Relationships Between Work Meaningfulness, Leader Membership Exchange and Organizational Commitment

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-Volume 14, Issue 1
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2022-02-05 10:58:44.0
Language : English
Konu : Educational Administration
Number of pages: 29-41
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Research on organizational commitment has demonstrated that lower commitment to organization among employees is a crucial problem. Low levels of commitment continue to be the problem of education sector as well. In addition to the individual factors, commitment level of teacher differs according to the quality of their relationships between principals and how they evaluate their profession.  This study examines how work meaningfulness and leader member exchange relates to organizational commitment and considers teachers perceived work meaningfulness and leader member exchange levels as predictors of organizational commitment. 346 teachers participated in our research. The results revealed in this study showed that both work meaningfulness and leader member exchange associated positively with organizational commitment. Work meaningfulness and leader member exchange predicted organizational commitment. However, not all sub dimensions of organizational commitment related with work meaningfulness and its sub-dimensions.  This study clarifies the role of meaningfulness and leader member exchange perceived by employees on organizational commitment.

Keywords


  • AbdRazak, N., Darmawan, I. G. N., & Keeves, J.P. (2010).The influence of culture on teacher commitment. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-009-9109-z

  • Anderson, C. M. & Martin, M. M. (1995). Why employees speak to coworkers and bosses: Motives, gender, and organizational satisfaction. The Journal of Business Communication, 32(3), 249-265.

  • Arnold, K. A., Turner, N., Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & McKee, M. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.193.

  • Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2017). Emotional reframing as a mediator of the relationships between transformational school leadership and teachers’ motivation and commitment. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(5), 450-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2016-0072.

  • Carver-Thomas, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher turnover: Why it matters and what we can do about it. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

  • Casimir, G., Ngee Keith Ng., Y., Yuan Wang, K., & Ooi, G. (2014).The relationships amongst leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, affective commitment, and in-role performance: A socialexchange perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(5), 366385. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2012-0054

  • Chalofsky, N., & Krishna, V. (2009). Meaningfulness, commitment and engagement: The intersection of a deeper level of intrinsic motivation. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422309333147

  • Çokluk, Ö. S., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, S. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: Spss ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: PegemA.

  • Dağlı, A., Elçiçek, Z., & Han, B. (2018). Adaptation of the “Organizational Commitment Scale” into Turkish: Validity and reliability study. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 17(68), 1765-1777.

  • Dessler, G. (1999). How to earn your employees’ commitment. Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 58-67.

  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W.H., Liden, R.C., Brouer, R.L., & Liden, G.R. (2012). A Meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of Leader-Member Exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415280

  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51-59.

  • Field, L. K., & Buitendach, J. H. (2011). Happiness, work engagement and organizational commitment of support staff at a tertiary education institution in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(1), 1-10.https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v37i1.946

  • Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (Seventh ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Gaziel, H. H. (2004). Predictors of absenteeism among primary school teachers. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 7(4), 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-004-5232-z

  • Geldenhuys, M., Łaba, K., & Venter, C.M. (2014). Meaningful work, work engagement and organisational commitment. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA TydskrifvirBedryfsielkunde, 40(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip. v40i1.1098

  • Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827-844.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827

  • Graen, G. B., Liden, R. C., & Hoel, W. (1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6),868-872. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.6.868

  • Graen, G. B., Orris, B., & Johnson, T. W. (1973). Role assimilation processes in a complex organization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 3(4), 395-420.https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(73)90053-5

  • Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.

  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219247.https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5

  • Gümüş, S., Bulut, O., & Bellibaş, M.S. (2013). The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration in Turkish primary schools: A multilevel analysis. Education Research and Perspectives, 40(1), 1-29.

  • Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2009). The influence of Distributed Leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903231201

  • Hunter, L. W., & Thatcher, S. M. (2007). Feeling the heat: Effects of stress, commitment, and job experience on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 953-968.https://doi.org/10.2307/20159899

  • Leong, C.S., Furnham, A., & Cooper, C.L. (1996). The moderating effect of organizational commitment on the occupational stress outcome relationship. Human Relations,49(10), 1345-1361.https://doi.org/10.1177/

  • Liden, R. C., &Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3),451-465.https://doi.org/10.2307/255511

  • Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader– member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/

  • Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader–member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, 47–119.

  • Lips-Wiersma, M., & Morris, L. (2009). Discriminating between meaningful work and the management of meaning. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 491-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0118-9

  • Martin, A., & Roodt, G. (2008). Perceptions of organisational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover intentions in a post-merger South African tertiary institution. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34(1), 23-31.https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v34i1.415

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37.https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.https://doi.org/10.1016/10534822(91)90011-Z

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J., & Smith, C.A. (1993). Commitment to organization’s and occupations: Extension and test of a three component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538551.https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538

  • Morrison, R. L. (2004). Informal Relationships in the workplace: Associations with job satisfaction, Organisational commitment and Turnover intentions. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 33(3), 114-128.

  • Nguni, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers' job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case'. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 145177.https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565746

  • Nielsen, I. K., Jex, S.M., & Adams, G.A. (2000). Development and validation of scores on a two-dimensional workplace friendship scale, Educational and Psychological Measurement. 60(4), 628-643.

  • Ömüriş, E. (2014). İşyerindearkadaşlıkilişkilerinintemelbelirleyicileriveörgütselsonuçlarüzerineetkisi. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Akdeniz University, Institute of Social Sciences, Antalya.

  • Öztürk, N., & Şahin, S. (2017). Organizational culture and teacher leadership in educational organizations: Mediation role of leader-member exchange. Elementary Education Online, 16(4), 1451-1468.

  • Pierce, J. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1987). Organizational commitment: Pre-employment propensity and initial work experiences. Journal of Management, 13(1), 163-178.https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638701300113

  • Pool, S., & Pool, B. (2007). A management development model: Measuring organizational commitment its impact on job satisfaction among executives in a learning organization. Journal of Management Development, 26(4), 353-369.https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710710740101

  • Porter, L.W., Crampon, W.J., & Smith, F.J. (1976). Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15(1), 87- 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90030-1

  • Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.

  • Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L.M. (2012). Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and culture: A Meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 Countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1097-1130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029978

  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001.

  • Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 428-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0021-9010.69.3.428

  • Schyns, B., & Day, D. (2010). Critique and review of leader–member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(1), 1-29.

  • Simpson, M. (2008). Engagement at work: A review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(7), 1012-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.05.003

  • Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader– member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 522–552. https://doi.org/10.2307/259332

  • Steger, M.F., &Dik, B.J. (2009). If one is looking for meaning in life, does it help to find meaning at work? Applied Psychology: Health and Wellbeing, 1(3), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.Ill l/j. I 758-0854.2009.01018.x

  • Steger, M.F., Dik, B.J., & Duffy, R.D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160.

  • Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Leadership effects on student learning mediated by teacher emotions. Societies, 5(3), 566-582.https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5030566

  • Toptaş, B. (2018). The level of teachers’ finding work meaningful and factors affecting teachers’ finding work meaningful. Journal of Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education,18(1), 521-542. https://doi.org/ 10.17240/aibuefd.2018.-363264

  • Tummers, L. G., & Bronkhorst, B. A. C. (2014). The impact of leader-member exchange (LMX) on work-family interference and work-family facilitation. Personnel Review, 43(4), 573-591.https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05

  • Tummers, L. G., & Knies, E. (2013). Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 859–868.

  • Wayne, S.J., Liden, R. C., & Sparrowe, R. T. (1994). Developing leader-member exchanges the influence of gender and ingratiation. The American Behavioral Scientist, 37(5), 697-714. https://doi.org/10.1177/

  • Wittmer, J. L. S., Martin, J. E., & Tekleab, A. G. (2010). Procedural justice and work outcomes in a unionized setting: The mediating role of Leader-Member Exchange. American Journal of Business, 25(2), 55-70.

  • Zhang, L., Jiang, H., & Jin, T. (2020) Leader-member exchange and organisational citizenship behaviour: The mediating and moderating effects of role ambiguity. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 30(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2020.1721948

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics