Mobbing, Teacher Victimization and Faculty Trust: A Structural Equation Model

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-Volume 14, Issue 1
Language : English
Subject : Educational Sciences
Number of pages: 77-90
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

This research aims to reveal the mediator role of teacher victimization between mobbing and faculty trust by constructing a structural equation model. The data were collected from 1144 educators working in the Sanliurfa province of Turkey by cross-sectional surveying with a form prepared online that consisted of questions regarding demographics, multidimensional teacher victimization scale, the mobbing scale, and the omnibus t-scale. The results showed that mobbing directly affects teacher victimization on a high level, teacher victimization negatively affects faculty trust on a high level and mobbing indirectly affects faculty trust on a medium level. It is concluded that mobbed teachers think that they are victimized by the faculty and thus they lose their trust in the faculty.

Keywords

Teacher, principal, school violence, school psychology


  • Adams, C. M. (2014). Collective student trust: A social resource for urban elementary students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 135-159.

  • Aiello, A., Dientinger, P., Nardella,C., & Bonafede, M. (2008). A tool for assessing the risk of mobbing in organizational environments: The “Val.Mob.” Scale. Prevention Today, 3, 9-24.

  • Alparslan, A. M., & Tunç, H. (2009). Mobbing olgusu ve mobbing davranışında duygusal zeka etkisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 1(1), 146-159.

  • Argentero, P., & Bonfiglio, N. S. (2006). A multivariate contribution to the study of mobbing, Using the QAM 1.5 questionnaire. In G. Minati, E. Pessa, & M. Abram (Eds), Systemics of Emergence: Research and Development (s. 527-531). New York: Springer.

  • APA. (2016). A silent national crisis: Violence against teachers.

  • Atmaca, T. & Öntaş, T. (2014). Velilerin öğretmenlere uyguladığı şiddete yönelik nitel bir araştırma. Anadolu Eğitim Liderliği ve Öğretim Dergisi, 2(1), 47-62.

  • Baier, A. C. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, (96), 231-260.

  • Beaujean, A. A. (2014). Latent variable modeling using R: A step-by-step guide. New York: Routledge.

  • Branch, S., Ramsay, S., & Barker, M. (2012). Workplace bullying, mobbing and general harassment: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1-20.

  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core source for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40-45.

  • Butler, J. K., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modelling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, (55), 81-105.

  • Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2013). Research methods: Design and analysis (12. ed.). Boston: Pearson.

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6. ed.). New York: Routledge.

  • Cornoiu, T. S., & Gyorgy, M. (2013). Mobbing in organizations. Benefits of identifying phenomenon. Social and Behavioral Sciences, (78), 708-712.

  • Corrigan, M. W., & Chapman, P. E. (2008). Trust in teachers: a motivating element to learning. Radical Pedagogy, 9(2), 1-3.

  • Cumaoğlu, N. (2007). The exposure of primary school teachers to bullying: An analysis of various variables. Social Behavior and Personality an International Journal, 35(6), 789-802.

  • Cummings, L. L., & Bromily, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In R. Kramer, & T. Tyler (Eds), Trust in organizations. CA:Sage: Thousand Oaks.

  • Çınar, İ. (2007). Okullarda şiddet: Dağın iki yamacını da görebilmek. In A. Solak (Ed.), Okullarda şiddet ve çocuk suçluluğu (pp. 1-18). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları

  • Çobanoğlu, S. (2005). Mobbing: İş yerinde duygusal saldırı ve mücadele yöntemleri. İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları.

  • Daniels, J. A., Bradley, M. C. & Hays, M. (2007). The impact of school violence on school personnel: Implications for psychologist. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(6), 652-659.

  • Dazuka, J. & Dalbert, C. (2007). Student violence against teachers: Teachers' wellbeing and the belief in a just world. European Psychologist, 12(4), 253-260.

  • Demirtaş, H., Özer, N., Demirbilek, N., & Balı, O. (2017). Algılanan müdür desteği ile müdüre güven ve örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4), 1075-1092.

  • Dikmetaş, E., Top, M., & Ergin, G. (2011). Asistan hekimlerin tükenmişlik ve mobing düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Türkiye Psikiyatri Dergisi, 22(3), 137-146.

  • Dönmez, B. (2001). Okul güvenliği sorunu ve okul yöneticisinin rolü. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi,

  • Doornik, J. A., & Hansen, H. (2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 927-939.

  • Durdağ, F. M., & Naktiyok, A. (2010). Psikolojik tacizin örgütsel güven üzerindeki etkisi. Kafkas Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 1(2), 5-37.

  • Espelage, D. L. & Swearer, S. M. (2008). Current perspectives on linking school bullying research to effective prevention strategies. In T. W. Miller (Ed.), School violence and primary prevention (pp. 335-353). New York: Springer.

  • Fan, W. & Yan, Z. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 132-139.

  • Faranda, W. T. (2015). The effects of instructor service performance, immediacy, and trust on student-faculty out-of-class communication. Marketing Education Review, 25(2), 88-97.

  • Farnsworth, S. J., Hallam, P. R., & Hilton, S. C. (2019). Principal learning-centered leadership and faculty trust in the principal. NASSP Bulletin, 1-20.

  • Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. London: Sage.

  • Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools can't improve without it? New York: NY: Teachers College Press.

  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Fuller, E. J., Richards, M., & Cohen, R. (2008). Conflict or congruence? The intersection of parent, teacher, and student trust in the principal. Journal of Public School Relations, 29(1), 112-142.

  • Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, (23), 767-794.

  • Galand, B., Lecocq, C. & Philippot, P. (2007). School violence and teacher professional disengagement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, (77), 465-477.

  • Gardner, S., & Johnson, P. R. (2001). The leaner, meaner workplace: Strategies for handling bullies at work. Employment Relations Today, (28), 23-36.

  • Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). Teacher trust in students and parents: A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in urban elementary schools. Elementary School Journal, (102), 3-17.

  • Govier, T. (1992). Distrust as a practical problem. Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 52-63.

  • Gregory, A., Cornell, D. & Fan, X. (2012). Teacher safety and authoritative school climate in high schools. American Journal of Education, (118), 401-425.

  • Groeblinghoff, D., & Becker, M. (1996). A case study of mobbing and the clinical treatment of mobbing victims. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 277-294.

  • Halaç, D. S., & Güloğlu, C. (2019). İşyerinde psikolojik yıldırma olgusunun çalışan verimliliği üzerine etkisi: MOSB'de bir saha çalışması. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 26(1), 157-180.

  • Henze, N., & Zirkler, B. (1990). A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 19(10), 3595-3617.

  • Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.

  • Howe, A. T. (2016). Principal trust: Factors that influence faculty trust in the principal. Brigham Young University: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.

  • Hoy, W. K. (2002). Faculty trust: A key to student achievement. Journal of Public Relations, (23), 88-104.

  • Hoy, W. K., & Kupersmith, W. J. (1985). The meaning and measure of faculty trust. Educational and Psychological Research, (5), 1-10.

  • Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2004). Organizational justice in schools: no justice without trust. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 250-259.

  • Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five facets of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, (9), 184-208.

  • Hoy, W. K., Sado, D., & Barnes, K. (1996). Organizational health and faculty trust: a view from the middle level. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 19(3), 21-39.

  • Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Witkoskie, L. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(1), 38-45.

  • Huang, H. (2006). Do print and Web surveys provide the same results? Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 334- 350.

  • Ihaka, R. & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(3), 299-314.

  • Johnson, B. R. & Barton-Bellessa, S. M. (2014). Consequences of school violence: Personal coping and protection measures by school personnel in their personal lives. Deviant Behavior, 35(7), 513-533.

  • Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Reducing school violence through conflict resolution. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD Books.

  • Karal, D. (2011). Korkmadan öğrenmek; Okul ve okul çevresi güvenliği hakkında rapor. Ankara: Uluslararası Stratejik Araştırmalar Kurumu Sosyal Araştırmalar Merkezi Uşak Rapor No:11-06.

  • Khoury-Kassabri, M., Astor, R. A. & Benbenishty, R. (2009). Middle eastern adolescents' perpetration of school violence against peers and teachers: A crosscultural and ecological analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(1), 159182.

  • Kirel, Ç. (2007). Örgütlerde mobbing yönetiminde destekleyici ve risk azaltıcı öneriler. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 317-334.

  • Korkmaz, S., Göksülük, D., & Zararsız, G. (2014). MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal, 6(2), 151-162.

  • Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B., & Hanna, B. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In R. Kramer, & T. Tyler (Eds), Trust in organizations. CA: Sage: Thousand Oaks.

  • Laleoğlu, A., & Özmete, E. (2013). Mobbing ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(31), 9-31.

  • Lee, S. J. (2007). The relations between the student-teacher trust relationship and school success in the case of Korean middle schools. Educational Studies, 33(2), 209-216.

  • Lester, D., Hvezda, J., Sullivan, S., & Plourde, R. (1983). Maslow's hierarchy of needs and psychological health. The Journal of General Psychology, 109(1), 83-85.

  • Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5(2), 119-126.

  • Maele, D. V., & Houtte, M. V. (2009). Faculty trust and organizational school characteristics: An exploration across secondary schools in Flanders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(4), 556-589.

  • Maele, D. V., & Houtte, M. V. (2012). The role of teacher and faculty trust in forming teachers' job satisfaction: Do years of experience make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 879-889.

  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519- 530.

  • Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis for testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya, 36,115-128.

  • Martinez, A., McMahon, S. D., Espelage, D., Anderman, E. M., Reddy, L. A., & Sanchez, B. (2016). Teachers' experiences with multiple victimization: Identifying demographic, cognitive and contextual correlates. Journal of School Violence, 15(4), 387-405.

  • McMahon, S., Martinez, A., Espelage, D., Rose, C., Reddy, L. A., Lane, K., . . . Brown, V. (2014). Violence directed against teachers: Results from a national survey. Psychology in the Schools, 51(7), 753-766.

  • Meadows, R. J. (2014). Understanding violence and victimization. New Jersey: Pearson.

  • Mellinger, G. D. (1956). Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, (52), 304-309.

  • Mercanlıoğlu, Ç. (2010). Çalışma hayatında psikolojik tacizin (mobbing) nedenleri, sonuçları ve Türkiye'deki hukuksal gelişimi. Organizasyon ve yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 37-46.

  • Mindrila, D. (2010). Maximum likelihood (ML) and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) estimation procedures: A comparison of estimation bias with ordinal and multivariate non-normal data. International Journal of Digital Society, 1(1), 60-66.

  • Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In R. Kramer, & T. Tyler (Eds), Trust in organizations. CA: Sage: Thousand Oaks.

  • O'Reilly, C. I., & Roberts, K. H. (1977). Task, group structure, communication and effectiveness in three organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, (62), 674-681.

  • Özdemir, S. M. (2012). An investigation of violence against teachers in Turkey. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(1), 51-62.

  • Özdere, M., & Terzi, Ç. (2018). Liselerde Öğretmene Yönelik Şiddetin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi: Niğde İli Örneği. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 68-88.

  • Özkılıç, R. (2012). Bullying towards teachers: An example from Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research,

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.

  • Polat, S., & Celep, C. (2008). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet, örgütsel güven, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarına ilişkin algıları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, (54), 307-331.

  • Poussard, J. M., & Çamuroğlu, M. İ. (2009). Psikolojik Taciz: İşyerindeki Kabus. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, (13), 35-42.

  • Revelle, W. (2018) psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.

  • Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, (62), 628-631.

  • Rose, C. A., Espelage, D. L. & Monda-Amaya, L. E. (2009). Bullying and victimisation rates among students in general and special education: a comparative analysis. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 29(7), 761776.

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.

  • Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, (35), 651-665.

  • Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: a cross discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.

  • Royston, J. P. (1992). Approximating the Shapiro-Wilk W-Test for non-normality. Statistics and Computing, 2,

  • Scarbrough, J. E. (2013). Student-faculty trust and student success in pre-licensure baccalaureate nurse education. Nurse Education Today, (33), 919-924.

  • Selm, M. V. & Jankowski, N. W. (2006). Conducting online surveys. Quality & Quantity, 40, 435-456.

  • Smith, P. A., Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2001). Organizational health of high schools and dimensions of faculty trust. Journal of School Leadership, (11), 135-151.

  • Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299.

  • Sungu, H. (2015). Teacher victimization in Turkey: A review of the news on violence against teachers. Anthropologist, 20(3), 674-706.

  • Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). Vanishing the truth: principals and teachers spinning reality. Journal of Educational Administration, (39), 282-293.

  • Tarter, C. J., Bliss, J. R., & Hoy, W. K. (1989). School characteristics and faculty trust in secondary schools. Education Administration Quarterly, 25(3), 294-308.

  • Tarter, C. J., Sabo, D., & Hoy, W. K. (1995). Middle school climate, faculty trust and effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Research and Development in Education, (29), 41-49.

  • Tomasek, J. (2008). A teacher as a victim of violence. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Prag: Univerzita Karlova Praze Filozoficka Fakulta Katedra Pedagogika.

  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2000). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4),

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). A conceptual and empirical analysis of trust in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, (36), 334-352.

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trust in schools: The Omnibus-T-Scale. Studies in Leading and Organizing Schools, Information Age Press, Greenwich, CT.

  • Wet, C. (2010). Victims of educator-targeted bullying: a qualitative study. South African Journal of Education,

  • Wilson, C. M., Douglas, K. S. & Lyon, D. R. (2011). Violence against teachers: Prevalence and consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(12), 23532371.

  • Yang, C., Fredrick, S. S., Nickerson, A. B., Jenkins, L. N., & Xie, J. S. (2019). Initial development and validation of the Multidimensional Teacher Victimization Scale. School Psychology, 34(2), 244. 4(2), 244-252. doi:10.1037/spq0000307

  • Zand, D. E. (1971). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, (17), 229-239.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics