Seeing Darkness, Hearing Silence: Student And Teacher Metaphors İn The Context Of Visually And Hearing Impaired

Author :  

Year-Number: 2016-Volume 8, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

This study sought to describe the teacher and student conceptual metaphors of the teachers of the hearing and visually impaired special education students. Participants completed the prompts such as “The teacher of the hearing- impaired student is like… because…”; “The teacher of the visually- impaired student is like… because…”; “The hearing - impaired student is like…because….”. “The visually-impaired student is like…because….”. Data were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The elicited teacher and student metaphors in the study indicated that the participant teachers conceived teacher and student roles in the realm of the educational context they teach and these roles had strong connections with the specific deficiency of the students

Keywords

Abstract

This study sought to describe the teacher and student conceptual metaphors of the teachers of the hearing and visually impaired special education students. Participants completed the prompts such as “The teacher of the hearing- impaired student is like… because…”; “The teacher of the visually- impaired student is like… because…”; “The hearing - impaired student is like…because….”. “The visually-impaired student is like…because….”. Data were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The elicited teacher and student metaphors in the study indicated that the participant teachers conceived teacher and student roles in the realm of the educational context they teach and these roles had strong connections with the specific deficiency of the students

Keywords


  • Aksan, Y., &Aksan, M. (2012). Armed with patience, suffering an emotion: Conceptualization of life, morality and emotion. In F. MacArthur, J. L. O. Martínez, M. S. García& A.M.Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture and communication (pp. 285-308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Arnon, R., Shani, M., &Ziger, T. (1999).Teachers’ thoughts on their profession. Tel Aviv: BeitBerl College.

  • Alger, C. L. (2009). Secondary teachers’ conceptual metaphors of teaching and learning: Changes over the carrer span. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 743-751.

  • Aydın, İ. S., &Pehlivan, A. (2010).Türkçeöğretmeniadaylarının “öğretmen” ve “öğrenci” kavramlarına ilişkin kullandıkları metaforlar.Turkish Studies International Periodical for the Languages, Literatureand History of Turkish or Turkic,5, 818-842.

  • Armstrong, S.L., Davis, H., & Paulson, E.J.(2011). The subjectivity problem: Improving triangulation approaches in metaphor analysis studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(2),151-163.

  • Ben-Peretz, M., Mendelson, N., &Kron, F.W. (2003). How teachers in different educational contexts view their roles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 277-290.doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00100-2

  • Block, D. (1992). Metaphors we teach and live by. Prospect 7, 42-55.

  • Bullough, R. V., & Stokes, D. K. (1994). Analysing personal teaching metaphors in preservice teacher education as a means for encouraging professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 31 (1), 197–224.

  • Cortazzi, M., &Jin, L. (1999). Bridges to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and language. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 149-176).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Guerrero, M. C. M., &Villamil, O. S. (2002).Metaphorical conceptualizations of ESL teaching and learning.Language Teaching Research, 6(2), 95–120.

  • Inbar, D. E. (1996). The free educational prison: Metaphors and images. Educational Research, 38(1), 77-92.

  • İlkbaşaran, D. (2013).Communicative practices of deaf people in Turkey and the sociolinguistics of Turkish sign language. In E. Arik (Ed.), Current directions in Turkish sign language research (pp. 19-54). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.

  • Kalra, M.B., &Baveja, B. (2012). Teacher thinking about knowledge, learning and learners: A metaphor analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55, 317-326.

  • Koro-Ljungberg, M.(2004).Displacing metaphorical analysis: Reading with and against metaphors. Qualitative Research, 4(3), 339-360.

  • Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.

  • Leavy, A.M., McSorley, E.A., &Bote, L.A. (2007). An examination of what metaphor construction reveal about the evolution of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1217-1233.

  • Laletas, S.,&Reupert, A. (2016). Exploring pre-service secondary teacher's understanding of care. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22 (4), 485-503.

  • Mahlios, M., &Maxson, M. (1998).Metaphors as structures for elementary and secondary preservice teachers’ thinking.International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 227–240.

  • Mahlios, M., Shaw, M., & Barry, A. (2010).Synthesis of metaphors: A reviewacrossthreestudies. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 49-71.

  • Makaroğlu, B., &Ergenç, İ. (2016).Inflectional morphological awareness of Turkish deaf children.Ankara ÜniversitesiSosyalBilimlerDergisi, 7(1), 30-46.doi: 10.1501/sbeder_0000000109.

  • Martinez, M.A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G.L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965-977.

  • MEB mevzuat (2015, October 6)Millî Eğitim Bakanliği eğitim kurumlari yöneticilerinin Görevlendirilmelerine dair yönetmelik. Sayı 29494 Retrived from http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/egitimkurumyon/egitkuryon.html August 9, 2016

  • MEB (n.d) örgün eğitim istatistikleri Retrived August 9, 2016 from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_03/30044345_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2015_201 6.pdf

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Nikitina, L., &Furuoka, F. (2008). Measuring metaphors: A factor analysis of students’ conception of language teachers. metaphorik.de 15, 161-180.

  • Oxford, R. L., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R. Z., Saleh, A., &Longhini, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: Toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26, 3-50.

  • Patchen,T., &Crawford,T. (2011). From gardeners to tour guides: The epistemological struggle revealed in teacher-generated metaphors. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 286–298. doi:10.1177/0022487110396716.

  • Ritchie, J.,& Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications.

  • Saban, A. (2003).A Turkish profile of prospective elementary school teachers and their views of teaching.Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 829–846.

  • Saban, A. (2004). Prospective classroom teachers’ metaphorical images of selves and comparing them to those they have of their elementary and cooperating teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 617–635.

  • Saban, A., Koçbeker, B. N., Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17 (2), 123-139.

  • Saban, A. (2010).Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner.Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 290–305. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.017

  • Seung, E., Park, S., & Narayan, R. (2011). Exploring elementary pre-service teachers’ beliefs about science teaching and learning as revealed in their metaphor writing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 703-714. doi :10.1007/s10956-010-9263-2.

  • Seung, E., Park, S., & Jung, J. (2015). Methodological approaches and strategies for elicit metaphor-based research: A critical review. In W. Wan & G. Low (Eds.), Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse (pp. 39-64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Scarella, R. C., & Oxford, R.L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle&Heinle Publishers.

  • Shuell, T. J. (2001).Learning theories and educational paradigms. In N. J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences Vol. 13(pp. 8613-8620). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Steen, G. (2007). Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Thomas, L., & Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 762-769. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.007.

  • OSYM(n.d.) Yüksek öğretim programları ve kontejanlar Retrived Agustos 9, 2016 fromhttp://www.osym.gov.tr/belge/1-23560/2015-osys-yuksekogretim-programlari-ve-kontenjanlariki-.html

  • Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu (n.d.)Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu anasayfa Retrived on May 13, 2013 from http://www.yok.gov.tr/web/guest/anasayfa;jsessionid=access date 13.05.2013

  • Wegner, E., & Nückles, M. (2015). Knowledge acquisition or participation in communities of practice? Academics’ metaphor of teaching and learning at the university. Studies in Higher Education, 40(4), 624643.doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.842213.

  • Wan, W., & Low, G. (Eds.). (2015).Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Zapata, G. C., &Lacorte, M. (2007).Preservice and inservice instructors’ metaphorical constructions of second language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 40 (3), 521-534.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics