A Metaphorical Study: Efl Teachers' Concepts Of "standard", "standards For Quality Efl And International Teacher"
Author :
Abstract
Delving into the multifaceted functions of EFL teaching, such concepts of global society as lingual and cultural diversity in the center of education manifest a big challenge for EFL. To deal with these demands on the teachers starts with setting the minimum level of practice expected of trainees and teachers: standards. Within this respect, this study was conducted to explore EFL teachers' metaphorical images about the concepts of "standard", "quality EFL teacher", "standards for quality EFL teacher" and "international teacher". 82 EFL teachers working in the Anatolian part of Istanbul in 2014-2015 academic year participated in the study. Data was collected through a form in which teachers were asked to produce a metaphor about each of the four mentioned concepts. Collected data was analyzed by using "content analysis technique". As a result, teachers were found to produce such metaphors about standards as a star, a scale, a book, a recipe to attract attention to the guiding nature of the standard to do the best. As result of the analysis of the metaphors in categories, teachers were also found to see quality EFL teacher as a multidimensional person, a lifelong learner, a guide and a multicultural domain. Moreover, they emphasized the facilitating impact of the standards on the quality of teaching service performed by EFL teachers. Participant teachers also stressed the cultural dimension of being an international teacher by resembling international teacher to a bridge between the local (national) and the universal cultures as a self sacrificing professional attempting to light the way for the students by keeping to be updated.
Keywords
Abstract
Delving into the multifaceted functions of EFL teaching, such concepts of global society as lingual and cultural diversity in the center of education manifest a big challenge for EFL. To deal with these demands on the teachers starts with setting the minimum level of practice expected of trainees and teachers: standards. Within this respect, this study was conducted to explore EFL teachers' metaphorical images about the concepts of "standard", "quality EFL teacher", "standards for quality EFL teacher" and "international teacher". 82 EFL teachers working in the Anatolian part of Istanbul in 2014-2015 academic year participated in the study. Data was collected through a form in which teachers were asked to produce a metaphor about each of the four mentioned concepts. Collected data was analyzed by using "content analysis technique". As a result, teachers were found to produce such metaphors about standards as a star, a scale, a book, a recipe to attract attention to the guiding nature of the standard to do the best. As result of the analysis of the metaphors in categories, teachers were also found to see quality EFL teacher as a multidimensional person, a lifelong learner, a guide and a multicultural domain. Moreover, they emphasized the facilitating impact of the standards on the quality of teaching service performed by EFL teachers. Participant teachers also stressed the cultural dimension of being an international teacher by resembling international teacher to a bridge between the local (national) and the universal cultures as a self sacrificing professional attempting to light the way for the students by keeping to be updated.
Keywords
- ACTFL. (2002). Program standards for the preparation of foreign language teachers. NY: Yonkers.
- Akbari, R. & Hosseini, K. (2008). Multiple intelligences and language learning strategies: Investigating possible relations. System, 36(2), 141-155. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2007.09.008
- Akbari, M. (2013). Metaphors about efl teachers' roles: a case of Iranian non-english-major students. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 1(2), 100-112.
- Anderson, J. N. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 1-33.
- Baker, W. & Boonkit, K. (2004). Learning strategies in reading and writing: EAP contexts. RELC Journal, 35(3), 299-328. doi: 10.1177/0033688205052143
- Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-492.
- Block, E. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 319-341.
- Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 1-14.
- Brown, S. (2002). Is rereading more effective than prereading? RELC Journal, 33(1), 91-100. doi: 10.1177/003368820203300105
- Canagarajah, A. S. & A. J. Wurr. (2011). Multilingual Communication and Language Acquisition: New Research Directions. The Reading Matrix. 11(1), 1-15.
- Capps, R., Fix, M., Murray, J., Ost, J., Passel, J. S., & Herwantoro, S. (2005). The new demography of America’s schools: Immigration and the no child left behind act. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
- Cerit, Y. (2008). Öğretmen kavramı ile ilgili metaforlara ilişkin öğrenci, öğretmen ve yöneticilerin görüşleri. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(4), 693-712.
- Chamot, A. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
- Clarken, R. H. (1997). Five metaphors for educators. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, March 24-28.
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Publication.
- Council of Europe. (2011). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Çakıroğlu, E. & Çakıroğlu, C. (2003). Reflections on teacher education in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 253-264. doi:10.1080/0261976032000088774
- Çelikten, M. (2006). Kültür ve öğretmen metaforları. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21 (2), 269-283.
- Çelebi, D. (2006). Türkiye’de anadili eğitimi ve yabancı dil öğretimi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2) 285-307.
- Department for Education. (2011). Teachers’ standards: Statutory guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. Retrieved on February 21, 2014, from www.gov.uk/government/publications.
- ECIS. (2014). ECIS International Teacher Certificate. Retrieved on April 14, 2014 from http://www.internationalteachercertificate.com/
- Demirel, Ö. (1991). Türkiye'de yabancı dil öğretmeni yetiştirmede karşılaşılan güçlükler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (6), 25-39.
- Eraslan, A. (2008). Fakülte-okul işbirliği programı: matematik öğretmeni adaylarının okul uygulama dersi üzerine görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (34), 95–105.
- Erişen, Y. (2007). Determination of the quality assurance standards in terms of EU priorities, for teacher training programs in Turkey, 9th International Conference European Unification and Educational Challenges in the Balkans, Thessaloniki, Greece.
- Hajhashemi, K., Akef, K. & Anderson, N. (2012). The relationship between multiple intelligences and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(10), 1475 - 1483. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.19.10.3134
- Hismanoğlu, M. (2000). Language learning strategies in foreign language learning and teaching. Retrieved on Februarey, 20, 2015, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Hismanoglu-Strategies.html
- Hymes, D. H. (1971). Competence and performance in linguistic theory. In R. Huxley & E. Ingram (Eds.), Language acquisition: Models and methods (pp. 3–28). New York: Academic Press.
- Işık, A. (2008). Yabancı dil eğitimimizdeki yanlışlar nereden kaynaklanıyor? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), 15-26.
- Javier, V.L. (1997). Cognitive Style and reading Comprehension in L1 and L2. Retrieved on February, 20, 2014, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED438733.pdf
- Kirkgoz, Y. (2007). English language teaching in Turkey: Policy changes and their implementations. RELC Journal, 38(2), 216-228. doi: 10.1177/0033688207079696
- Kuhlman, N. & Knezevic, B. (2013). The TESOL guidelines for developing EFL standards. Alexandria, VA: ESOL International Association.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Mathison, S. (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (2015). Retrieved on March 18, 2015, from http://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/standard
- Mohsen, A. (2013). Metaphors about EFL teachers' roles: A case of Iranian NonEnglish-major students.
- Nikitina, L. &Furuoka, F. (2008). "A language teacher is like…": examining Malaysian students’ perceptions of language teachers through metaphor analysis. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 192-205.
- O’Malley, J.M., & Valdez P.L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. New York: Addison-Wesley.
- Oxford, R. L., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R. Z., Saleh, A., & et al. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: Toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, (26), 3-50. :10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00071-7
- Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy to EFL reading achievement test performance. RELC Journal, 20(1), 26-56. doi: 10.1191/0265532203lt243oa
- Razmjoo, S. A. (2008). On the relationship between multiple intelligences and language proficiency. The Reading Matrix, 8(2), 155-174.
- Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
- Saban, A. (2004). Giriş düzeyindeki sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının “öğretmen” kavramına ilişkin ileri sürdükleri metaforlar. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (2), 131-155.
- Saban, A. (2011). Prospective computer teachers' mental ımages about the concepts of "school" and "computer teacher". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(1), 435-446.
- Saban, A., Koçbeker, B. N. & Saban, A. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının öğretmen kavramına ilişkin algılarının metafor analizi yoluyla incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 6, 461–522.
- Saban, A., Koçbeker-Eid, B. N., & Saban, A. (2014). Racing in the marathon or traveling to a mysterious place: prospective primary teachers’ conceptions of experienced and ıdeal learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(3), 1013-1030.
- Scriven, M. (1981). Evaluation thesaurus (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Schratz, M. (2005). What is a “European teacher"?: A discussion paper european network on teacher education policies (ENTEP). Retrieved on January 8, 2015, from http://www.sdcentras.lt/pla/res/Schratz.pdf
- Tarman, B. (2010). Global perspectives and challenges on teacher education in Turkey. International Journal of Arts & Sciences (IJAS), 3(17), 78-96.
- Taş, A. M. (2004). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenliği eğitimi program standartlarının belirlenmesi. Ankara Üniver- sitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 37 (1), 28-54.
- TESOL. (2010). TESOL P–12 ESL professional teaching standards. Alexandria, VA: TESOL International Association.
- Tsoukas, H. (1991). The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. The Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 566-585.
- Wan, W., Low, G.D., & Li, M. (2011). From students' and teachers' perspectives: metaphor analysis of beliefs about EFL teachers' roles. System, 39(3), 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.07.012
- Yelken, T. Y. (2009). An evaluation of the teacher development program standards by European teacher candidates from Turkey, Germany, and Denmark. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(4).
- Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
- Yüksel, İ. & Adigüzel, A. (2011). A glance at standard development studies and accreditation process as sustaining tools for quality in teacher education in Turkey. International Journal of Instruction, 4(2), 39-50.