Analysis Of The Self, Peer And Rater Assessment Of Teacher Candidates’ Use Of Teaching Methods With Many Facet Rasch Model
Author :
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to investigate the self, peer and rater assessment of the teacher candidates’ micro teaching applications for using teaching methods with many rasch model. The research sample is comprised of 25 teacher candidates taking the principles and methods of teaching course in a state university. Each candidate was assessed by one academician (rater), themselves (self) and two voluntary peers among classmates (peer) considering their skills in terms of usage of the concerned teaching method. As a result of the research, differences were found between the teacher candidates and their skills in terms of delivering the method satisfactorily. And teacher candidates’ ability measures belong to use teaching methods were determined with high reliability. It was concluded that the teacher candidates face difficulties in appropriate and true delivery of the selected method and making proper use of physical elements in the manner required by the selected method. However, it was determined that teacher candidates were successful in selecting/identifying the appropriate teaching method for a given subject and teaching objectives. It was determined that teacher candidates were lenient when it comes to assessing their own performances and severity in making assessment on that of their peers related to using teaching methods.
Keywords
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to investigate the self, peer and rater assessment of the teacher candidates’ micro teaching applications for using teaching methods with many rasch model. The research sample is comprised of 25 teacher candidates taking the principles and methods of teaching course in a state university. Each candidate was assessed by one academician (rater), themselves (self) and two voluntary peers among classmates (peer) considering their skills in terms of usage of the concerned teaching method. As a result of the research, differences were found between the teacher candidates and their skills in terms of delivering the method satisfactorily. And teacher candidates’ ability measures belong to use teaching methods were determined with high reliability. It was concluded that the teacher candidates face difficulties in appropriate and true delivery of the selected method and making proper use of physical elements in the manner required by the selected method. However, it was determined that teacher candidates were successful in selecting/identifying the appropriate teaching method for a given subject and teaching objectives. It was determined that teacher candidates were lenient when it comes to assessing their own performances and severity in making assessment on that of their peers related to using teaching methods.
Keywords
- Akın, Ö. & Baştürk, R. (2012). Keman eğitiminde temel becerilerin Rasch ölçme modeli ile değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 175-187.
- Akiyama, T. (2012). A close look at English teacher employment examinations (ETEEs): How do raters assess? Proceedings of the 17th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics. Erişim: 20.12.2014, http://www.paaljapan.org/conference2012/proc_PAAL2012/pdf/poster/P-15.pdf
- Atılgan, H. (2005). Müzik öğretmenliği özel yetenek seçme sınavının çok yüzeyli Rasch modeli ile analizi (İnönü üniversitesi örneği). Eğitim Araştırmaları, 20, 62- 73.
- Baştürk, R. (2008). Sözlü sunuma dayalı davranışların çok-yüzeyli Rasch ölçme modeli ile analizi, I. Ulusal Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, Ankara
- Baştürk, R. (2009). Applying the many – facet Rasch model to evaluate powerpoint presentation performance ın higher education. Assesment and Evaluation In Higher Education, 33(4), 431 – 444. doi:10.1080/02602930701562775
- Baştürk, R. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma ödevlerinin çok-yüzeyli Rasch ölçme modeli ile değerlendirilmesi. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 1(1), 51-57.
- Benton-Kupper, J. (2001). The microteaching experience: Student perspectives. Education, 121(4), 830-835. Cheng, W. & Warren, M. (1999). Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 24, No. 3, 301. doi: 10.1080/0260293990240304
- Çoban, A. (2015). Öğretmen Eğitiminde mikro öğretim ve farklı yaklaşımlar. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(53), 219-231. doi: 10.17755/esosder.43863
- Demirel, Ö. (2004). Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme: Öğretmen sanatı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
- Ekşi, G. (2012). Implementing an observation and feedback form for more effective feedback in microteaching. Education and Science, 37(164), 267-282.
- Elhan, A.H., & Atakurt, Y. (2005). Ölçeklerin değerlendirilmesinde niçin Rasch analizi kullanılmalıdır? Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 58(1), 47-50.
- Erdem, E., Erdoğan, Ü. I., Özyalçın Oskay, Ö. & Yılmaz, A. (2012). Kimya eğitiminde mikro öğretim yönteminin etkililiği ve öğrenci görüşleri. Niğde Üniversitesi Kongresi. Erişim: 15.02.2015, http://kongre.nigde.edu.tr/xufbmek/dosyalar/tam_metin/pdf/2427-30_05_2012-18_02_39.pdf
- Farrokhi, F., Esfandiari, R. & Schaefer, E. (2012). A many-facet Rasch measurement of differential rater severity/leniency in three types of assessment. JALT Journal, 34(1), 79-102.
- Gürses, A., Bayrak, R., Yalçın, M., Açıkyıldız, M. & Doğar, Ç. ( 2005). Öğretmenlik uygulamalarında mikro öğretim yönteminin etkililiğinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(1), 1-10.
- Karakaya, İ. (2015). Comparison of self, peer and instructor assessments in the portfolio assessment by using many facet Rasch model. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(2), 182-192. doi:10.15640/jehd.v4n2a22
- Kim, S. C. & Wilson, M. (2009). A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and many facet Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(4), 408-423.
- Küçükahmet, L. (2009). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
- Küçükoğlu, A., Köse, E., Taşgın, A., Yılmaz, B. Y. & Karademir, Ş. (2012). Mikro öğretim uygulamasının öğretim becerilerine etkisine ilişkin öğretmen adayı görüşleri. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2),
- Kuran, K. (2009). Mikro öğretimin öğretmenlik meslek bilgi ve becerilerinin kazanılmasına etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(11), 384-401.
- Linacre, J. M. (1989). Many-facet Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.
- Linacre, J. M. & Wright, B. D. (1993). A user’s guide to FACETS: Rasch model computer program, version 2.4 for PC compatible computers. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
- Linacre, J. M. (1994). FACETS: Rasch measurement computer program (Version 2.7) [Elektronik Versiyon]. Chicago: MESA Press.
- Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16, 878. Erişim: 21.06.2015, http://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt162f.html
- Linacre, J. M. (2003). Size vs. significance: Infit and outfit mean-square and standardized chi-square fit statistic. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 17, 918.
- Linacre, J. M. (2008). Facets Rasch model computer program [Elektronik Versiyon]. Chicago: Winsteps.com.
- Linacre, J. M. (2012). Many-facet Rasch measurement: Facets tutorial. Retrived from on 18.03.2015, http://www.winsteps.com/a/ftutorial2.pdf
- Lynch, B. K. & McNamara, T. F. (1998). Using G-theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in the development of performance assessments of the ESL speaking skills of immigrants. Language Testing, 15(2), 158–180. doi: 10.1177/026553229801500202
- Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 75-100.
- MEB. (2008). Öğretmen yeterlikleri: Öğretmenlik mesleği genel ve özel alan yeterlikleri. Ankara: MEB Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitimi Genel Müdürlüğü.
- Peker, M. (2009). Genişletilmiş mikro öğretim yaşantıları hakkında matematik öğretmeni adaylarının görüşleri. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 353-376.
- Semerci, Ç. (2011). Mikro öğretim uygulamalarının çok-yüzeyli Rasch ölçme modeli ile analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim/Education and Science, 36(161), 14-25.
- Semerci, Ç., Semerci, N. & Duman, B. (2013). Yüksek lisans öğrencilerinin seminer sunu performanslarının çok-yüzeyli Rasch modeli ile analizi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 7-22.
- Singh, Y. K. & Sharma, A. (2004). Micro teaching. India: APH Publishing Corporation.
- Tan, Ş. (2012). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
- Yüzüak, A.V., Yüzüak, B. & Kaptan, F. (2015). Performans görevinin akran gruplar ve öğretmen yaklaşımları doğrultusunda çok-yüzeyli Rasch ölçme modeli ile analizi. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 6, 1-11.