What Is A Virus? Prospective Biology Teachers’ Cognitive Structure on the Concept of Virus (Pages: 736-756)

Author :  

Year-Number: 2013-Volume 5, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to investigate prospective biology teachers’ cognitive structures related to "virus". As the research design of the study, the qualitative research method was applied. The data were collected from 44 prospective biology teachers. The free word-association test and the drawing-writing technique were used as data collection instruments. The data were subject to content analysis and divided into categories through coding. In the analysis, the categories were formed and determined through the results of word-association test and drawing-writing test which were completed by the prospective biology teachers. With the help of these categories, the cognitive structures of prospective biology teachers were explained. The data collected through the study were divided into 6 categories (defining viruses, virus genetics, the anatomic structure of viruses, virus types, virus diseases and what to do, virus-bacteria relationship). On the other hand, it was determined that prospective biology teachers had alternative concepts related to virus.

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to investigate prospective biology teachers’ cognitive structures related to "virus". As the research design of the study, the qualitative research method was applied. The data were collected from 44 prospective biology teachers. The free word-association test and the drawing-writing technique were used as data collection instruments. The data were subject to content analysis and divided into categories through coding. In the analysis, the categories were formed and determined through the results of word-association test and drawing-writing test which were completed by the prospective biology teachers. With the help of these categories, the cognitive structures of prospective biology teachers were explained. The data collected through the study were divided into 6 categories (defining viruses, virus genetics, the anatomic structure of viruses, virus types, virus diseases and what to do, virus-bacteria relationship). On the other hand, it was determined that prospective biology teachers had alternative concepts related to virus.

Keywords


  • Ad, V.N.K., & Demirci, N. (2012). Prospective teachers’ levels of associating environmental problems with science fields and thermodynamics laws. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (3), 19-46

  • Atasoy, B. (2004). Fen öğrenimi ve öğretimi. Ankara: Asil Yayınevi.

  • Backett-Milburn, K., & McKie, L. (1999). A critical appraisal of the draw and write technique. Health Education Research Theory & Practice, 14 (3), 387–398.

  • Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Hansell, M. H. (1999a). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 84–86.

  • Bahar, M., Johnstone, A.H., & Sutcliffe, R.G. (1999b). Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 134-141.

  • Bahar, M., & Kılıçlı, F. (2001).Kelime ilişkilendirme testi yöntemi ile Atatürk ilkeleri arasındaki bağların araştırılması. X. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.

  • Bahar, M. (2003). Biyoloji eğitiminde kavram yanılgıları ve kavram değişim stratejileri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 3 (1), 27- 64.

  • Bahar, M., & Özatlı, N.S. (2003). Kelime iletişim test yöntemi ile lise 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin canlıların temel bileşenleri konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının araştırılması. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5 (1), 75- 85.

  • Bahar, M., Nartgün, Z., Durmuş, S., & Bıçak, B. (2006). Geleneksel ve alternatif ölçme ve değerlendirme öğretmen el-kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.

  • Bahar, M., Özel, M., Prokop, P., & Uşak, M. (2008). Science student teachers’ ideas of the heart. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(2), 1648 -3898.

  • Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. USA: Open University.

  • Bartoszeck, A.B., Machado, D.Z., & Amann-Gainotti, M. (2008). Representations of internal body image: A study of preadolescents and adolescent students in Araucaria, Paraná, Brazil. Ciências & Cognição, 13 (2), 139-159.

  • Boo, H.-K., & Watson, J. R. (2001). Progression in high school students’ (aged 16–18) conceptualizations about chemical reactions in solution. Science Education, 85, 568–585.

  • Byrne, J. (2011). Models of micro‐organisms: Children’s knowledge and understanding of micro‐organisms from 7 to 14 years old. International Journal of Science Education, 33 (14), 1927-1961.

  • Byrne, J., & Grace, M. (2010). Using a concept mapping tool with a photograph association technique (CoMPAT) to elicit children’s ideas about microbial activity. International Journal of Science Education, 32(4), 479–500.

  • Cetin, G., Ozarslan, M., Isik, E., & Eser, H. (2013). Students’ views about health concept by drawing and writing technique. Energy Education Science and Technology, Part B, 5 (1), 597-606.

  • Cohen, L. ve Manion, L. (1997). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

  • Cimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views? Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71.

  • Cinici, A. (2013). From caterpillar to butterfly: A window for looking into students’ ideas about life cycle and life forms of insects. Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 84-95.

  • Coyne, I. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling: Merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26 (3), 623-630.

  • Çiftçi, S. (2009). Kelime çağrışımlarının cinsiyet değişkenine göre gösterdiği temel nitelikler üzerine bir deneme. Turkish Studies, 4 (3), 633-654.

  • Daskolia, M., Flogaitis, E., & Papageorgiou, E. (2006). Kindergarten teachers' conceptual framework on the ozone layer depletion. Exploring the associative meanings of a global environmental issue. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 168-178.

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1996). Strategies of qualitative inquiry. London: Sage Publications.

  • Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. National Academies Press.

  • Doran, R. L. (1972). Misconception of selected science concepts held by elementary school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9 (2), 127-137.

  • Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490.

  • Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.

  • Dumais, N., & Hasni, A. (2009). High school intervention for influenza biology and epidemics/pandemics: Impact on conceptual understanding among adolescents. Life Sciences Education, 8, 62–71.

  • Enginar, İ., Saka, A., & Sesli, E. (2002). Lise 2 öğrencilerinin biyoloji dersinde kazandıkları bilgileri güncel olaylarla ilişkilendirebilme düzeyleri. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara.

  • Ercan, F., Taşdere, A., & Ercan, N. (2010). Kelime ilişkilendirme testi aracılığıyla bilişsel yapının ve kavramsal değişimin gözlenmesi. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 7 (2), 136-154.

  • Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998a). Models in explanations, part 1, Horses for courses? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 83-97.

  • Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998b). Models in explanations, part 2, Whose voice? Whose ears? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 187–203.

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (2000) Learning science through models and modeling. In K Tobin and B Frazer (Eds). The international handbook of science education (pp. 53-66). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Given, L.M. (Ed.) (2008). The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, Vol.2, pp.697‐698.

  • Gussarsky, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (1990). On the concept chemical equilibrium: The associative framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27 (3), 197-204.

  • Hovardas, T., & Korfiatis, K.J. (2006). Word associations as a tool for assessing conceptual change in science education. Learning and Instruction, 16, 416-432.

  • Hruschka, D.J., Schwartz, D., St.John, D.C., Picone-Decaro, E., Jenkins, R.A., & Carey, J.W. (2004). Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods, 16 (3), 307331.

  • Huppert, S. J., Lomask, M., & Lazarowitz, R. (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: Students' cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (8), 803-821.

  • Işıklı, M., Taşdere, A., & Göz, N. L. (2011). Kelime ilişkilendirme testi aracılığıyla öğretmen adaylarının atatürk ilkelerine yönelik bilişsel yapılarının incelenmesi. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4 (1), 50-72.

  • Jones, M. G., & Rua, M. J. (2006). Conceptual representations of flu and microbial illness held by students, teachers, and medical professionals. School Science and Mathematics, 108 (6), 263-278.

  • Kinchin, I. M., Deleij, F. A. A. M., & Hay, D. B. (2005). The evolution of a collaborative concept mapping activity for undergraduate microbiology students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 29(1), 1-14.

  • Knight, S.L., Nolan, J., Lloyd, G., Arbaugh, F., Edmondson, J., & Whitney, A. (2013). Quality teacher education research: How do we know it when we see it? Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 114-116.

  • Kostova, Z., & Radoynovska, B. (2008). Word association test for studying conceptual structures of teachers and students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 2 (2), 209-231.

  • Kostova, Z., & Radoynovska, B. (2010). Motivating students’ learning using word association test and concept maps. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 4 (1), 62-98.

  • Kose, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3 (2), 283–293.

  • Köseoğlu, F., & Bayır, E. (2011). Examining cognitive structures of chemistry teacher candidates about gravimetric analysis through word association test method. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 107-125.

  • Kurt, H. Kaya, B. Ateş, A., & Kılıç, S. (2009). Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının biyolojik okuryazarlığı. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 17-30.

  • Kurt, H. (2013). Biology student teachers’ cognitive structure about “Living thing". Educational Research and Reviews, 8 (12), 871-880.

  • Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aksu, Ö., & Aktaş, M. (2013a). Determining cognitive structures and alternative conceptions on the concept of reproduction (The case of pre-service biology teachers).Creative Education, 4 (9), 572-587.

  • Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aktaş, M., & Aksu, Ö. (2013b). Determining biology student teachers’ cognitive structure on the concept of “diffusion” through the free word-association test and the drawing-writing technique. International Education Studies, 6 (9), 187-206.

  • Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aksu, Ö., & Aktaş, M. (2013c). The most important concept of transport and circulatory systems: Turkish biology student teachers’ cognitive structure. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(17),

  • Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aktaş, M., Aksu, Ö., & Gökmen, A. (2013d). Öğrencilerin biyoloji laboratuvarı sınıf çevresine ilişkin algılarının yordayıcıları olarak cinsiyet ve akademik başarı. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 128-143.

  • Lazarowitz, R., & Penso, S. (1992). High school students’ difficulties in learning biology concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 215-224.

  • Lukin, K. (2013). Exciting middle and high school students about immunology: An easy, inquiry-based lesson. Immunologic Research, 55(1-3), 201-209.

  • Mike, M., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). A pencil and paper instrument to diagnose students’ conceptions of breathing, gas exchange and respiration. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 44 (2), 55-60.

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

  • Mills, K., Shaw, R., Van Horne, K., Zhang, H., & Boughman, J. (2008). Essay contest reveals misconceptions of high school students in genetics content. Genetics, 178 (3), 1157-1168.

  • Nyachwayaa, J. M., Mohameda, A-R., Roehriga, G. H. Woodb, N. B., Kernc, A. L., & Schneiderd, J.L. (2011). The development of an open-ended drawing tool: An alternative diagnostic tool for assessing students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12 (2), 121132.

  • Nieswandt, M. (2001). Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective. Science Education, 85, 158-179.

  • Özatlı, N. S., & Bahar, M. (2010).Öğrencilerin boşaltım sistemi konusundaki bilişsel yapılarının yeni teknikler ile ortaya konulması. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10 (2), 9-26.

  • Özmen, H. (2003). Kimya öğretmen adaylarının asit ve baz kavramlarıyla ilgili ilgilerini günlük olaylarla ilişkilendirebilme düzeyleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 11 (2), 317-324.

  • Palmer, D. H. (1999) Exploring the link between students’ scientific and nonscientific conceptions. Science Education, 83, 639-653.

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. USA: Sage.

  • Pluhar, Z. F., Piko, B. F., Kovacs, S., & Uzzoli, A. (2009). Air pollution is bad for my health: Hungarian children’s knowledge of the role of environment in health and disease. Health & Place, 15, 239-246.

  • Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception. Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.

  • Pridmore, P., & Bendelow, G. (1995). Images of health: Exploring beliefs of children using the ‘draw-and- write’ technique. Health Education Journal, 54 (4), 473-88.

  • Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education, 42 (1), 36-39.

  • Reiss, M. J., & S. D. Tunnicliffe. (2001). Students’ understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research in Science Education 31, 383-399.

  • Rennie, L. J., & Jarvis, T. (1995). English and Australian children’s perceptions about technology. Research Science Technology Education, 13(1), 37-52.

  • Romine, W., Siegel, M., & Roberts, T. (2009). Analyzing secondary science teachers ‘alternative conceptions related to avian influenza. Paper presentation at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching annual meeting, Garden Grove, CA.

  • Romine, W. L., Barrow, L. H., & Folk, W. R. (2013). Exploring secondary students' knowledge and misconceptions about influenza: Development, validation, and implementation of a multiple-choice influenza knowledge scale. International Journal of Science Education, DOI:10.1080/09500693.2013.778439.

  • Sato, M., & James, P. (1999). "Nature" and "Environment" as perceived by university students and their supervisors. International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, 18 (2), 165-172.

  • Seloni, Ş.R. (2005). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde oluşan kavram yanılgılarının proje tabanlı öğrenme ile giderilmesi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Istanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi.

  • Seymour, J., & Longdon, B. (1991). Respiration-that's breathing isn't it? Journal of Biological Education, 23(3),

  • Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., & Harbor, J. (2007). Students’ mental models of the environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (2), 327-348

  • Skelly, K. M., & Hall, D. (1993). The development and validation of a categorization of sources of misconceptions in chemistry. Paper presented at the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in science and Mathematics, Ithaca.

  • Skemp, R. R. (1971). The psychology of learning mathematics. Penguin Books, Middlesex, England.

  • Smith, E.L., Blakeslee, T.D., & Anderson, C.W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30 (2), 111-126.

  • Stafstrom, C, E., Rostasy, K., & Minster, A. (2002). The usefulness of children's drawings in the diagnosis of headache. Pediatrics, 109 (3), 460-472.

  • Strommen, E. (1995). Lions and tigers and bears, oh my! Children’s conceptions of forests and their inhabitants. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 683-698.

  • Taşçı, G., & Soran, H. (2012).Yükseköğretim biyoloji öğrencilerinin öğrenme stratejileri ve bilişsel yapılarının incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 394-405.

  • Uzunkaya, A. (2007). Teaching based on associations between misconceptions and multiple intelligences: Investigating its effects on overcoming misconceptions: Microorganisms. Unpublished Master Thesis. Balıkesir: Balıkesir University.

  • Udovic, D., Morris, D., Dickman, A., Postlethwait, J., & Wetherwax, P. (2002). Workshop biology: Demonstrating the effectiveness of active learning in an introductory biology course. BioScience, 52 (3),

  • Taşdemir, A., & Demirbaş, M. (2010). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersinde gördükleri konulardaki kavramları günlük yaşamla ilişkilendirebilme düzeyleri. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1),125-148.

  • Timur, B., & Taşar, M.F. (2011). Developing pre-service science teachers’ cognitive structures about technology: Word Association Test (WAT). Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 2011, 131-138.

  • Torkar, G., & Bajd, B. (2006).Trainee teachers’ ideas about endangered birds. Journal of Biological Education,

  • Treagust, D.F. (1988).Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconception in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (2), 159-169.

  • Tsai, C. C., & Huang, C. M. (2002).Exploring students’ cognitive structures in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 163-169.

  • Vance, K., Miller, K., & Hand, B. (1995). Two examples of using constructivist approaches to teach ecology at the middle school level. The American Biology Teacher, 37 (4), 244-249.

  • Wandersee J. H., Mintzes J. J., & Novak J.D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In: Gabel DL (Eds.). Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). Simon & Schuster and Prentice Hall International, New York.

  • White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (2000). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.

  • Yayla, R. G., & Eyceyurt, G. (2011). Mental models of pre-service science teachers about basic concepts in chemistry. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 2011, 285-294.

  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

  • Yip, D. Y. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (4), 461-477.

  • Yiğit, N., Devecioğlu, Y., & Ayvacı, H.Ş. (2002) İlköğretim fen bilgisi öğrencilerinin fen kavramlarını günlük yaşamdaki olgu ve olaylarla ilişkilendirme düzeyleri. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Ankara.

  • Yorek, N., Sahin, M., & Ugulu, I. (2010). Students’ representations of the cell concept from 6 to 11 grades:

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics