Review of Primary School Student’s Jurisdiction Regarding Value of Justice, Honesty, Responsibility and Helpfulness according to Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-Volume 14, Issue 3
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-08-04 23:14:39.0
Language : İngilizce
Konu : Temel Eğitim
Number of pages: 807-822
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Değer, insanlara neyin doğru, neyin iyi, neyin güzel olduğunu ve bu değerlere ulaşmanın yollarını, yani insanların nasıl yaşaması gerektiğini gösteren bir olgudur. Ahlaki, değer yoluyla doğruyu veya yanlışı tercih etme yeteneğidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilkokul öğrencilerinin cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi ve okul değişkenlerine göre yargı alanlarının ikilemlere göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını ortaya koymaktır. Bu çalışma 1. ve 3. sınıfa devam eden toplam 166 öğrenci ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. grade levels of primary school in Ferizli and Serdivan districts of city of Sakarya. The data were gathered through face-to-face interview method carried out with students.  “Value oriented dilemma stories” written and approved by the researcher and the expert were used in the interviews.  These stories were fictionalized in a way as to require students to decide against a certain situation. Students’ reasoning’s towards ethical dilemmas in the stories were categorized according to Kohlberg’s Moral Development theory. Quantitative data were collected using students’ moral development stages as scores. It was analyzed whether there is a relation between students’ moral developments and their values regarding responsibility, justice, honesty and helpfulness   according to their grade levels, sex and school variables. Mann Whitney-U and Chi Square tests were used in data processing.  According to the results of the research, the social cultural differences of schools showed that values regarding fairness, honesty, responsibility and helpfulness affect the moral development stages and jurisdiction of students.

Keywords


  • Acuner, H. Y. (2004). The development of moral judgment and moral education of 14-18 year old youth. (PhD Thesis). Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun.

  • Arnold, M. L. (2000). Stage, sequence, and sequels: Changing conceptions of morality, post- Kohlberg. Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 365-383.

  • Buyukozturk, S. (2002). Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics. Research Pattern, SPSS Applications and Interpretation, PegemA Yayıncılık, Ankara.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

  • Cagdas, A. and Secer, S. (2002). Social and moral development of children and adolescents (1nd ed.) (R. Arı, Ed.), Nobel Publishing, Ankara: November.

  • Cam, Z., Seydoogullari, S., Cavdar, D., and Cok, F. (2012). Classical and contemporary approaches for moral development. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(2), 1222-1225.

  • Capan, A. S. (2005). Analysis of moral development of 3-11 year old children acording to Piaget`s moral development theory. (Master Thesis). Marmara University, Istanbul.

  • Ciftci, N. (2003). The cognitive-moral developmental theory of Kohlberg: moral and democracy education. Journal of Value Education, 1 (1), 43-77.

  • Cileli, M. (1981). Evaluation of moral judgment with mental developmental psychology approach in students aged 14- 18. (PhD Thesis). Ankara University.

  • Cinemre, S. (2014). Some critiques towards Kohlberg’s moral development theory. Journal of Value Education, 12(28), 69-99.

  • Dokmen, Z. Y. (2004). Gender, social psychological explanations. Sistem Publishing.

  • Eisenberg, N. and Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behaviour in children. New York, Cambridge University Press.

  • Evrim, S. (1972), Introduction to the problem of role as a psychosociological concept in the field of personality. Istanbul: Istanbul University, Faculty of Literature.

  • Gander, M. and Gardiner, H. (2010). Child and adolescent development (trans. A. Donmez). Ankara: Imge Bookstore.

  • Gerolds, L. R. (1981). Kohlberg and moral education: a more comprehensive Outlook. (Master Thesis). Concordia University.

  • Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., and Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847

  • Gumus, E. (2015). The Level Of Moral Development and Gender Roles of Secondary School Students According to Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development (Publication Number. 381648) (Master Thesis). Ataturk

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000) Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. New York, Cambridge

  • Inci, E. (2009). Examination of value orientations of students in early childhood period according to socio-economic level, age and gender variables (Publication Number. 240070) (Master Thesis). Adnan Menderes University.

  • Kabaday, A. and Aladag, K. S. (2010). Comparison of the moral development of the students attending to different primary schools from different variables. International Journal of Human Sciences, 7(1), 878-898.

  • Kandir, A. and Alpan, U. Y. (2008). The effects of parental behavior on the socio-emotional development in preschool. 14(14), 33-38.

  • Koca, G. (1987). Some factors influencing the moral jud gements of the seven year age students going to primary school's firot grade (Publication Number. 1119) (Master Thesis). Ankara University.

  • Kochanska, G. (1991) Socialization and temperament in the development of guilt and conscience. Child Development, 62(6), 1379–1392.

  • Krettenauer, T. (2021). Moral sciences and the role of education. Journal of Moral Education, 50(1), 77-91.

  • MEB (2018). Primary Education Social Studies Curriculum and Guide, Ankara.

  • Ozgulec, F. (2001). A research on the moral development of 7-11 years old children (Publication Number. 104566) (Master Thesis). Ankara University.

  • Ozkaynak, B. (1982). The development of moral judgments of children between the ages of six and eleven attending Tegmen Kalmaz Primary School. (Master Thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.

  • Schwartz, S. H. and Bilsky, W. (1987) Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550–562.

  • Selcuk, Z. (2008). Education psychology, (15. ed.). Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.

  • Staats, A. W. (1981). Paradigmatic behaviorism, unified theory, unified theory construction methods, and the Zeitgeist of separatism. American Psychologist, 36(3), 239.

  • Sahin, N. (2017). Nietzsche’nin Sosyolojisi. Universal Journal Of Theology, 2(3), 207-226.

  • Tasar, M. F. (2006). Probing preservice teachers'understandings of scientific knowledge by using a vignette in conjunctıon with a paper and pencil test. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2(1).

  • Tola, D. (2003). Analyse the rlationship between primary 5th grade childrens moral behaviour and parent attitudes. (Master Thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.

  • Ura, K. (2009). A proposal for GNH value education in schools. Thimphu: Gross National Happiness Commission.

  • Uyguc, N. (2003). Gender, individual values and career choice. Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. 18 (1), 93-103.

  • Vatandas, C. (2007). Perception of gender and gender roles. Journal of Sociology Conferences, (35), 29-56.

  • Williams, T. (1988). Diagnosis and treatment of survivor guilt. In Human adaptation to extreme stress (pp. 319- 336). Springer, Boston, MA.

  • Youniss, J. and Yates, M. (1999) Youth service and moral-civic identity: a case for everyday morality. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 361–376.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics