The Development of the Scale of Writing for Learning: The Validity and Reliability Study

Author :  

Year-Number: 2020-Volume 12, Issue 5
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2020-10-29 22:23:46.0
Language : English
Konu :
Number of pages: 79-95
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a valid and reliable scale that can be used in determining the perspectives of secondary school students and teacher candidates about using writing as a learning tool. After studies such as scale expert views and the evaluation of intelli¬gibility, the scale was conducted to two separate sample consisting of 158 middle school students and 325 teacher candidates. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed in order to deter¬mine the construct validity of the scale. According to the exploratory factor analysis results; fort he middle school sample, the scale consists of three factors including: Writing as a Learning Tool, Avoidance of Studying by Writing, Writing as a Note Taking Tool with a total of 15 five-Likert type items and for the teacher candidates sample, the scale consists of three factors including: Writing as a Learning Tool, Difficulty of Studying by Writing, Avoidance of Studying by Writing with a total of 16 five-Likert type items. For the both samples, the three-factor construct of the scale is confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The research findings have shown that the Writing for Learning Scale is a valid and reliable scale.

Keywords


  • Ackerman, J. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10(3), 334–370. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010003002

  • Aguirre, C. (2018). Does writing by hand sharpen your creativity? Retrieved from https://www.headspace.com/blog/2015/09/23/can-handwriting-sharpen-your-mind/

  • Balachandran, S., Venkatesaperumal, R., Clara, J. & Shukri, R. K. (2014). Writing-to-learn: Attitudes of nursing students at Sultan Qaboos University. Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 14(1), e113–e119. Retrieved from https://journals.squ.edu.om/index.php/squmj/article/view/1891/0

  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M. & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001029

  • Bazerman, C., Joseph, L., Lisa, B., Teri, C., Danielle, F., & Janet G. (2005). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

  • Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). Development of writing abilities [11-18]. London: McMillan.

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis: For applied research. New York: Guilford.

  • Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis manual for social sciences: Statistics, research design SPSS applications and interpretation] (23rd Ed.). Ankara: PegemA.

  • Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. (3rd Ed.), London: Continuum.

  • Comrey, L.A. & Lee, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (2013). Writing Apprehension Test (WAT). Measurement instrument database for the social science. Retrieved from https://www.midss.org/sites/default/files/writing_apprehension_test.pdf

  • Dobie A, & Poirrier G. (1996). When nursing students write: Changing attitudes. Language and Learning Across Disciplin. 1(3), 23–33. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/llad/v1n3/dobie.pdf

  • Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College composition and communication, 28(2), 122-128. Doi:

  • Faber, J. E., Morris, J. D., & Lieberman, M. G. (2000). The effect of note taking on ninth grade students’ comprehension. Reading Psychology, 21(3), 257–270. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050144377

  • Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286-299. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

  • Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson R. E. (2019) Multivariate data analysis. (8ht ed.). Boston: Cengage

  • Hall, A. H. (2016) The writing attitude scale for teachers (WAST). Retrieved from https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1061&context=eugene_pubs

  • Herrington, A., & Moran, C. (Eds.). (1992). Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines. New York: MLA.

  • Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21427/d7cf7r

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. Doi:

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the simplis command language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.

  • Klein, P. D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203–270. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021913217147

  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd.Ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Kodan, H. (2016). Yazma güçlüğü olan üçüncü sınıf öğrencisinin el yazısı okunaklılığının geliştirilmesi: Eylem araştırması. [Improving hand-writing legibility of a third class student with writing difficulty: Action research]. The Turkish Journal of Social Research, 2, 523- 539. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tsadergisi/issue/24724/261482

  • MacGregor, N. (2017). 100 Objede Dünya tarihi [A history of the World in 100 objects] (G. Bulut, Trans.). İstanbul: Pegasus Yayınları.

  • Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1988). A new more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 107-117. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.107

  • Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). CA: Sage.

  • Öztürk, B. & Günel, M. (2015). Öğretmen perspektifinden yazma ve yazmanın öğrenme amaçlı kullanımı: Ölçme envanteri geliştirme ve pilot uygulama. [Writing and its use as a learning tool from teachers’ perspective: Instrument development and a pilot implementation]. Elementary Education Online, 14(2), 713-733. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/index.php/io/article/view/1302

  • PennState. (2018). What is writing across the curriculum? Retrieved from https://berks.psu.edu/what-writing- across-curriculum.

  • Penrose, A. (1992). To write or not to write: Exploring the consequences of task interpretation on learning through writing. Written Communication, 9(4), 465-500. Doi:

  • Piolat, A. (2007). Effects of note-taking and working memory span on cognitive effort and recall performance. In Rijlaarsdam, G. (Series Ed.) and M. Torrance, L. van Waes & D. Galbraith (Volume Eds.), Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications (Studies in Writing, Vol. 20, pp. 109–124). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566–593. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<566::AIDSCE2>3.0.CO;2-U

  • Schumacher, G., & Gradwohl Nash, 1. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring knowledge change due to writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 67-96. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/ stable/40171182

  • Sipahi B., Yurtkoru, E.S., & Çinko M., (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS ile veri analizi [Data analysis with SPSS in social sciences], İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.

  • Slotte, V., & Lonka, K (2001). Note taking and essay writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.); P. Tynjälä, Mason, L. & Lonka K. (Volume Eds), Studies in writing, Vol. 7, Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 131–141). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Spires, H. A. (1993). Learning from a lecture: Effects of comprehension monitoring. Reading Research & Instruction, 32(2), 19–30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079309558113

  • Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar [Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications]. Turkish Psychological Review, 3(6), 49-74. Retrieved from https://www.psikolog.org.tr/tr/yayinlar/dergiler/1031828/tpy1301996120000000m000225.pdf

  • Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik [Reliability and validity of social and behavioral measures]. Ankara: Seçkin.

  • Şimşek Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş-Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları [Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling-Basic Principles and LISREL Applications]. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınevi.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th Ed.). Boston: Allyn ve Bacon.

  • Tavşancıl, E. (2019). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS] (3rd Ed.) Ankara: Nobel.

  • Tekin, H. (1996). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education]. Ankara: Yargı Yayınları.

  • Temur, T. (2009). Yazı ve yazma becerisi [Writing and writing skills]. In Pilten, G., Temur, T., Şahin, A. & Demir, E. (Eds.), İlk okuma ve yazma öğretimi [Primary reading and writing education], (82-110), Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.

  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington: American Psychological Association.

  • Tierney, R. I., O'Flahavan, J.F., & McGinley, W. (1989). The effects of reading and writing upon thinking critically. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 134-173. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/747862

  • Tynjälä, P. (1998). Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students' learning experiences during an experiment. Higher Education, 36, 209-230. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003260402036

  • Tynjälä, P. 2001. Writing as a learning tool. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of AERA (ED451 521), April, Seattle.

  • Tynjälä, P., Mason, L., & Lonka, K. (2001). Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Weinstein, C. & Mayer, R. (1986) The Teaching of Learning Strategies. In: Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, macmillan, (315-327), New York.

  • Young, A. (2006). Teaching writing across the curriculum. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics