The Investigation of Metacognitive Strategies Used by Gifted and Talented Students in Writing Process According to Some Variables

Author :  

Year-Number: 2020-Volume 12, Issue 5
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2020-10-29 23:10:02.0
Language : English
Konu :
Number of pages: 223-243
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

The purpose of this study, which is about the metacognitive strategies used by gifted and tal-ented students in writing process, is to “investigate the metacognitive strategies used by gifted and talented students in writing process according to some variables”. The model of the re-search is Convergent Parallel Mixed Method; and the study group includes gifted and talented students that are registered under the Science and Arts Centers (BILSEM/SAC) that are subsid-iaries of Izmir Provincial Directorate of National Education and a group of unidentified sec-ondary school students. The study group consists of 156 (41,9%) female, and 216 (58,1%) male students. In order to collect the quantitative data, the Metacognitive Writing Strategies Aware-ness Scale (MWSAS) developed by Aydin, Innali and Uyumaz (2017); and in order to collect the qualitative data, a semi-structured interview form have been utilized in the research. The analy-sis of the collected quantitative data has been carried out via a packaged software; and the qualitative data have been analyzed by categorizing the responses of the participants in the interview form. According to the results obtained, the metacognitive strategy awareness used by gifted and talented students in writing process shows a statistically significant difference com-pared to the unidentified students. While the metacognitive strategy awareness used by gifted and talented students in writing process doesn’t show a statistically significant difference ac-cording to gender and class level, it shows a statistically significant difference according to the school. High metacognitive strategy awareness of gifted and talented students towards writing obtained from the quantitative data of the research has been backed up by qualitative data.

Keywords


  • Abhakorn, M. J. (2014). Investigating the use of student portfolios to develop students’ metacognition in english as a foreign language learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(1), 46-55.

  • Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235-244.

  • Akça-Üşenti, Ü. (2014). Farklılaştırılmış Türkçe öğretim uygulamalarının üstün zekâlı ve yetenekli öğrencilerdeki bilişsel beceri ve başarı durumlarına etkisi. International Journal of Social Science Research, 2(2).

  • Anderson, D., Nashon, S. M., & Thomas, G. P. (2009). Evolution of research methods for probing and understanding metacognition. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 181-195.

  • Armbruster, B. B., Echols, C.H., & Brown A. L. (1983). The Role of metacognition in reading to learn: A developmental perspective. Reading Education Report No. 40.

  • Aydın, İ. S., İnnalı, H. Ö., & Uyumaz, G. (2017). Üstbilişsel yazma stratejileri farkındalık ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 12/25, p. 169-192 DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12198 ISSN: 1308-2140, Ankara-Turkey.

  • Bahar, A., Kaya, A. İ., & Bahar, F. (2016). Üstün zekâlı olan ve olmayan ilkokul öğrencilerinin okuma tutum ve tercihlerinin karşılaştırılması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(187), 45-61.

  • Bandura, A. (2004). Swimming against the mainstream: The early years from chilly tributary to transformative mainstream. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 613–630.

  • Bayat, N. (2011). Bilişüstü okuma stratejileri kullanım düzeyi ile yazılı anlatım becerisi arasındaki ilişkiler, NEWWSA, 6, 925-938.

  • Beal, C. R. (1996). The Role of comprehension monitoring in children's revision. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 219-238.

  • Beason, L. (1993). Feedback and revision in writing across the curriculum classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 395-422.

  • Benton, C. W. (2013). Promoting metacognition in music classes. Music Educators Journal, 100(2), 52-59.

  • Berkenkotter, C. (1981). Understanding a writer's awareness of audience. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 388-399.

  • Berninger, V. W., Cartwright, A. C., Yates, C. M., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades. Reading and Writing, 6(2), 161-196.

  • Breetvelt, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1994). Relations between writing processes and text quality: When and how?. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 103-123.

  • Campbell, K. H. (1990). The writing zone: Responding to talent. The English Journal, 79(5), 67-69.

  • Cheng, G., & Chau, J. (2013). Exploring the relationship between students' self-regulated learning ability and their eportfolio achievement. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 9-15.

  • Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78-84.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (Dr. S. B. Demir, & Y. Dede, Trans.). Anı Yayıncılık.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design (Dr. S. B. Demir, Trans.). Eğiten Kitap.

  • De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 687-698.

  • De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 139-156.

  • Diaz, I. (2015). Training in metacognitive strategies for students' vocabulary improvement by using learning journals. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 17(1), 87-102.

  • Diomand, I. M. (Ed.). (1980). A guide to helping the gifted student write. (From ERIC database ED 193 657).

  • Doly, A-M. (2004). Metacognition to learn how to write texts at school and to develop motivation to do it. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) and Rijlaarsdam, G. Van den Bergh, H. & Couzijn, M. (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing. Vol. 14, Effective Learning and Teaching of Writing, 2nd Edition, Part 2, Studies in How to Teach Writing, 381-392.

  • Eissa, M. A. (2015). The effectiveness of a self-regulated learning-based training program on improving cognitive and metacognitive efl reading comprehension of 9th graders with reading disabilities. Online Submission, 4(3), 49-59.

  • Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Fear, K. L., & Anderson, L. M. (1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(1), 18-46.

  • Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anthony, L. M. A. H. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 337-372.

  • Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., & Anderson, L. M. (1992). Socially mediated instruction: Improving students' knowledge and talk about writing. The Elementary School Journal, 411-449.

  • Festas, I., Oliveira, A. L., Rebelo, J. A., Damião, M. H., Harris, K., & Graham, S. (2015). Professional development in self-regulated strategy development: Effects on the writing performance of eighth grade portuguese students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 17-27.

  • Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., & García, J. N. (2008). The long-term effects of strategy-focussed writing instruction for grade six students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 672-693.

  • Fidalgo, R., Torrance, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., & Álvarez, M. L. (2015). Strategy-focused writing instruction: Just observing and reflecting on a model benefits 6th grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 37- 50.

  • Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving (L. B. Resnick, Ed.). The Nature of Intelligence. Hillsdale, Erlbaum.

  • Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development (J.M. Scandura & Ch.J. Brainerd, Ed.). Structural Process Theories of Complex Human Behavior, (pp. 34-78). Alphen aan den Rijin: Sitjhoff & Noorddhoff.

  • Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring (W.P. Dickson, Ed.). Children’s Oral Communications Skills (pp. 35- 60). Academic Press.

  • Flavell, J. H. (1982). On Cognitive Development. Child Development, 1-10.

  • Flavell, J. H. (1996). Piaget's Legacy. Psychological Science, 7(4), 200-203.

  • Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children's knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 21-45.

  • Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274-290.

  • Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. Z. (2002). Cognitive development (Fourth Edition). Upper Saddle River.

  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.

  • Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37(1), 16-55.

  • Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Unthinkable thoughts: Education of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(1), 5-12.

  • Gallagher, J. J. (2015). Education of gifted students: A civil rights issue?. Journal for the Education of the Gifted2015, 38(1) 64–69 (Reprinted from “Education of Gifted Students: A Civil Rights Issue?” by J. J. Gallagher, January 1995 PhiDelta Kappan. Reprinted with permission of Phi Delta Kappa International, www.pdkingl.org.).

  • Gallo, D. R. (1994). The writing processes of professional authors. The English Journal, 83(5), 55-60.

  • Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66-71.

  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1989). Improving learning disabled students skills at composing essays: Self- instructional strategy training. Exceptional Children, 56(3), 201-214.

  • Harrington, M., Holik, M., & Hurt, P. (1998). Improving writing through the use of varied strategies. An Action Research Project Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Education in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Teaching and Leadership. Saint Xavier University & IRI/Skylight Field-Based Masters Program Chicago, Illinois May, 1998.

  • Henderson, S. J., Jackson, N. E., & Mukamal, R. A. (1993). Early development of language and literacy skills of an extremely precocious reader. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(2), 78-83.

  • Hull, G. (1987). The editing process in writing: A performance study of more skilled and less skilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 8-29.

  • Jacobs, G. M. (2004). A classroom investigation of the growth of metacognitive awareness in kindergarten children through the writing process. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(1), 17-23.

  • Jaleel, S. (2016). A study on the metacognitive awareness of secondary school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 165-172.

  • Kellog, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 256-266.

  • Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological measurement, 56(5), 746-759.

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. Guilford.

  • Ku, K. Y., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 251-267.

  • Li, W. (2013). A Study of metacognitive awareness of non-english majors in L2 listening. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(3), 504-510.

  • Maker, J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration (N. Colangelo & G. Davis, Ed.). Handbook Of Gifted Education, (pp. 163 - 73). Allyn and Bacon.

  • McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299-325.

  • MoNe. (2018). Turkish language curriculum for 1st to 8th grades. Retrived from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx

  • MoNE. (2018a). Turkish language and literature curriculum for 9th to 12th grades. Retrived from

  • Reeve, R. A., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Metacognition reconsidered: Implications for intervention research. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13(3), 343-356.

  • Robinson, A., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2008). History of giftedness: Perspectives from the past presage modern scholarship (S. I. Pfeiffer, Ed.). Springer US.

  • Rodarte-Luna, B., & Sherry, A. (2008). Sex differences in the relation between statistics anxiety and cognitive/learning strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 327-344

  • Sak, U., Ayas, M. B., Sezerel, B. B., Öpengin, E., Özdemir, N. N., & Gürbüz, Ş. D. (2015). Gifted and talented education in Turkey: Critics and prospects. Turkish Journal of Giftedness & Education, 5(2), 110-132.

  • Santangelo, T., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2008). Using self-regulated strategy development to support students who have “trubol giting thangs into werds”. Remedial and Special Education, 29(2), 78-89.

  • Schellings, G., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2011). Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 83-90.

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structurale quation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 2374.

  • Smith, K. (2008). Teaching talented writers in the regular classroom. Gifted Child Today, 31(2), 19-26.

  • Smutny, J. F. (2001). Creative strategies for teaching language arts to gifted students (K-8). ERIC Digest E612.

  • Stoddard, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993). A peer editor strategy: Guiding learning-disabled students in response and revision. Research in the Teaching of English, 76-103.

  • Strassman, B. K. (1997). Metacognition and reading in children who are deaf: A review of the research. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 140-149.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th Ed.). Pearson.

  • Uyumaz, G., & Çokluk, Ö. (2016). An investigation of item order and rating differences in likert-type scales in terms of psychometric properties and attitudes of respondents. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science,

  • Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3-14.

  • Weaver, C. A., & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 12-22.

  • Weis, L., & Centrie, C. (2002). On the power of separate spaces: Teachers and students writing (righting) selves and future. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 7-36.

  • Welch, M. (1992). The PLEASE strategy: A metacognitive learning strategy for improving the paragraph writing of students with mild learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15(2), 119-128.

  • Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1986). Children's comprehension monitoring and recall of inconsistent stories. Child Development, 1401-1418.

  • Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Givon, H. (1991). Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 373-391.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics