Tangible Experiences-based Individual Differences Training For Teacher Candidates

Author :  

Year-Number: 2015-Volume 7, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Teacher candidates were provided with tangible experiences-based individual differences training via plants in the framework of this study undertaken in 2013-2014 academic year. In the study designed as action research, teacher candidates were asked to plan the first two weeks of their teaching as first grade teachers in order to ascertain their approach to individual differences in the teaching process. A 10-week training process was designed to create awareness about individual differences and importance of getting to know students in this framework. Research data were collected with the help of qualitative techniques-observations and semi-structured interview questions- and analyzed descriptively

Keywords

Abstract

Teacher candidates were provided with tangible experiences-based individual differences training via plants in the framework of this study undertaken in 2013-2014 academic year. In the study designed as action research, teacher candidates were asked to plan the first two weeks of their teaching as first grade teachers in order to ascertain their approach to individual differences in the teaching process. A 10-week training process was designed to create awareness about individual differences and importance of getting to know students in this framework. Research data were collected with the help of qualitative techniques-observations and semi-structured interview questions- and analyzed descriptively

Keywords


  • AbdalHaqq, I. (1998). Constructivism in teacher education: Considerations for those who would link practice to theory.ERIC Digest. Retrieved July 04, 2014, from http://www.ericdigests.org/1999-3/theory.htm.

  • Acosta, S. and Goltz, H. H. (2014). Transforming practices a primer on action research. Health promotion practice, 15 (4), 465-470. doi:10.1177/1524839914527591

  • Akçamete, G. and Kargın, T. (1992). Individualized education program: Having hearing dissabilities and reading. Ankara University Journal of Educational Sciences, 24 (1), 151-160.

  • Alp,Ş., Onat, İ. and Kupık, M.(2007).Gardening and interior plants. In Gardening manual (406-432). İstanbul: İstanbul Metropolitan Municipality Park Garden Green Spaces Department Publication.

  • Alp, Ş., Onat, İ. and Kupık, M.(2011). Ornamental plants production techniques and maintenance requests. In Gardening manual. (203-350). İstanbul: İstanbul Metropolitan Municipality Park Garden Green Spaces Department Publications.

  • Airasian, P.W. (1996). Assessment in the classroom. New York: McGraw Hill. Boston College.

  • Airasian, P.W. (2001). Classroom assessment. New York: McGraw Hill. Boston College.

  • Aktepe, V (2005). Importance of knowing the individual in education. Gazi University Kırşehir Faculty of Education Journal, 6 (2), 15-24.

  • Bassey, M. (1998). Action research for improving educational practice. In R. Halsall, (Ed.). Teacher research and school improvement (pp.93-108). Buckingham: Open University Press.

  • Başal, A.H.(2003). Practical environmental education in pre-school education: New approaches in early childhood development and education. İstanbul: Morpa Publication

  • Bloom, B. S. (2012). Human characteristics and school learning. (D.A. Özçelik Trans.). Ankara: Ministry of Education Publications:174. Teachers Books Series:15. (Original work published 1979).

  • Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64 (8), 723-733.

  • Ceyhan,A. (2002). Individual recognition requirement and recognition techniques. In A.A. Ceyhan, (Ed). Individual recognition techniques (pp.1-22). Eskişehir: Open University Publications.

  • Cohen J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales: Educational and psychological measurement. 20, 37-46.

  • Çöğenli, A. and Uçansoy, A. (2014). Opinions of teachers about orientation and preparation activities. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 4(1), 1-26. doi: 10.14527/pegegog.2014.001 Hammond, L.D., Austin, K., Orcutt, S. and Rosso, J. (2001).How people learn: Introduction to learning theories. Retrieved July, 12, 2014 from http://web.stanford.edu/class/ed269/hplintrochapter.pdf.

  • Demirbaş, A. R. (2010). Potted plant cultivation. Samsun: Samsun Governorship, Provincial Directorate of Agriculture, Farmer Training and Distribution Department Publication.

  • Deryakulu, D. (2000). Constructive learning. In A. Şimşek, (Ed.) Democracy in the classroom (pp. 53-77). Ankara: Eğitim Publication

  • Dunn, R. and Dunn, K. (1992).Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6.Boston : Allyn and Bacon.

  • Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes. Philadephia: Open University Press.

  • Erkan, S. and Kırca, A. (2010). A study on the effects of pre-school education on primary first graders’ school preparedness. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 94-106.

  • Ferrance, E. (2000).Themes in education: Action Research. Providence: , Brown University Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved on May 16, 2014, from http://www.lab.brown.edu/pubs/themes_ed/act_research.pdf.

  • Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M.U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L. Resnik, H. and Elias, M.J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58 (6/7), 466-474. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.5.6-7.466

  • Gregory, G.H. and Chapman, C. (2002).Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn’t fit all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

  • Güven, G. (2013). Techniques to get to know the child. In F. Alisinanoğlu, (Ed.). Preparing to primary school and in primary school curricula (pp. 36-37). Ankara: Pegem A Publications.

  • Hanushek, E.A.(2014). Boosting teacher effectiveness. In C. E. Finn Jr. and R. Sousa (Ed.). What lies ahead for America's children and their schools (pp.23-35). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.

  • Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom: How to reach and teach all learners, Grades 3- 12. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.

  • Henson, K.T. (2003). Foundations for learner-centered education: A knowledge base. Education, 124 (1), 5–16.

  • Huitt, W. (1997). Individual differences. Educational psychology ınteractive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved July 09,2014, from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/instruct/indiff.html.

  • Kanık,E. A. Örekeci Temel, G. and Kaya, İ.E. (2010). Effect of sample size: The number of raters and the category levels of diagnostic test on Krippendorff Alpha and the Fleiss Kappa Statistics for calculating Inter rater agreement: A Simulation Study. Journal of Biostatistics, 2(2), 74-81.

  • Kılıç Ekici, Ö. (2012). Plants also get sick, feels stressed but they show resistance. Plant pathology and immunity system. Scientific and Technical Journal, 54-61.

  • Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Kolb, D. A. (1985).Learning style inventory: Self scoring inventory and interpretation booklet. Boston: McBer and Company.

  • Kolb, A. Y. and Kolb, D. A. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory-Version 3.1: Technical specifications. Boston: Hay Group Holdings, Inc.

  • Köklü, N. (1993). Action research. Ankara University Journal of Educational Sciences, 26 (2), 357-366.

  • Kutluca Canbulat, A. and Canbulat, M. (2012).The school admission tests in Germany and the adaptation of the Kiel school admission test. Elementary Education Online, 11(1), 1-17.

  • Kutluca Canbulat, A. and Tuncel, M.(2012).Effectiveness of school admission practices and individualized support training. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. 12(3), 2059-2089.

  • Kuzgun, Y. and Deryakulu, D. (2004). Individual differences in education. Ankara: Nobel Publication.

  • Jonassen, D. (2009). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C.L.M. Reigeluth, (Ed.). Instructional design theories and models (pp. 215-239). New York: Routledge

  • Lubart, T. (2004). Individual student differences and creativity for quality education.Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005: The Quality Imperative.

  • McCombs, B. L. and Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass

  • Maclellan, E. and R. Soden.(2004). The importance of epistemic cognition in student-centered learning. Instructional Science, 32, 253–68.

  • Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S. and Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Miller, C. A. (2007). Action research: Making sense of data. Online article. Retrieved May 11, 2014, from www.coe.fau.edu/sfcel/sensdata.htm.

  • Özbay, Y. (2002). Personal guidance: Guidance and counselling. Ankara: Pegem A Publications.

  • Özgüven, İ. E.( 1998). Individual recognition techniques. Ankara: Pdrem Publications.

  • Parsons, R. D. and Brown, K. S. (2002).Teacher as reflective practitioner and action researcher. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

  • Ravitch, D. (2000).The great schoolwars: A history of the New York city public schools. Baltimore: JHU Press.

  • Ray, M.B. (1999). How individual differences affect organisation and how teachers can respond to these differences. Legal Writing: J. Legal Writing Inst, 5, 125-142.

  • Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings (3-14). Washington DC: FalmerPress.

  • Rosenfeld, M. and Rosenfeld, S. (2004).Developing teacher sensitivity to individual learning differences. Educational Psychology.24 (4), 465- 486.doi: 10.1080/0144200022885

  • Shoukri, M.M. (2010). Measures of interobserver agreement and reliability. Chapman and Hall Biostatistics Series. London: CRC Press.

  • Sims, R.R. and Sims, S.J. (1995). Learning enhancement in higher education. Westport: Greenwood Press.

  • Todes, D. (1999). Ivan Pavlov: Exploring the animal machine. Oxford portraits in science. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208.

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Reconcilable differences: Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58, 6-11.

  • Tomlinson, C.A. and Strickland, C.A. (2005). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, grades 9-12. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2014).The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Tóth ,P. (2014). The role of individual differences in learning. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(4), 183-197.

  • TUBITAK (2014). Live world. Retrieved on March, 07, 2014, from. www.biltek.tubitak.gov.tr.

  • Yin R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass

  • Zins, J. E.,Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C. and Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek H (2006). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics