An Evaluation of Teacher Candidates’ Analyses of Language Learning Software

Author :  

Year-Number: 2010-Volume 2, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

In this study, the aim is to evaluate the analyses on language learning software by the pre-service teachers who have taken the elective course FRN4104 Computer Assisted Language Teaching II. It is targeted to study the software in relation to technical and educational features; general structures and content; limitations and the possibility of effectiveness. The participants of study are 12 senior prospective teachers studying at Uludağ University, Education faculty, Department of French Language Teaching in the academic year of 2009-2010. While selecting the software, the criteria were that the software were designed for autonomous learning and that they were not analyzed by other researchers with related online publications before. The participants will have analyzed the software via the scales used by Kartal (2004) within the related literature. The software analyzed by the participants are the ones developed to teach Turkish, English, French and Spanish. The research findings reveal that the software meets the needs of the learner or the user especially on improving their language skills in general. The results of the present study indicate that there is a high need for the analyzed software to be improved especially to ensure that the learners are more active and motivated in the learning process.

Keywords

Abstract

In this study, the aim is to evaluate the analyses on language learning software by the pre-service teachers who have taken the elective course FRN4104 Computer Assisted Language Teaching II. It is targeted to study the software in relation to technical and educational features; general structures and content; limitations and the possibility of effectiveness. The participants of study are 12 senior prospective teachers studying at Uludağ University, Education faculty, Department of French Language Teaching in the academic year of 2009-2010. While selecting the software, the criteria were that the software were designed for autonomous learning and that they were not analyzed by other researchers with related online publications before. The participants will have analyzed the software via the scales used by Kartal (2004) within the related literature. The software analyzed by the participants are the ones developed to teach Turkish, English, French and Spanish. The research findings reveal that the software meets the needs of the learner or the user especially on improving their language skills in general. The results of the present study indicate that there is a high need for the analyzed software to be improved especially to ensure that the learners are more active and motivated in the learning process.

Keywords


  • Bertina, J.C., & Narcy-Combes, J.P. (2007). Monitoring the learner-who, why and what for? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 443-457.

  • CAVUL, (1999). Le centre audio-visuel de l'Université Charles-de-Gaulle- Lille 3. Retrieved January 9, 2002, from http://www.univ-lille3.fr/fr/universite/services/cavul/

  • Cembalo, S.M. (2001). Les TIC et l’orale. Le Français Dans le Monde, Numéro spécial Recherches et Applications: Oral: Variabilité et Apprentissage (pp.143-152). Paris: Clé International.

  • Chan, W. M., & Kim, D.-H. (2004). Towards greater individualization and process-oriented learning through electronic self-access: Project e-daf. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(1), 83-108.

  • Chevalıer, Y., & Perin, D. (1997) . Stratégies semi-autonomes d’apprentissage du Français Langue Etrangère. Revue de Linguistique et de Didactique des Langues, 16, 145-160.

  • Corbalan, G., Paas, F., & Cuypers, H. (2010). Computer-based feedback in linear algebra: Effects on transfer performance and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 692703.

  • Davis, J. N. (1989). Facilitating effects of marginal gloss on foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 41-48.

  • Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4), 325-346.

  • Eow,Y.L., Wan Ali, W.Z, Mahmud, R., Baki, R. (2009). Form one students’ engagement with computer games and its effect on their academic achievement in a Malaysian secondary school. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1082-1091.

  • Felix, U. (2003). Humanising automated online learning through intelligent feedback. In G.Crisp, D.Thiele, I.Scholten, S.Barker and J.Baron (Eds), Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp.178-186). Adelaide, 7-10 December 2003. Retrieved July 28, 2010 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/adelaide03/docs/pdf/178.pdf

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

  • Iheanacho, C.C. (1997). Effects of two multimedia computer-assisted language learning programs on vocabulary acquisition of intermediate level ESL students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. Retrieved August 11, 2010, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11397193839/unrestricted/Clems.pdf

  • Jaudeau, M. (1999). Le guide du multimédia pour l’enseignement du Français Langue Etrangère. Colloque International: Le multimédia et l’apprentissage du Français Langue Etrangère et/ou Second: de l’Expérimentation à la réalité dans l’Espace Francophone (pp.12-14). Toulouse : Université de Toulouse le Mirail, 25 et 26 Mars 1999. Retrieved December 11, 2001, from http://www.educnet.education.fr/superieur/coltoul.htm

  • Karasar, N. (1998). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.

  • Kartal, E. (2004). La place et les fonctions des produis multimédias dans la didactique du Français Langue Etrangère.(Thèse de Doctorat non-publiée). Ankara: Université de Hacettepe.

  • Kartal, E. (2005). Çoklu-ortamlı yazılımların Fransızcanın yabancı dil olarak öğretimindeki yeri ve işlevleri. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 231–244.

  • Kartal, E. (2010). Feedback processes in multimedia language learning software. US-China Education Review, 7(4), 53-65.

  • Kelly, G. (2008). A collaborative process for evaluating new learning technologies. Campus Wide Information Systems, 25(2), 105-113.

  • Lancien, T. (1998). Le Multimédia. Paris: Clé International.

  • Lepper, M. R., Iyenger, S. S., & Corpus, J. H. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age difference and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.

  • Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769-782.

  • Liu, T.Y., & Chu, Y.L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55, 633-640.

  • Mangenot, F. (1997). Le multimédia dans l'enseignement des langues. In J. Crinon et Ch.Gautellier (sous la dir.). Apprendre avec le multimédia: Où en est-on? (pp.119-134). Paris: Retz.

  • Martinez, P. (1996). La didactique des langues étrangères (Que sais-je ?). Paris: PUF

  • McFarlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A., & Heald, Y. (2002). Report on the educational use of games: An exploration by TEEM of the contribution which games can make to the education process (pp.1-26) United Kingdom: TEEM, St Ives, Cambridgeshire. Retrieved June 20, 2010 from http://www.teem.org.uk/publications/teem_gamesined_full.pdf

  • Mory, E. H. (2003). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 745-783). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

  • Mutlu, M.E., Gülen, M.F., & Dinçer, G.D. (2007). Açıköğretim e-öğrenme yapım ve sunum altyapısı. Akademik Bilişim’07 - IX. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri Kitabı (ss.1726), 31 Ocak - 2 Şubat 2007 Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Kütahya. 02 Temmuz 2010 tarihinde http://ab.org.tr/ab07/kitap/mutlu_gulen_AB07.pdf adresinden elde edilmiştir.

  • Mutlu, M.E., & Özkul, A.E. (2003). Eğitim yazılımları geliştirme sürecinde üretim yönetimi. 20. Ulusal Bilişim Kurultayı, 2-5 Eylül 2003, İstanbul. 05 Aralık 2005 tarihinde http://bde.anadolu.edu.tr/Lists/Yaynilar/AllItems.aspx adresinden elde edilmiştir

  • Park, J.S. (2006). Language Learning Software Evaluation: Top-down or Bottom-up? Asian EFL Journal, Teachers Articles, Volume 13, Article 2. Retrieved July 20, 2010 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/pta_july_06_jsp.php

  • Puren, C. (1988). Histoire des méthodologies de l’enseignement des langues. Paris: Nathan.

  • Ranalli, J. (2008). Learning English with The Sims: Exploiting authentic computer simulation games for L2 learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 441455.

  • Segler, T. M., Pain, H., & Sorace, A. (2002). Second language vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in ICALL environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(4), 409-422.

  • Sim, G., Macfarlane, S., & Read, J. (2006). All work and no play: Measuring fun, usability, and learning in software for children. Computers & Education, 46, 235–248.

  • Tüzün, H., Yılmaz-Soylu, M., Karakuş, T., İnal, Y., & Kızılkaya, G. (2009). The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning. Computers & Education, 52(1), 68-77.

  • Underwood, J. (1989). Hypercard and interactive video. CALICO Journal, 6(3), 7-20.

  • Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2005). A surprising effect of feedback on learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(6), 589-602.

  • Williams, D.L., Boone, R., & Kingsley, K.V. (2004). Teacher beliefs about educational software: A delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 213

  • Yeh, Y., & Wang, C.-W. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 131–144.

  • Yoshii, M. & Flaitz, J. (2002). Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of text and picture annotation types. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 33–58.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics