Author :
Abstract
Aim of this research is to determine the opinions of the students related to the orientations of value at School of Physical Education and Sports. The research is a hatching model. Scale is used as a tool of data collection. The tool of data collection was applied to 625 students totally, including 175 students of School of Physical Education and Sports (SPES) at ANKARA University, 265 students of School of Physical Education and Sports (SPES) at Gazi University, 185 students of School of Sports Sciences and Technology (SSST) at Hacettepe University. Whether the value orientations are different or not in terms of gender have been tested by non-related t-test, on the other hand, opinions on the schools and classes have been tested by One-Way Anavo test. LSD test has been used to test the differences among the groups. The first most important three values are determined as being successful, being virtuous and being smart. However three values, which have the least importance, have been determined as being rich, living an exciting life and kindness. Male students attach more importance to dimension of stimulation than female students. Students of SPES at Ankara University attach more importance to dimension of self-direction than students of SSST at Hacettepe University and students of SPES at Gazi University.
Keywords
Abstract
Aim of this research is to determine the opinions of the students related to the orientations of value at School of Physical Education and Sports. The research is a hatching model. Scale is used as a tool of data collection. The tool of data collection was applied to 625 students totally, including 175 students of School of Physical Education and Sports (SPES) at ANKARA University, 265 students of School of Physical Education and Sports (SPES) at Gazi University, 185 students of School of Sports Sciences and Technology (SSST) at Hacettepe University. Whether the value orientations are different or not in terms of gender have been tested by non-related t-test, on the other hand, opinions on the schools and classes have been tested by One-Way Anavo test. LSD test has been used to test the differences among the groups. The first most important three values are determined as being successful, being virtuous and being smart. However three values, which have the least importance, have been determined as being rich, living an exciting life and kindness. Male students attach more importance to dimension of stimulation than female students. Students of SPES at Ankara University attach more importance to dimension of self-direction than students of SSST at Hacettepe University and students of SPES at Gazi University.
Keywords
- Altun, A. S. (2003). Eğitim yönetimi ve değerler [Educational management and values]. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 7-18.
- Aydın, P.İ. (2001). Yönetsel mesleki ve örgütsel etik [Managerial professional and organizational ethics]. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
- Aydın, M. (2003). Gençliğin değer algısı: Konya örneği [Youth perception of value: Konya example]. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(3), 121-144.
- Aktepe, V. & S, Yel. (2009). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin değer yargılarının betimlenmesi: Kırşehir ili örneği [Descriptions of primary teachers' value judgment: Kırşehir example]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(3), 607-622.
- Bacanlı, H. (1999). Üniversite öğrencilerinin değer tercihleri [University students' value preferences]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 20, 597-609.
- Basaran, F. (1993). Üniversite eğitim süresi içinde öğrencilerin değer tercih sıralamalarında değişme [University students' value preferences in training period change in rank]. VII. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları. Ankara: VII. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Düzenleme Kurulu ve Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayını. 49-57.
- Bardi, A. & Schwartz, H.S. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 29, 1207-1220.
- Bulut, S. S. (2012). Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi öğrencilerinin değer yönelimleri [Gazi Faculty of Education students' value orientation]. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, (3) 216-238.
- Cileli, M. & Tezer, E. (1998). Life and value orientations of Turkish university students, Academic Search Premier, Adolessence, 33(129), 219-224.
- Demirutku, K. (2007). Çocuk yetiştirme tarzları, değerlerin içselleştirilmesi ve benlik kavramı [Parenting styles, internalization of values, and the self-concept]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ankara: Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
- Dilmac, B., Bozgeyikli, H., & Cıkılı, Y. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının değer algılarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Teachers' candidates of value perceptions to be examined in terms of different variables]. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(16), 65-92.
- Dilmac, B., Deniz, M. & Deniz, E. M. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öz-anlayışları ile değer tercihlerinin incelenmesi [University students' self-understanding through the examination of value preferences]. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(18), 9-24.
- Esmer, Y. (2008). Islam, gender, democracy and values: The case of Turkey, 1990–2001. In T. Pettersson and Y. R. Esmer (Eds.), Changing values, persisting cultures: Case studies in value change (pp.275–301). Leiden: Brill.
- Feather, N.T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: the ınfluence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal Personality and Social Psychology. 68(6) 1135-1151.
- Fırat, S. N. (2010). Okul müdürü ve öğretmenlerin okul kültürü ile değer sistemlerine ilişkin algıları [School principals and teachers' perceptions related to school culture and value system]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(156), 71-83.
- Gungor, E. (2000). Değerler psikolojisi [Values psychology]. Istanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat A.Ş.
- Gurkan, H., Camlıyer, H. & Saracaloglu, A.S. (2000). Beden eğitimi öğretmeni adaylarının değer sistemi [The value systems of prospective physical education teachers]. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 1, 35-52.
- Imamoglu, E.O. & Aygun, Z. K. (1999). 1970’lerden 1990’lara değerler; üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farklılıkları [Value preferences from 1970s to 1990s: Cohort, generation and gender differences at a Turkish university], Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 14(44), 1-18.
- Karaca, R. (2008). İlahiyat fakültesi öğrencilerinin değer yönelimleri [Value orientations of students of the faculty of theology]. Unpublished master thesis. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
- Kusdil, M.E. & Kagıtcıbası, Ç. (2000). Türk öğretmenlerin değer yönelimleri ve Shwartz değer kuramı [Value orientations of turkish teachers and schwartz's theory of values]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 15(45),
- Kilby, W.R. (1993). The study of human values. USA: University Press of America.
- Lindeman, M. & Verkasalo, M. (2005). Measuring values with the short Schwartz’s value survey. Journal of Persanonality Assesment, 85(2), 170-178.
- Oguz, E. (2012). Views of pre-service teachers on values and value education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice – 12 (2) [Supplementary Special Issue], 1320-1325.
- Pascual, C.A.M.P. (2009). The work values of teacher training students in a Spanish university. Symbiosis between Schwartz and xing of work (mow) study group, European Journal of Education, 44(3), 441-451.
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values, New York: The Free Press.
- Schwartz, H.S. (1992). Universal in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical test in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 25, 1-65.
- Schwartz, H.S. & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal Personality and Social Psychology. 53(3), 550-562.
- Thomas, E. (2000). Researching values in cross-cultural contexts. In R. Gardner, J. Cairns & D. Lawton (Eds.), Education for values: Morals, ethics and citizenship in contemporary teaching (pp.256–272). London: Kogan Page Limited.
- Ural, A. & Kılıc, I. (2006). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Scientific research process and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
- Yapıcı, A., Kutlu, M.O. & Bilican, F. I. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının değer yönelimleri [Value orientations of teacher candidates]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(42), 129-151.
- Wojciszke, B. (1989). The system of personal values and behaviour. In N. Eisenberg, J. Reykowski, & E. Staub (Eds.), Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives, (pp.229–251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Puplisher.