Introducing Prospective Teachers to the Dual Modelling Cycle

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-Volume 14, Issue 1
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-02-15 18:12:20.0
Language : English
Konu : Mathematics and Science Education
Number of pages: 232-253
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the working of prospective mathematics teachers on a modeling problem for the real-life use of a formula taught in the analytical geometry course, within the framework of the dual modeling cycle (DMCF), and to compare their success in the questions given as theories and relations in real-life contexts. A case study was performed with six undergraduate mathematics education students in Turkey. The data consisted of the solution papers of two activities, toilet paper tubes, the sound records, and classroom observations. In the dual modelling cycle framework (DMCF), participants resolved the results obtained from the working mathematically stages of the second activity by transferring them to the initial activity. Utilising the dual modelling cycle, prospective teachers could use similar and simpler activities to solve real life problems which they previously found difficult to solve. Participants were more successful in solving theoretical questions than the modelling activities. The dual modelling activities carried out in this study implies that prospective teachers can apply one of the theoretical equations they learned in field courses to real life.

Keywords


  • Anhalt, C. O., & Cortez, R. (2016). Developing understanding of mathematical modeling in secondary teacher preparation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(6), 523-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-0159309-8

  • Anhalt, C. O., Cortez, R., & Bennett, A. B. (2018). The emergence of mathematical modeling competencies: An investigation of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(3), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1474532

  • Blomhøj, M., & Jensen, T. H. (2003). Developing mathematical modelling competence: Conceptual clarification and educational planning. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 22, 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/22.3.123

  • Blomhøj, M., & Kjeldsen, T. N. (2006). Teaching mathematical modelling through project work. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik-ZDM, 38(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655887

  • Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 1530). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Blum, W., & Ferri, R. B. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt?. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45-58.

  • Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 222–231). Chichester: Horwood.

  • Bukova Güzel, E. (2011). An examination of pre-service mathematics teachers’ approaches to construct and solve mathematical modelling problems. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 30(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrq015

  • Bukova Güzel, E. (Eds.) (2016). Matematik eğitiminde matematiksel modelleme: araştırmacılar, eğitimciler ve öğrenciler için [Mathematical modeling in mathematics education: for researchers, educators and students]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (12th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

  • Czocher, J. A., Melhuish, K., & Kandasamy, S. S. (2020). Building mathematics self-efficacy of STEM undergraduates through mathematical modelling. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(6), 807-834. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1634223

  • Frejd, P. (2012). Teachers ’conceptions of mathematical modelling at Swedish Upper Secondary school. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(5), 17-40.

  • Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM, 38(2), 143-162. doi:10.1007/BF02655886

  • Garfunkel, S. & Montgomery, M. (Eds). (2016). GAIMME: Guideline for Assessment and Instruction in Mathematical Modeling Education. Philadelphia: Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications (COMAP) & Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).

  • Gastón, J., & Lawrence, B. (2015). Supporting teachers’ learning about mathematical modeling. Journal of Mathematics Research, 7(4), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijsp.v4n4p1

  • Henn, H. W. (2007). Modelling pedagogy—overview. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: 14 th ICMI Study (pp. 321-324). Boston: Springer.

  • Herget, W., & Torres-Skoumal, M. (2007). Picture (im) perfect mathematics!. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 379- 386). New York: Springer.

  • Hestenes, D. (2010). Modeling theory for math and science education. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students' mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 13-41). New York: Springer.

  • Hıdıroğlu, Ç. N. (2018, September). An Overview of the HTTM (History / Theory / Technology / Modeling) Learning Process (Expectations, Needs and Flow of the Process): Galileo and the Tower of Pisa Experiment HTTM Task. II. Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları ve Öğretmen Eğitimi Kongresi (ERTE Congress 2018), Aydın.

  • Jankvist, U. T., & Niss, M. (2019). Upper secondary school students' difficulties with mathematical modelling. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1587530

  • Kaiser, G., & Maaß, K. (2007). Modelling in lower secondary mathematics classroom—problems and opportunities. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 99-108). Springer, Boston, MA.

  • Kawakami, T., Saeki, A., & Matsuzaki, A. (2012). Necessity for modelling teaching corresponding to diversities: Experimental lessons based on dual modelling cycle framework for the 5th grade pupils. In ICME-12 pre- proceedings (pp. 3291–3300). Seoul: ICME.

  • Kawakami, T., Saeki, A., & Matsuzaki, A. (2015). How do students share and refine models through dual modelling teaching: The case of students who do not solve independently. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & M. S. Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education research and practice (pp. 195-206). Cham:

  • Kertil, M. (2008). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının problem çözme becerilerinin modelleme sürecinde incelenmesi [Investıgatıng problem solvıng abilitiy of pre-service mathematics teachers in modeling process] (Unpublished master's thesis). Marmara University, Institute of Educational Sciences.

  • Lamb, J., Matsuzaki, A., Saeki, A., & Kawakami, T. (2017). The dual modelling cycle framework: report on an australian study. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and applications (pp. 411-419). Cham: Springer.

  • Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2017). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students ’mathematics cognitive achievement?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/7695

  • Leiß, D., Schukajlow, S., Blum, W., Messner, R., & Pekrun, R. (2010). The role of the situation model in mathematical modelling—Task analyses, student competencies, and teacher interventions. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31(1), 119-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-010-0006-y

  • Lesh, R. A., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of models vemodeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh ve H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models vemodeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 3-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modeling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5, 157–189.

  • Maaß, K. (2006). What are modeling competencies? ZDM, 38(2),113-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655885

  • Matsuzaki, A. (2007). How might we share models through cooperative mathematical modelling? Focus on situations based on individual experiences. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 357–364). New York:

  • Matsuzaki, A. (2011). Using response analysis mapping to display modellers ’mathematical modelling progress. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling: ICTMA14 (pp. 499–507). New York: Springer.

  • Matsuzaki, A., & Saeki, A. (2013). Evidence of a dual modelling cycle: Through a teaching practice example for pre-service teachers. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 195-205). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Merriam, S. B. (2015). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber. [Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation] (S. Turan, Trans. ed). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. (Original work published 2009).

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Ng, K. E. D. (2013) Teacher readiness in mathematical modelling: Are there differences between pre-service and in-service teachers? In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (p.339-348). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Niss, M., & Blum, W. (2020). The learning and teaching of mathematical modelling. Routledge.

  • Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction to modelling and applications in mathematics education. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. Henn, &M. Niss, (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: 14th ICMI Study (pp. 3-32). New York, USA: Springer.

  • Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Mathematical competencies revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09903-9

  • Ortiz, J., & Dos Santos, A. (2011). Mathematical modelling in secondary education: A case study. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling: ICTMA 14 (pp.127-135). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Palm, T. (2007). Features and impact of the authenticity of applied mathematical school tasks. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: 14 th ICMI Study (pp. 201-208). Boston: Springer.

  • Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Saeki, A., & Matsuzaki, A. (2013). Dual modelling cycle framework for responding to the diversities of modellers. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 89-99). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Saeki, A., Matsuzaki, A., Kawakami, T., & Lamb, J. (2015, February). Examining the heart of the dual modelling cycle: Japanese and Australian students advance this approach. In CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1745-1751).

  • Schaap, S., Vos, P., & Goedhart, M. (2011). Students overcoming blockages while building a mathematical model: Exploring a framework. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 137- 146). Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Sevinc, S., & Lesh, R. (2018) Training mathematics teachers for realistic math problems: a case of modeling- based teacher education courses. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50, 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0898-9

  • Shahbari, J. A., & Tabach, M. (2016). Developing modelling lenses among practicing teachers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(5), 717-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1106015

  • Singer, M. (2007). Modelling both complexity and abstraction: a paradox? In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: 14 th ICMI Study (pp. 233240). Boston: Springer.

  • Soon, T. L., & Cheng, A. K. (2013). Pre-service secondary school teachers’ knowledge in mathematical modelling – A case study. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice: International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp.373-383). Dordrecht, South Holland, Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/97894-007-6540-5

  • Sriraman, B. (2005, February). Conceptualizing the notion of model eliciting. In Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.

  • Stillman, G. (2000). Impact of prior knowledge of task context on approaches to applications tasks. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(3), 333–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00049-3

  • Stillman, G., Brown J, & Galbraith P. (2010). Identifying challenges with transitions phases in mathematical modelling activities at year 9. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford, (Eds.), Modeling students ’mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 385–398). New York: Springer.

  • Stillman, G., Brown, J., Galbraith, P. L., & Ng, K. E. D. (2016). Research into mathematical applications and modelling. In K. Makar, S. Dole, J. Visnovska, M. Goos, A. Bennison & K. Fry (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia: 2012–2015 (pp. 281–304). The Netherlands: Springer.

  • Stohlmann, M. S., & Albarracín, L. (2016). What is known about elementary grades mathematical modelling? Education Research International, 2016(1), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5240683

  • Stohlmann, M., DeVaul, L., Allen, C., Adkins, A., Ito, T., Lockett, D., & Wong, N. (2016). What Is Known about Secondary Grades Mathematical Modelling--A Review. Journal of Mathematics Research, 8(5), 12-28. doi:10.5539/jmr.v8n5p12

  • Stohlmann, M., Maiorca, C., & Olson, T. A. (2015). Preservice secondary teachers' conceptions from a mathematical modeling activity and connections to the common core state standards. Mathematics Educator, 24(1), 21-43.

  • Tuna, A., Biber, A. Ç. & Yurt, N. (2013). Mathematical modeling skills of prospective mathematics teachers. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 33(1), 129-146.

  • Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets, & Zeitlinger.

  • Villarreal, M.E., Esteley, C.B., & Smith, S. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ experiences within modelling scenarios enriched by digital technologies. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50, 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0925-5

  • Voyer, D. (2010). Performance in mathematical problem solving as a function of comprehension and arithmetic skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1073-1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9239-y

  • Widjaja, W. (2013). Building awareness of mathematical modeling in teacher education: A case study in Indonesia. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modeling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 583-593). Dordrecht: Springer.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics