The Relationship between University Students’ Perceptions of Faculty Members’ Undesirable Behaviors, Their Trust for Faculty Members and Class Partici

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-Volume 8, Issue 4
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The main objective of the present study is to investigate the university students’ perceptions aboutthe undesirable behaviors of the faculty members, their trust levels towards faculty members,students’ class participation, and to scrutinize the relationship between these variables. Furthermore,the study aims to identify how and in which direction faculty members’ undesirable behaviors affectthe university students’ trust for faculty members and active participation into class activities. Thus,the relationship between three variables were analyzed via structural equation modelling. Studygroup included 327 volunteering students who attended pedagogical formation program held inInonu University during the summer semester of 2013–2014 academic year. “Undesirable Behaviorin Faculty Members”, “Confidence in Faculty Members”, and “University Students ClassParticipation” scales were used to collect data. Findings indicated that the trust of students towardsfaculty members and faculty members’ undesired behaviors affected students’ active participationinto class activities. It was concluded that the both variables explained the 16% of the variance instudents’ classroom participation level. 

Keywords

Abstract

The main objective of the present study is to investigate the university students’ perceptions aboutthe undesirable behaviors of the faculty members, their trust levels towards faculty members,students’ class participation, and to scrutinize the relationship between these variables. Furthermore,the study aims to identify how and in which direction faculty members’ undesirable behaviors affectthe university students’ trust for faculty members and active participation into class activities. Thus,the relationship between three variables were analyzed via structural equation modelling. Studygroup included 327 volunteering students who attended pedagogical formation program held inInonu University during the summer semester of 2013–2014 academic year. “Undesirable Behaviorin Faculty Members”, “Confidence in Faculty Members”, and “University Students ClassParticipation” scales were used to collect data. Findings indicated that the trust of students towardsfaculty members and faculty members’ undesired behaviors affected students’ active participationinto class activities. It was concluded that the both variables explained the 16% of the variance instudents’ classroom participation level. 

Keywords


  • Aksu, B. A. ,Çivitçi A.,& Duy, B.(2008).Yüksek öğretim öğrencilerinin ders uygulamaları ve öğretim elemanlarının davranışlarına ilişkin görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi ,9(16), 17-42.

  • Arslantaş, H. İ. (2011). Öğretim elemanlarının öğretim stratejileri-yöntem ve teknikleri, iletişim ve ölçme değerlendirme yeterliliklerine yönelik öğrenci görüşleri. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 487-506.

  • Aslan, M., & Yakar, A. (2012). Cognitive fictions of teacher candidate about ınstructors’ qualifications: a comparative analysis. Elementary Education Online, 11(4), 1036-1052.

  • Banfield,S.R. (2003). Theeffect of teacher misbehaviors on teacher credibility and affect. Unpublished master thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, U.S.A.

  • Banfield, S. R., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2006). The effect of teacher misbehaviors on teacher credibility and affect for the teacher. Communication Education,55,63-72.

  • Başar, H.(2003). Sınıf yönetimi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

  • Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Amos uygulamaları. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.

  • Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS 6 Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

  • Boysan, M. (2006). Çok örneklemli yapisal eşitlik modelleri. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. YüzüncüYıl University, Van.

  • Bozanoğlu, B. (2014). Üniversit eöğrencilerinin öğretim elemanları tarafından sergilenen istenmeyen davranışlara ilişkin görüşleri. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. İnönü University, Malatya.

  • Bökeoğlu, Ö. Ç., &Yılmaz, K. (2008). İlköğretim okullarında örgütsel güven hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 54, 211-233.

  • Broeckelman-Post, M.A., Tacconelli, A., Guzmán, J., Rios, M., Calero, B., & Latif, F. (2015). Teacher misbehavior and its effects on student ınterest and engagement. Communication Education, 4523, 1-9. doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1058962

  • Buckner, M.M., & Frisby, B.N. (2015). Feeling valued matters: An examination of ınstructor confirmation and ınstructional dissent. Communication Studies, 66(3), 398-413. doi:10.1080/10510974.2015.1024873

  • Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.

  • Cameron, A. (2004). Kurtosis. In The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods (Vol. 3, pp. 544-545). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

  • Çelik, H. E. &Yılmaz, V. (2013). Lisrel 9.1 ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: Temel kavramlar-uygulamalar- programlama. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

  • Chory, R., & McCroskey, J. (1999). The relationship between teacher management communication style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47(1), 1-11. doi:10.1080/01463379909370120

  • Claus, C. J., Booth-butterfield, M., & Chory, R.M. (2012). The relationship between instructor misbehaviors and student antisocial behavioral alteration techniques : The roles of instructor attractiveness , humor , and relational closeness, Communication Education,. 61(2), 161-183.doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.647922

  • Corrigan, M.W., & Klein, T.J. (2010). Documenting the relationship of students’ trust in teachers to cognition, character, and climate. Journal of Research Charecter Education, 8(2), 61-73.

  • Curzon-Hobson, A. (2002). A pedagogy of trust in higher learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(3), 265-276. doi:10.1080/1356251022014477

  • Çokluk, Ö.,Şekercioğlu, G., &Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

  • Demircan, N. & Ceylan, A. (2003). Örgütsel güven kavramı: Nedenleri ve sonuçları. Yönetim ve Ekonomi,10 (2), 139-150.

  • Dönmez,B.,&Cömert,M.(2009).Öğretmen adaylarının, kendilerinin ve uygulama öğretmenlerinin sınıf içi istenmeyen öğrenci davranışları ile baş etme konusundaki yeterliliklerine ilişkin algıları. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi ,10(2),47-55.

  • Doğanay, A., & Sarı, M. (2006). Öğrencilerin üniversitedeki yaşam kalitesine ilişkin algılarının demokratik yaşam kültürü çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 107-122.

  • Frisby, B. N., Berger, E., Burchett, M., Herovic, E., Michael, G., Frisby, B.N., & Strawser, M.G. (2014). Participation apprehensive students : The influence of face support and instructor – student rapport on classroom participation. Communication Education, 63(2), 105-123.doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.881516

  • Goodboy, A.K., & Bolkan, S. (2015). College teacher misbehaviors : Direct and ındirect effects on student communication behavior and traditional learning outcomes. Western Journal of Communication, 73(2), 204-219. doi:10.1080/10570310902856089

  • Goodboy, A.K., Myers, S.A., & Bolkan, S. (2015). Student motives for communicating with ınstructors as a function of perceived instructor misbehaviors. Communication Research Reports, 27(1), 11-19. doi:10.1080/08824090903526604

  • Goodboy, A.K., & Myers, S. A.(2015). Revisiting instructor misbehaviors : A revised typology and development of a measure. Communication Education, 64(2), 133-153.doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978798

  • Hai-Jew, S. (2005). Examining the trust factor in online instructor-led college courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seattle University, U.S.A.

  • Hoy, W., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmattion in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184-206.

  • Hu, L.T. &Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

  • İşcan, Ö.F. & Sayın, U. (2010). Örgütsel adalet, iş tatmini ve örgütsel güven arasındaki ilişki. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(4), 195-216

  • İlgar,L.(2007). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin sınıf yönetimi becerileri üzerine bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

  • Jöreskog, K.G. &Sörbom, D. (2006). Lısrel 8.80 for windows [computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

  • Karakaya, İ. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. A. Tanrıöğen (Ed.),Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (s.57-84). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

  • Kale, M. (2013). Perceptions of college of education students in Turkey towards organizational justice, trust in administrators, and instructors. Higher Education, 66(5), 521-533. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9619-7

  • Keçici, S.E., Beyhan, Ö., & Ektem, I.S. (2013). A study on aggressive teacher behavior based on student perceptions. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education, 2(2), 15-25.

  • Khandelwal, K.A. (2009). Effective teaching behaviors in the college classroom : A critical ıncident technique from students ’ perspective. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 299309.

  • Kline, R.B.(2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

  • Kumral, O. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretim elemanlarının davranışlarına yönelik algıları. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 92-102.

  • Lee, S. (2007). The relations between the student–teacher trust relationship and school success in the case of Korean middle schools. Educational Studies, 33(2), 209-216.doi:10.1080/03055690601068477

  • Martin, M.M., Chesebro, J.L., &Mottet, T.P. (1997). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports, 14(4), 431-440. doi:10.1080/08824099709388686

  • Mazer, J.P. (2013). Student emotional and cognitive ınterest as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student engagement: An examination of direct and ınteraction effects. Communication Education, 62(3), 253-277. doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.777752

  • McPherson, M.B., and Liang, Y.(Jake). (2007). Students’ reactions to teachers’ management of compulsive communicators. Communication Education, 56(1), 18-33. doi:10.1080/03634520601016178

  • Meydan, C.H. ve Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.

  • Mottet, T.P., Martin, M.M., and Myers, S.A. (2004). Relationships among perceived instructor verbal approach and avoidance relational strategies and students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 53(1), 116-122. doi:10.1080/0363452032000135814

  • Murat, M., Aslantaş, H.İ., & Özgan, H. (2006). Öğretim elemanlarının sınıf içi eğitim-öğretim etkinlikleri açısından değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 260(3) 263-278.

  • Mustapha, S.M., Rahman, N.S.N.A., & Yunus, M.Md. (2010). Factors influencing classroom participation: a case study of Malaysian undergraduate students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1079-1084. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.289

  • Myers, S.A., Edwards, C., Wahl, S.T., & Martin, M.M. (2007). The relationship between perceived instructor aggressive communication and college student involvement. Communication Education, 56(4), 495-508.

  • Myers, S.A., & Knox, R.L. (1999). Verbal aggression in the college classroom: Perceived instructor use and student affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47(1).doi:10.1080/01463379909370122

  • Özdemir, E.,&Üzel, D. (2010). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının öğretim elemanı özelliklerine yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(20), 122152.

  • Özer, N., & Atik, S. (2014). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğretim üyelerine güveni ve ders ekatılım düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Yayınlanmamış ders notu.

  • Özer,N., &Tül, C. (2014). Öğrenciler için öğretmene güven ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 10(1), 105-119.

  • Özer, N., & Bozanoğlu, B. (2016) Öğretim elemanları tarafından sergilenen istenmeyen davranışların üniversite öğrencilerinin algılarına göre değerlendirilmesi. Yayınlanmamış ders notu.

  • Özer, N., Atik, S., Şad, S. N. &Kış, A. (2016). Relationship between student engagement and trust in professors: a study on Turkish college students. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Pala, A. (2003). Sınıfta istenmeyen öğrenci davranışlarını önlemeye dönük disiplin modelleri. Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13, 171-179.

  • Pogue, L.L., & Ahyun, K. (2006). The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education, 55(3), 331-344.

  • Polat, S. & Taştan, M. (2009). Yükseköğretim öğrencilerinin öğretim elemanlarına olan güven düzeyi ve akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişki. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4(2), 558-574.

  • Rocca, K.A. (2004). College student attendance: Impact of instructor immediacy and verbal aggression. Communication Education, 53(2), 185–195. doi:10.1080/03634520410001682447

  • Rocca, K.A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185-213.doi:10.1080/03634520903505936

  • Rodgers, S.L. (2011). Grading participation in college courses: Instructor attitudes and practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Albany, Newyork, U.S.

  • Sanı, O.Ü., Çalışkan, S.C., Atan, Ö., & Yozgat, U. (2013). A comprehensive research about academician’s servant leadership style and its consequences. Ege Akademik Bakış, 13(1) 63-82.

  • Schumaker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Routlege.

  • Senemoğlu, N. (2004). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.

  • Smith, P. A. (2013). Trust and organizational citizenship: Moderating the effects of school socioeconomic status. Journal of School Public Relations, 34 (Spring), 213-248.

  • Stowe, A. C. (2005). Baccalaureate nursing students’ experience of trust in clinical ınstructors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Widener University.

  • Şad, S. N., & Özer, N. (2014). Silent scream: “I do not want to participate professor!” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2532-2536. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.606

  • Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayıncılık.

  • Raykov, T., &Marcoulides, G.A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Taşkın, Ç., &Akat, Ö. (2010). Araştırma yöntemlerinde yapısal eşitlik modelleme. Bursa: EkinBasımYayınDağıtım.

  • Teven, J.J. (2007). Teacher caring and classroom behavior: Relationships with student affect and perceptions of teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 433-450.

  • Thweatt, K.S., & McCroskey, J.C. (1998). The impact of teacher immediacy and misbehaviors on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 47(4), 348-358.doi:10.1080/03634529809379141

  • Toale,M.C.(2001).Teacher clarity and teacher misbehaviors: relationships with students’affective learning and teacher credibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, U.S.

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (1998). Trust in schools: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 334-352. doi:10.1108/09578239810211518

  • Tüzün, İ.P. (2007). Güven, örgütsel güven ve örgütsel güven modelleri. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Aralık, 93-118.

  • Wooten, A., & McCroskey, J. (1996). Student trust of teacher as a function of socio-communicative style of teacher and socio-communicative orientation of student. Communication Research Reports, 13(1), 94-100.

  • Yıldız, K. (2013). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel güven algıları. AIBU Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1), 289-316.

  • Yılmaz, E. &Sünbül, A.M. (2009). Öğretmenlerin yaşam doyumları ve okullardaki örgütsel güven düzeyleri. Journal of Qafqaz University, 26(1), 172-179.

  • Zhang, Q. (2007). Teacher misbehaviors as learning demotivators in college classrooms: A cross-cultural ınvestigation in China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Education, 56(2), 209227. doi:10.1080/03634520601110104.

  • Zhang, Q., Zhang, J.,& Castelluccio, A. A. (2011). Across-cultural investigation of student resistance in college classrooms: The effects of teacher misbehaviors and credibility.Communication Quarterly, 59(4),450-464.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics