Why Do Larks Perform Better At School Than Owls? The Mediating Effect Of Conscientiousness

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-Volume 8, Issue 5
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

Circadian preference refers to individuals’ preference for morning or evening activities. Its two dimensions (i.e., morningness and eveningness) are related to a number of academic outcomes. While morningness shows positive relations with academic achievement, eveningness shows negative relations. Further, morningness and eveningness show the same correlational pattern with conscientiousness (i.e., positive relations for morningness, negative relations for eveningness), which – in turn – predicts academic achievement. Therefore, the main aim of the present study was to investigate if the relation between circadian preference and academic achievement was mediated by conscientiousness. The sample comprised 422 students attending the 11th grade at a grammar school in Germany. Circadian preference (morningness and eveningness) and conscientiousness were assessed by self-report questionnaires; academic achievement was operationalized by school grades. Using confirmatory analyses and structural equation modelling, the results supported the assumption that conscientiousness mediates the relation between circadian preference and academic achievement. Implications for research into circadian preference and for education are discussed.

Keywords

Abstract

Circadian preference refers to individuals’ preference for morning or evening activities. Its two dimensions (i.e., morningness and eveningness) are related to a number of academic outcomes. While morningness shows positive relations with academic achievement, eveningness shows negative relations. Further, morningness and eveningness show the same correlational pattern with conscientiousness (i.e., positive relations for morningness, negative relations for eveningness), which – in turn – predicts academic achievement. Therefore, the main aim of the present study was to investigate if the relation between circadian preference and academic achievement was mediated by conscientiousness. The sample comprised 422 students attending the 11th grade at a grammar school in Germany. Circadian preference (morningness and eveningness) and conscientiousness were assessed by self-report questionnaires; academic achievement was operationalized by school grades. Using confirmatory analyses and structural equation modelling, the results supported the assumption that conscientiousness mediates the relation between circadian preference and academic achievement. Implications for research into circadian preference and for education are discussed.

Keywords


  • Arbabi, T., Vollmer, C., Dörfler, T., & Randler, C. (2015). The influence of chronotype, intelligence, conscientiousness, and motivation on academic achievement in primary school. Chronobiology International, 32, 349-357. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.980508.

  • Bailey, S. L., & Heitkemper, M. M. (2001). Circadian rhythmicity of cortisol and body temperature: Morningness-eveningness effects. Chronobiology International, 18, 249-261. doi: 10.1081/CBI-100103189.

  • Cavallera, G. M., & Giudici, S. (2008). Morningness and eveningness personality: A survey in literature from 1995 up till 2006. Personality and Individual differences, 44, 3-21. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.009.

  • Crowley, S., Acebo, C., & Carskadon, M. (2007). Sleep, circadian rhythms, and delayed phase in adolescence . Sleep Medicine, 8, 602-612. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2006.12.002

  • Deary, I., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35, 13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001.

  • Díaz-Morales, J. F. (2007). Morning and evening-types: Exploring their personality styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 769-778. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.002.

  • Dickhäuser, O., & Plenter, I. (2005). “Letztes Halbjahr stand ich zwei”. Zur Akkuratheit selbst berichteter Noten [“Last term I had a B”. On the accuracy of self-reported school grades]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 219-224. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.19.4.219.

  • Dijk, D. J., & von Schantz, M. (2005). Timing and consolidation of human sleep, wakefulness, and performance by a symphony of oscillators. Journal of Biological Rhythms, 20, 279-290. doi: 10.1177/0748730405278292.

  • Escribano, C., & Díaz-Morales, J. F. (2016). Are achievement goals different among morning and evening – type adolescents? Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.032.

  • Furnham, A., & Monsen, J. (2009). Personality traits and intelligence predict academic school grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.02.001.

  • Giannotti, F., Cortesi, F., Sebastiani, T., & Ottaviano, S. (2002). Circadian preference, sleep and daytime behaviour in adolescence. Journal of Sleep Research, 11, 191-200. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2002.00302.x.

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26.

  • Hahn, E., Preckel, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2011). Das Eule-Lerche-Prinzip: Der Zusammenhang von Chronotyp, Persönlichkeit, Intelligenz und akademischer Leistung [The owl–lark principle: The correlation between chronotype, personality, intelligence, and academic achievement]. Report Psychologie, 36(10), 410-420.

  • Hidalgo, M. P., Caumo, W., Posser, M., Coccaro, S. B., Cammozato, A. L., & Chaves, M. L. F. (2009). Relationship between depressive mood and chronotype in healthy subjects. Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 63, 283-290. doi: 10.11 11/j.1440-1819.01965.x.

  • Horne, J. A., & Östberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine Morningness–eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4(2), 97-110.

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.

  • Kerkhof, G. A. (1985). Interindividual differences in the human circadian system: A review. Biological Psychology, 20, 83-112. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(85)90019-5.

  • Kirby, E. G., & Kirby, S. L. (2006). Improving task performance: The relationship between morningness and proactive thinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2715-2729. doi: 10.1111/j.00219029.2006.00124.x.

  • Korczak, A. L., Martynhak, B. J., Pedrazzoli, M., Brito, A. F., & Louzada, F. M. (2008). Influence of chronotype and social zeitgebers on sleep/wake patterns. Brazilian Journal of Medical Biological Reaseach, 41, 914-919. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2008005000047

  • Lipnevich, A. A., Preckel, F., & Roberts, R. D. (Eds.) (2016). Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century. Theory, research, and practice. The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality. New York: Springer.

  • Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., Selig, J. P., & Card, N. A. (2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 357-365. doi:

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-49. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.

  • Mayes, S. D., Calhoun, S. L., Bixler, E. O., & Zimmerman, D. N. (2009). IQ and neuropsychological predictors of academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 238-241. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.001.

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus Version 7.4 [statistical software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Natale, V., & Alzani, A. (2001). Additional validity evidence for the Composite Scale of Morningsness. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 293-301. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00046-5.

  • Neubauer, A. C. (1992). Psychometric comparison of two circadian type questionnaires and their relationship with personaltity. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 125.131. doi: 10.1016/01918869(92)90035-N.

  • Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the Five-Factor Model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322-338. doi: 10.1037/a0014996.

  • Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Vock, M. (2006). Academic underachievement: Relationship with cognitive motivation, achievement motivation, and conscientiousness. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 401-411. doi:10.1002/pits.20154.

  • Preckel, F., Lipnevich, A. A., Boehme, K., Brandner, L., Georgi, K., Könen, T., Mursin, K., & Roberts, R. D. (2013). Morningness-eveningness and educational outcomes: The lark has an advantage over the owl at high school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 114-134. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02059.x.

  • Preckel, F., Lipnevich, A. A., Schneider, S., & Roberts, R. D. (2011). Chronotype, cognitive abilities, and academic achievement: A meta-analytic investigation. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 483-492. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.003.

  • Putilov, A. A., Donskaya, O. G., & Verevkin, E. G. (2015). How many diurnal types are there? A search for two further “bird species”. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.003

  • Putilov, A. A., & Onischenko, M. A. (2005). The 52-item sleep-wake pattern assessment questionnaire: Evaluation of it psychotmetric features. Ergonomia, 27, 131-144.

  • Rahafar, A., Maghsudloo, M., Farhangnia, S., Vollmer, C., & Randler, C. (2015). The role of chronotype, gender, test anxiety, and conscientiousness in academic achievement of high school students. Chronobiology International, 33, 1-9. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2015.1107084.

  • Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit [Shortversion of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Development and validation of an economic measure to assess the Big Five personlity dimensions]. Diagnostica, 51, 195-206. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.195.

  • Randler, C. (2008). Warum sind wir montags morgens immer so müde? Aspekte zur Chronobiologie und Chronopsychologie [Why are we always that tired in the morning? Aspects of chronobiology and chronopsychology]. Aachen: Shaker.

  • Randler, C., Díaz-Morales, J. F., Rahafar, A., & Vollmer, C. (2016). Morningness–eveningness and amplitude – development and validation of an improved composite scale to measure circadian preference and stability (MESSi). Chronobiology International, 33, 1-17. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2016.1171233

  • Randler, C., & Frech, D. (2006). Correlation between morningness-eveningness and final school leaving exams. Biological Rhythm Research, 37, 233-239. doi: 10.1080/09291010600645780.

  • Randler, C., & Vollmer, C. (2012). Epidemiological evidence for the bimodal chronotype using the Composite Scale of Morningness. Chronobiology International, 29, 1-4. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2011.635233

  • Roberts, R. D. (1998). The Lark-Owl (Chronotype) Indicator (LOCI). Intelligent Testing Products: Sydney, Australia.

  • Roberts, R. D., & Kyllonen, P. C. (1999). Morningness-eveningness and intelligence: early to bed, early to rise will likely make you anything but wise! Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1123-1133. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00054-9.

  • Roenneberg, T., Kuehnle, T., Pramstaller, P. P., Ricken, J., Havel, M., Guth, A., & Merrow, M. (2004). A marker for the end of adolescence. Current Biology, 14, R1038-R1039. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.039.

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological ResearchOnline, 8, 23-74. Retrieved online: http://www.dgps.de/fachgruppen!methoden/mpr-online.

  • Scherrer, V., Roberts, R. D., & Preckel, F. (2016). Parents’ assessment of circadian preference in elementary school-aged children: Validity and relations to educational outcomes. Chronobiology International. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2016.1210618.

  • Tankova, I., Adan, A., & Buela-Casals, G. (1994). Circadian typology and individual differences. A review. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 671-684. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90209-7.

  • Tsaousis, I. (2010). Circadian Preferences and Personality Traits: A Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Personality, 24, 356-373. doi: 10.1002/per.754.

  • Zimmermann, L. K. (2016). The influence of chronotype in the daily lives of young children. Chronobiological International: The Journal of Biological and Medical Rhythm Research, 33, 268-279. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2016.1138120.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics