Demand And Supply Of Supplementary Private Tutoring İn Upper Primary Schools Of Ethiopia

Author :  

Year-Number: 2017-Volume 9, Issue 3
Language : null
Konu : null

Abstract

This study was aimed at assessing the demand and supply of private tutoring in the upper primary schools of Ethiopia. To achieve this objective a cross-sectional survey research design was employed. Data were collected from upper primary school students, teachers, and school principals. Accordingly, four regions (two from the relatively developed and two from the emerging regions) and one city administration were selected as sample regions by using simple random sampling technique. Again from each region the capital town of each sample regions was selected as sample towns again through simple random sampling method. Then from each sample town three government schools and three private schools were selected by simple random sampling technique. Finally, from each selected sample schools 50% of the students and all the teachers of the sample schools and the principal of the school were taken as sample of the study by purposive sampling techniques. Data were collected through questionnaires’, interview, and focus group discussion. The result shows that students received supplementary private tutoring in addition to learning in mainstream schools and started this program when they are grade 7-8. In Ethiopian context the private tutors are the mainstream teachers of the students and other teachers in the same school. The main reason for students to participate in the supplementary tutorial is due to their parents and friends push. Students receive the tutorial in one-to-one base. The major reason students need supplementary private tutoring is education-related purpose.

Keywords

Abstract

This study was aimed at assessing the demand and supply of private tutoring in the upper primary schools of Ethiopia. To achieve this objective a cross-sectional survey research design was employed. Data were collected from upper primary school students, teachers, and school principals. Accordingly, four regions (two from the relatively developed and two from the emerging regions) and one city administration were selected as sample regions by using simple random sampling technique. Again from each region the capital town of each sample regions was selected as sample towns again through simple random sampling method. Then from each sample town three government schools and three private schools were selected by simple random sampling technique. Finally, from each selected sample schools 50% of the students and all the teachers of the sample schools and the principal of the school were taken as sample of the study by purposive sampling techniques. Data were collected through questionnaires’, interview, and focus group discussion. The result shows that students received supplementary private tutoring in addition to learning in mainstream schools and started this program when they are grade 7-8. In Ethiopian context the private tutors are the mainstream teachers of the students and other teachers in the same school. The main reason for students to participate in the supplementary tutorial is due to their parents and friends push. Students receive the tutorial in one-to-one base. The major reason students need supplementary private tutoring is education-related purpose.

Keywords


  • Aurini, J. & Davies, S. (2004). The transformation of private tutoring: education in a franchise form. Paper submitted to the annual meeting of the CSAA.

  • Bajaj M. & Belinda C. (2009). Education for sustainable development as peace education, Peace and Change, 34(4).

  • Biswal, B. (1999) ‘Private tutoring and public corruption: A cost-effective education system for developing countries’. The Developing Economies, 37(2), 222-240.

  • Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implication. Paris: UNESCO-IIEP.

  • Bray, M. & Seng B. (2005). Balancing the books: Household financing of basic education in Cambodia. Washington DC: World Bank, and Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong. Available on-line: http://www0.hku.hk/cerc/Publications/ cambodia.htm

  • Bray, M. (2009): Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring? Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).

  • Bray, M. (2013). Benefits and tensions of shadow education: Comparative perspectives on the roles and impact of private supplementary tutoring in the lives of Hong Kong students. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2(1), 18-30.

  • Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2013). Behind the facade of fee-free education: Shadow education and its implications for social justice. Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 480 - 497. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.821852.

  • Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2014). Regulating private tutoring for public good: Policy options for supplemantary education in Asia. The University of Hong Kong: Compartive Education Research Center.

  • Buchmann, C.(2002). ‘Getting Ahead in Kenya: Social Capital, Shadow Education, and Achievement.’ In Schooling and Social Capital in Diverse Cultures. 13, 133-159

  • Chui M. Mary (2016). Private supplementary tutoring: Motivation and effects a review studies. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(27), 142-163

  • Dang, Hai-Anh. (2007). ‘The determinants and ımpact of private tutoring classes in Vietnam.’ Economics of Education Revie, 26(6),648–699.

  • Dawson, W. (2010). ‘Private schooling and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of ınequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia’. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11 (1), 14-24.

  • Dierkes, J. (2013). The insecurity industry: Supplementary education in Japan. In J. Dierkes, S. Davies, & A. Janice, (Eds.). Out of the shadows: The great ıntensification of supplementary education. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 22, 3 - 21. doi: 10.1108/S1479-3679(2013)0000022003. Foondun, R. A. (2002). The issue of private tuition: The practice in Mauritius and selected South-East Asian countries. International Review of Education, 48(6), 485-515.

  • Gale T. (2016). Private supplementary tutoring in Vancouver ındependent school. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of British Colombia.

  • Huang, M.-H. (2013). After-school tutoring and the distribution of student performance. Comparative Education Review, 57(4), 689 - 710. doi: 10.1086/671346.

  • Ireson, J. (2004). ‘Private tutoring: How prevalent and effective is it?’ London Review of Education 2(2), 109-122.

  • Jackson L. S. (2009). Research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach. New York: Wadsworth

  • Kim, Ji-Ha & Daekwon P. (2010). ‘The determinants of demand for private tutoring in South Korea.’ Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(3), 411–421.

  • Kim S. & Ju Ho, Lee (2004). Private tutoring demand for education in South Korea. Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin Milwalukee

  • Kirss, Laura (2011). Education in the shadows: The case of Estonia. Tallinn: Center for Policy Studies.

  • Kwo, O. & Mark B. (2011). ‘Facing the shadow education system in Hong Kong.’ IIAS Newsletter (University of Leiden, International Institute\ for Asian Studies), 56:20. Retrived from http://www.iias.nl/article/ facing-shadow-education-system-hong-kong

  • Lee, C. Park, H. J. & Lee, Heesook (2009). ‘Shadow Education Systems’. In G. S. B. Sykes, & D. N. Plank, (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 901-919). New York: Rutledge for the American Educational Research Association.

  • Nath, Samir Ranjan. (2008). ‘Private supplementary tutoring among primary students in Bangladesh.’ Educational Studies 34(1), 55–72.

  • Paviot, L., Heinsohn, N. & Korkman, J. (2008). ‘Extra-tuition in Southern and Eastern Africa: Coverage, growth, and linkages with pupil achievement’. International Journal of Educational Development, 28 (2), 149-160.

  • Popa, S., & Acedo, C. (2003). Redefining professionalism: Romanian teachers and the private tutoring system. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, New Orleans, USA, 12–\ 16 March.

  • Shafiq, M.N. (2002). The economic burden of private tutoring expenses on households in developing countries: The case of Bangladesh. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, Orlando, Florida.

  • Stevenson, D. L. and David P. B. (1992). ‘Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan.’ American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639-57.

  • Silova, I. (2009). ‘Education and post-socialist transformations in Central Asia’, In I. Silova, (Ed.). Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia: New opportunities and burdens. (pp.49–680. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).

  • Silova, I. & Elmina K. (2006). ‘Azerbaijan.’ In Silova, Būdienė, and M. Bray, (Eds.). Education in a hidden marketplace: Monitoring of private tutoring (pp.113–142). New York: Open Society Institute.

  • Sobhy, H. (2012). The de-facto privatization of secondary education in Egypt: A study of private tutoring in technical and general schools. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42 (1), 47

  • Trent J. (2016). Constructing professional ıdentities in shadow education: Perspectives of supplementary educators in Hong Kong. Education Research Policy Practices, 15:115-130.

  • World Bank (2012). Diagnosis corruption in Ethiopia: Perceptions, realities, and the way forward for key sectors. Washington DC

  • Zeng, Kangmin. 1999. Dragon gate: Competitive examinations and their consequences. London: Cassell.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics