The Effect of the Literature Circle Technique on Preservice Teachers’ Attitudes towards Book Reading Habit

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-Volume 14, Issue 3
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-07-06 20:49:55.0
Language : English
Konu : Turkish Education
Number of pages: 651-669
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

The literature circle, one of the collaborative learning techniques that can be used in developing reading skills and gaining reading habit, is a reading activity in which students read the books they choose with their group mates and discuss the chapters they read in accordance with the roles they have chosen. Based on this, in this study, it was aimed to determine the effect of literature circle technique on Turkish teacher candidates' attitude towards reading habit and to determine their opinions about literature circle technique. In order to serve this purpose, a 9-week practice in which the literature circle technique was used was conducted with Turkish preservice teachers. The descriptive pattern of the mixed method was used in the study. In the quantitative research part; a quasi-experimental design with pretest, posttest, experimental and control groups was preferred. The study group of the research consists of 75 preservice teachers studying in the Turkish language teaching department of a state university. The data were collected using the “Attitude Scale Regarding Reading Habits” developed by Gömleksiz (2004) and a semi-structured interview form. The attitude scale was applied as a pre-test and a post-test, and the interview form was administered after the application. According to the findings, it has been observed that the literature circle technique has a positive effect on developing preservice teachers' attitudes towards reading habits.

Keywords


  • Altınkaya, A. (2019). The effects of literature circle technique on middle school learners' reading comprehension skills and self sufficiency on reading. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Dumlupınar University, Kütahya.

  • Applegate, A. J. & Applegate, M. D. (2004). The Peter effect: Reading habits of preservice teachers. The Reading Teacher, 57(6), 554–563.

  • Avcı, S. & Yüksel, A. (2011). Cognitive and affective contributions of the literature circles method on the acquisition of reading habits and comprehension skills in primary level students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(3), 1285-1300.

  • Avcı, S., Baysal, N., Gül, M. & Yüksel, A. (2013). The effect of the reading circle method on understanding skills. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 6, 535-550.

  • Avcı, S., Yüksel, A. & Akıncı, T. (2010). Literature circles: An effective method to develop reading habit. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Journal of Educational Sciences, 32, 5-24.

  • Balantekin, M. & Pilav, S. (2017). The effect of the reading circle method on understanding skills. Journal of Social Sciences Kirikkale University, 7, 149-170.

  • Balantekin, M. (2016). The effect of reading cycle method on the reading comprehension skill. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale.

  • Blum, H. T., Lipsett, L. R. & Yocom, D. J. (2002). Literature circles: A tool for self determination in one middle school inclusive classroom. Remedial and Special Education, 23(2), 99-108.

  • Boardman Moen, C. (2004). Literature circle role sheets. Dayton: Lorenz Company.

  • Brabham, E. G. & Villaume, S. (2000). Questions and answers: continuing conversations about literature circles. The Reading Teacher, 54(3), 278-280.

  • Briggs, S. (2010). Using literature circles to increase reading comprehension in third grade elementary students. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Dominician University of California, California.

  • Burda, K. (2000). Living and learning: A four-year journey into literature circles. Primary Voices K-6, 9(1), 17-22.

  • Campbell Hill, B. (2010). Literature circles and the heart of response (grades 1-8). CEESA Conference Tallinn, Estonia.

  • Çermik, H., Doğan, B., Ateş, S. & Yıldırım, K. (2019). Preservice teachers’ views on literature circles. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 7(87), 1-15.

  • Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson.

  • Culli, L. M. (2002). Investigation of literature circles in the middle school language art classroom. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Chapman University, California.

  • Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs and reading groups. (2nd Edition). Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.

  • Daniels, H. (2003). How can you grade literature circles? Voices From the Middle, 11(1), 52-53.

  • Demir, E. (2019). The effect of reading circle method on students reading attitudes and critical reading skills. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Kırıkkale, Kırıkkale.

  • Demirel, Ö. (2007). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri, öğretme sanatı [Teaching principles and methods, the art of teaching]. Ankara: Pegem A Publishers.

  • Diego-Medrano, E., Coneway, B. & Williams, J. D. (2016). Inquiry circles as a vehicle for comprehending informational texts: Preservice teachers’ reactions and perceptions. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 4(2), 57-68.

  • Doğan, B., Ateş, S., Çermik, H. & Yıldırım, K. (2018). Reading performance indicators are poor! Let’s make them better together. TAY Journal, 2, 46-62.

  • Doğan, B., Çermik, H., Ateş, S. & Yıldırım, K. (2018). Preservice teachers’ views on the roles they took in literature circles. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 7(1), 141-157.

  • Doğan, B., Yıldırım, K., Çermik, H. & Ateş, S. (2018). Literature circles: Why and how? An example of implementation. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 6(3), 747-765.

  • Ekinci, N. (2007). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme [Cooperative learning] (Ed. Ö. Demirel), Eğitimde yeni yönelimler [New directions in education] (p. 93-109). Ankara: Pegem A Publishers.

  • Ekinci, Z. (2018). The effect of cooperative writing activities on improving writing skills of students who learning Turkish as a foreign language. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.

  • Ekiz, D. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Anı Publishers.

  • Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A. & Leech, N. L. (2015). Uygulamada araştırma yöntemleri desen ve analizi bütünleştiren yaklaşım [An approach that integrates research methods, design and analysis in practice]. (Translation Ed. S. Turan). Ankara: Nobel Publishers.

  • Gömleksiz, M. N. (2004). Validity and reliability of an attitude scale towards reading habit. Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 14(2), 185-195.

  • Gümüş, O. & Buluç, B. (2007). İşbirliğine dayalı öğrenme yaklaşımının Türkçe dersinde akademik başarıya etkisi ve öğrencilerin derse ilgisi [The effect of cooperative learning approach on academic success in Turkish course and students’ interest in the lesson]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 49, 7-30.

  • Güngör Kılıç, A. (2004). Cooperative learning, reading comprehension, strategy use and attitude. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.

  • Gürol, M. (2004). Öğretim sürecinde iletişim, model ve uygulamalar [Communication, model and applications in the teaching process]. (Ed. M. Gürol). Öğretimde planlama uygulama ve değerlendirme [Planning, implementation and evaluation in teaching] (p. 67-120). Elazığ: Üniversite Kitabevi.

  • Hardin, J. (2012). Motivating disengaged readers: fifth grade readers and university students partner in literature circles. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University, Texas.

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Holubec, E. J. (2016). İşbirlikli öğrenme el kitabı [Collaborative learning handbook]. (Translation Ed. A. Kocabaş). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishers.

  • Karakoyun, M. E. (2010). The effect of one of the collaborative learning techniques, Jigsaw I, to academic success in the teaching of punctuation to elementary education 5th grade students. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Atatürk University, Erzurum.

  • Kardaş, M. (2014). The effects of collaborative and conventional group work on academic achievement in teaching grammar. Turkish Studies, 9(8), 603-622.

  • Kennedy, G. (2010). The effects of skill-focused mini lessons on students’ independent use of reading skills during literature circles. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida Atlantic University, Florida.

  • Kırbaş, A. (2010). Effect of the collective learning method on the improvement of listening skills of primary school eighth. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Atatürk University, Erzurum.

  • Maden, S. (2011). Effect of Jigsaw I technique on achievement in written expression skill. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(2), 901-917.

  • McElvain, C. M. (2010). Transactional literature circles and the reading comprehension of English learners in the mainstream classroom. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 178-205.

  • Meredith, J. (2015). The effects of literature circles on second graders’ reading comprehension and motivation. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Goucher College, Maryland.

  • Mertens, D. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

  • Mizerka, P. M. (1999). The impact of teacher directed literature circles versus student-directed literature circles on reading comprehension at the sixth-grade level. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Illinois.

  • Moeller, V. J. & Moeller, M. V. (2007). Literature circles that engage middle and high school students. Larcmont, NY: Eye on Education.

  • Neamen, M. & Strong, M. (2001). More literature circles: Cooperative learning for grades 3-8. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.

  • Olsen, A. S. W. (2007). Literature circles and ninth grade students: A student-centered approach to reading. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Southwest Minnesota State University, Minnesota.

  • Özbay, M. & Kaldırım, A. (2015). The effect of reading circle technique on the critical reading self-efficacy perception of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 3(2), 222234.

  • Pitton, D. E. (2005). Lit circles, collaboration and student interest. Academic Exchange Quartely, 9(4), 84-90.

  • Purifico, J. (2015). Literature Circles: In class and online discussions. http://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/486

  • Rutherford A., Carter L., Hillmer T., Kramer M. & Parker A. (2009). Promoting intrinsic reading: Implementing literature circles with intermediate-grade students and preservice teachers. The International Journal of the Book, 6(4), 43-49.

  • Sarı, T., Kurtuluş, E. & Yücel-Toy, B. (2017). Okuma çemberi yönteminin ortaokul 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin okuma- anlama becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi [Secondary school 7th grade of the reading circle method the effect of students on reading-comprehension skills investigation]. YILDIZ Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 1-14.

  • Shelton-Strong, S. (2012). Literature circles in elt. ELT Journal, 66(2), 214-223.

  • Soysal, T. (2019). The effect of cooperative learning activities on developing the 21st century learning and innovation skills in Turkish lessons. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.

  • Tan Hatun, E. & Kurtlu, Y. (2019). The effect of the method of literature circles on students' critical reading skills. EKEV Academy Journal, 23(78), 191-204.

  • Thomas, D. (2013). The effects of literature circles on the reading achievement of college reading students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle Tennessee State University, Tennessee.

  • Ün Açıkgöz, K. (1992). İşbirlikli öğrenme: kuram, araştırma, uygulama [Cooperative learning: theory, research, practice]. Malatya: Uğurel Press.

  • Uysal, M. E. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning method on the access, achievement, critical thinking and creativity skills of the elementary school fourth-grade student. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.

  • Varita, D. (2017). Improving reading comprehension through literature circles. English Education Journal, 8(2), 234-244.

  • Whittingham, J. (2013). Literature circles: A perfect match for online instruction. Tech Trends, 57(4), 53-58.

  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. (6th edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

  • Yıldırım, K., Ateş, S., Çermik, H. & Doğan, B. (2019). The effects of literature circles on development of preservice teachers’ reading comprehension levels. GEFAD / GUJGEF, 39(2), 1029-1048.

  • Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. (2nd edition). London: Sage Publications.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics