Science Teacher Education İn Turkey: What We Do? What We Expect? A Critical Study

Author :  

Year-Number: 2017-Volume 9, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

It is clear that education faculties, where pre-service teachers study, and the Ministry of National Education that provides employment for the teaching profession are expected to be consistent about the competencies and qualifications that must be possessed by the teachers who are to be trained. In this research, an attempt has been made to find out the extent to which the undergraduate programs which are conducted in science teaching departments of the faculties of education and the contents of which are determined by the Higher Education Council, have fulfilled the special field competencies defined by the Ministry of National Education. For this purpose, a descriptive method was adopted, because the present situation was assessed by experts and determined through document reviewing. The experts consisted of 28 academics who work in Science Teaching programs of different universities in Turkey. Attention was paid to the possession of at least a PhD degree by these experts in the field of science teaching who had studied science teacher education. At the end of the study, it was found that there were some conflicts in the special field competencies between the undergraduate education plan in Science Teacher Education and the expectations of the Ministry of National Education.

Keywords

Abstract

It is clear that education faculties, where pre-service teachers study, and the Ministry of National Education that provides employment for the teaching profession are expected to be consistent about the competencies and qualifications that must be possessed by the teachers who are to be trained. In this research, an attempt has been made to find out the extent to which the undergraduate programs which are conducted in science teaching departments of the faculties of education and the contents of which are determined by the Higher Education Council, have fulfilled the special field competencies defined by the Ministry of National Education. For this purpose, a descriptive method was adopted, because the present situation was assessed by experts and determined through document reviewing. The experts consisted of 28 academics who work in Science Teaching programs of different universities in Turkey. Attention was paid to the possession of at least a PhD degree by these experts in the field of science teaching who had studied science teacher education. At the end of the study, it was found that there were some conflicts in the special field competencies between the undergraduate education plan in Science Teacher Education and the expectations of the Ministry of National Education.

Keywords


  • Alake-Tuenter, E., Biemans, H.J.A., Tobi, H., & Mulder, M. (2013). Inquiry-based science teaching competence of primary school teachers: A delphi study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 13-24. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.013

  • Appleton, K. (2006). Future directions in elementary science teacher education: Conclusion. In K. Appleton, (Ed.). Elementary science teacher education, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Aslan, K. A. (2003). Eğitim fakültelerinin yeniden yapılandırılmalarına ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(6), 23-37.

  • Başkan, G. A. (2001). Öğretmenlik mesleği ve öğretmen yetiştirmede yeniden yapılanma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 16-25.

  • Bilir, A. (2011). Türkiye’de öğretmen yetiştirmenin tarihsel evrimi ve istihdam politikaları. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(2), 223-246.

  • Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

  • Çakmak, E., & Civelek, F. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenliği lisans programının MEB özel alan öğretmen yeterlikleri açısından incelenmesi. 12(47), 349-367.

  • European Commission. (2006). Science teaching in schools in Europe: Policies and research. Eurydice European Unit. Belgium. ISBN: 92-79-01923-6. Retrieved on 12.10.2016 from http://www.indire.it/lucabas/lkmw_file/eurydice///Science_teaching_EN.pdf

  • European Commission. (2008). Competencies of science teachers. Education, audiovisual and culture executive agency European Commission. Retrieved on 12.10.2016 from http://www.iqst.upol.cz/project/COMPETENCY%20of%20Science%20Teachers_TR.pdf.

  • European Commission. (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research. EACEA (Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency). Belgium. ISBN:978-92-9201-218-2. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/133en.pdf

  • Ergun, M., Yurdatapan, M., & Sürmeli, H. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji özel alan yeterliklerinin öğretmen yetiştirme programlarında kazandırılmalarına ilişkin öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 42(200), 49-67.

  • Genç, S. Z. (2005). Sınıf öğretmeni yetiştirme meselemiz. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 86-99.

  • HEC. (1998). Fakülte-okul işbirliği. Yök/Dünya Bankası milli eğitimi geliştirme projesi hizmet öncesi öğretmen eğitimi. Ankara, Turkey: YÖK.

  • HEC. (2006). Eğitim fakültelerinde uygulanacak yeni programlar hakkında açıklama. 09.04.2016 tarihinde http://www.yok.gov.tr/component/option.com adresinden erişilmiştir.

  • Kavcar, C. (2002). Cumhuriyet döneminde dal öğretmeni yetiştirme. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1-2), 1-14.

  • Köksal, N. (2008). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterliklerinin öğretmen, müdür ve bakanlık yetkilileri tarafından değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 36-46.

  • Kurudayıoğlu, M., & Tüzel, S. (2011). Türkçe eğitimi lisans programının Türkçe öğretmeni özel alan yeterlikleri açısından incelenmesi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 1(2), 40-51.

  • Legendre, P. (2005). Species associations: The Kendall coefficient of concordance revisited. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 10(2), 226–245. doi: 10.1198/108571105X46642

  • Mazurek, J. (2011). Evaluation of ranking similarity in ordinal ranking problems. Acta Academica Karviniensia, 11(2), 119-128.

  • McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

  • MNE. (2006). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlikleri. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.

  • MNE. (2008). Öğretmen yeterlikleri. Ankara, Turkey: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.

  • National Science Teachers Association. (2012). Next generation science standards. Retrieved on 10.10.2016 from http://www.nsta.org/about/standardsupdate/default.aspx

  • Panda, S. (2012). Mapping pedagogical competency of secondary school science teachers: An attempt and analysis. International Educational E-Journal, 1(4), 32-45.

  • Şişman, M. (2009). Öğretmen yeterlilikleri: Modern bir söylem ve retorik. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 63-82.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics