Researchıng Effects Of Coordınatıon And Physıcal Educatıon On 6 Years Old Prımary School Chıldren’s Balance And Hand Power Improvement

Author :  

Year-Number: 2015-Volume 7, Issue 4
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

In this research, 8 week coordination and physical education teaching programme, are carried out by applying to 6 year-old primary school students to examine its effects on children's balance and hand power improvement. The research consists of 6 year- old chidren. 60 children in total voluntered for this research 30 of whom are experimental group and the other 30 of whom are control group. To examine the effects of physical education programme carried out in the research on children's finger power and static and dynamic comprehension tests were applied. In analysing, datas statistic programme was used. To find the difference between experiment and control group, independent t test was used but to find the difference between pre and last tests of both groups paired samples t test was used. According to statistic results, no significant change was found among all factors in the pre and last tests (p>0,05). Among the last test results of experiment and control group, right finger power, in average dynamic and static test results, showed (p<0,001), right hand holding power and left hand finger power, in average test results, showed (p<0,01), left hand holding power, in average test results, showed (p<0,05) change which is a significiant difference in favour of experiment group. Among the pre and last test results of experiment group, right finger power, in average static and dynamic test results, showed (p<0,001), right and left hand holding power, in average test results, showed (p<0,05), left hand grip strength average test results, showed (p<0,01) significant change in favour of last test. Among the pre and last test results of control group, right hand finger and grip strength, in average dynamic balance test results, showed (p<0,05), left hand finger strength, in average static balance results, showed (p<0,01), significant change in favour of last tests. In average left hand grip strength test results significant changes weren’t found. As a result, it is understood that, planned and long term coordination and physical education programme will improve 5-6 year-old children's gripping strength with static and dynamic balance and finger strength motor properties.

Keywords

Abstract

In this research, 8 week coordination and physical education teaching programme, are carried out by applying to 6 year-old primary school students to examine its effects on children's balance and hand power improvement. The research consists of 6 year- old chidren. 60 children in total voluntered for this research 30 of whom are experimental group and the other 30 of whom are control group. To examine the effects of physical education programme carried out in the research on children's finger power and static and dynamic comprehension tests were applied. In analysing, datas statistic programme was used. To find the difference between experiment and control group, independent t test was used but to find the difference between pre and last tests of both groups paired samples t test was used. According to statistic results, no significant change was found among all factors in the pre and last tests (p>0,05). Among the last test results of experiment and control group, right finger power, in average dynamic and static test results, showed (p<0,001), right hand holding power and left hand finger power, in average test results, showed (p<0,01), left hand holding power, in average test results, showed (p<0,05) change which is a significiant difference in favour of experiment group. Among the pre and last test results of experiment group, right finger power, in average static and dynamic test results, showed (p<0,001), right and left hand holding power, in average test results, showed (p<0,05), left hand grip strength average test results, showed (p<0,01) significant change in favour of last test. Among the pre and last test results of control group, right hand finger and grip strength, in average dynamic balance test results, showed (p<0,05), left hand finger strength, in average static balance results, showed (p<0,01), significant change in favour of last tests. In average left hand grip strength test results significant changes weren’t found. As a result, it is understood that, planned and long term coordination and physical education programme will improve 5-6 year-old children's gripping strength with static and dynamic balance and finger strength motor properties.

Keywords


  • Altinkok, M. (2006). Researching the effects of special body education programme design including basic motor motion development on 5-6 years old pre-school children’s basic motor motion development. Unpublished postgraduation thesis. M. Ü. Education Sciences Insititute, Istanbul.

  • Asci, F. H., Gokmen H., and Karagul, T. (1995). Physcomotor development. Ankara: Gokce Ofset.

  • Aytaç, Ü., 2003. Çocukta hareket, oyun gelişimi ve öğretimi, açık öğretim fakültesi okul öncesi öğretmenliği lisans programı. Eskişehir: Web-Ofset Tesisleri.

  • Bayraktar, L. (2005). The comporison of 11-12 years old sports woman who do swimming gymnastics and athleticism. Unpublished post graduation thesis. M. U Health Sciences Institute, Istanbul.

  • Bompa, T.O. (1994). Theory and methodology of training. Toronto, Ontorio Canada: Kendall/ Hunt Publishing Company.

  • Bucher, C.A., Koening, C.R. (1983). Method and material for secondary school physical education. Saint Louis: The C. V. Mossey Company.

  • Camliyer, H. (1999). Children’s motion education and play in education unity. Izmir: Can Ofset Yayıncılık.

  • Cratty, J.B. (1973). Movement behavior and motor learning. Philedelphia: Lea. Febiger.

  • Çolakoglu, H. (1986). Children and sport. Ankara: Milli Eğitim basımevi.

  • Erdil, G., Altınkök, M., Ölçücü, B. (2013). The effects of the method of teaching of activity education with coordinationon 9-10 years old children’s motoric skills. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, 101112.

  • Ertat, A. (1985). Seminar in Europe concerning in sport and physical education. Sports Doctor Magazine. 3, 115–119.

  • Frost, J.L., Klein B. (1979). Children’s play and playgrounds. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  • Gallahue, D.L. (1982). Understanding motor development in children. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Gallahue, D.L. (1989). Understanding motor development. Indiana: Benchmark Pres.

  • Gallahue, D.L. (1996). Developmental physical education for today’s children. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Gray, Ty-Am., Judy, O. (2003). Primary school students' choices for a healthy active lifestyle. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. 74(6), 52-57.

  • Harmandar, I. H. (2004). Special teaching methods at physical education and sports. Ankara: Nobel Yayın ve Dağıtım.

  • Hirtz, P. (1988). Koordinative fähigkeiten im schulsport: vielseitig, variationsreich, ungewohnt. (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Volk u. Wissen.

  • Jimmy, A. (2003). Participation in extracurricular physical in middle schools. 74(4), 10 – 10.

  • Kasap, H. (1999). The transfer effect of sport skills in learning and performance. Istanbul: Beyaz Yayıncılık.

  • Katie, M.M, Brad, S.M., Joanne, K., Linda, D.V., Terence, J.W. (2003). Contribution of timetabled physical education to total physical activity in primary school children. Cross Sectional Study. BMJ 327, 13 September.

  • Muniroglu, S. (1995). An examination on motor improvement of 4-5 years old children who attend to kindergarten. Unpublished post-graduation thesis, Ankara Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.

  • Muratli, S. (1998). Children and sports. Ankara : Bagirgan Yayınevi.

  • Östman, L. (2010). Education for sustainable development and normativity: A transactional analysis of moral meaning‐making and companion meanings in classroom communication. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 75–93.

  • Quay, J., Stolz, S. (2014). Game as context in physical education: A Dewey an philosophical perspective. In R. Light, J. Quay, S. Harvey, & A. Mooney (Eds.), Contemporary developments in games teaching (pp. 15–28). London and New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Quennerstedt, M., Öhman, J., & Öhman, M. (2011). Investigating learning in physical education–A transactional approach. Sport, Education and Society, 16, 159–177.

  • Saygın, O. , Polat, Y. , Karacabey, K. (2005). Çocuklarda hareket eğitiminin fiziksel uygunluk özelliklerine etkisi. Fırat Üniversitesi Saglık Bilimleri Tıp Dergisi 19(3), 205-212

  • Sevim Y. (1995). Training information. Ankara.

  • Tufekcioglu, E. (2002). The effets of perceptive motor improvement programmes on balance and quickness in, 4-6 years old pre-school children. Unpublished post-graduation thesis, M. U. Health Sciences Institute, Istanbul.

  • Ulrich, D. (1985). Test of gross motor development. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.

  • Ward, G., & Quennerstedt, M. (2015). Knowing in primary physical education in the UK: Negotiating movement culture. Sport, Education and Society, (ahead-of-print), 1-16.

  • Yetkin MK, Kayapınar FÇ, (2008). On iki haftalık halk oyunları eğitiminin ilköğretim birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin el-göz koordinasyonları ve reaksiyon sürelerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 10(4), 60 – 70.

  • Ziyagil, M. A., Tamer, K., Zorba, E., Uzuncan, S. and Uzuncan, H. (1996). Evaluating the physical convenience and antropometric properties of 10-12 years old male primary school children according to their habits of doing sports via Eurofit Test Battery. Physical Education and Sport Sciences Magazine 1, 20 - 28.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics