 504– 522, DOI:10.1111/1467-9817.12281.

  • Šafranj, J. (2019). The effect of meta-cognitive strategies on self-efficacy and locus of control of gifted in foreign language learning. Research in Pedagogy, 9(1), 40-51. DOI: 10.17810/2015.90.

  • Taki, S. (2016). Metacognitive online reading strategy use: Readers’ perceptions in L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(4), 409–427, DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12048.

  • Tan, Ş. et al. (2009). Teaching principles and methods. Pegem Akademi Publishing.

  • Tanju, H, E. (2010). An overview of children’s book reading habits. Family and Society Education, Culture and Research Journal, 6(22) 30-39.

  • Temizkan, M. (2008). A research on Turkish teacher candidates’ attitudes towards teaching profession. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 461-486.

  • Trapman, M., Gelderen, A. V., Steensel, R. V., Schooten, E. V., & Hulstijn, J. (2014). Linguistic knowledge, fluency and meta-cognitive knowledge as components of reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: differences between monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 3-21, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01539.x.

  • Troseth, G. L., Strouse, G. A., Flores, I., Stuckelman, Z. D. & Johnson, C. R. (2020). An enhanced eBook facilitates parent–child talk during shared reading by families of low socioeconomic status. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 45-58, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecresq.2019.02.009.

  • Wu, J. Y. & Peng, Y. C. (2017). The modality effect on reading literacy: perspectives from students’ online reading habits, cognitive and metacognitive strategies, and web navigation skills across regions. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 859-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1224251.

  • Yaman, İ. & Çakıcı, D. (2013). The effect of cognitive and compensation strategy ınstruction on reading comprehension skill. Journal of Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Education, 32(2), 369-384.

  • Yalçın, B., Tetik, S. & Açıkgöz, A. (2010). A study on determining the problem solving skill perceptions of high school students and locus of control. Journal of Organization and Management Sciences, 2(2), 19-27.

  • Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S. & Mistianah (2018). Revealing the relationship between reading ınterest and critical thinking skills through remap GI and remap jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics