Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ problem posing abilities in context of van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thinking

Author :  

Year-Number: 2020-Volume 12, Issue 2
Language : English
Konu :
Number of pages: 132-152
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu çalışmada ortaokul matematik öğretmeni adaylarının van Hiele geometrik düşünme düzeyleri bağlamında problem kurma becerilerini incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden birisi olan durum çalışması kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın katılımcılarını 65 ortaokul matematik öğretmeni adayları oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın verileri, ortaokul matematik öğretmeni adaylarının serbest bir problem kurma durumunu cevapladıkları yazılı dökümanlardan elde edilmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarından van Hiele geometrik düşünme düzeylerinin ilk üçüne uygun olacak şekilde problem kurmaları istenmiştir. Ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının kurduğu problemlerin düşünme düzeyinin hangi özelliklerini yansıttığını açıklamaları da istenmiştir. Veriler betimsel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma bulgularına göre, öğretmen adaylarının “matematiksel-düzeye uygun” problem kurma oranının düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğretmen adayı yanıtlarının yarısından fazlasının matematiksel problem olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Öğretmen adayları en çok düzey 2’ye yönelik “matematiksel-düzeye uygun” problemler kurmuştur. Üçüncü düzeyin özelliklerini doğru açıklayan öğretmen adayı sayısı, ilk iki düzeye göre düşüktür. Öğretmen adaylarının geometrik düşünme düzeylerine ilişkin bilgilerini, problem kurmaya aktaramadıkları söylenebilir. Öğretmen adaylarının matematik eğitimi derslerinin problem kurma deneyimlerini içermesi önerilmektedir. Uygulamaya dönük tasarlanacak ders içeriklerinin öğretmen adaylarının hem problem kurma becerilerini hem de geometri konu alan bilgilerini geliştireceği düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca, yapılandırılmış, yarı yapılandırılmış ve serbest problem kurma türlerinin birlikte olduğu çoklu durum çalışmaları yapılabilir.

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the problem posing skills of prospective middle school mathematics teachers in the context of van Hiele levels of geometric thinking. Case study was used in this study. Participants were 65 third-year prospective middle school mathematics teachers. The data obtained from the prodpective teachers’ (PTs) written documents about the situation of a free problem posing. PTs were asked to pose problems in accordance with the first three van Hiele levels. At the same time, PTs were asked to explain the characteristics of the van Hiele level. Descriptive analysis was preferred. The findings indicated that the problem posing rate of the PTs was low in the category “mathematical-appropriate for the level”. It was found that more than half of the PTs’ responses were not mathematical problems. The PTs posed mathematical problems in the category “appropriate for the level” mostly related to level 2. The number of PTs who correctly explained the characteristics of the level 3 is lower than the first two levels. According to findings, it can be said that PTs cannot transfer their knowledge to problem posing. It is suggested that PTs’ mathematics education courses should include problem posing experiences. The course contents to be designed for practice are thought to improve both the problem posing skills and the subject matter knowledge related to geometry. Future research should focus on multiple case studies integrating free,semi-structured, and structured problem posing situations.

Keywords


  • Alex, J. K., & Mammen, K. J. (2018). Students’ understanding of geometry terminology through the lens of van Hiele theory. Pythagoras, 39(1), 1-8. doi:/10.4102/ pythagoras.v39i1.376.

  • Altun, M. (2015). Eğitim fakülteleri ve sınıf öğretmenleri için matematik öğretimi [Teaching mathematics for education faculties and primary teachers] (19th ed.). Bursa: Alfa Aktüel.

  • Armah, R. B., & Kissi, P. S. (2019). Use of the van Hiele Theory in investigating teaching strategies used by college of education geometry tutors. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(4), 1-13. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/103562.

  • Aslan-Tutak, F., & Adams, T. L. (2015). A Study of geometry content knowledge of elementary preservice teachers. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 301-318. Aydogdu Iskenderoglu, T. (2018). Fraction multiplication and division word problems posed by different years of pre-service elementary Mathematics teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 373385. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.373.

  • Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 843-908). Charlotte, NC: NCTM/Information Age Publishing.

  • Bayazit, İ., & Kırnap-Dönmez, S. M. (2017). Prospective teachers’ proficiencies at problem posing in the context of proportional reasoning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 130-160.

  • Browning, C., Edson, A.J., Kimani, P., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2014). Mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary mathematics: A focus on geometry and measurement. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2), 333– 384.

  • Cai, J., Chen, T., Li, X., Xu, R., Zhang, S., Hu, Y., et al. (2019). Exploring the impact of a problem-posing workshop on elementary school mathematics teachers’ problem posing and lesson design. International Journal of Educational Research. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.004 Online first.

  • Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). Generalized and generative thinking in U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 401–421.

  • Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2019). Learning to teach mathematics through problem posing: Theoretical considerations, methodology, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.001 Online First.

  • Chapman, O. (2012). Prospective elementary school teachers’ ways of making sense of mathematical problem posing. PNA, 6(4), 135–146.

  • Chen, T., & Cai, J. (2019). An elementary mathematics teacher learning to teach using problem posing: A case of the distributive property of multiplication over addition. International Journal of Educational Research. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.004 Online first.

  • Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis, M., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. P. (2005). Problem solving and problem posing in a dynamic geometry environment. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 2(2), 125-143.

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133-148.

  • Couto, A., & Vale, I. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge on elementary geometry concepts. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 9, 57–73.

  • Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers’ practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 243–270.

  • Crespo, S., & Harper, F. (2019). Learning to pose collaborative mathematics problems with secondary prospective teachers. International Journal of Educational Research. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.003 Online first.

  • Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395–415.

  • Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluatin quantitative and qualitative research. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Cunningham, F., & Roberts, A. (2010). Reducing the mismatch of geometry concept definitions and concept images held by pre-service teachers. IUMPS The Journal, 1, 1-17.

  • Çakmak, D., & Güler, H. K. (2014). Determining the geometric thinking levels of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 12(1), 1-16.

  • Duatepe-Paksu, A. (2016). Van hiele geometrik düşünme düzeyleri [van Hiele levels of geometric thinking]. In E. Bingölbali, S. Arslan, & İ. Ö. Zembat (Eds.), Matematik eğitiminde teoriler [Theories in mathematics education] (pp. 266-275). Ankara: Pegem Publ.

  • Ellerton, N. F. (2013). Engaging pre-service middle-school teacher-education students in mathematical problem posing: Development of an active learning framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83, 87–101.

  • Ellerton, N. (2015). Problem posing as an integral part of the mathematics curriculum: A study with prospective and practicing middle-school teachers. In F. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Problem posing in mathematics: From research to effective practice (pp. 513-546). New York, NY: Springer.

  • English, L. D. (2019). Teaching and learning through mathematical problem posing: Commentary. International Journal of Educational Research. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.06.014 Online first.

  • Geçici, M. E., & Aydın, M. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between eighth grade students’ geometry problem posing skills and their geometry self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 12(2), 431-456.

  • Gonzales, N. A. (1998). A blueprint for problem posing. School Science and Mathematics, 9(8), 448-456. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17437.x.

  • Grundmeier, T. (2015). Developing the problem-posing abilities of prospective elementary and middle school teachers. In F. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 411-432). New York, NY: Springer. SİLİNDİ

  • Halat, E. (2008a). In-service middle and high school mathematics teachers: Geometric reasoning stages and gender. The Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 8-14.

  • Halat, E. (2008b). Pre-service elementary school and secondary mathematics teachers’ van Hiele levels and gender differences. IUMPST: The Journal, 1, 1-11.

  • Halat, E., & Sahin, O. (2008). Van Hiele levels of pre-and in-service Turkish elementary school teachers and gender related differences in geometry. The Mathematics Educator, 11(1/2), 143-158.

  • Howse, T. D., & Howse, M. E. (2015). Linking the van Hiele theory to instruction. Teaching children mathematics, 21(5), 305-313.

  • İlhan, M., & Oral, B. (2012). Analysis of geometric thinking levels of candidate mathematics teachers of primary and secondary schools in terms of various variables. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 201-219.

  • Kanbur Tekerek, B., & Argün, Z. (2019). Investigation of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ problem posing situations in dynamic geometry environment. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 9(1), 125-148. doi: 10.14527/pegegog.2019.005

  • Kar, T. (2016). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers' knowledge of linear graphs in context of problem-posing. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 643-658.

  • Kılıç, Ç. (2017). A new problem-posing approach based on problem-solving strategy: Analyzing pre-service primary school teachers’ performance. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 771-789.

  • Knight, K. C. (2006). An investigation into the change in the Van Hiele levels of understanding geometry of pre-service elementary and secondary mathematics teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Maine, Orono.

  • Korkmaz, E., & Gür, H. (2006). Determining of prospective teachers’ problem posing skills. Journal of Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 8(1), 64-74.

  • Kovács, Z. (2017). Mathematics teacher trainees facing the “What-if-not” strategy-a case study. In A. Ambrus, & É. Vásárhelyi (Eds.), Problem Solving in Mathematics Education (Vol. 19, pp. 68-81). Hungary, Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.

  • Lavy, I., & Bershadsky, I. (2003). Problem posing via “what if not?” strategy in solid geometry-a case study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 369-387. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.007.

  • Lavy, I., & Shriki, A. (2007). Problem posing as a means for developing mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers. Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 129-136). Seoul: PME.

  • Lavy, I., & Shriki, A. (2010). Engaging in problem posing activities in a dynamic geometry setting and the development of prospective teachers’ mathematical knowledge. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(1), 11-24. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.12.002

  • Leavy, A., & Hourigan, M. (2019). Posing mathematically worthwhile problems: developing the problem- posing skills of prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-21. doi:10.1007/s10857018-09425-w.

  • Lee, Y., Bicer, A., Kwon, H., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ preparedness for problem posing: pedagogical content knowledge and subject matter knowledge. Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science, 5(10), 13-30.

  • Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in problem posing. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 13(2), 75-90.

  • Leikin, R. (2015). Problem posing for and through investigations in a dynamic geometry environment. In F. M. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 373–391). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Leung, S. S. (2013). Teachers implementing mathematical problem posing in the classroom: Challenges and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 103-116.

  • Ma, L. (2010). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Newyork, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Martinovic, D., & Manizade, A. G. (2018). The challenges in the assessment for knowledge for teaching geometry. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(4), 1–17.

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. CA: SAGE.

  • Ministry of National Education. (2018). Mathematics curriculum (Primary and secondary 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 grades). Ankara: MEB Publ.

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA, USA: Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/wpcontent/uploads/ filebase/ full%20pdfs/T15-International-Results-in-Mathematics.pdf.

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

  • Osana, H., & Pelczer, I. (2015). A review on problem posing in teacher education. In F. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Problem posing in mathematics: From research to effective practice (pp. 469-492). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Robichaux-Davis, R. R., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Assessing elementary pre-service teachers’ knowledge for teaching geometry. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention, 4(1), 12-20.

  • Rosli, R., Capraro, M., Goldsby, D., Gonzalez y Gonzalez, E., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Capraro, R. (2015). Middle grade preservice teachers’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. In F. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 333- 354). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Shriki, A., & Lavy, I. (2012). Problem posing and the development of mathematical insights. International Journal of Learning, 18(5), 61–70.

  • Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.

  • Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: Implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(1), 37–52. doi:10.1007/s11858016-0820-x.

  • Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Melbourne: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

  • Tichá, M., & Hošpesová, A. (2009). Problem posing and development of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service teacher training. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 19411950). Lyon, France: Institute National de Recherche Pédagogique.

  • Tichá, M., & Hošpesová, A. (2013). Developing teachers’ subject didactic competence through problem posing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83 (1), 133–143.

  • Türnüklü, E., Ergin, A. E., & Aydoğdu, M. Z. (2017). Investigation of studies an 8th grade students’ problem posing about triangles. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 12(24), 467-486.

  • Ulusoy, F., & Kepceoğlu, İ. (2018). The contextual and cognitive structure of prospective middle school mathematics teachers' problems in semi-structured problem-posing context. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 19(3), 1910-1936.

  • Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry. CDASSG Project. Chicago, US: The University of Chicago.

  • van de Walle, J., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th international ed.). Essex: Pearson.

  • van Hiele, P. M. (1999) Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 310-316.

  • Xie, J., & Masingila, J. O. (2017). Examining interactions between problem posing and problem solving with prospective primary teachers: A case of using fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 101118.

  • Xu, B., Cai, J., Liu, Q., & Hwang, S. (2019). Teachers’ predictions of students’ mathematical thinking related to problem posing. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.04.005. Online first.

  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin Publ.

  • Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.

  • Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2008). Exemplifying definitions: a case of a square, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69,131–148.

  • Žilková, K., Partová, E., Kopáčová, J., Tkačik, Š., Mokriš, M., Budínová, I., & Gunčaga, J. (2018). Young children’s concepts of geometric shapes. Harlow: Pearson.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics